On 01/05/2010 06:54 PM, Steve Huston wrote:
Hi Kerry,
Thought I'd mention this - I get some errors building a clean
trunk on Ubuntu and Windows.
On Windows, I'm running VC9 SP1 on XP (fully patched), CMake
2.8.0, boost 1.3.9 against r896143, clean checkout.
On 01/04/2010 04:27 PM, Robert Godfrey wrote:
Happy New Year all...
So, at the start of this new year I think it is important that we try to
focus on improving the experience of our project... and in particular I
think we should be looking at making the project look like a single coherent
On 01/04/2010 06:41 PM, john dunning wrote:
I'm squiffing up qpid-config to add the ability to configure xml
exchanges and queue bindings. I'm trying to add stuff to the test suite
(cpp/src/tests/cli_tests.py and related) to match.
The difficulty I have right now is that the xml support is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2104?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12797080#action_12797080
]
Gordon Sim commented on QPID-2104:
--
The property used as the key should ideally be
[Java Broker] SASL PLAIN authentication does not work when both an
authentication and authorization id are supplied
---
Key: QPID-2325
URL:
Hello!
On current trunk (r896256) I am getting this error
after compiling --with-swig (see attachment) and
running 'make check'.
Best regards, Jan Sarenik
make[3]: Entering directory `/home/jsarenik/qpid/qpid/cpp/bindings/qmf/tests'
Running qmf interop tests using broker on port 40430
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 09:19:57AM -0500, Ted Ross wrote:
The problem is that you've built without the cyrus-sasl-devel. The
client in that test tries to set the user-id header with information
extracted from the sasl context (which isn't there). This test should
be disabled in the
On Fri, 2009-12-18 at 12:48 -0500, Rafael Schloming wrote:
Rafael Schloming wrote:
As there have been no comments or questions on the discussion thread,
I'm going to move this to a vote:
Qualities we look for:
- A candidate must demonstrate an understanding of how our project
exchange.declare should throw a 404 - not found exception if the exchange type
is unknown
-
Key: QPID-2326
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2326
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1982?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12797149#action_12797149
]
Alan Conway commented on QPID-1982:
---
We already have portable constructs for this type of
On 01/06/2010 06:14 AM, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 01/04/2010 06:41 PM, john dunning wrote:
I'm squiffing up qpid-config to add the ability to configure xml
exchanges and queue bindings. I'm trying to add stuff to the test suite
(cpp/src/tests/cli_tests.py and related) to match.
The difficulty I
On 01/06/2010 06:52 AM, Robert Godfrey wrote:
2010/1/6 Rafael Schlomingrafa...@redhat.com
Robert Godfrey wrote:
Overall I think with a bit of work from both the C++ and Java communities
we
can get the brokers to look and behave much more similarly... however we
will also need to change the
On 01/06/2010 04:05 PM, Alan Conway wrote:
On 01/06/2010 06:14 AM, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 01/04/2010 06:41 PM, john dunning wrote:
I'm squiffing up qpid-config to add the ability to configure xml
exchanges and queue bindings. I'm trying to add stuff to the test suite
(cpp/src/tests/cli_tests.py
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 16:11 +, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 01/06/2010 04:05 PM, Alan Conway wrote:
Thats true, but I think it is still worth splitting out test sets for
optional modules into separate files for the sake of clarity and
readability.
Yes, thats a fair point.
Thanks all. For
On 01/06/2010 11:20 AM, john dunning wrote:
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 16:11 +, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 01/06/2010 04:05 PM, Alan Conway wrote:
Thats true, but I think it is still worth splitting out test sets for
optional modules into separate files for the sake of clarity and
readability.
Enhance qpid-config to deal with xml and headers brokers
Key: QPID-2327
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2327
Project: Qpid
Issue Type: Improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2327?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
john dunning updated QPID-2327:
---
Attachment: bz-549443.patch
This patch implements the new qpid-config functionality, and enhances the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2327?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ted Ross reassigned QPID-2327:
--
Assignee: Ted Ross
Enhance qpid-config to deal with xml and headers brokers
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 7:42 PM, Rajith Attapattu rajit...@gmail.com wrote:
It appears that there are two different means configuring the
heartbeat interval for the JMS client.
The 0-9 codepath uses a jvm argument while the 0-10 codepath uses a
broker URL property.
From a users perspective
On 01/06/2010 11:20 AM, john dunning wrote:
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 16:11 +, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 01/06/2010 04:05 PM, Alan Conway wrote:
Thats true, but I think it is still worth splitting out test sets
for optional modules into separate files for the sake of
clarity and
Querying for 500 objects causes C++ based ruby console to hang
--
Key: QPID-2328
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2328
Project: Qpid
Issue Type: Bug
Queries require lower case versions of class names?
---
Key: QPID-2329
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2329
Project: Qpid
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Qpid Managment
Querying 30 to 100 objects and then calling methods causes some methods to not
return?
--
Key: QPID-2330
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2330
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ted Ross reassigned QPID-2329:
--
Assignee: Ted Ross
Queries require lower case versions of class names?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2330?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ted Ross reassigned QPID-2330:
--
Assignee: Ted Ross
Querying 30 to 100 objects and then calling methods causes some methods to
not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ted Ross reassigned QPID-2328:
--
Assignee: Ted Ross
Querying for 500 objects causes C++ based ruby console to hang
C++ based ruby console leaks memory?
