Thanks Alex,
I've merged the changes for SOLR-16852
On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 10:51 AM Houston Putman wrote:
> Yeah that was moved without fixing the script. So fixing the script is the
> way to go.
>
> - Houston
>
> On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 1:44 PM Alex Deparvu wrote:
>
> > Looking for some help on
Yeah that was moved without fixing the script. So fixing the script is the
way to go.
- Houston
On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 1:44 PM Alex Deparvu wrote:
> Looking for some help on creating the feature branch, I have a failure due
> to the fact that SolrVersion class moved:
>
> Q: Shall I run 'python3
Looking for some help on creating the feature branch, I have a failure due
to the fact that SolrVersion class moved:
Q: Shall I run 'python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/addVersion.py 9.5.0' in folder
'/Users/alexdeparvu/.solr-releases/9.4.0/solr' (y/n): y
.
changing version to 9.5.0...
File
"/Use
Thank you David. Yes I got the feeling I needed to create the freeze
branch, but I could not figure out the releaseWizard. I am stuck in some
setup limbo. Will try to skip over the key setup (and jira permissions and
so on) and jump straight to the branch creation.
Is this all documented anywhere?
Alex, *normally* as the release manager, you designate in advance the
feature freeze date & time and then at that time cut the release branch.
Ideally, there is then some time after that in which a RC is built
(multiple days). This time, it's too late; it's all last-minute... but
just telling you
I understand we still don't have a feature freeze, right? I'm planning on
merging SOLR-16852 for 9.4 unless there are any objections.
On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 11:35 AM Eric Pugh
wrote:
> So, I’m thinking that SOLR-14496 probably needs more tests and eyeballs,
> so don’t hold up the release for it.
So, I’m thinking that SOLR-14496 probably needs more tests and eyeballs, so
don’t hold up the release for it. Hopefully it makes it!
> On Oct 2, 2023, at 2:01 PM, Alex Deparvu wrote:
>
> Another quick update.
>
> There are 2 things pending and wanted to check on the progress
> - https://is
Another quick update.
There are 2 things pending and wanted to check on the progress
- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17005 seems to be a
regression in the start script on Windows. it looks like this needs to
block the release. please correct if I misunderstood the priority.
- https:
I added a blocker Jira for one solrbot upgrade for a CVE. Please check. Good
luck with the release, I’ll not be available for the next few days.
Jan Høydahl
> 30. sep. 2023 kl. 00:02 skrev Eric Pugh :
>
> If SOLR-14496, https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1954 ends up getting
> reviewed with
If SOLR-14496, https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1954 ends up getting
reviewed with no issues, I’m hoping to get it into 9.4…. Since we have basic
auth added to prometheus as well!
> On Sep 29, 2023, at 1:45 PM, Alex Deparvu wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Just a quick status update
> - SOLR-16994 l
Hi,
Just a quick status update
- SOLR-16994 looks almost complete: PR was reviewed, I'm not sure if there
is more work pending
- SOLR-16644 was merged and backported
- SOLR-16985 - lucene upgrade is almost complete. there are no more
failures (still running one single test a few more times just
There is no feature freeze yet (there is no branch_9_4), thus no necessity
to ask permission.
~ David
On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 10:34 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'd like to merge SOLR-16644, please. I think it is low risk, since it
> affects only the start scrip
I'd like to merge SOLR-16644, please. I think it is low risk, since it
affects only the start script and fixes the way a low entropy warning is
generated.
On Fri, 29 Sept 2023 at 03:19, Alex Deparvu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It would be unfortunate to get this close and miss out on the Lucene
> release.
Hi,
It would be unfortunate to get this close and miss out on the Lucene
release. I would want to give it one more day, if things do not work out, I
will go ahead with the release.
best,
alex
On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 2:25 PM Jan Høydahl wrote:
> I see there is energy and traction into finaliz
I see there is energy and traction into finalizing the Lucene 9.8 integration,
so that's fine as long as we believe the risk to be low-ish.
Jan
> 28. sep. 2023 kl. 21:53 skrev Anshum Gupta :
>
> I don't like holding up releases, but it's nice to not have too many
> releases from an operational
By default, Solr returns all metrics, of which there are a ton of them!
