On 8/4/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I like shale-goodies for the group id and shale.goodies for the package
name.
+1
Sean
Craig
On 8/4/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/4/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 8/4/06, Sean Schofield <[
I like shale-goodies for the group id and shale.goodies for the package name.
Sean
On 8/4/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/4/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 8/4/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > shale.goodies.petstore ?
> >
> > I like it
On 8/4/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/4/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > shale.goodies.petstore ?
>
> I like it except for one problem. What is the maven group id? If it
> starts with shale, people browsing ibiblio might get confused and
> wonder where the re
On 8/4/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> shale.goodies.petstore ?
I like it except for one problem. What is the maven group id? If it
starts with shale, people browsing ibiblio might get confused and
wonder where the rest of the stuff is?
The Maven groupId would probably be co
shale.goodies.petstore ?
I like it except for one problem. What is the maven group id? If it
starts with shale, people browsing ibiblio might get confused and
wonder where the rest of the stuff is?
Wendy
Sean
I'm cool with that too. It doesn't have to be a web address :-)
Greg
On Aug 4, 2006, at 2:47 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
On 8/4/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The only problem with com.google is if we move it from being
hosted on
google.com (a distinct possibility at this point.)
On 8/4/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The only problem with com.google is if we move it from being hosted on
google.com (a distinct possibility at this point.)
shale.goodies.petstore ?
--
Wendy
The only problem with com.google is if we move it from being hosted on
google.com (a distinct possibility at this point.)
Sean
On 8/4/06, Greg Reddin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think I prefer that too. shale.org doesn't appeal to me for some
reason I can't really put my finger on.
Greg
On
I think I prefer that too. shale.org doesn't appeal to me for some
reason I can't really put my finger on.
Greg
On Aug 4, 2006, at 2:03 PM, James Mitchell wrote:
I prefer com.google.shalegoodies
Your thoughts?
--
James Mitchell
678.910.8017
On Aug 4, 2006, at 11:30 AM, Sean Schofiel
I prefer com.google.shalegoodies
Your thoughts?
--
James Mitchell
678.910.8017
On Aug 4, 2006, at 11:30 AM, Sean Schofield wrote:
> Lets think on the package names a bit.
OK.
What about just org.shale? So for petstore we have org.shale.petstore
as the package name with org.shale as
> Lets think on the package names a bit.
OK.
What about just org.shale? So for petstore we have org.shale.petstore
as the package name with org.shale as the maven group name.
Craig
Sean
Yep. What we would need to know is the "from" address on the commit emails,
so we know what address to subscribe.
I changed the email from public to moderated so I could discover the sender:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You'd think Google would have figured this stuff out already :-).
Yes but its a wo
I also took the [shale-goodies] prefix off the emails. Users can just
the to address for filtering. We can save the [] notation for
subcategories - google code is already adding that for instance. Plus
then we can have [petstore], etc. to help sort the emails.
Sean
On 8/4/06, Sean Schofield <
On 8/3/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well the email list is not public atm. That's probably the problem.
Yep. What we would need to know is the "from" address on the commit emails,
so we know what address to subscribe.
We could create a shell gmail account for the svn email
Added.
Craig
On 8/3/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
gmail
mwessendorf @
gmail
DOT
com
:)
On 8/3/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well the email list is not public atm. That's probably the problem.
> We could create a shell gmail account for the svn emai
gmail
mwessendorf @
gmail
DOT
com
:)
On 8/3/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well the email list is not public atm. That's probably the problem.
We could create a shell gmail account for the svn emails and have that
same account subscribed to the group. Then set up forwarding
Well the email list is not public atm. That's probably the problem.
We could create a shell gmail account for the svn emails and have that
same account subscribed to the group. Then set up forwarding. That
should work.
Which brings us to the issue of the list permissions. One option is
to req
On 8/3/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Lets think on the package names a bit.
OK.
I set up a google group for
us. I tried adding the svn commit messages to the group but I'm not
sure that's possible. Maybe we just add each "commiter" manually as
we go?
