Re: Podling Report Reminder - June 2017

I’ve been thinking of other ways to get the word out. There are few current and ex-Wisconsin folks in the Bay area this summer. Question for all: Are there any forums in the Bay area that may be good to think about presenting this summer? IMHO, it would also be good to target specific meetups

Re: Podling Report Reminder - June 2017

A starting point for the podling report is now at: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/June2017#preview. Feel free to make any changes or suggest them. Cheers, Jignesh On 6/1/17, 6:43 AM, "johndam...@apache.org" wrote: Dear podling, This email was sent by an automated system on b

Re: Podling Report Reminder - June 2017

Good idea Julian! Would love to get your suggestions. We do have some folks from Quickstep graduate recently, and they may continue to be involved. So, that could be one of the steps. I think a good way to get a community is if we can find someone to adopt the technology and actually use it. A

Next set of technical things to work on?

Hello folks, Would love to have a discussion of what are the next set of technical things to work on. To begin, here is a summary of what has gone into the PRs recently. #1: A large amount of focus has been on the query execution and optimization methods. The key PRs here are PR #113, I

New Committer: Tianrun Li

The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache (incubating) Qucikstep has invited Tianrun Li to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that he has accepted. Welcome Tianrun! Being a committer enables easier contribution to the project since there is no need to go via the

Re: Blog post on storage formats

Very nice Harshad! I made minor edits in the PR https://github.com/hbdeshmukh/incubator-quickstep-site/pull/1 Cheers, Jignesh On 3/31/17, 2:29 PM, "Harshad Deshmukh" wrote: Hello all, I have written a blog post on various storage formats implemented in Quickstep. Please rev

Re: release announcement + thinking about demos

Great idea Marc about making an announcement. And a big CONGRATULATIONS to you, the team and our mentors for getting us here. This is a huge accomplishment!! Building on Harshad’s idea for a terse description, how about: High performance auto-managed SQL data processing platform that can be used

Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubating Quickstep 0.1.0 RC7

+1 from me too. Cheers, Jignesh On 3/21/17, 6:27 PM, "Julian Hyde" wrote: +1 (binding) Downloaded, checked hashes, checked L&N, disclaimer, ran rat. For next release, please add headers on all .md, .git*, .sh and .patch files. That will reduce the number of rat exception

Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubating Quickstep 0.1.0 RC7

+1 from me. On 3/19/17, 5:57 PM, "Marc Spehlmann" wrote: This vote is for approval of the Quickstep-0.1.0 RC7. We had a few minor changes since RC6. They were changes to the LICENSE and NOTICE file, as well as updating some headers. These should not have made function

Re: [RESULT] quickstep 0.1.0 rc6

Thank YOU Marc for leading this release! Cheers, Jignesh On 3/10/17, 6:24 PM, "Marc Spehlmann" wrote: +1 Julian Hyde (binding) Jignesh Patel (binding) Harshad Deshmukh Jianqiao Hakan -1 Thanks everyone for trying it out. As per the Apache

Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubating Quickstep 0.1.0 RC6

+1 (binding). On 3/8/17, 4:16 PM, "Marc Spehlmann" wrote: This vote is for approval of the Quickstep-0.1.0 RC6. Voters should download, unpack, build, and test the package before voting. +1 vote should be accompanied with what you did with the release. -1 vote should b

Re: tmb compile error

Sadly TMB is not optional ☹ On 3/6/17, 4:17 PM, "Marc Spehlmann" wrote: Hi all, Anyone know if tmb is an optional component? I was putting together release artifacts for 0.1.0rc6 and got this compile warn->error on an ubuntu machine. It seems that a variable which was previously

Re: Podling Report - Seeking feedback

ack >> of releases so far" >> >> If there's no disagreement -- I'll change it. >> >> Thanks, >> Roman. >> >> On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 5:44 PM, Jignesh Patel wrote: >>> Thanks Harshad for taking

