+1
We require at least one or two reviewers review for java-chassis in practice.
We can make it required by adding this configuration.
-- --
??: "zzzwjm";
: 2019??4??3??(??) 10:23
??: "dev";
: Re: [DISCUSS] Require the rev
Hello All,
This is a call for a Vote to release Apache ServiceComb Java-Chassis
version 1.2.0
Release Notes :
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12321626&version=12344561
Release Candidate :
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/servicecomb/servicecomb-java-chassi
+1
zhang_...@boco.com.cn 于2019年4月3日周三 下午3:25写道：
> +1
>
> > 在 2019年4月3日，下午2:55，Zheng Feng 写道：
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just wonder if we can enable this setting [1] on servicecomb-pack [2]
> and
> > it could be helpful when reviewing the PR. I think at least one people
> > review the changes and ap
java-chassis:
we have provide a new module named "inspector" to inspect internal data
of a microservice instance.
currently we only have one feature in inspector: view/test/download
schemas
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCB-1188
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12961872/
Hi all,
I had one from the servicecomb-pack [1] which needs to implement the LRA
spec. I think the student could learn
1. cooperate with the open source community. The LRA spec [2] is under the
microprofile currently.
2. strong programming skill.
The other question is we have to be the mentor to
Hello All,
As we know that Apache is an approved organization for GSOC 2019 so
ServiceComb being an Apache project also has an opportunity to engage in
this program.
Currently we have not listed any ideas for GSOC 2019 for ServiceComb so if
someone from Java-Chassis, Service-Center, Saga & Pack h
+1 binding
Checks Done:
- Hashes and Signature is good
- Archive matching the Git tag
- LICENSE, NOTICE exist
- ASF headers present in relevant files
- mvn clean install
Regards
Asif
On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 1:42 PM Willem Jiang wrote:
> +1.
>
> The git tag is right, and commits has the latest f
Hello All,
We are glad to announce that ServiceComb community has approved the Apache
ServiceComb Service-Center 1.2.0 release with the following results:
+1 binding: 4 (Willem Jiang, Cuiyihua, Liubao, Mohammad Asif Siddiqui)
We will be publishing the release binaries soon.
Thanks All for your
+1 binding
Checks Done :
- Hashes and Signature is good
- Archive matching the Git tag
- LICENSE, NOTICE exist
- ASF headers present in relevant files
- Compiled code from source
- Ran Test in Windows, Mac & Linux
Regards
Asif
On 2019/03/29 07:35:01, Mohammad Asif Siddiqui w
Hi All,
This vote is closed now and we will be announcing the results shortly.
Thanks All for helping to verify the release.
Regards
Asif
On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 1:05 PM Mohammad Asif Siddiqui <
asifdxtr...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> This is a call for a Vote to release Apache ServiceCom
+1.
The git tag is right, and commits has the latest fix of issue we found
in last round release.
I verified the staging repo by running the demo test against it.
The release kits looks good to me.
Willem Jiang
Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: 姜宁willem
On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 6:23 AM Mohammad Asif Si
+1
> 在 2019年4月3日，下午2:55，Zheng Feng 写道：
>
> Hi,
>
> I just wonder if we can enable this setting [1] on servicecomb-pack [2] and
> it could be helpful when reviewing the PR. I think at least one people
> review the changes and approve before merging it. We have to raise a JIRA
> for the infra tea
+1 for it.
We could start from servicecomb-pack project first. We could enable
this feature for the other sub projects if it goes well.
Any thoughts?
Willem Jiang
Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: 姜宁willem
On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 2:56 PM Zheng Feng wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I just wonder if we can enable th
13 matches
Mail list logo
