I’d think if projects such as Apache Camel, Apache Jackrabbit, Apache Tomee,
Apache Cordova to mention some can handle it we should be smart enough to
handle it too.
None of those projects make use of file attachments for issues the way that we
do.
I can’t see the issues tab for these
e.g. Apache Camel does use JIRA for issue tracking. They are not using GitHubs
issue management. And they do accept pull requests.
And from the infra blog
https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/improved_integration_between_apache_and
Any Pull Request that gets opened, closed, reopened or
The problem is that PRs can be opened without JIRA ticket IDs attached to them,
and the projects you linked to show this happening on many occasions.
The integration you mention looks pretty good though - linking PRs to JIRA
issues is what we want. But we need to have some way to prevent PRs
Now, that’s a different issue
Actually, it’s what I said 5 emails back in this thread:
The problem with that approach is that GitHub’s pull requests can only be
managed via GitHub’s issues interface, so we’re forced to use it. There’s no
way to prevent GitHub users from opening and
I’d think if projects such as Apache Camel, Apache Jackrabbit, Apache Tomee,
Apache Cordova to mention some can handle it we should be smart enough to
handle it too. And I can’t see the issues tab for these projects but pull
requests.
BR
Maruan
Am 20.09.2014 um 04:22 schrieb John Hewson
Issue tracking would still be done using Jira. Same as for most other Apache
projects
The problem with that approach is that GitHub’s pull requests can only be
managed via GitHub’s issues interface, so we’re forced to use it. There’s no
way to prevent GitHub users from opening and discussing
Dear Santosh,
you can unregister using the link below.
https://pdfbox.apache.org/mailinglists.html
With kind regards
Maruan
Am 17.09.2014 um 03:00 schrieb Santosh Arakeri santosh.arak...@gmail.com:
Pl dont send me mail.
On 16 Sep 2014 13:52, Maruan Sahyoun sahy...@fileaffairs.de wrote:
Hi,
Tilman Hausherr thaush...@t-online.de hat am 16. September 2014 um 18:03
geschrieben:
-1, I don't like the idea to have different repository types.
Hmmm, is this just a I don't like it, but I can live with it or is it a clear
veto?
In a case of a veto, how about starting with moving
It is a I don't like it, but I can live with it but I think it might be
a pain. A soft -1.
Tilman
Am 17.09.2014 um 08:40 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler:
Hi,
Tilman Hausherr thaush...@t-online.de hat am 16. September 2014 um 18:03
geschrieben:
-1, I don't like the idea to have different
is that because of the examples, the docs or both?
BR
Maruan
Am 17.09.2014 um 18:46 schrieb Tilman Hausherr thaush...@t-online.de:
It is a I don't like it, but I can live with it but I think it might be a
pain. A soft -1.
Tilman
Am 17.09.2014 um 08:40 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler:
Hi,
Am 17.09.2014 um 19:01 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun:
is that because of the examples, the docs or both?
The examples could be tricky as they depend on the source code in the svn repo.
BR
Maruan
BR
Andreas
Am 17.09.2014 um 18:46 schrieb Tilman Hausherr thaush...@t-online.de:
It is a I don't
Hi Maruan,
The examples only.
With the docs I assume you mean the website. I've never touched it
(although I might in the future), it isn't part of the project, so I
don't mind.
Tilman
Am 17.09.2014 um 19:01 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun:
is that because of the examples, the docs or both?
BR
The docs are part of the website
Currently I mean the cookbook, how to build the project, architecture ..
Maruan
Am 17.09.2014 um 19:26 schrieb Tilman Hausherr thaush...@t-online.de:
Hi Maruan,
The examples only.
With the docs I assume you mean the website. I've never touched it
I agree with Tilman on this point, the examples need to stay in the trunk where
they can be built along with it.
It’s very common to modify an example to take into account API changes. They’re
also currently distributed along with the main PDFBox source bundle, which is a
good thing.
I’d be
Maruan Sahyoun
Am 18.09.2014 um 02:03 schrieb John Hewson j...@jahewson.com:
I agree with Tilman on this point, the examples need to stay in the trunk
where they can be built along with it.
It’s very common to modify an example to take into account API changes.
They’re also currently
Hi there,
in order to make it easier for people to contribute to the documentation and
examples I thought about the potential benefits of moving these to a git based
repository instead of svn. The main idea behind that is to allow people to
contribute via github opening another channel of
Hi,
Maruan Sahyoun sahy...@fileaffairs.de hat am 16. September 2014 um 10:21
geschrieben:
Hi there,
in order to make it easier for people to contribute to the documentation and
examples I thought about the potential benefits of moving these to a git based
repository instead of svn. The
what about having extra repos for pdfbox-docs and pdfbox-examples?
Maruan
Am 16.09.2014 um 11:43 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler andr...@lehmi.de:
Hi,
Maruan Sahyoun sahy...@fileaffairs.de hat am 16. September 2014 um 10:21
geschrieben:
Hi there,
in order to make it easier for people to
Maruan Sahyoun sahy...@fileaffairs.de hat am 16. September 2014 um 11:46
geschrieben:
what about having extra repos for pdfbox-docs and pdfbox-examples?
Hmm, I'm a little bit puzzled. Your origin proposal was already about extra
git-repos for docs and examples, wasn't it?
Andreas
Maruan
OK - I see what you mean, got your question wrong. We can check with infra but
I don’t see a reason why pdfbox-docs and pdfbox-examples can't exist in new
repos and there is pdfbox in the old one and the new repos being git based.
Would behave just like ‚different‘ projects.
So if it’s
Maruan Sahyoun sahy...@fileaffairs.de hat am 16. September 2014 um 12:06
geschrieben:
OK - I see what you mean, got your question wrong. We can check with infra but
I don’t see a reason why pdfbox-docs and pdfbox-examples can't exist in new
repos and there is pdfbox in the old one and the
Hi,
Maruan Sahyoun sahy...@fileaffairs.de hat am 16. September 2014 um 14:35
geschrieben:
Am 16.09.2014 um 14:27 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler andr...@lehmi.de:
Maruan Sahyoun sahy...@fileaffairs.de hat am 16. September 2014 um 14:23
geschrieben:
Am 16.09.2014 um 14:08 schrieb
Pl dont send me mail.
On 16 Sep 2014 13:52, Maruan Sahyoun sahy...@fileaffairs.de wrote:
Hi there,
in order to make it easier for people to contribute to the documentation
and examples I thought about the potential benefits of moving these to a
git based repository instead of svn. The main
23 matches
Mail list logo