Re: Podling Report - Seeking feedback

Thanks Harshad for taking the lead on this! I have also uploaded this on: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/March2017. We can make changes to the wiki if there is feedback from the mentors. Let us know. Cheers, Jignesh On 3/2/17, 5:36 PM, "Harshad Deshmukh" wrote: Hello mentors,

Re: [VOTE] incubator-quickstep-0.1.0RC5

+1 from me! On 3/1/17, 10:48 PM, "Jianqiao" wrote: +1. I'm good with the release. Best, Jianqiao 2017-03-01 17:21 GMT-06:00 HAKAN MEMISOGLU : > Hi Marc, > > +1 from me. It works with Docker. > > However I also get an error when I try to build it

Re: Release Managers?

Regarding the report. It's possible that you're now scheduled to report only once per quarter. Projects are only monthly when they start out. Julian [1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Key_signing_party Sent from my iPad > On Feb 11, 2017, at

Release Managers?

Hi folks: We are nearly ready to do a release. Anyone else wants to sign the release along with me? Also, I haven’t seen an email about providing input for the usual Podling report? Anyone else has seen this? I hope I haven’t missed it. Cheers, Jignesh  

Re: Editing documentation for release: BUILDING.md

Marc, Should we get rid of curl from the build instructions? We don’t need it with the current instruction flow. Cheers, Jignesh On 2/7/17, 6:43 PM, "Marc Spehlmann" wrote: For example, here is the edited doc: https://github.com/cramja/incubator-quickstep/blob/refactor-building/BUI

Re: Editing documentation for release: BUILDING.md

Great changes! +1 for replacing the current building doc with this one. Cheers, Jignesh On 2/7/17, 6:43 PM, "Marc Spehlmann" wrote: For example, here is the edited doc: https://github.com/cramja/incubator-quickstep/blob/refactor-building/BUILDING.md#prerequisites On Tue, Feb

Re: Release Signing

That would be nice if that were the case. We are nearly there then! Cheers, Jignesh On 2/1/17, 7:47 PM, "Marc Spehlmann" wrote: It sounds like only one release manager needs to sign it then?

Re: release: third_party/

n these changes. > > Thanks Julian, Marc and Zuyu for your help. > > On 01/23/2017 09:57 PM, Jignesh Patel wrote: >> Thanks Zuyu for the nice summary! For this release, I’d support going with Harshad’s lead, which is a single script to download the third par

Re: release: third_party/

Thanks Zuyu for the nice summary! For this release, I’d support going with Harshad’s lead, which is a single script to download the third party libraries. Dear Harshad: If your life is simpler with any of the other option (e.g. the issue you are having with an old version of Ubuntu in Travis),

Re: release: third_party/

I think it was Zuyu. Zuyu – can you comment? Cheers, Jignesh On 1/5/17, 12:56 PM, "Harshad Deshmukh" wrote: If I recall correctly, one of the Quickstep developers wrote the python script. On 01/05/2017 11:43 AM, Marc Spehlmann wrote: > That seems to be the repo with

Re: Working towards a release

Thanks Hakan! On 12/11/16, 12:52 AM, "Hakan Memisoglu" wrote: Hi Jignesh, No objections. I can also help you with that. On 12/10/2016 05:54 PM, Jignesh Patel wrote: > Fellow Quickstep-pers: AFAIK we are good on all the items under 3.X in the release

Re: blog

Nice. Thanks Marc! On 12/11/16, 11:54 AM, "Marc Spehlmann" wrote: Hey, we have a jekyll blog and a first blog article now! It can be viewed here http://apache.github.io/incubator-quickstep/ It's a page automatically generated by github. We can probably change the URL so

Re: Working towards a release

3, 2016 at 5:04 PM, Jignesh Patel     wrote:     > Thanks Harshad for volunteering!     >     > Re. 3.5, I think the generated files are ok.     >     > We can sync up after you come back. Happy Travels.     >     > Cheers,     > Jignesh     >     > O

