2010/1/21 Gurkan Erdogdu <cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com>: >>>>what about 1.0.0-M5-SNAPSHOT ? >>>>That makes it at least a little bit more obvious where the current >>>>direction is, IMO > > Yes, it is so reasonable. Actually M5 contains 2 bullets that we can move > them to 1.0.0 release.
nice, sounds good. > But as a common pattern with old releases, I want to > releas e artifacts as 1.0.0-M5 instead of 1.0.0-M5-SNAPSHOT. Sure. Release like: 1.0.0-M3 1.0.0-M4 ... but current code (unreleased) in trunk, something like 1.0.0-M5-SNAPSHOT would make it nicer to understand, IMO. > > There is no road map other than one in OWB JIRA.( > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB?report=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project:roadmap-panel > ) Ok, perhaps we should write something down, on the website. Perhaps I can get to it soon (or in the wiki) > I will go ahead and remove M5 release this evening if no other objection. that is fine with me. However, if the OWB project releases a 1.0.0 release, it has to pass TCK by 100% -Matthias > > Thanks; > > --Gurkan > > > > 21 Ocak 2010 12:46 tarihinde Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org> yazdı: > >> 2010/1/21 Gurkan Erdogdu <cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com>: >> >>>>I feel we should not continue to use the "1.0.0-SNAPSHOT" version >> number >> >>>>Do you agree ? >> > >> > * In released artifacts we will use 1.0.0-M4. >> > * After releasing M4, we still to continue to use 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT. >> > >> > We have not reached our 1.0.0 release yet. We will be there after M5. >> After >> > releasing 1.0.0, I think we will use 1.0.1-SNAPSHOT in our modules. >> > >> > Any other ideas? >> >> what about 1.0.0-M5-SNAPSHOT ? >> That makes it at least a little bit more obvious where the current >> direction is, IMO >> >> Regarding the 1.0.0 is out after M5, is there a roadmap or so ? >> >> Once the "official" 1.0.0 is out, using the 1.0.x-SNAPSHOT pattern is fine. >> I agree :-) >> >> -Matthias >> >> >> > >> > --Gurkan >> > >> > 21 Ocak 2010 10:22 tarihinde Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org> >> yazdı: >> > >> >> I agree with you. >> >> >> >> +1 on a new release. >> >> >> >> Minor things: >> >> -after the release, I feel we should not continue to use the >> >> "1.0.0-SNAPSHOT" version number >> >> Do you agree ? >> >> >> >> -Matthias >> >> >> >> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 7:48 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu < >> gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com> >> >> wrote: >> >> > Hi folks, >> >> > >> >> > It has been lots of corrections and bug resolutions after our M3 >> release. >> >> I want to release M4 version, because current code base is the most >> mature >> >> and covers lots of specification requirements. I would like to re-solve >> >> issues that we can do until weekend and create M4 release beginning of >> the >> >> next week. >> >> > >> >> > I am very happy that this will be the our first release while living >> as a >> >> TLP. >> >> > >> >> > WDYT? >> >> > >> >> > Thanks; >> >> > >> >> > --Gurkan >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> ___________________________________________________________________ >> >> > Yahoo! Türkiye açıldı! http://yahoo.com.tr >> >> > İnternet üzerindeki en iyi içeriği Yahoo! Türkiye sizlere sunuyor! >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Matthias Wessendorf >> >> >> >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> >> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >> >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Gurkan Erdogdu >> > http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Matthias Wessendorf >> >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> > > > > -- > Gurkan Erdogdu > http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
