How could there be a reason not to do this? (This is not a rhetorical
question.)
Jack
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 07:08:40 -0400, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 12:50:05 -0700, Craig McClanahan wrote:
> > My personal itch is to not have to build everything from scratch --
>
Why is it not possible for the framework to use interfaces into which
JSF can be plugged in, perhaps with adapters, as an option well as
other alternatives? This too is not a rhetorical question.
Jack
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 10:16:56 -0700, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu
I admit to a huge amount of ignorance about JSF. I have partly been
stymied by an inability to decide on a text to read. I have always
liked Hans work, and may go that direction. I cannot know, of course,
how that ignorance impacts my part in this discussion. I do think
that in any event it is
Thanks, Vic,
Magnolia seems to be oriented to developers whereas JDNC is oriented
to clients/users. Which connection are you seeing with Struts?
For my part, I don't see a connection with either. Struts is not
either a clientside application or a graphics or page-builder tool.
So, I am confuse
I have installed TortoiseSVN and created the SVNRepository on my local
machine. Can someone save me a bit of time and give me the rigmarole
for getting the Struts dev files? That would be appreciated. Thanks.
Jack
--
"You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep."
~Native Proverb
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 08:47:39 -0500, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Consider a "populate" method on ActionForm. From an OOP standpoint, it might
> be cleaner if an ActionForm populated itself rather than rely on an "god"
> class to populate it from the outside.
>
Yes! This would reve
SVN seems to be considerably slower than CVS. Is that standard for most people?
Jack
--
"You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep."
~Native Proverb~
"Each man is good in His sight. It is not necessary for eagles to be crows."
~Hunkesni (Sitting Bull), Hunkpapa Sioux~
---
Well, I'm soon going to find out what the disk outage is for the
struts directory. Man! Whew! I started just doing asf. Not good!
I'm still deleting on that one. LOL I hope there are no major file
reorganizations happening soon. ;-)
Jack
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 22:43:30 -0600, Eddie Bush <[E
The ARChives are down -- search errors -- so I have to ask a question
which has probably been covered well there. How do you build from
SVN. The Struts SVN download, by the way, was 1.68 gigs on the disk.
Woo hoo!
Jack
--
"You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep."
~Native Pr
Is there a potential useful and reasonable "rewrite" of JSF so that
the sort of navigation (controller) system in Struts can be employed
instead of the page based navigation in JSF consistent with the rest
of JSF, or is the page based navigation too tied to the rest of JSF?
Thanks for any insights
Thanks, Martin -- Jack
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 12:04:02 -0800, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 03:26:50 -0800, Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The ARChives are down -- search errors -- so I have to ask a question
> > whic
n Mon, 22 Nov 2004 12:04:02 -0800, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 03:26:50 -0800, Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The ARChives are down -- search errors -- so I have to ask a question
> > which has probably been covered well there.
&
e man to talk to on this one, Martin. What do you
think? Is that a bad idea at this time? Could just use a hack for
the moment?
Jack
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 17:17:16 -0800, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 17:11:30 -0800, Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I am trying to build 1_2_6 and Struts upload requires something prior
to Servlet 2.4. Does someone have a Servlet 2.2 or 2.3 around that I
can use for the build? I would appreciate that. Just email it, if
you do and would like to donate tot he cause. I really don't want to
go searching around f
Without disagreeing with anything you have said, Don, I think the
confusion is caused in part by the fact that CoR is anticipated in
part for its pluggable nature. In this respect, there is a real
connection in functionality between CoR and IoC that is not as
attenuated as the one between HashMap
Where is this checked in. folks?
Jack
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 11:44:04 -0800, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there any reason that a JSF-independent version of the
> application-wide controller scheme, as just checked in, couldn't be
> part of Struts 1.3? Or, for that matter, even p
ave more control over the process of events, as well as what
> components are used by that process. So yes, one goal perhaps, but two
> different problems being solved in two different ways.
>
> Don
>
>
>
> Dakota Jack wrote:
>
> >Without disagreeing with any
McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 14:39:45 -0800, Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Where is this checked in. folks?
>
> We recently reorganized the repository so that independent pieces of
> "Struts" could be branched and rele
Double Hmm? I just tried again, but this time instead of updating
all of shale I just did the trunk, and it worked. What is up with
that?
Jack
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 18:37:14 -0800, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 18:32:26 -0800, Dakota Jac
Do the new commons utility classes allow us to have an ActionForm implement Map?
Jack
--
"You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep."
~Native Proverb~
"Each man is good in His sight. It is not necessary for eagles to be crows."
~Hunkesni (Sitting Bull), Hunkpapa Sioux~
---
Assuming that there is a significant interest in Jericho, which from
the work on chain as well as other notes and discussions on the list,
I think I can assume there is, would there also be an interest in
making the significant class factories in Jericho hot deploy
factories? I would like to open
Thanks, Martin,
Some notes:
On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 15:05:22 -0800, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> We are currently discussing the use of Commons Chain in the Struts 1.x
> family, starting with 1.3. The idea is that we would replace the
> current request processor with the one from st
Whatever the fate and whatever the nature of this submission, having
this sort of development available to users and to developers is, I
think, a definite plus. Does it make sense for Struts to have a
repository for such things, even if they are not in the distribution
to others? It does to me.