Re: site

+1 from me. Go for it! Cheers, Jignesh On 12/7/16, 3:52 PM, "Marc Spehlmann" wrote: I noticed that we have a site @ https://github.com/apache/incubator-quickstep-site and that it is hosted at http://quickstep.incubator.apache.org/ Does anyone know/care if I

Re: Working towards a release

one. Maybe we could distill the recent paper, or talk about a specific component? Or just talk about all the recent improvements which got our performance way up before the paper. On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 5:04 PM, Jignesh Patel wrote: > Thanks Harshad for volunteeri

Re: building on OSX 10.12.1

It would be nice though to get things working on native MacOS. Saket, not sure if you have gotten around to trying to move up the protobuf libraries. If you have, did it work? Cheers, Jignesh On 11/29/16, 10:36 AM, "Marc Spehlmann" wrote: Follow up: Saket is working on updatin

Re: Working towards a release

Thanks Harshad for volunteering! Re. 3.5, I think the generated files are ok. We can sync up after you come back. Happy Travels. Cheers, Jignesh On 12/3/16, 7:25 AM, "Harshad Deshmukh" wrote: A question on 3.5 - We have preprocessed parser and lexer files in the parser module. Shoul

Working towards a release

Hi guys, I’d like to propose that we start thinking about a release. A key issue is that we need to figure out how we want to deal with outstanding issues. There is one critical issue (PlanVisualizer related crash). I propose that once that we have that solved, we go forward with the re

Re: Podling Report Reminder - December 2016

I have entered an initial podling report. Please let this group know if you have comments on the initial report. Cheers, Jignesh On 11/28/16, 6:06 AM, "johndam...@apache.org" wrote: Dear podling, This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache Incubator PM

Re: Travis CI 50-minute Timeout

As a stop-gap measure, can we all run the debug build on our local machine before opening a PR? Harshad makes a good point about getting into a mode where the DEBUG ASSERTS are never checked. I’d also suggest that we make a note of this in each PR description so the reviewer does not have to a

Re: QueryHandle Ownership During a Query Execution

Hi Zuyu, This makes sense to me. I think Harshad has some work on concurrent query execution in a branch, so would be good to get his input too. Perhaps, we could move to a unified design to allow concurrent query execution? Cheers, Jignesh On 11/19/16, 10:48 PM, "Zuyu Zhang" wrote: Hi

Re: Delay in showing a branch on GitHub mirror

Good discussion! I see a mix of approaches to opening PR in Quickstep and we do not have a set policy. I believe, Saket and Tarun use the model that Julian recommends. Great idea switching to it! Cheers, Jignesh On 11/5/16, 2:51 PM, "Hakan Memisoglu" wrote: Hi, The workflow t

Re: Xcode 8

u try 'glog-fix-apple' branch? On 10/28/2016 02:12 PM, Jignesh Patel wrote: > As some of you probably know, the code does not compile when you upgrade to XCode 8. An example error message is: > > > > quickstep/third_party/glog/src/r

Re: SplitRow Now fixed

Thanks Marc for the quick fix! Cheers, Jignesh On 11/1/16, 4:26 PM, "Marc Spehlmann" wrote: Hello, we were experiencing issues with the splitrow store which amounted to an overestimate of the amount of tuples we could insert into the block. This has been fixed in #125 and I tried

Xcode 8

As some of you probably know, the code does not compile when you upgrade to XCode 8. An example error message is: quickstep/third_party/glog/src/raw_logging.cc:153:3: 'syscall' is deprecated: first deprecated in macOS 10.12 - syscall(2) is unsupported; please switch to a supported interface.