That's great for looking at metrics if you are exploring them for the first
time. But as you'll see in the ref guide, there are many filtering options
which I would consider to be mandatory if you are going to use metrics "for
I don't like holding up releases, but it's nice to not have too many
releases from an operational standpoint. If fixing Solr for the Lucene
upgrade will take time, I think it's worth the trade-off and moving forward
with the older version of Lucene.
On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 6:05 AM Jan Høydahl wro
Christine
From: dev@solr.apache.org At: 09/28/23 14:05:25 UTC+1:00To: dev@solr.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] 9.4 release
Can I propose we do NOT hold the 9.4 release to add the (too fresh) Lucene 9.8?
We can do a rapid 9.5 with any benefits reaped from the new Lucene version.
Jan
> 28.
I'd like to raise an issue that I'm having with Solr 9.3 that might make a
good case for getting another release (9.3.1 or 9.4) out soon.
I've had a 9.3 cluster of 180 nodes up and running for about a week. After
the weekend, I noticed that metrics from the cluster were failing to ship.
Upon inves
Can I propose we do NOT hold the 9.4 release to add the (too fresh) Lucene 9.8?
We can do a rapid 9.5 with any benefits reaped from the new Lucene version.
Jan
> 28. sep. 2023 kl. 00:36 skrev Alex Deparvu :
>
> Hi,
>
> Some updates to share on the upgrade.
> I have identified a cause for most
Hi,
Some updates to share on the upgrade.
I have identified a cause for most of the failures and pushed a fix. this
comment has all the details if anyone is interested in taking a look
https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1958#issuecomment-1736170176
I have also sent an email to lucene dev list to
Hi,
It seems a lot of the upgrade failures are somehow related to
the CollapsingQParser (
https://solr.apache.org/guide/solr/latest/query-guide/collapse-and-expand-results.html
).
If anyone is familiar with this code, I would appreciate a look at the PR,
maybe something pops up.
best
alex
On
Hi,
To prepare for the release I opened an 'early' Lucene 9.8.0 upgrade PR for
review. There is a large number of tests failing, if anyone has some time I
would appreciate a hand.
Tracking failures here
https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1958#issuecomment-1734473783
best,
alex
On Mon, Sep
Good call Houston. I have created a Jira for the Lucene 9.8 upgrade and
marked it as blocker for Solr 9.4
I will take a look once the Lucene release is out, if no one else picks it
up first.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16985
best
alex
On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 7:42 AM Houston Putma
It looks like the next Lucene version might be released soon, so we may
want to wait for that. It will come with Java 21 support for the
vector/memory map stuff.
- Houston
On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 10:53 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Alex and Jan!
>
> On Fri,
Thanks Alex and Jan!
On Fri, 15 Sept, 2023, 2:10 am Jan Høydahl, wrote:
> Sure, it's all yours..
> You'll find what you need in the Release Wizard. Just run this script to
> get going.
> https://github.com/apache/solr/blob/main/dev-tools/scripts/releaseWizard.py
>
> Jan
>
> > 14. sep. 2023 kl. 2
Sure, it's all yours..
You'll find what you need in the Release Wizard. Just run this script to get
going.
https://github.com/apache/solr/blob/main/dev-tools/scripts/releaseWizard.py
Jan
> 14. sep. 2023 kl. 21:53 skrev Alex Deparvu :
>
> Hi,
>
> I would be happy to give this a go (if provided
Hi,
I would be happy to give this a go (if provided ample hand holding).
best,
alex
On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 9:32 AM Jan Høydahl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Branch_9x has accumulated 4 features, 18 improvements, 2 optimizations, 21
> bug fixes, 7 "other", and a bunch of dependency updates. It's been al
Hi,
Branch_9x has accumulated 4 features, 18 improvements, 2 optimizations, 21 bug
fixes, 7 "other", and a bunch of dependency updates. It's been almost 2 months
since 9.3.
I propose cutting the branch and preparing first RC on Tuesday Sept 26th,
twelve days from today.
I volunteer as RM, but
29 matches
Mail list logo