On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 18:24:41 -0800, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 16:39:51 -0800, Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Whatever the fate and whatever the nature of this submission, having
> > this sort of development available to
7;re suggesting. So perhaps you could
> clarify what it is that you _are_ suggesting? ;-) If it's not in
> Struts SVN, and it's not in Struts Applications at SourceForge, what -
> and where - is it?
>
> --
> Martin Cooper
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, 26 Nov
I just noticed this. Looks like Ted already has something along the
lines I was thinking going with this Apps business. What's up with
that?
Jack
On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 23:27:44 -0500, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There's a download module in the struts-examples application. Original
Downloading a file in Struts is, as Martin says, "almost trivial". In
fact, downloading a file in Java is pretty danged easy. So is number
theory: five postulates. What's to worry? LOL
http://www.mathacademy.com/pr/minitext/number/index.asp .
* Pl. 0 is a number.
* P2. The successor
owing the
> user to have more control over the process of events, as well as what
> components are used by that process. So yes, one goal perhaps, but two
> different problems being solved in two different ways.
>
> Don
>
>
>
> Dakota Jack wrote:
>
> >W
an <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 15:36:27 -0800, Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [snip]
>
>
> > With hot deploy, instead of switching the implementation and the name
> > of the implementation class, e.g. ColonSeparatedMovieFinder
Here is code, as opposed to "pretty pictures" -- LOL ;-)
This is intended to demonstrate how simple Had is in contrast to
normal Service Locator or Inversion of Control (Dependency Injection)
frameworks. Remember, THIS IS ALL THE CODE. There are no
NanoContainers. Not XML. No Config classes,
ould, on the dynamic proxies. I think I know what
you mean but do not want to muddy the waters and would rather have you
elaborate a bit. Okay? "Eschew obfuscation and avoid metaphors 'til
the cows come home!"
Thanks, again,
Jack
>
> Craig
>
>
>
>
> On Mon,
Just a few notes and more later after some thought:
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 17:01:43 -0800, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 15:04:48 -0800, Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > Yup! Dang! LOL Nothing is free, is it?
Thanks, Craig. I think there might be a misunderstanding. See within.
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 18:32:06 -0800, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 17:36:09 -0800, Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I am not sure what you mean by &q
Thanks for the information, Peter. A couple of comments within. To
think ahead to the next couple of submissions, I know about Halloway,
and based most of what I have done so far on his thinking.
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 11:04:58 -, Pilgrim, Peter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hence WebL
Hi, Paul,
Sorry to disappoint you, but thanks for stopping in to say you are not
interested. LOL Seriously, this is a "think tank" thread not a
completed idea which is being ballyhooed thread. If you know a better
way than is being presented, please step up. I have not seen this
conversation a
Thanks again. More useful information, Craig. I am trying to figure
out a good way to do a Registry.java class without messing up garbage
collection. I was hoping to use finalize() to keep track outside of
the garbage collection loop of live classes, but have discovered, I
think, that only class
I'm putting a cap on my work here for the moment. I would be
interested if anyone has some ideas, directions, etc. they could offer
on the Registry issues. I would like to thank everyone, even Paul
;-), for their assistance on this thread. I need to do some homework
and then will be back on this
Working here on a "new" paradigm, sort of, I think.
Apparently you can track what has happened to a strong reference with
a weak reference but you cannot manipulate the object referred to by
the strong reference by manipulating the weak reference. Is that
right? Seems odd to me.
Jack
--
"Y
null.
>
> Maybe it would help to know what you are trying to do with it. There
> are other Reference implementations that may be better suited.
>
> -Paul
>
> Dakota Jack wrote:
>
> > Working here on a "new" paradigm, sort of, I think.
> >
> >
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 00:05:12 -0800, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Don't forget that Strings are immutable in Java :-).
>
> You might have better luck experimenting with a JavaBean that has
> getters/setters for the properties you want to be able to mess with.
>
> Craig
>
>
Thank
Paul and Craig
I am getting what I expect with the following code (see below), thanks
to Craig, but not with the code which you can find at
http://131.191.32.112:8080/classes.zip and I am not sure what the
difference is. Essentially, I am trying to keep a WeakReference to
Point classes so that wh
lease)wr.get()));
}
}
class CheckPlease {
private String bill = "0.00";
public void setBill(String add) {
if(add == null) add = "freebee";
else bill += " + " + add;
}
public String getBill() {
return bill;
}
public String toString() {
ret
Thanks, Craig,
I am going to have to look into this more, then. Interesting stuff in
any event.
Jack
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 12:07:28 -0800, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 11:56:31 -0800, Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Ess
PointComposite would be
updated via a callback with a weak referenced listener. This may all
be way too complex. If so, then I can abandon it, but I think it
deserves a look. I think maybe it could be made simple.
Jack
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 12:10:58 -0800, Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please move this thread to a Java language mailing list. This
> discussion is not related to Struts. Thanks.