Re: Outreach

t on the system. On 10/25/2016 10:02 AM, Jignesh Patel wrote: > I’m hoping to get some feedback from the general developers list on potential outreach activities for the project. To set the background for this discussion, Quickstep became an Apache project earlier this yea

Outreach

I’m hoping to get some feedback from the general developers list on potential outreach activities for the project. To set the background for this discussion, Quickstep became an Apache project earlier this year. Nearly all the people on the project are relatively new to the Apache way of doing t

Re: Podling Report Reminder - October 2016

Dear Quickstep-pers: See my input for the podling report at https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/October2016. Comments welcome! Cheers, Jignesh On 9/29/16, 7:47 PM, "johndam...@apache.org" wrote: Dear podling, This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache In

Re: Missing report + some thoughts

Will do Julian – Sorry I was traveling and missed this. PS: Everyone – please feel free to take the lead in drafting a report if you want to do that. As a general update, I’d like to welcome Tarun Bansal as a committer. He is helping make the data ingest part of Quickstep more robust (it is q

Re: BlockNotFoundInMemory

I have seen this before. I belive it is realated to the hash table allocation, which are very large (actually larger than they need to be due to estimation errors). Tcmalloc warns on such allocations. BTW: Jianqiao and Harshad, can we reduce the initial hash table allocation. I think starting

Quickstep Copyright changes

Quick update: The copyright changes are likely to happen today. I have a PR open, and Zuyu will review, and merge if it looks good. Sorry for the disruption that this will likely cause as it touches every file. Cheers, Jignesh

Question about using github as the main repo

Currently we use the git-wip-us.apache.org as the main repo for Quickstep. This works, but has limitations compared to doing development on github. One key limitation is closing PRs on github is far easier. Question: Is it possible for us to use github instead of ASF git server to host the m

5 things

Dear Quickstep-pers: A bunch of comments/updates. #1: The initial project website is up at http://quickstep.incubator.apache.org. It is really early and still needs a lot of work. #2: There is now a quickstart guide in the main repo: https://github.com/apache/incubator-quickstep/blob/

Re: LLVM Apt Repositories are back

Go for it Nav! > On Jun 27, 2016, at 10:01 AM, Navneet Potti wrote: > > Do you think we should switch Travis back to using the Apt repositories? > > http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-June/101500.html > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Building a community

Great questions Julian and neat comments Greg. Website is being worked on, but need a bit more work before putting it up. Agreed — need to work on all this. The key question that we have to solve as a group is getting some funding stability in place to gather resources to work on things that

Re: Guideline To Update Copyright Header

Hi Julian, Good point. To clarify. I was only going to copy the copyright into the root NOTICE file, and leave the files completely untouched. So, they wouldn’t have the Apache header in the source files. Only our files would have the new Apache Copyright template. Also, I think if it makes s

Re: Do we need 3 different InsertDestination classes?

A huge +1 from me to get rid of dead code! +CC: Gerald who also worked on this a while back, in case he has some input. Thanks! Jignesh > On Jun 14, 2016, at 11:36 PM, Navneet Potti wrote: > > Hi Harshad > I’m just kicking off this discussion based on a conversation I had with > Jignesh th

Re: [jira] [Commented] (QUICKSTEP-20) Add parser support for SQL window aggregation function

Great points Julian, especially about algebra. Couldn’t agree more. In fact, we have been strong advocates of the viewpoint that it is all about the algebraic framework. Furthermore, we have argued that the relational algebraic framework is the right “core” to build a platform. With it you can g

Re: Guideline To Update Copyright Header

Following up on Roman’s excellent comment, I took all the copyright notices under third_party and collected them into a new NOTICE file (see below). Notice that there are comments within [Square Braces]. This will make it easier for us to update the NOTICE file if we chose to upgrade some of th

Re: Guideline To Update Copyright Header

mebody other > that Pivotal and Quickstep Technologies. For example, I definitely see > Google and a few > others in the codebase. > > Thanks, > Roman. > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 4:41 PM, Jignesh Patel wrote: >>> +1 to keeping the NOTICE file as short as possible. So

Re: [jira] [Commented] (QUICKSTEP-20) Add parser support for SQL window aggregation function

Great point Julian and something that I have been thinking about too. I’d love to kick off a discussion to see how we can find a way to make this work. I’d love to give a talk to the Calcite team sometime later on this summer (July?) on Quickstep and explore this very synergy. Some of the ORC

