This may seem [OT] to some people on the list, but I hope it drives another
nail into FormDef's coffin. Seriously, who in their right mind would declare a
bean with Java?
Ryan Stewart wrote:
I'll second that. I'm hardly "new," but I much prefer to have everything packaged
as one unit as well
Dave Durham wrote:
> I certainly prefer to have the source code bundled along with the binaries.
>
> As everyone on the list probably knows, Eclipse and other IDEs require the
> source code be "attached" to the libraries for certain features, such
as
> in-line documentation and ctrl-clicking in
Craig McClanahan wrote:
Call it a social experiment :-). I'm continually amazed at how many people
treat open source projects as a binary distribution, and never bother to go
get the source. Several commons packages, as well as Spring, do it this way
... I want to see if it encourages people to
On 12/2/05, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> +1 for the plan, but with the following comment on the release plan
> dependencies:
>
> The release plan is showing Commons Validator 1.1.4 - but the
> website/build.xml has Validator 1.2.0. Also looking at the build.xml, the
> dependency d
On 12/2/05, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also looking at the build.xml, the
> dependency download also includes three Commons components not mentioned on
> the website or in the release plan (Codec 1.2, Collections 3.0 and
> FileUpload 1.0).
Those three are for MyFaces:
http://
01, 2005 5:02 PM
Subject: [VOTE] Confirm Shale 1.0.0 Test Build Release Plan
All of the outstanding issues have been accounted for -- it's time to
release the initial test build of Shale! Given the amount of time since the
1.0.0 release plan was first proposed, I'd like to call for a vot
+1 for the plan, but with the following comment on the release plan
dependencies:
The release plan is showing Commons Validator 1.1.4 - but the
website/build.xml has Validator 1.2.0. Also looking at the build.xml, the
dependency download also includes three Commons components not mentioned on
the
+1 (user vote)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Craig
McClanahan
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 11:02 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: [VOTE] Confirm Shale 1.0.0 Test Build Release Plan
All of the outstanding issues have been
On 12/1/05, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All of the outstanding issues have been accounted for -- it's time to
> release the initial test build of Shale! Given the amount of time since the
> 1.0.0 release plan was first proposed, I'd like to call for a vote
> confirming it:
>
>
+1
On 12/1/05, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All of the outstanding issues have been accounted for -- it's time to
> release the initial test build of Shale! Given the amount of time since the
> 1.0.0 release plan was first proposed, I'd like to call for a vote
> confirming it:
-
+1. Looks like a plan to me.
--
Martin Cooper
On 12/1/05, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> All of the outstanding issues have been accounted for -- it's time to
> release the initial test build of Shale! Given the amount of time since
> the
> 1.0.0 release plan was first proposed
+1
On 12/1/05, Laurie Harper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> L.
>
> Craig McClanahan wrote:
> > All of the outstanding issues have been accounted for -- it's time to
> > release the initial test build of Shale! Given the amount of time since the
> > 1.0.0 release plan was first
+1 (non-binding)
L.
Craig McClanahan wrote:
All of the outstanding issues have been accounted for -- it's time to
release the initial test build of Shale! Given the amount of time since the
1.0.0 release plan was first proposed, I'd like to call for a vote
confirming it:
http://wiki.apache.
+1 (non-binding, "its about time" user vote)
-Rahul
On 12/1/05, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All of the outstanding issues have been accounted for -- it's time to
> release the initial test build of Shale! Given the amount of time since the
> 1.0.0 release plan was first propos
+1 (non-binding)
On Dec 1, 2005, at 4:02 PM, Craig McClanahan wrote:
All of the outstanding issues have been accounted for -- it's time to
release the initial test build of Shale! Given the amount of time
since the
1.0.0 release plan was first proposed, I'd like to call for a vote
confirmin
+1 from Gary VanMatre
-- Original message --
> All of the outstanding issues have been accounted for -- it's time to
> release the initial test build of Shale! Given the amount of time since the
> 1.0.0 release plan was first proposed, I'd like to call for a vote
> con
+1
Craig McClanahan wrote:
All of the outstanding issues have been accounted for -- it's time to
release the initial test build of Shale! Given the amount of time since the
1.0.0 release plan was first proposed, I'd like to call for a vote
confirming it:
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/ShaleRe
All of the outstanding issues have been accounted for -- it's time to
release the initial test build of Shale! Given the amount of time since the
1.0.0 release plan was first proposed, I'd like to call for a vote
confirming it:
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/ShaleRelease100
At this time, I woul
18 matches
Mail list logo
