Re: Proposed QIP: Support for Message Grouping in the broker.

ssage-groups.html http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/websphere/library/techarticles/0602_currie/0602_currie.html http://forum.springsource.org/showthread.php?48798-Spring-2.5.1-JMS-1.1-and-distributed-jobs-implementation Marnie On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Marnie McCormack < marni

Re: Proposed QIP: Support for Message Grouping in the broker.

Message groups are typically used for items such as steps in a trade or a workflow process, so that all parts of a group are processed in a single transaction or not until all data required to process the action has arrived. Queues are different as the data may be entirely unrelated. Marnie On Tue,

Re: Proposed QIP: Support for Message Grouping in the broker.

My reading of the JMS spec and common implmentations/user expectations would be the same as Rob's - i.e. the message order is not the only characteristic used to define group support. In JMS, the sequence id would be used to maintain order, but the expectation is that the group are processed as a

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Qpid 0.10 released

Thanks Justin, Robbie, Andrew, Jonathan et all for getting the release out. Regards, Marnie On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Justin Ross wrote: > As a first-time release manager who needed help and advice at many turns, > I'd like to especially thank Robbie Gemmell and Andrew Stitcher for taking

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.10

Can I kindly ask this thread move off the VOTE thread please ? Many Thanks, Marnie On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 27/04/2011 21:34, Jonathan Robie a écrit : > > > Would there be copyright issues? >> > > With the proper copyright notice on the Javadoc pages there is

Re: SIGHUP with the Java broker

Should just be a warning on startup, rather than any error - can you post the error you're getting ? Thanks, Marnie On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Marnie McCormack < marnie.mccorm...@googlemail.com> wrote: > I believe its used to reload the security data for firewalls (to sup

Re: SIGHUP with the Java broker

I believe its used to reload the security data for firewalls (to support dynamic changes while the broker is running) - it is only supported on unix platforms and should simply have no effect on windows. Regards, Marnie On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 6:52 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura < danushka.menikkumb..

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.10

All, I think this [VOTE} thread could be closed. The question is does anyone wish to change their vote in the light of the discussions over the 7 days it has been open ? We should decide today if we're proceeding or not, as its all getting a little confusing ;-) If people are uncomfortable with

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.10

All, I've had a look at the details and I'd like to propose the release go ahead now, rather than be delayed any further. The reasoning is that the Java items highlighted are not strictly regressions (existing largely in Qpid 0.8) and more importantly the fixes for them, and associated issues, ar

Re: What is our strategy for "errata" and/or "hot fixes" ?

gt; On 19 April 2011 17:55, Marnie McCormack > wrote: > > I think regular, on schedule releases are key for an Apache project - > > without them we are seen as less credible than other OS projects in the > > messaging space. > > > > We have historically really st

Re: What is our strategy for "errata" and/or "hot fixes" ?

I think regular, on schedule releases are key for an Apache project - without them we are seen as less credible than other OS projects in the messaging space. We have historically really struggled to get our releases out on time/as planned and across the ?5 years we've been going we have made (I t

Re: What is our strategy for "errata" and/or "hot fixes" ?

I agree on looking at these items, though I think the underlying questions are actually about: - testing (our coverage) - what constitutes a regression when the final RC vote is underway -> the change for QPID-3214 was completed in Aug 2010 I believe, and was present in 0.8 I believe the logic her

Re: ApacheCon CFP - Qpid proposal

Hi Steve, Thanks - that'd be great and I'll count you in. Regards, Marnie On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Steve Huston wrote: > I would be interested in helping with this if it seems useful to you. > > -Steve > > > -Original Message- > > From: Marn

Re: ApacheCon CFP - Qpid proposal

? Regards, Marnie On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Marnie McCormack < marnie.mccorm...@googlemail.com> wrote: > I'm happy to contribute any way thats useful. > > Cheers, > Marnie > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote: > >> On 03/

Re: Qpid and AMQP 1-0: Plans?