Re: Guideline To Update Copyright Header

> +1 to keeping the NOTICE file as short as possible. Some projects get into > the habit of adding copyrights & notices merely out of “courtesy” but that > imposes a burden on downstream projects (who are obliged by the ASL to pass > on the NOTICE file intact). > > Julian Thanks Julian for th

Re: Guideline To Update Copyright Header

Thanks Roman! To not disturb the ongoing work in existing PRs, I can take care of fixing the copyright in all existing files once we have closed the existing PRs (upto PR #28) . I’ll write a sed script to make the switch. Tentatively, lets plan on running this script this on Thursday 6/16 at n

Re: Code Style Guidelines and Code Review pages added to ASF wiki

d running > clang-format (with a suitably modified style file based on > google-style-guide) as a pre-push git-hook? > > >> On Jun 11, 2016, at 19:17, Jignesh Patel wrote: >> >> Folks: Added two pages to the ASF wiki under the How-to page. You can visit >&

Code Style Guidelines and Code Review pages added to ASF wiki

Folks: Added two pages to the ASF wiki under the How-to page. You can visit them by going here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/QUICKSTEP/How-to+articles Comments welcome! Cheers, Jignesh  

Re: Travis Vector_Copy_Elision_Level

Great idea Nav. I have no objections. Cheers, Jignesh > On Jun 8, 2016, at 8:45 PM, Navneet Potti wrote: > > I noticed that we only run Travis with copy elision levels set to the two > non-default cases. The default case, which is also the only one that’s turned > out to be useful in the be

Re: [FINAL DRAFT] Incubator PMC Board Report - June 2016 -- feedback

k through the board minutes. > > Julian > > [1] > https://www.apache.org/foundation/records/minutes/2016/board_minutes_2016_04_20.txt > > <https://www.apache.org/foundation/records/minutes/2016/board_minutes_2016_04_20.txt> > >> On Jun 7, 2016, at 6

Re: Where are design discussions happening?

ns. I recommend that you try to use your apache > ID for as many as possible. JIRA makes it too easy to create new users. > > Julian > > >> On Jun 7, 2016, at 6:03 AM, Jignesh Patel wrote: >> >> Anyone know how to file a Jira for Quickstep? My Jira login is

Re: [FINAL DRAFT] Incubator PMC Board Report - June 2016 -- feedback

Hi Julian and Marvin: Changes made to https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/June2016 . Thanks for the feedback! Good to know about not using wiki markup. The wiki edit page is confusing as it shows in the bottom pane the markup syntax. That seems to encou

Re: Where are design discussions happening?

Anyone know how to file a Jira for Quickstep? My Jira login is “jignesh” — I can’t find a “create button” Another question — there appears to be too many different logins. Not sure if I am doing something wrong, and not finding a way to have a unified way of managing my identity across git, Jir

Re: Logo?

rt + cute animal mascot has worked well for a lot of Apache projects. > > This guy (a Basilisk lizard) seems appropriate: > > https://i.ytimg.com/vi/PgSvN70lJ6w/hqdefault.jpg > > The swoop of his tail could be incorporated into the flourish of the > capital 'Q'. >

Re: Logo?

Great to hear from our resident marketing guru. Awesome suggestion Greg! Here is another design. It has the logo and the word art with the full system name in it. Comments Greg? I may have misunderstood what you were suggesting. Powerpoint is also attached if someone is feeling adventurous. No

Logo?

Hello Quickstep-pers: I think it would be good to have a logo for the project. I created three simple ones for us to consider. Ideally a logo is distinctive, renders well (so needs to be simple), and reflects the project theme. As many of you may recall, when we started this project, we had a

Re: [GitHub] incubator-quickstep issue #7: Bug fixed in SimpleScalarSeparateChainingHashT...

