On 8/18/06, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That would statisfy me. "Current versions" can be versions of the latest release
regardless of vote. While "Past Releases" can be actual GA. That's really a good idea!
Close... "Current Versions" are the latest snapshot docs. But 1.3.5
sti
On 8/18/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/18/06, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please be careful with the terminology. There is no such thing as a
"beta
> release".
As I understand it, test builds are not releases, but once it passes a
vote it is a sanctioned release
Wendy,
That would statisfy me. "Current versions" can be versions of the latest
release regardless of vote. While "Past Releases" can be actual GA. That's
really a good idea!
Paul
Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 8/18/06, Paul Benedict
wrote:
> If this were true, there would be no
On 8/18/06, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If this were true, there would be no 1.2.x link on the sidebar menu. 1.2.9 was
the last GA release, which means anything after that is a snapshot or some beta
release.
So I ask: why is 1.2.x given preference (a version without a label or vo
On 8/18/06, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So I ask: why is 1.2.x given preference (a version without a label or vote),
but not 1.3.5
(versioned and voted)?
First, 1.3.x is given preference, since 1.3.x is the top-level
website. We have a link to 1.2.x because is *not* the head, it's
>>But, the original question was about the sidebar menu. Those are links
to the archival copies for GA releases, not every incidental beta that
we release.
If this were true, there would be no 1.2.x link on the sidebar menu. 1.2.9 was
the last GA release, which means anything after that is a snap
On 8/18/06, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'll take the correction, but I don't understand it. We released a product and
voted it beta --
a beta release? :-)
As mentioned in another message, we can in fact have beta releases.
But, the original question was about the sidebar menu. T
I'll take the correction, but I don't understand it. We released a product and
voted it beta -- a beta release? :-)
Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 8/18/06, Martin Cooper wrote:
> Please be careful with the terminology. There is no such thing as a "beta
> release".
As I understand it
On 8/18/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As I understand it, test builds are not releases, but once it passes a
vote it is a sanctioned release of alpha, beta, or GA quality.
True. The rule is that "releases" are approved by the PMC.
From http://apache.org/dev/release.html
* Relea
On 8/18/06, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please be careful with the terminology. There is no such thing as a "beta
release".
As I understand it, test builds are not releases, but once it passes a
vote it is a sanctioned release of alpha, beta, or GA quality.
I hope so, because I j
On 8/18/06, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I understand both your concerns... But I don't believe it has to be the policy that we
cannot advertise beta releases on the main page too. 1.3.5 is the latest (not the
greatest with no GA) but we still have a link to 1.2.x, why? It is kind
On 8/18/06, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I understand both your concerns... But I don't believe it has to be the
policy that we cannot advertise beta releases on the main page too.
Please be careful with the terminology. There is no such thing as a "beta
release".
1.3.5 is the la
I understand both your concerns... But I don't believe it has to be the policy
that we cannot advertise beta releases on the main page too. 1.3.5 is the
latest (not the greatest with no GA) but we still have a link to 1.2.x, why? It
is kind of silly to a dead branch (there will be no more 1.2) b
On 8/18/06, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Will 1.3.5 appear on the side bar?
Not until it's a GA release, but we could mention it on the front page
below the 1.2.9 section.
It is already on the mirrors, in ibiblio, and on the downloads page.
If wider distribution doesn't turn anyt
After a day or so, the mirrors will have refreshed, and we could
mention it on the downloads page. But, I wouldnt' suggest that we
archive the release documentation on the website until the release
earns GA status and becomes the latest "Best Available Release". As it
stands, some people are still
Kudos to all.
Will 1.3.5 appear on the side bar?
Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thanks so much for mopping this up,
Wendy. It's great to see that
1.3.5 is finally "out there".
Next stop: 2.0.0 :)
-T.
On 8/18/06, Wendy Smoak wrote:
> The Apache Struts team is pleased to announce the re
Thanks so much for mopping this up, Wendy. It's great to see that
1.3.5 is finally "out there".
Next stop: 2.0.0 :)
-T.
On 8/18/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The Apache Struts team is pleased to announce the release of Struts 1.3.5 Beta.
-
The Apache Struts team is pleased to announce the release of Struts 1.3.5 Beta.
Struts 1.3.5 is available in a full distribution, or as separate
library, source, example and documentation distributions.
http://struts.apache.org/download.cgi#struts135
It is also available in the central Mave
18 matches
Mail list logo