> > > For eample, for Qpid users we want solid inter-op and upgrade as we > > introduce AMQP > > 1.0 and clean 0-10 1.0 inter-op for the C++ broker. For the Java broker > > there may also > > be a desire to also have 0-9 upgrade path. that is for those that know > > better to comment > > on. > >

Re: ApacheCon CFP - Qpid proposal

I'm happy to contribute any way thats useful. Cheers, Marnie On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote: > On 03/24/2011 11:10 AM, Robert Godfrey wrote: > >> On 24 March 2011 16:05, Marnie McCormack> >wrote: >> >> All, >>> >>> Y

ApacheCon CFP - Qpid proposal

All, You may have seen that the ApacheCon CFP is out (to be in by 29th April). I'd like to propose the following for Qpid: 'Rearchitecting for change - AMQP 1-0 in Qpache Qpid' In a timely fashion, the 1-0 conversation on the list helps with this. I really think that this is a topic we should b

Re: vhost-level access control in Java broker

Hi Danushka, Yes - if you mean can we control virtualhost level access ? Details and examples are available here: * https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12448750/Security-Plugins.pdf * The XML for the docbook for t

Re: 0-10 JIRAs

> On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Marnie McCormack wrote: > > I think we'd need to have a vote thread to redo the versioning approac - >> which is effectively what this implies if I'v eunderstood correctly ? >> > > I don't think they're really coupled. The mode

Re: 0-10 JIRAs

I think we'd need to have a vote thread to redo the versioning approac - which is effectively what this implies if I'v eunderstood correctly ? I don't like the scheme we've got but iirc it was discussed at length and voted in. However, the harder task to do which involves (at least this is how I'

0-10 JIRAs

Hi Justin/All, I'm wondering what the approach for identifying the content of the 0-10 release from JIRA is ? I've just been trying to figure out what is actually in 0-10 from JIRA and its not easy since we have 0-10 items complete adn I think raised during the release process and a load of open

[jira] Commented: (QPID-3044) Implement JCA Adapter for Java JMS client

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3044?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13001954#comment-13001954 ] Marnie McCormack commented on QPID-3044: Also, can details of related tasks

Re: Review Request: Recreation of JCA Resource Adapter review

any response on the issues being raised here, and for some further discussion. Is this a likely candidate to be set up as a plugin for the broker and contributed to a sandbox space ? Thanks, Marnie On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Marnie McCormack < marnie.mccorm...@googlemail.com> wrote: >

[jira] Commented: (QPID-3044) Implement JCA Adapter for Java JMS client

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3044?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12998787#comment-12998787 ] Marnie McCormack commented on QPID-3044: Code being provided for this JIRA sh

Re: Review Request: Recreation of JCA Resource Adapter review

Do none of the classes have unit tests ? I can understand the possible dependencies for system/integration tests but 0% unit test coverage is not ideal. Thanks, Marnie On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Andrew Stitcher wrote: > On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 13:54 +0000, Marnie McCormack wrote: >

Re: Review Request: Recreation of JCA Resource Adapter review

Hi Andrew, My comment on the new code, from an initial glance is that it doesn't seem to have any tests - are these attached somewhere else ? Thanks, Marnie On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Andrew Stitcher wrote: > > --- > This is an autom

[jira] Commented: (QPID-3062) Add additional example for AMQP0-8 .net client (qpid-dotnet-0-8-x.x)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3062?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12998322#comment-12998322 ] Marnie McCormack commented on QPID-3062: Will hit Accepted once IE upgraded &

[jira] Commented: (QPID-3062) Add additional example for AMQP0-8 .net client (qpid-dotnet-0-8-x.x)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3062?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12998321#comment-12998321 ] Marnie McCormack commented on QPID-3062: Patch from Keith Wall > Add add

[jira] Commented: (QPID-3062) Add additional example for AMQP0-8 .net client (qpid-dotnet-0-8-x.x)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3062?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12998320#comment-12998320 ] Marnie McCormack commented on QPID-3062: Reviewed and committed patch to t

[jira] Updated: (QPID-3062) Add additional example for AMQP0-8 .net client (qpid-dotnet-0-8-x.x)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3062?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marnie McCormack updated QPID-3062: --- Status: Ready To Review (was: In Progress) > Add additional example for AMQP0-8 .net cli

[jira] Assigned: (QPID-3062) Add additional example for AMQP0-8 .net client (qpid-dotnet-0-8-x.x)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3062?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marnie McCormack reassigned QPID-3062: -- Assignee: Marnie McCormack (was: Andrew Kennedy) > Add additional example for AMQP

[jira] Commented: (QPID-3059) Example TopicListener.cs does not await the arrival of messages