Intersting that when one comments on a PR the email to this list has the name of the original author of the PR (in this case hbdeshmukh) rather than the person who created the comment. Somewhat misleading. Any tips on how to fix this? Cheers, Jignesh > On Jun 4, 2016, at 3:55 PM, hbdeshmukh

Re: Podling Report Reminder - May 2016

d also have a broader discussion: how do > you intend to meet your goal of "Acquire early adopters". Electing > committers is a consequence of a successful strategy for growing > community, and helps further that growth. > > Julian > > [1] http://community.apache.o

Re: Podling Report Reminder - May 2016

Thanks Julian! What are the guidelines for election? We would love to welcome new committers who are starting to make serious contributions. Cheers, Jignesh > On Jun 2, 2016, at 3:28 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: > > The key word here is "elected", as opposed to "showed up in his > congressional

Re: Podling Report Reminder - May 2016

Answers inlined. > On Jun 2, 2016, at 2:55 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: > The report makes the incorrect statement "Last committer joined on May > 30, 2016." No committers have been elected since incubation, as far as > I know. Please correct that statement. I mentioned this last committer date sinc

Travis limit of 4GB

When working with features that touch our template meta-programming framework, sometimes some of our builds fail. Why? Because Travis has a 4GB memory+swap limit, and when compiling with aggressive vector copy elision, the underlying VM runs of of memory (happens more often with gcc than clang).

Re: Update on the Quickstep project

Great tip Roman! I’ll work on a similar page for us over the next week. Cheers, Jignesh > On May 31, 2016, at 12:29 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Jignesh Patel wrote: >> Hi Roman, >> >> I’m guessing that someone closing a PR sh

Re: Update on the Quickstep project

Hi Roman, I’m guessing that someone closing a PR should check if the committer has an ICLA. Or, is submitting a PR and implicit assignment by the code contributor that they are willing to donate the code to Apache? Cheers, Jignesh > On May 31, 2016, at 12:21 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > >

Re: Update on the Quickstep project

Thanks Zuyu! I wasn’t there about a while ago, so good to see that it is listed there. I see Siddharth Suresh, Navneet Potti and Craig Chasseur are missing. I believe they have signed the ICLA. Others may be missing too — haven’t done a full check. I wonder if they have misses a step that I

Update on the Quickstep project

Quick update on the Quickstep project: We are now transitioned to ASF. So, no new commits should go to the old repo. The workflow for committers is at: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/QUICKSTEP/Workflow+For+Committers

Re: Podling Report Reminder - May 2016

te Apache infrastructure is painful, but it is part of the process of > incubation. > > Julian > > >> On May 26, 2016, at 5:57 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: >> >> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 5:37 PM, Jignesh Patel wrote: >>> Ah … catching on. So, not merit

Re: Podling Report Reminder - May 2016

Ah … catching on. So, not meritocracy based on that front? > On May 26, 2016, at 6:23 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > Mentors are kind of like managers really ;-) we don't do -- we advise ;-)

Re: Podling Report Reminder - May 2016

I’d respectfully say that transitioning is certainly what Zuyu is working on and we are trying to do that over the next few days (students are all traveling to their internships). But, that is a task not a goal. I’d love to also get help from mentors on hitting our stated goal though :-) Cheer

Re: Podling Report Reminder - May 2016

Great point Julian and thanks for the prod. Here is the first cut. Comments welcome! Will populate the wiki after collecting feedback from this group. ——— Your project name: Quickstep A brief description of your project: Modern servers pack enough storage and computing power that j

Travis

Thanks to Zuyu we now have Travis CI setup for ASF mirror repo. https://travis-ci.org/apache/incubator-quickstep/builds/130675486 . Let us all work on migrating to the Apache repo so that by the end of next week, we don’t need

Re: When do you think you can fully transition to ASF infrastructure?

an > INFRA request. Ask the Geode folks what they had to do to set up Travis. > > Julian > > >> On May 10, 2016, at 3:25 PM, Jignesh Patel wrote: >> >> Hi Julian: The current workflow is to have the PRs go through Travis to make >> the job of the rev

Re: When do you think you can fully transition to ASF infrastructure?

priority stuff block the > important stuff. Moving source control is urgent. I haven’t yet heard a > reason why CI should delay moving source control. > >> On May 10, 2016, at 3:15 PM, Jignesh Patel wrote: >> >> Dear Julian, >> >> You do make a good po

Re: When do you think you can fully transition to ASF infrastructure?

