Ok false alarm I think missed updating the separate solr-test-framework
line in my build (need to parameterize that version or something), I have
other problems with the upgrade now such as import
org.apache.lucene.util.QuickPatchThreadsFilter going away, but the class
def problem disappeared
On
I might be finding something. I just tried upgrading JesterJ to 9.1 from
9.0 and got
org/apache/lucene/codecs/lucene90/Lucene90Codec
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
org/apache/lucene/codecs/lucene90/Lucene90Codec
at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase.(LuceneTestCase.java:663)
at
You're good to go, Michael. Wish you all the best!
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 1:28 AM Michael Gibney
wrote:
>
> Great, thanks Alessandro! Once I get the go-ahead from Ishan that he's
> done wrapping up the loose ends from the 9.1.0 release, I'll build an
> RC based on
Great, thanks Alessandro! Once I get the go-ahead from Ishan that he's
done wrapping up the loose ends from the 9.1.0 release, I'll build an
RC based on 2c669fe43777342758a0042b821efb6aa3ec15b6.
Michael
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 12:47 PM Alessandro Benedetti
wrote:
>
> From my side I merged
>From my side I merged everything and I am monitoring Jenkins!
On Mon, 9 Jan 2023, 10:08 Alessandro Benedetti,
wrote:
> Hi Michael, yes! Doing it right now!
>
> Cheers
> --
> *Alessandro Benedetti*
> Director @ Sease Ltd.
> *Apache Lucene/Solr Committer*
> *Apache Solr
Hi Michael, yes! Doing it right now!
Cheers
--
*Alessandro Benedetti*
Director @ Sease Ltd.
*Apache Lucene/Solr Committer*
*Apache Solr PMC Member*
e-mail: a.benede...@sease.io
*Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied
Consulting | Training | Open Source
Website:
Alessandro, are you still looking to include the SOLR-16588 bugfix?
Ishan, any updates on the handful of tasks that you had mentioned were
still outstanding from the 9.1.0 release? Aside from these two open
questions, it looks like branch_9_1 has settled down with all of the
changes we had
discussing on the PR, once clarified a bit around Lucene94 (and a backport
to Lucene 9.3 ad hoc for 9.1.1) we should be ready to merge and cherry pick!
--
*Alessandro Benedetti*
Director @ Sease Ltd.
*Apache Lucene/Solr Committer*
*Apache Solr PMC Member*
e-mail:
This seems fine to me, assuming no objections from others.
On Wed, Jan 4, 2023 at 4:30 PM Alessandro Benedetti
wrote:
>
> What about including this as well in 9.1.1 :
> https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1255 ?
> It's an annoying neural search bug, and it's pretty much done, just waiting
> for
What about including this as well in 9.1.1 :
https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1255 ?
It's an annoying neural search bug, and it's pretty much done, just waiting
for a few checks and then I'll merge it with the changes!
--
*Alessandro Benedetti*
Director @ Sease Ltd.
On 1/3/23 08:05, Michael Gibney wrote:
and possibly upgrade to Lucene 9.4
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16442
particularly considering:
https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11718
It seems like a bad idea to upgrade a critical component to a new major
or minor version in a bugfix
Thanks! Agreed wrt 9.2 soon w/ Lucene upgrade; but to be explicit: the
SlotAcc deadlock in particular can be addressed in 9.1.1 (by
backporting SOLR-16165). The analyzer SPI deadlock (requires Lucene
9.4) is separate.
On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 11:02 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya
wrote:
>
> The slot
The slot accumulator deadlocks make a good case for doing a 9.2 soon
(with the Lucene upgrade).
On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 9:30 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya
wrote:
>
> +1 to SOLR-16165.
> Let's not do a Lucene upgrade in a bugfix release.
>
> I have some pending steps from the post release of 9.1, I'll
+1 to SOLR-16165.
Let's not do a Lucene upgrade in a bugfix release.
I have some pending steps from the post release of 9.1, I'll complete
them in another 48-72 hours. Sorry about the delay.
On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 9:16 PM David Smiley wrote:
>
> +1. Don't add a Lucene upgrade though :-)
>
> ~
+1. Don't add a Lucene upgrade though :-)
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 10:05 AM Michael Gibney
wrote:
> Wondering what folks think of backporting some classloading
> deadlock-related fixes:
>
Wondering what folks think of backporting some classloading
deadlock-related fixes:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16165
and possibly upgrade to Lucene 9.4
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16442
particularly considering:
https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/11718
The main
Still looking for a PR approval for the protobuf upgrade:
https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1252
There's this one I would like to include:
https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1245
It's almost ready!
--
*Alessandro Benedetti*
Director @ Sease Ltd.
*Apache Lucene/Solr Committer*
*Apache Solr PMC Member*
e-mail: a.benede...@sease.io
*Sease* - Information Retrieval
More specifically:
SOLR-16443: Upgrade Jackson bom to 2.13.4.20221013 (#1106)
SOLR-16568: Update FasterXML Woodstox to 6.4.0 (#1209)
I will push those cherry-picks tonight after my local build succeeds.
And I created a new JIRA issue for Protobuf:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16598
Thanks for volunteering!
I'd like to propose that the upgrades to dependencies due to CVEs be
back-ported to 9.1.1. I can help with this. One example I see is
woodstox-core.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at
Thanks for volunteering, Michael.
On Thu, 22 Dec, 2022, 8:14 pm Michael Gibney,
wrote:
> I'd like to get the ball rolling on a 9.1.1 bugfix release, and
> volunteer to be release manager. There aren't very many bugfixes
> accumulated since 9.1.0 on `branch_9_1`, but SOLR-16585 in particular
>
I'd like to get the ball rolling on a 9.1.1 bugfix release, and
volunteer to be release manager. There aren't very many bugfixes
accumulated since 9.1.0 on `branch_9_1`, but SOLR-16585 in particular
(NPE on MatchAllDocs pagination) should be fixed asap.
I'm thinking to build a release candidate
22 matches
Mail list logo