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3059?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12998314#comment-12998314 ] Marnie McCormack commented on QPID-3059: Reviewed and applied patch, having

[jira] Updated: (QPID-3059) Example TopicListener.cs does not await the arrival of messages

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3059?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marnie McCormack updated QPID-3059: --- Status: Ready To Review (was: In Progress) > Example TopicListener.cs does not await

[jira] Assigned: (QPID-3059) Example TopicListener.cs does not await the arrival of messages

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3059?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marnie McCormack reassigned QPID-3059: -- Assignee: Marnie McCormack > Example TopicListener.cs does not await the arrival

Re: [VOTE] add a pre-commit hook to check for JIRA references

+1

Re: 0.10 release update

Thanks Justin. Speaking with others, I think we should definitely target maven artefacts as part of our release distirbution for 0.10. All - are we in shape for this i.e. do the maven artefacts create-able from the build work ok/include the correct dependencies ? I haven't tried them, but iirc ot

Re: Zap trailing whitespace?

I'm with Chuck - I'd vote for a hook that you can opt to ignore. Why do we care so much about trailing white space - enough to generate diffs for all files seems too much, unless I'm missing an editor related problem people have ? There's a long lived maintenance branch from 0.5 that I use, and f

Re: Qpid Improvement Process

I think there's a question here about how we go about introducing new process to the project. Some of us are still discussing QIPs oon this thread and trying to better understand the point of them, proposed just over a working week ago. On the dev list, however, QIP is off and running. I'm not sur

Re: Qpid Improvement Process

I'm in favour of keeping things simple, and I'm not sure what gap/issue the QIP process and the additional work it introduces are seeking to address - that the existing Apache processes don't cover ? My take on how we should produce a meaningful roadmap and communicate about it is to raise high le

Re: Eclipse project files for Java code

I think Martin's suggestion to have a pom for project file generation is a great one ! Regards, Marnie On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 2:12 AM, Martin Ritchie wrote: > On 4 January 2011 18:07, Robert Godfrey wrote: > > On 4 January 2011 16:59, Andrew Kennedy >wrote: > > > >> On 4 Jan 2011, at 15:06,

[jira] Assigned: (QPID-2973) broker handling of reject without requeue and setup/use of DLQ

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marnie McCormack reassigned QPID-2973: -- Assignee: Andrew Kennedy (was: Robbie Gemmell) Assigning to ADK for final review of

[jira] Commented: (QPID-2973) broker handling of reject without requeue and setup/use of DLQ

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12973654#action_12973654 ] Marnie McCormack commented on QPID-2973: Post-initial review changes look ok t

[jira] Updated: (QPID-2973) broker handling of reject without requeue and setup/use of DLQ

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marnie McCormack updated QPID-2973: --- Status: Ready To Review (was: In Progress) > broker handling of reject without requeue

[jira] Resolved: (QPID-2980) expose the delivery count as a property

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2980?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marnie McCormack resolved QPID-2980. Resolution: Fixed Review of commits to branch, comments/questions are: 1

[jira] Updated: (QPID-2980) expose the delivery count as a property

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2980?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marnie McCormack updated QPID-2980: --- Status: Ready To Review (was: In Progress) > expose the delivery count as a prope

Re: Eclipse project files for Java code

Hi All, This discussion is something worthy of its own thread with a meaningful subject name on dev. There are quite a few opinions out there on the subject and likely requires a vote to make major changes. We've been through so many build system re-writes that I don't have much appetite for more

Re: Eclipse project files for Java code

Much as I hate to raise the subject - isn't this primarily a debate about dependency management ? I have the same problems using IntelliJ. It was pretty much the onlt thing I liked about the maven build -> generated project files ! How about using the ant-eclipse generator, has anyone been using i

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release RC3 as Qpid 0.8

Thanks Robbie - great work. Regards, Marnie On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Carl Trieloff wrote: > > > Robbie, > > Make sure to also send a mail to announce list, so that all of Apache knows > that the release has been made. Make sure the download page has been > updated > and synced before you

Re: [DRAFT] Apache Qpid 0.8 released !

