>>> do you mean to move the plugin out of Struts? Because Dojo is already
> >>> on its own plugin in trunk.
> >>>
> >>> musachy
> >>>
> >>> On 8/18/07, James Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>&
.
musachy
On 8/18/07, James Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 on moving Dojo out of the core to a plugin.
-Original Message-
From: Ian Roughley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2007 1:34 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: Ajax Theme
So let me
On 8/18/07, James Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> +1 on moving Dojo out of the core to a plugin.
> >>
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Ian Roughley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2007 1:34 PM
&
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 on moving Dojo out of the core to a plugin.
-Original Message-
From: Ian Roughley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2007 1:34 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: Ajax Theme
So let me ask this - what is the percentage of co
On 8/18/07, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> do you mean to move the plugin out of Struts? Because Dojo is already
> on its own plugin in trunk.
My question was whether we wanted to keep Dojo as part of the project,
or move it GoogleCode, along with the YUI plugin. I think some of the
PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2007 1:34 PM
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: Re: Ajax Theme
>
> So let me ask this - what is the percentage of code that has changed
> between 2.0.x and 2.1.x as far as the Ajax tags go?
>
> To answer Ted's questions, my fe
+1 on moving Dojo out of the core to a plugin.
-Original Message-
From: Ian Roughley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2007 1:34 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: Ajax Theme
So let me ask this - what is the percentage of code that has changed
between 2.0.x
So let me ask this - what is the percentage of code that has changed
between 2.0.x and 2.1.x as far as the Ajax tags go?
To answer Ted's questions, my feeling to is move them out the core and
into a plugin. There have been quiet a few headaches with dojo upgrades
during the initial ww2 implem
On 2.1 ajax validation will be provided by Dojo by default, but other
libraries can be used easily, (with prototype example):
http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/ajax-validation.html
musachy
On 8/17/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I haven't dived into this part of the source code, but
I haven't dived into this part of the source code, but I've beent
taking "The ajax validation depends on DWR" to mean that we use DWR to
call the usual server-side validators from client-side ajax code. Is
that correct?
Is the use of DWR changing from 2.0.x to 2.1.x?
Does the YUI Ajax plugin supp
The ajax validation depends on DWR
musachy
On 8/15/07, Ian Roughley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is the ajax theme in the 2.0.x branch completely Dojo driven now? If
> so, there seems to be a lot of DWR code that could be removed (i.e. from
> the web.xml and form.ftl). I can open a ticket if th
11 matches
Mail list logo