UI Branch

I’m splitting the topic, I read something about an UI Branch, where can I find it? Is there a particular reason why ReactJS? What is it supposed to be? A unified UI library for all supported plc? So many questions 😉 I had an idea of using plc4j add a websocket API and use vueJS (I’m using v

AW: UI Branch

I see... Are you sure you wanna go with gRPC or Apache Karaf as Backend? Can you elaborate on this? Why not websockets builtin in plc4x? Best regards - Coding Nexus LLC Björn Haverland 2880W Oakland Park Blvd Suite 225C Oakland P

ADS

Hi, Is someone able to provide me a small code example on how to query ADS variable? Say I have a GVL called GVL_TEST how could I browse it or even read GVL_TEST.test which would be a String(10). My attempts to read it like I do read a Variable at the S7 are leading to null… Thank

AW: ADS

a per variable bases while querying it, but it doesn't. As soon as I set the options to true I can browse the variables. Best regards, Björn - Bjoern Haverland Tel.: +49 171 7535 889 Mail: bjo...@b-have.de -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Łukasz Dy

AW: ADS

keen to work on this project. Maybe I can find the time after my current obligations are satisfied. Best regards Björn ----- Bjoern Haverland Tel.: +49 171 7535 889 Mail: bjo...@b-have.de -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Christofer Dutz Gesendet: Donnerstag, 30. Ma

AW: AW: [D] How to seed community engagement?

e across, is the limited appreciation of this project and the active members. I don't know why still as many people think open source means without costs. I appreciate your work! Thank you very much! Best regards Björn - Bjoern Haverland Mail: bjo...@b-have.de -

Integration of other Languages / Daffodil

Hi everyone, I got in touch with Chris and Julian during the buildingIoT Conference in Cologne and I would like to participate in the further development of PLC4X. Our main interest is to extend PLC4X to make it usable with .NET / C#. So after looking at the sources and the discussions in the ma

Integration of other Languages / Daffodil Templating

Hi everyone, I got in touch with Chris and Julian during the buildingIoT Conference in Cologne and I would like to participate in the further development of PLC4X. Our main interest is to extend PLC4X to make it usable with .NET / C#. So after looking at the sources and the discussions in the ma

AW: Integration of other Languages / Daffodil

n't have content assist of your IDE in Freemarker (I think). I hope that explains things and I really hope this email goes through (better save it first) Chris On 2019/04/08 13:44:35, Bjoern Hoeper wrote:

AW: Integration of other Languages / Daffodil

... What do you think? I definitely can offer our Frankfurt office as location as it's intentionally planned to have meetups here. Just know that it's really good to reach for all ... But I'm also fine with alternate locations. Chris Am 10.04.19, 10:14 schrieb "Bjoern Hoepe

AW: [jira] [Created] (PLC4X-110) Implement Basic .NET API

I already started implementing the basic outer parts today. I like Julians Idea regarding the Thrift server. I already commented in JIRA that it may be a good idea to have it as a separate issue to make it more clear / easier to find for users of other languages. Apart from that would it be of

AW: Next PLC4X Meetup

As already mentioned Frankfurt would be perfectly okay for me. I personally think that the presentation by Chris is needed to start the discussion about the driver generation. The thing I could offer is to give a presentation about the architecture we currently use at our customers site to retr

AW: [DISCUSS] The State and Future of PLC4X

Hi erveryone, I agree with Markus because OPC UA is somewhat universal. If we want something open source there is a stack which is quite evolved already: https://github.com/open62541/open62541 it is maintained by a bunch of institutes (one of them is the Process Control Institute in Aachen). So

AW: [DISCUSS ] PLC4X Teamware

+1 like the idea Björn -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Julian Feinauer Gesendet: Samstag, 27. April 2019 14:27 An: dev@plc4x.apache.org Betreff: [DISCUSS ] PLC4X Teamware Hi all, As some of you may have heard, the plc4x project will be very well represented next weekend on a hackathon

AW: [Python] Adding build support for Python

Hey Chris, as far as I am informed the more modern standard for distribution in Python is python wheels. Which already contains the precompiled sources for the platforms in case of C extensions and is more or less a plain ZIP for pure Python (https://pypi.org/project/wheel/). The mechanisms for

AW: Approaching the European Commission for some help?

I would definitely appreciate such an effort. I have participated in two EU founded projects during my time at university and they always provided quite good results. Nevertheless most of them are really big...like the whole PLC4X project is the size of a single workpackage in such a project (if

AW: [ANNOUNCE] Björn Höper joins PLC4X PMC

Hey everyone, I am very happy and honoured to join the PMC. I really enjoy the work with the project team and I am really looking excited to really advance the project. I also like to especially thank Chris, Julian and Tim for the warm welcome and the support in getting started quickly with the p

AW: [VOTE] Apache PLC4X 0.4.0 RC1

Hi, I checked: - no incubating in name or DISCLAIMER file - all sources have ASF headers using rat plugin - can compile from source I ran mvnw.cmd -P with-java -P with-python -P with-proxies -P with-dotnet -P with-cpp -P with-python install On Windows 10 64-Bit (Version 1803). So +1 for the

AW: [BUILDS] What build system to use?