Looks good to me - thanks Robbie ! Regards, Marnie On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Robbie Gemmell wrote: > Seems reasonable, I will update it accordingly later today. > > Robbie > > > -Original Message- > > From: Emmanuel Bourg [mailto:ebo...@apache.org] > > Sent: 06 December 2010 14:27

[jira] Resolved: (QPID-2788) jmx management console can throw ConcurrentModificationException whilst connected to (older) brokers with MBeans actively (un)registering

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marnie McCormack resolved QPID-2788. Resolution: Fixed > jmx management console can throw ConcurrentModificationException whi

[jira] Resolved: (QPID-2867) enable the JMX management console to remove bindings from direct/topic exchanges

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2867?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marnie McCormack resolved QPID-2867. Resolution: Fixed > enable the JMX management console to remove bindings from direct/to

[jira] Resolved: (QPID-2695) VirtualHostConfigRecoveryHandler can NPE or bind to the wrong exchange on binding recovery

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2695?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marnie McCormack resolved QPID-2695. Resolution: Fixed Changes look fine > VirtualHostConfigRecoveryHandler can NPE or bind

[jira] Resolved: (QPID-2870) an unauthorised attempt to delete a queue will prevent all further deletion attempts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2870?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marnie McCormack resolved QPID-2870. Resolution: Fixed Change reviewed ok, perils of AtomicX > an unauthorised attempt

[jira] Resolved: (QPID-2418) Existing durable subscription with selector is not unsubscribed during change to new subscription

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2418?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marnie McCormack resolved QPID-2418. Resolution: Fixed Patches reviewed/applied by RGe. > Existing durable subscription w

[jira] Resolved: (QPID-2422) DerbyStore does not persist queue exclusivity or arguments

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2422?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marnie McCormack resolved QPID-2422. Resolution: Fixed Reviewed non-test classes ok. > DerbyStore does not persist qu

[jira] Resolved: (QPID-2931) nulling the MessageReference handle on the Message during QueueEntry disposal can result in NPE

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2931?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marnie McCormack resolved QPID-2931. Resolution: Fixed Review ok, but we'd possibly be better to fix the NPE handling i

[jira] Resolved: (QPID-2872) Java broker incorrectly indicates it supports sending 0-10 heartbeats when it currently does not

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marnie McCormack resolved QPID-2872. Resolution: Fixed Accepted change, also need tests for heartbeating as a separate task

[jira] Resolved: (QPID-2417) Enhance topic test coverage

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2417?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marnie McCormack resolved QPID-2417. Resolution: Fixed Accepting test changes/addition > Enhance topic test cover

[jira] Resolved: (QPID-2869) prevent specifying the souce queue as destination when moving/copying messages

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2869?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marnie McCormack resolved QPID-2869. Resolution: Fixed Changes look fine. > prevent specifying the souce queue as destinat

[jira] Commented: (QPID-2322) remove redundant "version" key property from the ObjectName of the JMX MBeans

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2322?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12966069#action_12966069 ] Marnie McCormack commented on QPID-2322: Logical && used in if

[jira] Resolved: (QPID-2322) remove redundant "version" key property from the ObjectName of the JMX MBeans

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2322?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marnie McCormack resolved QPID-2322. Resolution: Fixed Review ok, had a look around some of the commits. Logic and changes seem

[jira] Resolved: (QPID-2927) JMX Shutdown plugin throws InstanceNotFoundException during broker shutdown

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2927?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marnie McCormack resolved QPID-2927. Resolution: Fixed Change looks fine. > JMX Shutdown plugin thr

[jira] Resolved: (QPID-2781) QPBRKR process name tag should be declared in qpid-server script, not qpid-run

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2781?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marnie McCormack resolved QPID-2781. Resolution: Fixed > QPBRKR process name tag should be declared in qpid-server script,

[jira] Resolved: (QPID-2614) QueueConfiguration requires to configurations to be provided on construction

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2614?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marnie McCormack resolved QPID-2614. Resolution: Fixed Reviewed changes made ok. Config code loks way more handcrafted that it

[jira] Resolved: (QPID-2425) Augment TKTestRunner to provide latency data for throughput tests.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2425?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marnie McCormack resolved QPID-2425. Resolution: Fixed > Augment TKTestRunner to provide latency data for throughput te

[jira] Commented: (QPID-2613) message data is not commited to the persistent store on 0-8/0-9 codepath

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2613?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12965897#action_12965897 ] Marnie McCormack commented on QPID-2613: Clearly we need a test that persis

[jira] Resolved: (QPID-2583) Update tests to throw ConfigurationExceptions

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2583?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marnie McCormack resolved QPID-2583. Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: (was: 0.7) > Update tests to th

