Canceling this RC , will come up with new RC once LICENSE and NOTICE
issues(PHOENIX-3091) are resolved.
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 11:38 AM, James Taylor
wrote:
> Switching my vote to -1. Our releases need to conform to ASF policy.
>
> Besides the stuff that Josh is already doing (thanks so much, J
Canceling this RC , will come up with new RC once LICENSE and NOTICE
issues(PHOENIX-3091) are resolved.
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 11:38 AM, James Taylor
wrote:
> Switching my vote to -1. Our releases need to conform to ASF policy.
>
> Besides the stuff that Josh is already doing (thanks so much, J
Canceling this RC , will come up with new RC once LICENSE and NOTICE
issues(PHOENIX-3091) are resolved.
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 11:38 AM, James Taylor
wrote:
> Switching my vote to -1. Our releases need to conform to ASF policy.
>
> Besides the stuff that Josh is already doing (thanks so much, J
Canceling this RC , will come up with new RC once LICENSE and NOTICE
issues(PHOENIX-3091) are resolved.
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 11:39 AM, James Taylor
wrote:
> Switching my vote to -1. Our releases need to conform to ASF policy.
>
> Besides the stuff that Josh is already doing (thanks so much, J
If we could have a single vote, that'd be great, but I didn't think that
was possible. Would we be voting on the union of all the source codes
across all four branches? Is it acceptable to be voting on multiple
hash/tags (since they're in different branches)? What about binary release?
We'd have mu
The licensing issues should affect all 4 RCs, so they all should fail or
succeed atomically. Having 4.8.0-HBase-0.98 with slightly different content
than 4.8.0-HBase-1.1, etc is just asking for trouble.
Thinking about this, doing the votes together makes sense. Otherwise, we
might end up with 4.8.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2785?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15383140#comment-15383140
]
Lars Hofhansl edited comment on PHOENIX-2785 at 7/19/16 6:17 AM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2785?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15383140#comment-15383140
]
Lars Hofhansl edited comment on PHOENIX-2785 at 7/19/16 6:16 AM:
-
Sean,
I switched my vote to -1. I'm on vacation, so my connectivity is kind of
hit or miss.
We do separate releases because each branch has different code to deal with
HBase differences.
Thanks,
James
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 7:34 AM, Sean Busbey wrote:
> Am I reading the tallies correctly?
>
>
Switching my vote to -1. Our releases need to conform to ASF policy.
Besides the stuff that Josh is already doing (thanks so much, Josh), my
recommendation would be to:
- cancel the vote on the current release. Ankit - as RM would you mind
doing that?
- remove the trace UI module from both the sou
Switching my vote to -1. Our releases need to conform to ASF policy.
Besides the stuff that Josh is already doing (thanks so much, Josh), my
recommendation would be to:
- cancel the vote on the current release. Ankit - as RM would you mind
doing that?
- remove the trace UI module from both the sou
Switching my vote to -1. Our releases need to conform to ASF policy.
Besides the stuff that Josh is already doing (thanks so much, Josh), my
recommendation would be to:
- cancel the vote on the current release. Ankit - as RM would you mind
doing that?
- remove the trace UI module from both the sou
Switching my vote to -1. Our releases need to conform to ASF policy.
Besides the stuff that Josh is already doing (thanks so much, Josh), my
recommendation would be to:
- cancel the vote on the current release. Ankit - as RM would you mind
doing that?
- remove the trace UI module from both the sou
Am I reading the tallies correctly?
0.98: pass with four +1s
1.0: pass with four +1s
1.1: fail with two +1s
1.2: pass with three +1s, one -1, and one non-binding -1
This presumes I did not miss a vote cancellation from a release manager
(which I've done in the past, tbf).
As an aside, could we d
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3089?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Josh Elser reassigned PHOENIX-3089:
---
Assignee: Josh Elser
> Trim fat from NOTICE file
> -
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3090?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Josh Elser reassigned PHOENIX-3090:
---
Assignee: Josh Elser
> Ensure all bundled products not ASL licensed are included in LICENSE
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3084?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15383506#comment-15383506
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on PHOENIX-3084:
-
GitHub user joshelser opened a pull r
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3084?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15383507#comment-15383507
]
Josh Elser commented on PHOENIX-3084:
-
Just opened up https://github.com/apache/phoe
GitHub user joshelser opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/183
PHOENIX-3084 source release licensing issues.
Fixes for the Apache Phoenix source release
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/josh
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3090?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15383502#comment-15383502
]
Josh Elser commented on PHOENIX-3090:
-
Moot point, glyphicons-halflings is bundled a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3090?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15383500#comment-15383500
]
Josh Elser commented on PHOENIX-3090:
-
Specifically CC-BY falls into category-b as o
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3042?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15383482#comment-15383482
]
Hudson commented on PHOENIX-3042:
-
SUCCESS: Integrated in Phoenix-master #1330 (See
[ht
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3070?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15383345#comment-15383345
]
Hudson commented on PHOENIX-3070:
-
SUCCESS: Integrated in Phoenix-master #1329 (See
[ht
GitHub user twdsilva opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/182
Encodecolumns
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/apache/phoenix encodecolumns
Alternatively you can review and apply these chang
GitHub user twdsilva opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/181
Encodecolumns
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/apache/phoenix encodecolumns
Alternatively you can review and apply these chang
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1367?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Cody Marcel updated PHOENIX-1367:
-
Attachment: PHOENIX_1367.test.patch
The attachment is only a test, but an actual patch.