Key: QPID-2331
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2331
Project: Qpid
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Qpid Managment Framework
Environment:
Would be nice to have some kind of wait_for() functionality in the console API
--
Key: QPID-2332
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2332
Project: Qpid
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2331?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ted Ross reassigned QPID-2331:
--
Assignee: Ted Ross
C++ based ruby console leaks memory?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2332?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ted Ross reassigned QPID-2332:
--
Assignee: Ted Ross
Would be nice to have some kind of wait_for() functionality in the console API
Seemingly random timeouts
-
Key: QPID-2333
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2333
Project: Qpid
Issue Type: Bug
Environment: qmf-0.5.829175-3.fc11.x86_64
Running console and qpidd on one
Alan Conway wrote:
On 01/06/2010 06:52 AM, Robert Godfrey wrote:
2010/1/6 Rafael Schlomingrafa...@redhat.com
Robert Godfrey wrote:
Overall I think with a bit of work from both the C++ and Java
communities
we
can get the brokers to look and behave much more similarly...
however we
will
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2333?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12797285#action_12797285
]
Ian Main commented on QPID-2333:
We saw this happen in ovirt a lot as well. Which is kind
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2330?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12797286#action_12797286
]
Ian Main commented on QPID-2330:
I actually think this may be a thread deadlock and may be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1875?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12797294#action_12797294
]
Rajith Attapattu commented on QPID-1875:
Martin I cannot recall who added the option
Strange hang in console
---
Key: QPID-2334
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2334
Project: Qpid
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Qpid Managment Framework
Environment:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2334?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12797298#action_12797298
]
Ian Main commented on QPID-2334:
Actually this seems to be the most common error I'm seeing
I don't wish to overcomplicate, but do you want some grouping of features...
(e.g. a parentFeature tag) if we're looking at the same sort of granularity
as unit tests, that should be quite fine... but many of them may be aspects
of the same feature...
-- Rob
2010/1/6 Rafael Schloming
I was just trying to quickly figure out the svn rev the Java 0.5
release and found that there wasn't a tag available for it.
(please note we do have a branch for it, but I still think we should
be tagging the final release).
It seems we have tags for the previous releases (all though some
aren't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2333?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ted Ross reassigned QPID-2333:
--
Assignee: Ted Ross
Seemingly random timeouts
-
Key:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2334?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ted Ross reassigned QPID-2334:
--
Assignee: Ted Ross
Strange hang in console
---
Key: QPID-2334
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1880?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12797303#action_12797303
]
Ian Main commented on QPID-1880:
Actually we had a conversation on irc and figured that so
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 15:29 -0500, Rajith Attapattu wrote:
I was just trying to quickly figure out the svn rev the Java 0.5
release and found that there wasn't a tag available for it.
(please note we do have a branch for it, but I still think we should
be tagging the final release).
It seems
I've just noticed (after several hours of puzzling about what was
screwing up my git branch history) that there are a number of branches
and tags that omit the top level, redundant qpid directory.
Now I'm for getting rid of uselessness like this as much as the next guy
(and I'm in fact
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Carl Trieloff resolved QPID-2320.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.7
Committed revision 896687.
test and fix
Failed
Shall we retroactively create a 0.5 tag for future usage? Andrews suggestion of
looking at the .svnrevision file doesn't work for 0.5 as it reports HEAD.
I just noticed from the users list why Rajith wanted to know the revision, and
he understandably got the wrong revision from looking at the
It is indeed unfortunate, and I try my best to remember it when dealing with
branches.
While the topic is raised though, is the 0.6 branch rooted at:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/branches/0.6-release/qpid or
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/branches/0.6-release/trunk/qpid ?
Robbie
I see this has been marked resolved for 0.7, was it decided it isn't a blocker?
Robbie
-Original Message-
From: Carl Trieloff [mailto:cctriel...@redhat.com]
Sent: 04 January 2010 21:23
To: dev@qpid.apache.org
Subject: Re: [jira] Created: (QPID-2320) Failed acquire on LVQ causes
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 21:51 +, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
Shall we retroactively create a 0.5 tag for future usage? Andrews suggestion
of looking at the .svnrevision file doesn't work for 0.5 as it reports HEAD.
Oh - I think retroactively creating the tag would be useful.
Thinking a little
I only ask as both already exist.
Robbie
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Stitcher [mailto:astitc...@redhat.com]
Sent: 06 January 2010 22:09
To: dev@qpid.apache.org
Subject: RE: Subversion tags and branches (a little moan)
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 22:00 +, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 22:14 +, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
I only ask as both already exist.
Bugger, you're right - I'm starting to hate svn branching.
I'll fix it (when I figure out the idiot thing I did)
Andrew
-
Apache
Oh, and I forgot to add that I think Tag names should just be the direct
version number, e.g. simply M4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.6.1 etc
Robbie
-Original Message-
From: Robbie Gemmell [mailto:robbie.gemm...@gmail.com]
Sent: 06 January 2010 22:22
To: dev@qpid.apache.org
Subject: RE: Tagging our
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 17:25 -0500, Andrew Stitcher wrote:
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 22:14 +, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
I only ask as both already exist.
Bugger, you're right - I'm starting to hate svn branching.
I'll fix it (when I figure out the idiot thing I did)
Figured it out and fixed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2283?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12797474#action_12797474
]
Rajith Attapattu commented on QPID-2283:
The first attempt at resolving the above is
54 matches
Mail list logo