Hmm ... looks like
Lets think on the package names a bit. I set up a google group for
us. I tried adding the svn commit messages to the group but I'm not
sure that's possible. Maybe we just add each "commiter" manually as
we go?
Sean
On 8/3/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/3/06, Sean Schofi
On 8/3/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Any reason why we can't use org.apache.shale for the package names
still? I can't really think of a better package name off hand.
Using org.apache.shale.x would seem to create a false perception that
the goodies were actually a formal
Any reason why we can't use org.apache.shale for the package names
still? I can't really think of a better package name off hand.
Sean
On 8/3/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/3/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm ok with shale-goodies as long as we can rel
On 8/3/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm ok with shale-goodies as long as we can release artifacts as
different versions, etc. I'm assuming that's the case. I think we're
all curious about the google option so lets go ahead with it. We can
always move it in a few months if it
I'm ok with shale-goodies as long as we can release artifacts as
different versions, etc. I'm assuming that's the case. I think we're
all curious about the google option so lets go ahead with it. We can
always move it in a few months if it doesn't pan out. Right now
there;s just shale-petstore
On 8/3/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The only difference between project owner and project member is access to
the admin screens for the project itself. Both have commit rights. I'll set
you as a member if you want just that.
I didn't know that was an option. Just 'member'
On 8/3/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mine is [EMAIL PROTECTED], but please don't make me the owner -- too
much responsibility. Unless 'owner' is the same as committer?
The only difference between project owner and project member is access to
the admin screens for the project
Mine is [EMAIL PROTECTED], but please don't make me the owner -- too
much responsibility. Unless 'owner' is the same as committer?
--
James Mitchell
678.910.8017
On Aug 3, 2006, at 3:08 PM, Craig McClanahan wrote:
On 8/3/06, Greg Reddin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1. I was wanting to
On 8/3/06, Greg Reddin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What about just adding shale-petstore as part of shale-goodies? Was
that just a thing of getting wires crossed or did you intend for it
to be a separate project?
It was definitely "great minds thinking alike at the same time" ... :-)
I thin
What about just adding shale-petstore as part of shale-goodies? Was
that just a thing of getting wires crossed or did you intend for it
to be a separate project?
Greg
On Aug 3, 2006, at 2:26 PM, Sean Schofield wrote:
And I just set up a shale-petstore ;-)
Do you envision this being more
And I just set up a shale-petstore ;-)
Do you envision this being more then the petstore app? Also, are we
sure we want google as opposed to dev.java.net? I don't know much
about the google option.
It seems like we can have discussion via a google group. What about
distribution of jar files?
On 8/3/06, Greg Reddin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1. I was wanting to figure out what all that google open source
stuff was about anyway. But I'm cool with either google or java.net.
I just set up "shale-goodies" for us at Google[1]. Note that you must have
a GMail account to log in with
+1. I was wanting to figure out what all that google open source
stuff was about anyway. But I'm cool with either google or java.net.
Greg
On Aug 3, 2006, at 1:25 PM, Sean Schofield wrote:
I'm considering an option that Craig mentioned earlier - moving this
to google's new open source area
Yes, nothing wrong with hosting this on java.net
+1 from me
On 8/3/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/3/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm considering an option that Craig mentioned earlier - moving this
> to google's new open source area. While I understand the
On 8/3/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm considering an option that Craig mentioned earlier - moving this
to google's new open source area. While I understand the reasons for
the tight restrictions that ASF has, it makes it difficult to host a
fully functional sample app using s
On 8/3/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm considering an option that Craig mentioned earlier - moving this
to google's new open source area. While I understand the reasons for
the tight restrictions that ASF has, it makes it difficult to host a
fully functional sample app using s
I'm considering an option that Craig mentioned earlier - moving this
to google's new open source area. While I understand the reasons for
the tight restrictions that ASF has, it makes it difficult to host a
fully functional sample app using several different technologies.
On google (and presumab
35 matches
Mail list logo
