Re: Ajax Theme

2007-08-20 Thread Musachy Barroso
>>> do you mean to move the plugin out of Struts? Because Dojo is already > >>> on its own plugin in trunk. > >>> > >>> musachy > >>> > >>> On 8/18/07, James Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> > >>&

Re: Ajax Theme

2007-08-19 Thread Frank W. Zammetti
. musachy On 8/18/07, James Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: +1 on moving Dojo out of the core to a plugin. -Original Message- From: Ian Roughley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2007 1:34 PM To: Struts Developers List Subject: Re: Ajax Theme So let me

Re: Ajax Theme

2007-08-19 Thread Musachy Barroso
On 8/18/07, James Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> +1 on moving Dojo out of the core to a plugin. > >> > >> -Original Message- > >> From: Ian Roughley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2007 1:34 PM &

Re: Ajax Theme

2007-08-19 Thread Ian Roughley
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: +1 on moving Dojo out of the core to a plugin. -Original Message- From: Ian Roughley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2007 1:34 PM To: Struts Developers List Subject: Re: Ajax Theme So let me ask this - what is the percentage of co

[S2] [2.1.x] Bundled Plugins (was Re: Ajax Theme)

2007-08-19 Thread Ted Husted
On 8/18/07, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > do you mean to move the plugin out of Struts? Because Dojo is already > on its own plugin in trunk. My question was whether we wanted to keep Dojo as part of the project, or move it GoogleCode, along with the YUI plugin. I think some of the

Re: Ajax Theme

2007-08-18 Thread Musachy Barroso
PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2007 1:34 PM > To: Struts Developers List > Subject: Re: Ajax Theme > > So let me ask this - what is the percentage of code that has changed > between 2.0.x and 2.1.x as far as the Ajax tags go? > > To answer Ted's questions, my fe

RE: Ajax Theme

2007-08-18 Thread James Holmes
+1 on moving Dojo out of the core to a plugin. -Original Message- From: Ian Roughley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2007 1:34 PM To: Struts Developers List Subject: Re: Ajax Theme So let me ask this - what is the percentage of code that has changed between 2.0.x

Re: Ajax Theme

2007-08-18 Thread Ian Roughley
So let me ask this - what is the percentage of code that has changed between 2.0.x and 2.1.x as far as the Ajax tags go? To answer Ted's questions, my feeling to is move them out the core and into a plugin. There have been quiet a few headaches with dojo upgrades during the initial ww2 implem

Re: Ajax Theme

2007-08-17 Thread Musachy Barroso
On 2.1 ajax validation will be provided by Dojo by default, but other libraries can be used easily, (with prototype example): http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/ajax-validation.html musachy On 8/17/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I haven't dived into this part of the source code, but

Re: Ajax Theme

2007-08-17 Thread Ted Husted
I haven't dived into this part of the source code, but I've beent taking "The ajax validation depends on DWR" to mean that we use DWR to call the usual server-side validators from client-side ajax code. Is that correct? Is the use of DWR changing from 2.0.x to 2.1.x? Does the YUI Ajax plugin supp

Re: Ajax Theme

2007-08-15 Thread Musachy Barroso
The ajax validation depends on DWR musachy On 8/15/07, Ian Roughley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is the ajax theme in the 2.0.x branch completely Dojo driven now? If > so, there seems to be a lot of DWR code that could be removed (i.e. from > the web.xml and form.ftl). I can open a ticket if th