[jira] Resolved: (QPID-2613) message data is not commited to the persistent store on 0-8/0-9 codepath

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2613?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marnie McCormack resolved QPID-2613. Resolution: Fixed > message data is not commited to the persistent store on 0-8/

[jira] Resolved: (QPID-2828) jmx management console can NPE when adding a queue to the navigation tree after its MBean has just been unregistered but before the view is refreshed

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2828?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marnie McCormack resolved QPID-2828. Resolution: Fixed If not already added, user docs should include the new error message and

[jira] Resolved: (QPID-2943) add the examples to the Java client binary convenience release package

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2943?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marnie McCormack resolved QPID-2943. Resolution: Fixed RC3 contains example src > add the examples to the Java client bin

[jira] Resolved: (QPID-2430) Java broker emits NPE following qpid-tool being connected

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2430?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marnie McCormack resolved QPID-2430. Resolution: Fixed > Java broker emits NPE following qpid-tool being connec

[jira] Resolved: (QPID-1825) Improve TimeToLiveTest.testActive to prevent spurious failures

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1825?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marnie McCormack resolved QPID-1825. Resolution: Fixed > Improve TimeToLiveTest.testActive to prevent spurious failu

[jira] Resolved: (QPID-2868) throw exception users when attempt is made to move/copy messages to a non-existent queue

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2868?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marnie McCormack resolved QPID-2868. Resolution: Fixed > throw exception users when attempt is made to move/copy messages t

[jira] Resolved: (QPID-2929) the broker-plugins jars are not incorporated into the broker release binary when using 'ant release-bin'

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2929?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marnie McCormack resolved QPID-2929. Resolution: Fixed broker plugins present in RC3 tar > the broker-plugins jars are

[jira] Resolved: (QPID-2315) remove unused client package jar dependencies

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2315?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marnie McCormack resolved QPID-2315. Resolution: Fixed > remove unused client package jar dependenc

[jira] Resolved: (QPID-2421) Augment performance tests to allow pre-filling broker, fill and consume only runs.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2421?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marnie McCormack resolved QPID-2421. Resolution: Fixed > Augment performance tests to allow pre-filling broker, fill and cons

[jira] Resolved: (QPID-2424) Augment CPU/GC processing scripts to provide additional stats.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marnie McCormack resolved QPID-2424. Resolution: Fixed > Augment CPU/GC processing scripts to provide additional st

Re: How easy is it to get Qpid going ?

I agree with most of Andrew Kennedy's comments. Source dist we should do, but for most users it's a hurdle they don't want to deal with - we should ship built packages too. Across the project we have a range of dev platforms we can leverage to setup automated testing for the kind of smoke tests r

Re: JMS Client reconnect

Hi Tim, The Java client uses the connection URL to control failover, but I'm not sure whether/how that is honoured by the C++ broker. It also defaults on trunk to use a NoFailover policy. Rajith - I think you might have the most up-to-date knowledge on the Java client failover on trunk, do you ha

[jira] Commented: (QPID-2935) Support "best effort" producer flow control within the AMQP 0.10 implementation.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12930174#action_12930174 ] Marnie McCormack commented on QPID-2935: Hi Ken, FYI - In case you haven'

Re: Trunk now open for 0.9 development

Thanks Robbie - great to see the release moving along (and thanks to Justin too !). Regards, Marnie On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 8:21 PM, Robbie Gemmell wrote: > I have taken a branch to be used for the 0.8 release process, mysteriously > named as 0.8-release-candidates. > > Trunk can now be considere

Re: Automating docbook generation

2010 4:08 PM > > To: dev@qpid.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Automating docbook generation > > > > > > On 11/03/2010 01:18 PM, Marnie McCormack wrote: > > > All, > > > > > > Would it be possible to agree/setup an automated task on one of the > > &g

[jira] Assigned: (QPID-2680) Provide user documentation for configuring SCD

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marnie McCormack reassigned QPID-2680: -- Assignee: Andrew Kennedy (was: Marnie McCormack) Assigning to Andrew for review/check

Automating docbook generation

All, Would it be possible to agree/setup an automated task on one of the various CI instances around to build/export the master docbooks from svn ? I'm working on Windows, and have just completed the 3 stages to create a new user doc. Somewhat painful and now I'm stuck (I think?) at the make stag

