I've recently been wrestling with transaction handling in the java
broker in the context of 0-9-1 compliance. We're currently not
strictly spec compliant with 0-9-1 as we will resend messages that
have been rolled back. 0-9 and 0-8 are... ambiguous... on this matter,
and I've been trying to retain
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 4:28 PM, Marnie McCormack
wrote:
> That's corect - they will have done. I've been reviewing them when time
> permits, but happy for other devs to review too to aid progress. Hoping
> we'll have more time for review in the 0.8 cycle.
This is essentially inevitable with CTR
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 7:56 PM, Rajith Attapattu wrote:
> We could temporarily exclude until the issue is fixed.
> If you are going to check in a fix soon, I'd say don't bother.
I'm not entirely clear on what the issue with this is at this stage.
Is the problem that the java broker doesn't auto-
On 03/31/2010 02:22 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote:
Gordon Sim wrote:
On 03/31/2010 05:41 PM, Alan Conway wrote:
I think we can extend qpid_send and qpid_recv to do most of the things
that perftest and latencytest do. Interested in any ideas on the topic.
I like the approach.
+1
Here's what I
I don't have any current plans to look at it, so ill exclude it tomorrow
(can't be bothered firing up the dev env just now, enough of this computer
lark for tonight... time for Lost :P)
Robbie
> -Original Message-
> From: Rajith Attapattu [mailto:rajit...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 31 March 2010
We could temporarily exclude until the issue is fixed.
If you are going to check in a fix soon, I'd say don't bother.
Rajith
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Robbie Gemmell
wrote:
> This new test fails on all the Java test profiles other than java.0.10. Is it
> ok to exclude it from these?
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2418?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12852046#action_12852046
]
Rajith Attapattu commented on QPID-2418:
Interesting, the queue declare with the new
This new test fails on all the Java test profiles other than java.0.10. Is it
ok to exclude it from these?
Regards,
Robbie
> -Original Message-
> From: raj...@apache.org [mailto:raj...@apache.org]
> Sent: 23 March 2010 22:48
> To: comm...@qpid.apache.org
> Subject: svn commit: r926829 -
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010, Rafael Schloming wrote:
Overall I'm not sure we should try to cram too much into qpid-send and
qpid-recv. I think it might make sense to have two sets of utilities with the
difference being based on whether the utilities themselves generate the
messages, or whether they're
The changes made to DurableSubscriptionTest were not intended to yet expose
this bug any more than it was, and were deliberately kept short so that they
wouldnt (the comment is innacurate youll note, as it isnt doing what it was
originally and I forgot to update that). The new test added in
Durable
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2418?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12852032#action_12852032
]
Robbie Gemmell commented on QPID-2418:
--
The changes made to DurableSubscriptionTest wer
Gordon Sim wrote:
On 03/31/2010 05:41 PM, Alan Conway wrote:
I think we can extend qpid_send and qpid_recv to do most of the things
that perftest and latencytest do. Interested in any ideas on the topic.
I like the approach.
+1
Here's what I propose:
Additional qpid_send options:
--report
Robbie,
The change to the test case is causing the test to fail when run
against the c++ (which should be expected as we have a bug in the Java
client).
However it's passing against the Java broker, so perhaps better to
investigate this.
I suspect the broker is creating a new queue bcos the args l
Could someone enlighten me about the Mina version currently used in Qpid
please? I searched through the messages of the list back to 2006 and
found this:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/qpid-dev/200612.mbox/%3cc5e632550612010029j3c0beec6p4eeff0aab1d36...@mail.gmail.com%3e
That is, Qpi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2418?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12851997#action_12851997
]
Rajith Attapattu commented on QPID-2418:
When investigating the test failure for "te
Rajith Attapattu a écrit :
I am sorry sir, but Maven is a big no due to the well documented reasons.
You are paying a big price for that convenience :).
I understand you had some troubles in the past with Maven, and
considering the complexity of the Qpid project I'm not surprised. But
for th
On 03/31/2010 05:41 PM, Alan Conway wrote:
I think we can extend qpid_send and qpid_recv to do most of the things
that perftest and latencytest do. Interested in any ideas on the topic.
I like the approach.
Here's what I propose:
Additional qpid_send options:
--report=Y/N: report sender thro
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gordon Sim resolved QPID-2477.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> std::cout in agent not used anymore
> ---
>
>
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Jonathan Robie a écrit :
>
>> I think Maven is out, because people have been pretty loud about not
>> wanting Yet Another Build System.
>
> In this case Maven isn't used as a build system, it's just a convenient tool
> to build the document
Jonathan Robie a écrit :
I think Maven is out, because people have been pretty loud about not
wanting Yet Another Build System.
In this case Maven isn't used as a build system, it's just a convenient
tool to build the documentation on any platform.
P.S. Did you run into problems trying to
would expect a message queue client to be not bigger than ~500KB
(dependencies included and fully compressed with pack200+lzma)
500KB would be nice. Some of my "science experiments" target Java-based
platforms with 1MB of Flash and 1MB of RAM. For now I open sockets to a
server, and the se
I think we can extend qpid_send and qpid_recv to do most of the things that
perftest and latencytest do. Interested in any ideas on the topic.
Here's what I propose:
Additional qpid_send options:
--report=Y/N: report sender throughput on exit.
--report-interval=SECS: print throughput report eve
On 03/31/2010 12:18 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
That's still better than installing the tool chain manually, but that
sounds like a lot of troubles for something that is already done with
a short Maven file.
I'm more than happy to do what the group wants if (1) the group can all
want the same
On 03/31/2010 12:13 PM, Steve Huston wrote:
I should probably go look at what's checked in first, but...
Is there a defined set of tools for building the docs? Is there a reason
you can't put a README there with a list of what's needed, and let
people get it whatever way works best?
The RE
Jonathan Robie a écrit :
We could move back to the earlier tool chain (ant, Saxon, Xerces,
DocBook DTDs, DocBook stylesheets.
Instead of checking these things into subdirectories, I could put them
in a zip file in my people.apache.org account, and create an ant task
that retrieves them and un
Hi Jonathan,
> We could move back to the earlier tool chain (ant, Saxon, Xerces,
> DocBook DTDs, DocBook stylesheets.
I'm hoping you can help me out here... When I see documentation sources
checked in and mention of a way to build them, I think there must be
some defined tools that build the doc
We could move back to the earlier tool chain (ant, Saxon, Xerces,
DocBook DTDs, DocBook stylesheets.
Instead of checking these things into subdirectories, I could put them
in a zip file in my people.apache.org account, and create an ant task
that retrieves them and unzips them into the right s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2418?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Kennedy updated QPID-2418:
-
Attachment: 0001-QPID-2418-trunk.patch
0001-QPID-2418-branch.patch
> Existing dur
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2476?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12851860#action_12851860
]
Rajith Attapattu commented on QPID-2476:
Andrew,
Great to see you working on the AC
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2418?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Kennedy updated QPID-2418:
-
Attachment: (was: 0001-QPID-2418-trunk.patch)
> Existing durable subscription with selector i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2418?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Kennedy updated QPID-2418:
-
Attachment: (was: 0001-QPID-2418-branch.patch)
> Existing durable subscription with selector
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2418?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12851830#action_12851830
]
Robbie Gemmell commented on QPID-2418:
--
On line 1086 (after patching) this code segment
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jan Sarenik updated QPID-2477:
--
Description:
See attached one-liner. It removes the obsolete line.
(All cout calls were removed from C++
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jan Sarenik updated QPID-2477:
--
Attachment: qpid-agent-cout.diff
> std::cout in agent not used anymore
> ---
std::cout in agent not used anymore
---
Key: QPID-2477
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2477
Project: Qpid
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: C++ Broker
Affects Versions: 0.7
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2360?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12851798#action_12851798
]
Robbie Gemmell commented on QPID-2360:
--
Patches were commited in revisions 929136 and 9
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2418?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Kennedy updated QPID-2418:
-
Attachment: 0001-QPID-2418-trunk.patch
0001-QPID-2418-branch.patch
> Existing dur
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2418?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Kennedy updated QPID-2418:
-
Attachment: (was: 0001-QPID-2418-trunk.patch)
> Existing durable subscription with selector i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2473?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12851784#action_12851784
]
Jan Sarenik commented on QPID-2473:
---
Building with CMake does not help either...
[ 79%] B
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2473?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12851785#action_12851785
]
Jan Sarenik commented on QPID-2473:
---
And when I uninstall xqilla and xerces, I am getting
Complete ACL implementation for 0-10 code path
--
Key: QPID-2476
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2476
Project: Qpid
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: Java Broker
Aff
41 matches
Mail list logo