Dear Julian, You do make a good point, but we have a very heavy reliance on the CI and it will certainly help the transition. Since other Apache projects do have a Travis CI, Zuyu has reached out to Roman to see if we can set this up. Agreed about the points that both you and Roman are makin

Re: When do you think you can fully transition to ASF infrastructure?

Hi Julian, I agree with the emails that moving faster is better. Working on it. Is there an easy way to see who has already signed the ICLA for Quickstep? Thanks! Jignesh > On May 9, 2016, at 1:36 AM, Julian Hyde wrote: > > Also, how is the transition to Apache email lists going? I see a

Re: Podling Report Reminder - May 2016

erent organizations, electing the most dedicated as additional > committers > 2. Demonstrate open collaboration and decision making among contributors, > committers and the PPMC in The Apache Way > 3. Create one or more usable official releases of Apache Quickstep > > > On Sun,

Re: Podling Report Reminder - May 2016

I just entered info for Quickstep. Here it is for quick reference. Comments or corrections? Cheers, Jignesh Quickstep Quickstep is a high-performance data processing platform based on a core relational kernel. Quickstep has been incubating since 2016-03-29. Three most important issues to a

Re: Apache Quickstep (incubating) on-boarding

age the team to start using Apache JIRA and the Apache dev list for > everything. > > Julian > > >> On Apr 19, 2016, at 10:33 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: >> >> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Jignesh Patel wrote: >>> To be on the safe side in

Re: Apache Quickstep (incubating) on-boarding

To be on the safe side in 2-3 weeks. But, certainly working on getting there sooner. Cheers, Jignesh > On Apr 19, 2016, at 11:54 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > Awesome! So when do you think you can cut over to ASF Git repo as the single > source of truth (IOW commits happening to that repo,

Re: Apache Quickstep (incubating) on-boarding

> Please give me an example of something that may be painful. We have to go back to each PR and issue them back again in the same order. I don’t see an easy way to do this in github (e.g. reopen a closed PR against a new repo). Maybe I’m missing something. >> The cloning came somewhat of a surp

Re: Apache Quickstep (incubating) on-boarding

gt;> On Apr 18, 2016, at 4:02 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: >> >> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Jignesh Patel wrote: >>> I can certainly do this. >>> >>> Quick questions: WE have a bunch of PR open on the current github repo >>> off pivotalsoft

Re: Apache Quickstep (incubating) on-boarding

before the students get off to the end-of semester sprint). If this is hard, then that is ok. We can do as you suggest, but it sets us back a bit. Regards, Jignesh > On Apr 18, 2016, at 6:02 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Jignesh Patel wrote:

Re: Apache Quickstep (incubating) on-boarding

I can certainly do this. Quick questions: WE have a bunch of PR open on the current github repo off pivotalsoftware. Can we re-create the new Apache Quickstep github clone in 10 days to give all of us a chance to “wrap up.” Or perhaps there is a better solution. Cheers, Jignesh > On Apr 18,

Re: Twitter account?

Great idea Julian! I’ll create one later on tonight. Cheers, Jignesh > On Apr 18, 2016, at 3:33 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: > > Do you think it would be useful to have a project twitter account? > > I tweeted about Quickstep a couple of days ago[1] and I would have referenced > @ApacheQuickstep

Re: Apache Quickstep (incubating) on-boarding

Thanks Roman for all your help with getting Quickstep on Apache. Two quick notes: #1: The ICLA that you had for Pivotal (to get you the public github repo) doesn’t transfer to Apache. Hence the request for the new ICLA below. #2: Here are the address to send emails to get you on the official