On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 19:47:40 -0600, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 4:56 PM -0800 3/17/05, Dakota Jack wrote:
> >I don't want to do much of anything in the action. Rather, I want the
> >reading of the first form into FirstFormAction and the population of
> >the second form handled by
At 4:56 PM -0800 3/17/05, Dakota Jack wrote:
I don't want to do much of anything in the action. Rather, I want the
reading of the first form into FirstFormAction and the population of
the second form handled by the framework which means that it has to be
available to the Action. The best solution
I don't want to do much of anything in the action. Rather, I want the
reading of the first form into FirstFormAction and the population of
the second form handled by the framework which means that it has to be
available to the Action. The best solution, I assume, would be to
have an overloaded si
At 2:36 PM -0800 3/17/05, Dakota Jack wrote:
Suppose, Joe, that we have first.jsp and second.jsp,
FirstActionForm.java and SecondActionForm.java. We call MyAction.java
as the action for in first.jsp and want to setup the
values in second.jsp via SecondActionForm.java. How would you
configure the
Suppose, Joe, that we have first.jsp and second.jsp,
FirstActionForm.java and SecondActionForm.java. We call MyAction.java
as the action for in first.jsp and want to setup the
values in second.jsp via SecondActionForm.java. How would you
configure the for this use case, which I think is the
mos
I don't know how to state the problem more simply. I cannot believe
that this is not obvious. It is definitely in the top ten of
difficulties discussed.
If you want to go from page A to page B where they have different
ActionForms, as they should, and you want to use one Action and not
instantia
Without a concrete usecase, I doubt that I would. Without changing
other aspects of the default request processing, I don't see how it
would make a shred of difference.
The very best thing would be a patch to either the MailReader or
Exercises example, that not only demonstrated the problem, but c
At 1:13 PM -0800 3/17/05, Dakota Jack wrote:
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 14:55:17 -0600, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At 9:58 AM -0800 3/17/05, Dakota Jack wrote:
>Cool, I think. Do you mean you can do this with the ?
> Sorry if this is a really stupid question. I have not looked at the
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 14:55:17 -0600, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 9:58 AM -0800 3/17/05, Dakota Jack wrote:
> >Cool, I think. Do you mean you can do this with the ?
> > Sorry if this is a really stupid question. I have not looked at the
> >configuration of v1.3. If this is going
At 9:58 AM -0800 3/17/05, Dakota Jack wrote:
Cool, I think. Do you mean you can do this with the ?
Sorry if this is a really stupid question. I have not looked at the
configuration of v1.3. If this is going to be possible, you will have
solved half the qusetions on the list.
Yep:
http://svn.apa
--- "Pilgrim, Peter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Konstantin Priblouda
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> > --- Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > What is your antecedent for "this"? Having an
> > > ActionCommand
> > > interface?
Date: 2005-03-17T11:33:29
Editor: FrankZammetti
Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki
Page: StrutsMultipleActionForms
URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsMultipleActionForms
no comment
Change Log:
--
@@ -50,6 +
Date: 2005-03-17T11:24:16
Editor: FrankZammetti
Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki
Page: StrutsMultipleActionForms
URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsMultipleActionForms
no comment
Change Log:
--
@@ -46,6 +
Trying to get to the Wiki now to add a comment... Seem to be having some
network issues right now...
--
Frank W. Zammetti
Founder and Chief Software Architect
Omnytex Technologies
http://www.omnytex.com
On Thu, March 17, 2005 2:06 pm, Dakota Jack said:
> I really understand your pain, Frank. I
I really understand your pain, Frank. I don't understand why Ted
thinks this is not a central problem or why it is okay for one action
to process and another action to setup but not okay for one action to
do both. I do think that somehow combining setup and processing is
crucial. We all have to
Date: 2005-03-17T11:01:01
Editor: DakotaJack
Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki
Page: StrutsMultipleActionForms
URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsMultipleActionForms
no comment
New Page:
##language:en
== Multiple ActionForms in ActionMapping ==
There is no way in Struts to handle
Le Mar 16, 2005, à 12:51 AM, Matthias Wessendorf a écrit :
David,
No, I don't have anything JSF-specific. The extracted version is
simply decoupled from Struts. Otherwise, it's just vanilla Tiles,
except that I
So you have no facility like a ViewHandler or something like that?
Have you looked at
On Thu, March 17, 2005 12:56 pm, Dakota Jack said:
> This means that you EITHER have to use two actions, leading to all the
> nonsense of chaining actions (why do you think that is recurrent,
> Ted?), OR you have to make PAGE-A the same as PAGE-B, which you can
> only do for so long unless you want
Date: 2005-03-17T10:21:40
Editor: DakotaJack
Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki
Page: FrontPage
URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/FrontPage
no comment
Change Log:
--
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
* StrutsFunStuff
* Stru
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 17:45:40 -, Pilgrim, Peter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It is also instructive to observe the growing popularity (in
> > enterprise Java circles) of IoC approaches to instantiating business
> > and service objects (Spring, Hivemind, PicoContainer, etc.), which are
> > imp
Cool, I think. Do you mean you can do this with the ?
