Thu, 10 Feb 2011 17:46:50 + -n
Dan Creswell írta:
> Uhm, one more follow-up and I'll shut-up
No please, do not stop :-)
I like these discussions, see below.
> Note this isn't about technical superiority, it's about mindset and
> education. Google GFS isn't particularly clever or technica
As I recall, while the code was still at Sun, there were thoughts about making
Mahalo XA-compliant.
And as more general comment, taking into account both comments on Outrigger,
and the TransactionManager, perhaps there should be an effort to look at all
the default services supplied with River,
All -
I'm at the beginning of moving all my Jini-related projects away from java.net.
Does anyone have any opinions on which particular 'brand' of project hosting is
a 'good one'? (in whatever terms you define that)
Immediate considerations are sourceforge, and GitHub (although I've not yet
u
XA-compliant - red rag to a bull that is.can't keep my mouth shut
XA and two-phase commit tend to go hand in hand and whilst that's certainly
the current Jini spec it has some dark corners progress wise we might want
to look at. This might entail some changes to the spec or at least some
a
On 11 February 2011 08:00, Zsolt Kúti wrote:
> Thu, 10 Feb 2011 17:46:50 + -n
> Dan Creswell írta:
>
> > Uhm, one more follow-up and I'll shut-up
> No please, do not stop :-)
> I like these discussions, see below.
>
> > Note this isn't about technical superiority, it's about mindset and
On 11 February 2011 08:56, Dan Creswell wrote:
> XA-compliant - red rag to a bull that is.can't keep my mouth shut
>
I'm not saying we SHOULD, but I know that mahalo and TransactionManager
changes were being talked about publicly towards the end of Sun's tenure as
Jini's custodian.
>
>
I'd say SourceForge or GitHub. SourceForge I think is more rounded at the
moment, offers git and mercurial (and svn too I recall).
If what you need though is basically source code control, I'd say GitHub is
the better option.
On 11 February 2011 08:48, Calum Shaw-Mackay wrote:
> All -
>
> I'm at
GitHub has great popular momentum and it doesn't appear to be letting
up - although each of these hosting sites has had its day in the sun.
We switched away from java.net to GH for our code repository and
Google Code for documentation, releases, and issue tracking, as we
felt the tools on GC were
Sourceforge still is Subversion and CVS, isn't it?
I usually use GitHub for my open source stuff. Seems to be fine. Also
Gitorious, which has the added benefit of being open source itself so if you
like it, you just grab it and install it :)
On 11Feb, 2011, at 09:48 , Calum Shaw-Mackay wrote:
Nope, SF does Git and Mercurial as well. Blitz was on svn, then went hg and
is now git
On 11 February 2011 09:29, De Groot, Cees wrote:
> Sourceforge still is Subversion and CVS, isn't it?
>
> I usually use GitHub for my open source stuff. Seems to be fine. Also
> Gitorious, which has the ad
I've never had a problem with bitbucket.org, which is Mercurial and
has a nice wiki and bug tracker. I don't know if it ticks all your
boxes though.
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:46 AM, Dan Creswell wrote:
> Nope, SF does Git and Mercurial as well. Blitz was on svn, then went hg and
> is now git...
As you might have noticed, still a small hickup on the production website.
No CMS updates for now.
Gr. Sim
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 2:58 AM, Sim IJskes - QCG wrote:
> Assuming you used 'spelunk: to explore unknown territory' you need to
> explain this some more.
>
> What was done wrong? How could we have done this better?
Yes you have captured the intent of my metaphor, and no I really
didn't mean to c
On 11-02-11 13:34, Benson Margulies wrote:
Holding a formal vote as a way of discovering (e.g. spelunking,
humorously) whether a consensus exists is fine. My point, such as it
was, is that once you have a supply of -1 votes, you're really done.
It doesn't matter exactly how much time has passed,
Sim IJskes - QCG wrote:
On 11-02-11 13:34, Benson Margulies wrote:
Holding a formal vote as a way of discovering (e.g. spelunking,
humorously) whether a consensus exists is fine. My point, such as it
was, is that once you have a supply of -1 votes, you're really done.
It doesn't matter exactly h
Hi Calum,
I moved Rio to GitHub, and created google group mailing lists for users and
developers.
HTH
Dennis
On Feb 11, 2011, at 348AM, Calum Shaw-Mackay wrote:
> All -
>
> I'm at the beginning of moving all my Jini-related projects away from
> java.net.
>
> Does anyone have any opinions
On 11-02-11 15:17, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
there is considerable opposition to dropping Java 5 support at this
time. The real question is whether we had allowed long enough for anyone
who objected to dropping 1.4 to say so. I think we have.
I do too. How do we proceed from here? SVN is up agai
Sim IJskes - QCG wrote:
On 11-02-11 15:17, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
there is considerable opposition to dropping Java 5 support at this
time. The real question is whether we had allowed long enough for anyone
who objected to dropping 1.4 to say so. I think we have.
I do too. How do we proceed
On 11-02-11 12:38, Sim IJskes - QCG wrote:
As you might have noticed, still a small hickup on the production website.
No CMS updates for now.
All is ok now. Only content fixes and missing links.
Gr. Sim
--
QCG, Software voor het MKB, 071-5890970, http://www.qcg.nl
Quality Consultancy Group b
Patricia Shanahan wrote:
Sim IJskes - QCG wrote:
On 11-02-11 13:34, Benson Margulies wrote:
Holding a formal vote as a way of discovering (e.g. spelunking,
humorously) whether a consensus exists is fine. My point, such as it
was, is that once you have a supply of -1 votes, you're really done.
I
Sim IJskes - QCG wrote:
Sim IJskes +1
Jeff Ramsdale +1 (non-binding)
Patricia Shanahan +1
jgr...@simulexinc.com +1 (non-binding)
Dan Creswell +1 (non-binding)
Tom Hobbs +1
Peter Firmstone +1
Dennis Reedy +1 (non-binding)
Greg Trasuk +1
Gr. Sim
We need to update our future roadmap on the webs
21 matches
Mail list logo
