> Now, that’s a different issue
Actually, it’s what I said 5 emails back in this thread:
>> The problem with that approach is that GitHub’s pull requests can only be
>> managed via GitHub’s issues interface, so we’re forced to use it. There’s no
>> way to prevent GitHub users from opening and d
Am 21.09.2014 um 23:57 schrieb John Hewson :
> The problem is that PRs can be opened without JIRA ticket IDs attached to
> them, and the projects you linked to show this happening on many occasions.
>
Now, that’s a different issue and I don’t know if there is a solution to
prevent that. It may
The problem is that PRs can be opened without JIRA ticket IDs attached to them,
and the projects you linked to show this happening on many occasions.
The integration you mention looks pretty good though - linking PRs to JIRA
issues is what we want. But we need to have some way to prevent PRs fro
e.g. Apache Camel does use JIRA for issue tracking. They are not using GitHubs
issue management. And they do accept pull requests.
And from the infra blog
https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/improved_integration_between_apache_and
Any Pull Request that gets opened, closed, reopened or commente
> I’d think if projects such as Apache Camel, Apache Jackrabbit, Apache Tomee,
> Apache Cordova to mention some can handle it we should be smart enough to
> handle it too.
None of those projects make use of file attachments for issues the way that we
do.
> I can’t see the issues tab for these
I’d think if projects such as Apache Camel, Apache Jackrabbit, Apache Tomee,
Apache Cordova to mention some can handle it we should be smart enough to
handle it too. And I can’t see the issues tab for these projects but pull
requests.
BR
Maruan
Am 20.09.2014 um 04:22 schrieb John Hewson :
>>
> Issue tracking would still be done using Jira. Same as for most other Apache
> projects
The problem with that approach is that GitHub’s pull requests can only be
managed via GitHub’s issues interface, so we’re forced to use it. There’s no
way to prevent GitHub users from opening and discussin
Maruan Sahyoun
> Am 18.09.2014 um 02:03 schrieb John Hewson :
>
> I agree with Tilman on this point, the examples need to stay in the trunk
> where they can be built along with it.
> It’s very common to modify an example to take into account API changes.
> They’re also currently distributed a
I agree with Tilman on this point, the examples need to stay in the trunk where
they can be built along with it.
It’s very common to modify an example to take into account API changes. They’re
also currently distributed along with the main PDFBox source bundle, which is a
good thing.
I’d be sur
The docs are part of the website
Currently I mean the cookbook, how to build the project, architecture ..
Maruan
Am 17.09.2014 um 19:26 schrieb Tilman Hausherr :
> Hi Maruan,
>
> The examples only.
>
> With "the docs" I assume you mean the website. I've never touched it
> (although I might
Hi Maruan,
The examples only.
With "the docs" I assume you mean the website. I've never touched it
(although I might in the future), it isn't part of the project, so I
don't mind.
Tilman
Am 17.09.2014 um 19:01 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun:
is that because of the examples, the docs or both?
BR
Am 17.09.2014 um 19:01 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun:
is that because of the examples, the docs or both?
The examples could be tricky as they depend on the source code in the svn repo.
BR
Maruan
BR
Andreas
Am 17.09.2014 um 18:46 schrieb Tilman Hausherr :
It is a "I don't like it, but I can li
is that because of the examples, the docs or both?
BR
Maruan
Am 17.09.2014 um 18:46 schrieb Tilman Hausherr :
> It is a "I don't like it, but I can live with it but I think it might be a
> pain". A "soft -1".
>
> Tilman
>
> Am 17.09.2014 um 08:40 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler:
>> Hi,
>>
>>> Ti
It is a "I don't like it, but I can live with it but I think it might be
a pain". A "soft -1".
Tilman
Am 17.09.2014 um 08:40 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler:
Hi,
Tilman Hausherr hat am 16. September 2014 um 18:03
geschrieben:
-1, I don't like the idea to have different repository types.
Hmmm,
Hi,
> Tilman Hausherr hat am 16. September 2014 um 18:03
> geschrieben:
>
>
> -1, I don't like the idea to have different repository types.
Hmmm, is this just a "I don't like it, but I can live with it" or is it a clear
veto?
In a case of a veto, how about starting with moving parts of the docs
Dear Santosh,
you can unregister using the link below.
https://pdfbox.apache.org/mailinglists.html
With kind regards
Maruan
> Am 17.09.2014 um 03:00 schrieb Santosh Arakeri :
>
> Pl dont send me mail.
>> On 16 Sep 2014 13:52, "Maruan Sahyoun" wrote:
>>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> in order to make it
Pl dont send me mail.
On 16 Sep 2014 13:52, "Maruan Sahyoun" wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> in order to make it easier for people to contribute to the documentation
> and examples I thought about the potential benefits of moving these to a
> git based repository instead of svn. The main idea behind that
-1, I don't like the idea to have different repository types.
Tilman
Am 16.09.2014 um 10:21 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun:
Hi there,
in order to make it easier for people to contribute to the documentation and
examples I thought about the potential benefits of moving these to a git based
repository
Hi,
> Maruan Sahyoun hat am 16. September 2014 um 14:35
> geschrieben:
>
>
>
> Am 16.09.2014 um 14:27 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler :
>
> >> Maruan Sahyoun hat am 16. September 2014 um 14:23
> >> geschrieben:
> >>
> >>
> >> Am 16.09.2014 um 14:08 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler :
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
>
> Maruan Sahyoun hat am 16. September 2014 um 12:06
> geschrieben:
>
>
> OK - I see what you mean, got your question wrong. We can check with infra but
> I don’t see a reason why pdfbox-docs and pdfbox-examples can't exist in new
> repos and there is pdfbox in the old one and the new repos being
OK - I see what you mean, got your question wrong. We can check with infra but
I don’t see a reason why pdfbox-docs and pdfbox-examples can't exist in new
repos and there is pdfbox in the old one and the new repos being git based.
Would behave just like ‚different‘ projects.
So if it’s possible
> Maruan Sahyoun hat am 16. September 2014 um 11:46
> geschrieben:
>
>
> what about having extra repos for pdfbox-docs and pdfbox-examples?
Hmm, I'm a little bit puzzled. Your origin proposal was already about extra
git-repos for docs and examples, wasn't it?
Andreas
>
> Maruan
>
> Am 16.09.2014
what about having extra repos for pdfbox-docs and pdfbox-examples?
Maruan
Am 16.09.2014 um 11:43 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler :
> Hi,
>
>> Maruan Sahyoun hat am 16. September 2014 um 10:21
>> geschrieben:
>>
>>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> in order to make it easier for people to contribute to the docu
Hi,
> Maruan Sahyoun hat am 16. September 2014 um 10:21
> geschrieben:
>
>
> Hi there,
>
> in order to make it easier for people to contribute to the documentation and
> examples I thought about the potential benefits of moving these to a git based
> repository instead of svn. The main idea behin
24 matches
Mail list logo