Sorry if this is a really stupid question. I have not looked at the
configuration of v1.3. If this is going to be possible, you will have
solved half the qusetions on the list.
Jack
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 09:06:04 -0600, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL
According to your logic, Ted, we should not do setups for forms? I
really don't understand your point at all.
Jack
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 10:09:03 -0500, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> People have often brought up things like multiple ActionsForms up on
> the user list, but it seems like
See mix-ins!
> -Original Message-
> From: Craig McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
===/===
>
>
> On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 10:08:15 -0800, Dakota Jack
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 09:54:48 -0800, Craig McClanahan
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I agree
I think you are missing my point, Peter. Clearly you can use
different commands in a chain. That is, after all, exactly what you
do do.
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 15:51:18 -, Pilgrim, Peter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
AMEN! +42
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 08:25:04 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Craig McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 5:04 PM
> > To: Struts Developers List; Dakota Jack
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sub
> -Original Message-
> From: Konstantin Priblouda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> --- Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > What is your antecedent for "this"? Having an
> > ActionCommand
> > interface? Using an IoC container as an
> > ActionFactory? Having a
> > Thread
> From: Dakota Jack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
====
>
>
> +42
>
>
> On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 09:23:29 +0100, Manfred Wolff
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Dakota Jack wrote:
> >
> > >The idea, I thought, was to use the Commands to supplant the
> > >RequestProcessor with a composable request pr
> -Original Message-
> From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
====
>
> I've looked at 1.3 and the Chain stuff, but not actually tried it out.
> However the original RequestProcessor is still there and
> presumably still
> works. The default RequestProcessor is now the chain
Author: jmitchell
Date: Thu Mar 17 07:38:19 2005
New Revision: 157938
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=157938
Log:
Specify the pattern for tests, cactus default patter is failing for
SimpleFormBeanForTesting.java and TaglibTestBase.java (Doh)
Modified:
struts/taglib/trunk/pro
Moving thread to DEV
> Ted: how do you use ASP.NET? Do you have a framework you use?
It's under active development, but Spring.Web
[http://opensource.atlassian.com/confluence/spring/display/NET/Spring.Web]
is starting to look very Struts-like. (Not surprising considering the
similaritie
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 06:33:42 -0600, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For the record: Since what I wanted looked more like a Command, I
> dropped the extension to CreateAction. Instead, I wired Spring to
> produce instances of DispatchCommand (in the commons-chain SVN repo),
> and I wrote
I would prefer if we could make
ActionMappings such that a single action could result in the
instantiation of two or more ActionForm objects rather than one.
Done. In Struts 1.3, ActionConfig supports an arbitrary map of
properties. Define one, "secondForm" whose value is the name of
another fo
(It was Konstantin Pribluda that wanted to trash ActionForms.)
People have often brought up things like multiple ActionsForms up on
the user list, but it seems like a misuse of the ActionForm to me.
An ActionForm is best used to represent the input needed to service a request.
Ideally, an Action
On Thu, March 17, 2005 9:25 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> You can't make things idiot-proof because the idiots are too clever.
I have hanging on my office wall a saying I got from an old boss of mine...
"Software development today is a constant struggle between developers
striving to make better
> -Original Message-
> From: Craig McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 5:04 PM
> To: Struts Developers List; Dakota Jack
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: POJO Actions and the ActionCommand interface
> (Re: Configuration inheritance, module init cod
I note below my biggest WISH for Struts that would be easy to
accommodate and which would transform the usefulness of Struts, in my
opinion, in a MAJOR way.
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 06:33:42 -0600, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jack, if you want to throw away ActionForm -- go for
> it!
I don't remember what the resolution was (or if there was one) for
version numbers. This being the first release since taglibs and
tiles were removed from the main distribution, I'm guessing a release
of those should be done as well? Are we calling those 1.3.0 too?
Hubert
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 1
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 19:07:13 -0500, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> :) Hey, don't we have a new tradiition that says the first thing a new
> Committer has to do is volunteer to manage the next release. :)
>
> :) And I'm thinking we just gave someone a shiny new Commiter stripe :)
(Ooooh,
So, as this discussion seems to be winding down, I thought it might
be interesting to share that it turned out to be surpassingly easy to
implement the features I needed as extensions to the struts-core.
This is good, of course, because it lets us defer decisions that
raise strong opinions unti
Date: 2005-03-17T03:20:52
Editor: DuncanMills
Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki
Page: StrutsShale
URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsShale
no comment
Change Log:
--
@@ -23,3 +23,6 @@
* Add some JSF compo
40 matches
Mail list logo