[jira] Commented: (QPID-2680) Provide user documentation for configuring SCD

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12927903#action_12927903 ] Marnie McCormack commented on QPID-2680: added How-to

[jira] Updated: (QPID-2680) Provide user documentation for configuring SCD

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marnie McCormack updated QPID-2680: --- Status: Ready To Review (was: In Progress) > Provide user documentation for configuring

[jira] Assigned: (QPID-2680) Provide user documentation for configuring SCD

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marnie McCormack reassigned QPID-2680: -- Assignee: Marnie McCormack (was: Martin Ritchie) > Provide user documentation

[jira] Resolved: (QPID-2615) JMX Management Console fails to connect to 0.5 and below brokers if run in a Java5 VM

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2615?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marnie McCormack resolved QPID-2615. Resolution: Fixed Reviewed change ok > JMX Management Console fails to connect to 0.5

Re: Qpid 0.8 Release - Documentation

ommitters could spend time on the docbook. I've got some feature docs to add, but am short of time on the overall piece - be great to see everyone pitch in here. Thanks & Regards, Marnie On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 9:20 PM, Jonathan Robie wrote: > On 10/05/2010 10:04 AM, Marnie McCormack w

Qpid 0.8 Release - Documentation

Hi All, So we're starting the countdown towards release. I wonder what we need to do on the docs front and if it's integrated into the release/dist tools ? Are other people's docs for 0.8 already in svn as part of the existing 0.7 docbook ? I've got a couple of docs to put into the docbook, but

[jira] Resolved: (QPID-2749) [Java Broker] Add -XX:+ExplicitGCInvokesConcurrent to qpid-server[.bat]

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2749?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marnie McCormack resolved QPID-2749. Resolution: Fixed Correctly set for bat/bash script > [Java Broker] Add

[jira] Resolved: (QPID-2877) QPID_JAVA_MEM usage in windows qpid-server.bat fails and prevents startup

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-2877?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marnie McCormack resolved QPID-2877. Resolution: Fixed Before fix script fails as described, output: Info: QPID_JAVA_GC not set

Release Preparations - Scope/JIRA

All, We're heading towards our October release schedule for 0.7 (labelled as release 0.8) fixes and features. Please start moving anything not likely to be completed in the next 2-3 weeks from the 0.7 version, as well as updating/reviewing/closing out existing JIRAs for 0.7. We currently have 20

Re: Release - End Oct

tems we're all targetting for inclusion. Regards, Marnie On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Robbie Gemmell wrote: > No concerns here. > > I'd like to volunteer myself for the release manager role. > > Robbie > > > On 31 August 2010 16:45, Marnie McCormack > w

Re: Release - End Oct

Thanks Steve & Rajith. Anyone got any concerns before we aim for an October release, with trunk frozen for all but release-related-fixes from around mid-Oct ? Thanks & Regards, Marnie On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 11:20 PM, Rajith Attapattu wrote: > On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Steve Huston > wr

Re: Documentation - Google hits

ll needs finished, and only once its more > prominent on the website (the FAQ links still point to the wiki > export) will it start being favoured for search results. > > Robbie > > On 27 August 2010 16:16, Marnie McCormack > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm

Release - End Oct

All, I'd like to propose a timeline for the next Qpid release - with a target of end October. IIRC, we usually take trunk as stable/defect fixing only for 2 weeks before release so that would take us back to 18th Oct for the start of that period. The work I'm closest to, 0-10 implementation on

Documentation - Google hits

Hi, I'm wondering if anyone on the list can shed list on why the details contained in the new docbook format doesn't come back on the front page of Google search results - where the wiki previously did. For example, information on the Qpid Java FAQ comes back from cwiki but not from the docbook (

Re: Operational Logging for 0-10 code path

Hi Sorin, Thanks for the info. I've had a read through of the JIRAs, I think the interface/implementation changes look good with an eye on 1-0 introduction too. Thanks, Marnie On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 12:28 PM, Sorin S. wrote: > Hi, > I am working to extend the operational logging framework to

Re: Queue message overwriting

Hi Tim, On the Java Broker there are a few options for constraining a queue's growth (Producer Side Flow Control), and using only in memory storage (MemoryMessageStore) as well as LVQ where older messages are overwritten by new messages with the same header value. However, these don't as yet come

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >