[jira] [Commented] (QPID-4086) Java Client 0-9.x deadlocks on concurrent connection close and session close from failover thread

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4086?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13400354#comment-13400354 ] Keith Wall commented on QPID-4086: -- Hi Alex I'm not sure about this. Doesn't the origin

Re: Review Request: NO-JIRA: Get rid of noisy errors from rejected connections.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/5529/#review8535 --- /trunk/qpid/cpp/src/qpid/sys/AsynchIOHandler.cpp

[jira] [Commented] (QPID-4086) Java Client 0-9.x deadlocks on concurrent connection close and session close from failover thread

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4086?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13400369#comment-13400369 ] Alex Rudyy commented on QPID-4086: -- Hi Keith, I believe that the suggested code changes d

[jira] [Commented] (QPID-4086) Java Client 0-9.x deadlocks on concurrent connection close and session close from failover thread

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4086?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13400411#comment-13400411 ] Alex Rudyy commented on QPID-4086: -- Hi Keith, You are right, it seems that existing imple

[jira] [Comment Edited] (QPID-4086) Java Client 0-9.x deadlocks on concurrent connection close and session close from failover thread

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4086?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13400411#comment-13400411 ] Alex Rudyy edited comment on QPID-4086 at 6/25/12 11:41 AM: Hi

Re: Qpid Connection URL syntax

On 06/22/2012 08:47 PM, Andrew Stitcher wrote: On Fri, 2012-06-22 at 20:10 +0100, Gordon Sim wrote: ... I think the 'amqp' scheme should really be specified by the OASIS AMQP member section. I entirely agree with this, but in the meantime it will help qpid a lot to use the same connection url

Re: Qpid Connection URL syntax

On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 12:28:00PM -0400, Andrew Stitcher wrote: > I think we need to focus the URL syntax discussion on a specific > proposal with concrete syntax to be implemented. +1 > I think we should take this in parts, and it appears to me that we have > somewhat muddies the waters by conf

Re: Qpid Connection URL syntax

On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 01:14:33PM +0100, Gordon Sim wrote: > >My proposal didn't seek to match http really, rather unify what was > >there. > > Right, but what is there is there in general because it sought to > match http. That is the only reason I don't reject that unofficial > form entirely: i

Re: Proton Update/Draft Website

On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 07:07:38PM -0400, Rafael Schloming wrote: > Regarding (2), I believe this would require an official vote, so I'd > like to throw it out there for discussion. Currently the need for such a > list is being filled with ad-hoc off-list emails. It would be very nice > to be able

Re: Proton Update/Draft Website

On Mon, 2012-06-25 at 10:07 -0400, Darryl L. Pierce wrote: > On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 07:07:38PM -0400, Rafael Schloming wrote: > > Regarding (2), I believe this would require an official vote, so I'd > > like to throw it out there for discussion. Currently the need for such a > > list is being fill

Re: Proton Update/Draft Website

> > I was thinking pro...@qpid.apache.org. > Given the conversations I've been having with people who are very interested in Proton going forward, I'm strongly +1 on creating this group. -- Rob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsu

Re: Proton Update/Draft Website

On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 10:17:42AM -0400, Rafael Schloming wrote: > On Mon, 2012-06-25 at 10:07 -0400, Darryl L. Pierce wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 07:07:38PM -0400, Rafael Schloming wrote: > > > Regarding (2), I believe this would require an official vote, so I'd > > > like to throw it out

Re: Proton Update/Draft Website

On 25 June 2012 16:17, Rafael Schloming wrote: > On Mon, 2012-06-25 at 10:07 -0400, Darryl L. Pierce wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 07:07:38PM -0400, Rafael Schloming wrote: >> > Regarding (2), I believe this would require an official vote, so I'd >> > like to throw it out there for discussion.

RE: Proton Update/Draft Website

> -Original Message- > From: Robbie Gemmell [mailto:robbie.gemm...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 11:04 AM > To: dev@qpid.apache.org > Subject: Re: Proton Update/Draft Website > > On 25 June 2012 16:17, Rafael Schloming wrote: > > On Mon, 2012-06-25 at 10:07 -0400, Darryl L. Pie

Re: Proton Update/Draft Website

On Jun 25, 2012, at 10:17 AM, Rafael Schloming wrote: > On Mon, 2012-06-25 at 10:07 -0400, Darryl L. Pierce wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 07:07:38PM -0400, Rafael Schloming wrote: >>> Regarding (2), I believe this would require an official vote, so I'd >>> like to throw it out there for discu

Re: Proton Update/Draft Website

On Fri, 2012-06-22 at 19:07 -0400, Rafael Schloming wrote: > ... > The code is nearing the point where a first release is in sight, and > this does raise two infrastructure questions. > > 1) We'll need to do something for bug tracking. > 2) It would be extremely helpful to have an email list for

Re: Proton Update/Draft Website

On 25 June 2012 18:09, Andrew Stitcher wrote: > On Fri, 2012-06-22 at 19:07 -0400, Rafael Schloming wrote: >> ... > >> The code is nearing the point where a first release is in sight, and >> this does raise two infrastructure questions. >> >> 1) We'll need to do something for bug tracking. >> 2) I

[jira] [Updated] (QPID-4080) HAClusterWhiteboxTest#testClusterLosingNodeRetainsData fails occasionally on Apache CI

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4080?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alex Rudyy updated QPID-4080: - Attachment: (was: 0001-QPID-4080-Fix-failing-tests-from-HAClusterWhiteboxTe.patch) > HAClusterWhi

[jira] [Updated] (QPID-4080) HAClusterWhiteboxTest#testClusterLosingNodeRetainsData fails occasionally on Apache CI

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4080?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alex Rudyy updated QPID-4080: - Attachment: 0001-QPID-4080-Fix-failing-test.patch Updated patch code to check existance of test queue MBea

Re: Proton Update/Draft Website

On 06/25/2012 05:37 PM, Rob Godfrey wrote: when we are talking about Qpid Proton, it may be integrated in the (imaginary) XXXMQ broker, and XXXMQ's relationship to Qpid Proton and the Qpid Proton discussion lists should (theoretically) be the same as that between Qpid Java/C++ Broker and Qpid Pr

Re: Proton Update/Draft Website

On Mon, 2012-06-25 at 12:09 -0400, Andrew Stitcher wrote: > On Fri, 2012-06-22 at 19:07 -0400, Rafael Schloming wrote: > > ... > > > The code is nearing the point where a first release is in sight, and > > this does raise two infrastructure questions. > > > > 1) We'll need to do something for bug

Re: Proton Update/Draft Website

On 25 June 2012 19:26, Gordon Sim wrote: > On 06/25/2012 05:37 PM, Rob Godfrey wrote: >> >> when we are talking about Qpid Proton, it may be >> integrated in the (imaginary)  XXXMQ broker, and XXXMQ's relationship >> to Qpid Proton and the Qpid Proton discussion lists should >> (theoretically) be

Re: Proton Update/Draft Website

On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Gordon Sim wrote: > On 06/25/2012 05:37 PM, Rob Godfrey wrote: >> >> when we are talking about Qpid Proton, it may be >> integrated in the (imaginary)  XXXMQ broker, and XXXMQ's relationship >> to Qpid Proton and the Qpid Proton discussion lists should >> (theoreti

Re: Proton Update/Draft Website

On 25 June 2012 19:33, Rajith Attapattu wrote: > On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Gordon Sim wrote: >> On 06/25/2012 05:37 PM, Rob Godfrey wrote: >>> >>> when we are talking about Qpid Proton, it may be >>> integrated in the (imaginary)  XXXMQ broker, and XXXMQ's relationship >>> to Qpid Proton a

Re: Proton Update/Draft Website

On Mon, 2012-06-25 at 19:33 +0200, Rob Godfrey wrote: > On 25 June 2012 19:26, Gordon Sim wrote: > > On 06/25/2012 05:37 PM, Rob Godfrey wrote: > >> > >> when we are talking about Qpid Proton, it may be > >> integrated in the (imaginary) XXXMQ broker, and XXXMQ's relationship > >> to Qpid Proton

Re: Proton Update/Draft Website

On Mon, 25 Jun 2012, Rafael Schloming wrote: The fundamental issue here is that Qpid now needs to serve two audiences. A very horizontal audience made up of pretty much anything that might ever want to speak AMQP, and a more specialized, vertical audience of people interested in a particular mes

Re: Proton Update/Draft Website

On 25 June 2012 20:06, Justin Ross wrote: > On Mon, 25 Jun 2012, Rafael Schloming wrote: > >> The fundamental issue here is that Qpid now needs to serve two >> audiences. A very horizontal audience made up of pretty much anything >> that might ever want to speak AMQP, and a more specialized, verti

Re: Proton Update/Draft Website

On Mon, 25 Jun 2012, Rob Godfrey wrote: On 25 June 2012 20:06, Justin Ross wrote: On Mon, 25 Jun 2012, Rafael Schloming wrote: The fundamental issue here is that Qpid now needs to serve two audiences. A very horizontal audience made up of pretty much anything that might ever want to speak A

Re: Proton Update/Draft Website

On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Rob Godfrey wrote: > That's not unreasonable, except Futon and Halfton don't exist yet and > I'm not sure that I know enough to say those will be precisely those > three things. I'm certainly very comfortable pushing everything one > level below Qpid and using Qpi

Re: Qpid Connection URL syntax

On Mon, 2012-06-25 at 13:14 +0100, Gordon Sim wrote: > On 06/22/2012 08:47 PM, Andrew Stitcher wrote: > > On Fri, 2012-06-22 at 20:10 +0100, Gordon Sim wrote: > >> ... > >> I think the 'amqp' scheme should really be specified by the OASIS AMQP > >> member section. > > > > I entirely agree with this

[jira] [Updated] (QPID-4083) Disable building the language bindings by default.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4083?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Darryl L. Pierce updated QPID-4083: --- Component/s: (was: Qpid Examples) (was: Python Tools)

[jira] [Updated] (QPID-4083) Disable building the language bindings by default.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4083?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Darryl L. Pierce updated QPID-4083: --- Attachment: 0001-Excludes-the-language-bindings-from-the-default-buil.patch > Disable buil

Re: Proton Update/Draft Website

On Mon, 2012-06-25 at 14:06 -0400, Justin Ross wrote: > On Mon, 25 Jun 2012, Rafael Schloming wrote: > > > The fundamental issue here is that Qpid now needs to serve two > > audiences. A very horizontal audience made up of pretty much anything > > that might ever want to speak AMQP, and a more spe