2006/6/6, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 6/3/06, Erik Bertelsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have tweaked my build scripts a little and now successfully upgraded
a
> handfull of Struts Action applications from 1.3.0 to 1.3.5-SNAPSHOT /
> (appears to be built on 29 May 2006).
> Seems to
On 6/3/06, Erik Bertelsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have tweaked my build scripts a little and now successfully upgraded a
handfull of Struts Action applications from 1.3.0 to 1.3.5-SNAPSHOT /
(appears to be built on 29 May 2006).
Seems to work well and as the distribution's contents
has cha
2006/5/29, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Meanwhile, we have yet to build a 1.3.x distribution that we care to
publish. What would be most helpful is for people to put the snapshot
through its paces and post any issues now (as Joe) did, rather than
wait for the tag. It is helpful to post "wor
OK, Extras needs a welcome page, and the Taglibs home page could use a
bit more content, but other than that, it seems good to go.
-Ted.
On 5/31/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I got through most of the Action1 site last night, and will try to
make a final pass tonight.
On 5/30/06, T
I got through most of the Action1 site last night, and will try to
make a final pass tonight.
On 5/30/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OK, I'm on it.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands
OK, I'm on it.
On 5/29/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/29/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What kind of work?
Nothing major. Extras needs an index page:
http://struts.apache.org/struts-action/struts-extras/index.html
This Scripting page is out of date:
http://
On 5/29/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/29/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Done. And that leaves no open issues for 1.3.5, (except for the
> documentation which still needs some work.)
What kind of work?
Nothing major. Extras needs an index page:
http://struts.a
On 5/29/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Done. And that leaves no open issues for 1.3.5, (except for the
documentation which still needs some work.)
What kind of work?
-T.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
On 5/29/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OK good plan - I think we should close STR-2527 as fixed in 1.3.5 and
leave tiles to be dealt with under SB-23 (adding a note to port back
the changes to 1.3.x).
Done. And that leaves no open issues for 1.3.5, (except for the
documentation
On 5/29/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/29/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Its resolved except for tiles - from a quick scan there are quite a
> few tiles attributes that don't allow runtime expersions (I've noted
> them on the Jira ticket) - but IMO its not actua
On 5/29/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Its resolved except for tiles - from a quick scan there are quite a
few tiles attributes that don't allow runtime expersions (I've noted
them on the Jira ticket) - but IMO its not actually a bug and we
shouldn't stop 1.3.5 because of it. Rath
On 5/29/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It looks like that we are down to one, that might already be resolved.
Comments?
* http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/STR-2527
Its resolved except for tiles - from a quick scan there are quite a
few tiles attributes that don't allow runtime
On 5/29/06, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am asking about the website, not the builds. I know the developer
builds are always available, but I see no reason why we shouldn't
publish the 1.3.x website on the left-hand bar as we release new
beta versions.
The website is published fro
It looks like that we are down to one, that might already be resolved.
Comments?
* http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/STR-2527
-T.
On 5/29/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/28/06, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> These two commits cover the things that I "knew" were
On 5/28/06, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
btw, considering my last email, I should point out that Wendy's test
build predates those two commits I made, so either 1.3.5 should be
rebuilt, or it should be skipped. In my mind, 1.3.5 has not been
released yet, and Wendy's test build could
* Link it to an Apache server (where Wendy's test build is) and
suffer the wrath of the Apache infrastructure group when a huge
number of people try to download it -- given how widely Struts
is used, this is likely to be a very serious hit on the Apache
infrastructure.
* Publish the release "
On 5/28/06, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
These two commits cover the things that I "knew" were issues.
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=409443
Thanks, Joe. Was there a JIRA issue opened for this one? (It won't
appear in the release notes otherwise.)
There are still
On 5/28/06, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ted,
I am asking about the website, not the builds. I know the developer
builds are always available, but I see no reason why we shouldn't
publish the 1.3.x website on the left-hand bar as we release new
beta versions. We don't need a vote fo
At 10:57 PM -0400 5/28/06, Ted Husted wrote:
Wendy posted a snapshot to get some preliminary feedback.
* http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40struts.apache.org/msg22386.html
If Joe's issue is resolved
These two commits cover the things that I "knew" were issues.
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?vie
Ted,
I am asking about the website, not the builds. I know the developer
builds are always available, but I see no reason why we shouldn't
publish the 1.3.x website on the left-hand bar as we release new
beta versions. We don't need a vote for that.
Paul
--- Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Wendy posted a snapshot to get some preliminary feedback.
* http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40struts.apache.org/msg22386.html
If Joe's issue is resolved, then the next step would be to tag the
repository, roll the build, and post a release vote. If the vote gets
at least three binding +1s and mo
To get developer traction, can we begin posting beta builds
onto the website? It would be nice to see a "1.3.5 (Beta)"
link listed there to view the snapshot website. And why not?
As long as we listd it as not a production build, we can
give it publicility. We have done that with "Struts 1.2.x",
so
22 matches
Mail list logo