Hey everyone, I would also opt for Maven being at least the triggering build system because it also integrates well with Jenkins and the mechanisms behind it are quite understandable. I think the main point we need to solve is to get some kind of documentation which build step in which profile

AW: Please welcome Matthias Strljic as new Apache PLC4X PMC and Committer

Hey Matthias, really nice to have you on board! Björn -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Christofer Dutz Gesendet: Montag, 3. Juni 2019 11:28 An: dev@plc4x.apache.org Betreff: Please welcome Matthias Strljic as new Apache PLC4X PMC and Committer Hi all, I would like to take the opportunity

AW: [DISCUSS] Retire Daffodil and SCXML?

+1 cleaning up is always good Björn -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Christofer Dutz Gesendet: Dienstag, 25. Juni 2019 09:42 An: dev@plc4x.apache.org Betreff: [DISCUSS] Retire Daffodil and SCXML? Hi all, I would like to start to move the new code generation outside the sandbox. For this

AW: [Draft] July Board Report

Looks fine. Thanks for the effort! Björn -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Christofer Dutz Gesendet: Donnerstag, 4. Juli 2019 12:02 An: dev@plc4x.apache.org Betreff: [Draft] July Board Report Hi all, I just added a new board report draft here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/

Re: [KAFKA] Refactoring the Kafka Connect plugin?

Hi everyone, I am on holiday currently so just a short note: We have a use case at our customer that would need the sink functionality to exchange data between distinct DCSes controlling different areas. In a current implementation that provides this exchange the receiving dcs is an active pull

Re: [KAFKA] Refactoring the Kafka Connect plugin?

py? Chris Holen Sie sich Outlook für Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36> ____ From: Bjoern Hoeper Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2019 11:30:34 AM To: dev@plc4x.apache.org Subject: Re: [KAFKA] Refactoring the Kafka Connect plugin? Hi everyone, I am on holiday currently so

Re: Next PLC4X Meetup on 22.08.2019 in the codecentric Office in Frankfurt

Hi everyone, I sadly cannot participate because I am still on holiday on Thursday. I wish all of you a productive meeting and I am really sad not seeing you all again. Greetings from Hallig Hooge Björn Outlook für Android herunterladen From

AW: [VOTE] Accept CRUNCH as subproject for PLC4X

+1 (binding) Björn -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Julian Feinauer Gesendet: Montag, 2. September 2019 20:57 An: dev@plc4x.apache.org Betreff: [VOTE] Accept CRUNCH as subproject for PLC4X Hi all, as the discussion seems to slow down and to stabilizes in [1] I take the freedom to start

AW: [DISCUSS] Rename CRUNCH to something different

Hi Everyone, as Chris already mentioned a logic analyzer is quite a nice tool and in (loose) analogy to plc4x I would propose something like "Analyze4PLC" Or "PLCAnalyze4J" it would keep the logic in the naming convention somehow and make clear what the intention of the framework is. Just my 50

AW: [PLC-Simulator] Thoughts on the "Context" for our simulator

Hey everyone, sorry for joining the party this late. But it is rather busy times at the moment. Depending on the context maybe I can help with an existing solution: There is the runtime environment provided by the Chair of Process Control Engineering in Aachen. It is a rather complete RTE for PL

AW: [PLC-Simulator] Thoughts on the "Context" for our simulator

hough ... as I'm not very looking forward to writing C code ;-) Chris Am 18.10.19, 08:11 schrieb "Bjoern Hoeper" : Hey everyone, sorry for joining the party this late. But it is rather busy times at the moment. Depending on the context maybe I can help with an exist

AW: [VOTE] Apache PLC4X 0.5.0 RC3

Hi all, +1 (binding) Minor issues: * Tests needing libpcap loopback not runnable because libpcap does not support loopback interface on Windows (RawSocketChannelTest). Already addressed in PLC4X-150. - Downloaded and extracted staged artifacts - Checked README, RELEASE_NOTES, LICENSE and NOTICE

AW: Getting you others involved (again)?

Hi Chris, on my side it is just being busy with other work not directly related to PLC4X. So it has nothing to do with the project. I hope to have some spare time to contribute again around Christmas. Björn -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Christofer Dutz Gesendet: Montag, 18. November 2

AW: [DISCUSS] Rename PLC4DOTNET to PLC4CSHARP?

Hi, in my opinion the runtime is the more relevant thing in this context because if you take a .NET Lib you could use it with VB or F# or any other language that is compatible with the .NET Runtime. So the language is only the language in which it is written (which could also be intermixed). Fu

AW: [DISCUSS] Rename PLC4DOTNET to PLC4CSHARP?

to PLC4CSHARP? But VB?!?!?!?! Am 03.04.20, 16:12 schrieb "Bjoern Hoeper" : Hi, in my opinion the runtime is the more relevant thing in this context because if you take a .NET Lib you could use it with VB or F# or any other language that is compatible with the .NET Runti