I have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1367?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15383378#comment-15383378
]
Cody Marcel edited comment on PHOENIX-1367 at 7/19/16 12:34 AM:
--
Alicia Ying Shu created PHOENIX-3096:
Summary: Explain command is raising an ArithmeticException
Key: PHOENIX-3096
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3096
Project: Phoenix
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3042?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thomas D'Silva updated PHOENIX-3042:
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.8.0)
4.8.1
> Using functional index expressi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3042?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thomas D'Silva updated PHOENIX-3042:
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.8.1)
4.8.0
> Using functional index expressi
Option #2 looks ok but I think implied it is source release only, right?
Option #3 is the full solution so that's fine.
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 4:46 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
> Carrying this over from the discussion.
>
> -1 (binding)
>
> Option 1 isn't viable. Getting IP right in a release is f
Carrying this over from the discussion.
-1 (binding)
Option 1 isn't viable. Getting IP right in a release is fundamental.
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Josh Elser wrote:
> Sean Busbey wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Ankit Singhal
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Now we have three options
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3077?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thomas D'Silva updated PHOENIX-3077:
Attachment: params.gif
[~jamestaylor]
Can you please review this doc change?
The APPEND_
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2916?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
prakul agarwal reassigned PHOENIX-2916:
---
Assignee: prakul agarwal
> Need a client-side level property to control write timeo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3086?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Josh Elser reassigned PHOENIX-3086:
---
Assignee: Josh Elser
> Source release artifact name should be "apache-phoenix-$VERSION"
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3088?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Josh Elser reassigned PHOENIX-3088:
---
Assignee: Josh Elser
> Prune rat-check exclusions
> --
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3085?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Josh Elser reassigned PHOENIX-3085:
---
Assignee: Josh Elser
> Remove 'Copyright Apache Software Foundation' from source file
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Josh Elser reassigned PHOENIX-3087:
---
Assignee: Josh Elser
> Ensure all source files have license headers
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3084?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15383263#comment-15383263
]
Josh Elser commented on PHOENIX-3084:
-
Current progress:
https://github.com/apache/
Thanks for the response, Andrew!
I've started knocking out the source-release issues. Will put up a patch
with how far I get tonight.
Andrew Purtell wrote:
With PMC hat on I am -1 releasing with known policy violations. This is the
same position I took when it was HBase releases at issue. Op
With PMC hat on I am -1 releasing with known policy violations. This is the
same position I took when it was HBase releases at issue. Option 1 is not a
good option. Let's go with another.
> On Jul 18, 2016, at 1:53 PM, Josh Elser wrote:
>
> (Moving this over to its own thread to avoid boggin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2785?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lars Hofhansl updated PHOENIX-2785:
---
Attachment: 2785-v2.txt
This is the best test I can think of.
Uses UPSERT into an existing i
ApacheCon: Getting the word out internally
Dear Apache Enthusiast,
As you are no doubt already aware, we will be holding ApacheCon in
Seville, Spain, the week of November 14th, 2016. The call for papers
(CFP) for this event is now open, and will remain open until
September 9th.
The event is divid
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3070?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lars Hofhansl resolved PHOENIX-3070.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.8.1
Committed to 4.x* and master.
> Unnecessary
(Moving this over to its own thread to avoid bogging down the VOTE further)
PMC, what say you? I have cycles to work on this now.
Original Message
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.8.0-HBase-1.2 RC0
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 14:43:54 -0400
From: Josh Elser
To: dev@p
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3081?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Josh Elser updated PHOENIX-3081:
Attachment: PHOENIX-3081.001.patch
.001 little patch with a little test.
> MIsleading exception o
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2229?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Maryann Xue resolved PHOENIX-2229.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Maryann Xue (was: Rajeshbabu Chintaguntla)
> Support CREATE
Sean Busbey wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Ankit Singhal
wrote:
Now we have three options to go forward with 4.8 release (or whether to
include licenses and notices for the dependency used now or later):-
*Option 1:- Go with this RC0 for 4.8 release.*
-- As the build is func
Ankit Singhal wrote:
@Josh, bq. Bad:
* SHA1 xsum is wrong. It looks like complete nonsense to me, but I
can't find the appropriate xsum in that file (which was
64208164580f3467cd2c8b51c0d9f8ac37f0c671)
In Phoenix , we don't use SHA1 , SHA files has only SHA-512 and
SHA-256 hashes
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Ankit Singhal
wrote:
> Now we have three options to go forward with 4.8 release (or whether to
> include licenses and notices for the dependency used now or later):-
>
> *Option 1:- Go with this RC0 for 4.8 release.*
>-- As the build is functionally good a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3079?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Samarth Jain updated PHOENIX-3079:
--
Assignee: prakul agarwal
> Run point queries serially if the row count is below a configurable
@Josh, bq. Bad:
* SHA1 xsum is wrong. It looks like complete nonsense to me, but I
can't find the appropriate xsum in that file (which was
64208164580f3467cd2c8b51c0d9f8ac37f0c671)
In Phoenix , we don't use SHA1 , SHA files has only SHA-512 and
SHA-256 hashes, so you can use shasum to
+1 ran salesforce validation tests
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 4:14 PM, Samarth Jain
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 4:13 PM, Mujtaba Chohan
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Checked backward compatibility and performance
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 1:13 AM, James Taylor
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +
+1 ran salesforce validation tests
On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 9:16 AM, Mujtaba Chohan wrote:
> +1.
>
> verified binary/src distribution and utests.
>
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 1:14 AM, James Taylor
> wrote:
>
> > +1. Great work on the release, everyone!
> >
> > James
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 14, 20
You can check the dev list for the VOTE thread which contains a link to
the release candidate but it is not an official Apache Phoenix release yet.
Vasanth Bhat wrote:
Thanks a lot Ankit.
where do I download this from? I am looking at
http://mirror.fibergrid.in/apache/phoenix/don't seem
Josh Elser created PHOENIX-3092:
---
Summary: Ensure LICENSE is accurate for all bundled projects/works
Key: PHOENIX-3092
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3092
Project: Phoenix
I
Maryann Xue created PHOENIX-3095:
Summary: Support bind variables in DDL in Calcite-Phoenix
Key: PHOENIX-3095
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3095
Project: Phoenix
Issue Ty
Josh Elser created PHOENIX-3094:
---
Summary: Rename artfiact to "apache-phoenix-$VERSION..."
Key: PHOENIX-3094
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3094
Project: Phoenix
Issue Type:
Filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3084 for the source
release and https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3091 for the
binary release.
I tried to give a general overview on what needs to happen in the parent
issue. I am also happy to help fix this, explain in greater de
Josh Elser created PHOENIX-3093:
---
Summary: Ensure NOTICE is accurate for all bundled projects/works
Key: PHOENIX-3093
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3093
Project: Phoenix
Is
Josh Elser created PHOENIX-3091:
---
Summary: Licensing issues with binary release
Key: PHOENIX-3091
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3091
Project: Phoenix
Issue Type: Task
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3092?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Josh Elser updated PHOENIX-3092:
Description:
See PHOENIX-3090 for a description on how to go about assembling a correct
LICENSE f
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3091?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15382397#comment-15382397
]
Josh Elser commented on PHOENIX-3091:
-
I was talking to experts [~joewitt] and [~bil
Josh Elser created PHOENIX-3090:
---
Summary: Ensure all bundled products not ASL licensed are included
in LICENSE file
Key: PHOENIX-3090
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3090
Project: Ph
Josh Elser created PHOENIX-3088:
---
Summary: Prune rat-check exclusions
Key: PHOENIX-3088
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3088
Project: Phoenix
Issue Type: Sub-task
Josh Elser created PHOENIX-3089:
---
Summary: Trim fat from NOTICE file
Key: PHOENIX-3089
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3089
Project: Phoenix
Issue Type: Sub-task
Ooof. it's always rough when this stuff gets out of sync. FWIW, as a
non-binding community participant, I'd label this stuff a blocker on
further releases. It's too easy to let it slip and is one of the few
mandatory responsibilities we get from the board as a project.
In my prior experience, the
Josh Elser created PHOENIX-3087:
---
Summary: Ensure all source files have license headers
Key: PHOENIX-3087
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3087
Project: Phoenix
Issue Type: Su
Josh Elser created PHOENIX-3086:
---
Summary: Source release artifact name should be
"apache-phoenix-$VERSION"
Key: PHOENIX-3086
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3086
Project: Phoenix
Josh Elser created PHOENIX-3085:
---
Summary: Remove 'Copyright Apache Software Foundation' from
source file license headers
Key: PHOENIX-3085
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3085
P
Josh Elser created PHOENIX-3084:
---
Summary: Licensing issues with source release
Key: PHOENIX-3084
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3084
Project: Phoenix
Issue Type: Task
A
Loknath Priyatham Teja Singamsetty created PHOENIX-3083:
Summary: Avoid additional handling of concurrency control inside
timertask of BuildIndexScheduleTask when ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor
executeAtFixedRate does it int
qinzl created PHOENIX-3082:
--
Summary: timestamp function display wrong output
Key: PHOENIX-3082
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3082
Project: Phoenix
Issue Type: Bug
R
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2785?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15381972#comment-15381972
]
Lars Hofhansl commented on PHOENIX-2785:
I'd like to warm this up again, as this
74 matches
Mail list logo