>
> --
> Martin Cooper
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 12:30:03 -0800, Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
s, but as a general practice it's probably prohibitively
> expensive and error prone. And for those key interfaces, it's almost
> always better to have both parties involved in the negotiation, ie: tell
> Foo it has a new Bar implementation so it can synch its logic properly.
&
ourney to realizing your ideas.
>
> -Paul
>
>
>
> Dakota Jack wrote:
>
> > Thanks for your input, Martin, however .
> >
> > I am doing this in an attempt to flush out HaD, Martin. HaD is a
> > potential Struts 2.0 imple
I figured out how to efficiently do the HaD for classes. Not too hard
actually. This will allow key framework classes to be hot deployed
and will act as a simpler, though how effective remains to be seen,
way to solve the problem IoC is presently used to solve through
dependency injection. The s
Those on the dev list whom have been secretly corresponding with me
about HaD and Struts 2.0 hot deploy can find the latest at
http://131.191.32.112:8080/hot_deploy.zip. I have discovered that the
solution is essentially a much more lightweight version of JMX MLet
for hot deploy widely used in var
, int y) in PointImpl and compiling to see the hot deploy work.
Jack
[LAST ENTRY IN THIS THREAD]
On Sun, 5 Dec 2004 00:21:20 -0800, Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Those on the dev list whom have been secretly corresponding with me
> about HaD and Struts 2.0 hot deploy can fin
I have sent you an answer on the user list under the same subject line
Jack
On Tue, 7 Dec 2004 03:59:39 + (UTC), Marc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi there. Help a struts rookie pls.
>
> I have successfully implemented a two step wizard like interface where I have
> A.jsp for the first step
Do the newer versions of commons utils allow an ActionForm to
implement Map? Thanks!
Jack
--
"You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep."
~Native Proverb~
"Each man is good in His sight. It is not necessary for eagles to be crows."
~Hunkesni (Sitting Bull), Hunkpapa Sioux~
-0600, Vic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> HTML tag lib for getters. (Else you could do some funky EL)
> Request processor you should look at for setters. Also look at Joda
> beans on sf.net.
>
> My implement ion made a FormBean into a List (for mutirow CRUD).
>
> .V
&
Struts sub project on sf.net.
> I am not a comitter, just so you know.
>
> .V
>
>
>
> Dakota Jack wrote:
>
> >Thanks, Vic,
> >
> >Your assistance is a little dark to me. It seems as if you are
> >suggesting solutions other than using a Map imple
ect analogy, then, would not be a court of appeals but a
commanding officer. ;-) In a court of appeals, you get to have your
briefs read and you have time to speak too. But, as I said, "sigh".
--
"You can lead a horse to water, but you cannot make it float on its back."
~D
James,
You are right. I took the stuff off the wiki.
Jack
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 10:26:31 -0500, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dakota Jack, you really should stop trying to host content on your home pc.
> Everything you've ever posted on the list or on the wiki as
uestion)
>
> Does struts-faces provide a way for the JSF reference implementation to
> work with tiles and not require two jsps per view?
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
"Yo
h included something called a TROJAN HORSE?
Jack
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 18:50:38 -0800 (PST), Martin Cooper
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 14 Dec 2004, Dakota Jack wrote:
>
> > How is JSF not OT with struts-dev or struts-user? Struts is not dead
> > yet, is
)
Jack
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 18:50:38 -0800 (PST), Martin Cooper
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 14 Dec 2004, Dakota Jack wrote:
>
> > How is JSF not OT with struts-dev or struts-user? Struts is not dead
> > yet, is it? And, if not, why is struts airtime fre
-sig
> the implementation.
Jack
--
"You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back."
~Dakota Jack~
"You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep."
~Native Proverb~
"Each man is good in His sight. It is not necessary
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
"You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back."
~Dakota Jack~
"You can&#x
(Http11Protocol.java:732)
at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.TcpWorkerThread.runIt(PoolTcpEndpoint.java:619)
at
org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run(ThreadPool.java:688)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534)
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 11:18:45 -0800, Dakota Jack <[
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 14 Dec 2004, Dakota Jack wrote:
>
> > How is JSF not OT with struts-dev or struts-user? Struts is not dead
> > yet, is it? And, if not, why is struts airtime free to JSF?
>
> You don't consider a question about ST
a consistent approach to
> > subprojects, where they may (and probably should) link to Struts core,
> > but Struts core should not depend on them.
>
> I hope this can actually be accomplished ...
Jack
--
"You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back.&q
urces
> 10 - Plug Ins
> 11 - web.xml
> 12 - Getting Started
>
> Then do the same for the Validator and Tiles DTDs.
>
My $.02 is that this order actually will be easier for newbies. +1
Jack
--
"You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back."
--
"You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back."
~Dakota Jack~
"You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep."
~Native Proverb~
"Each man is good in His sight. It is not necessary for eagles to be crows."
~Hunk
gic suitable for inclusion
> in Commands like this as well.
>
> -----
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
--
&q
"You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back."
~Dakota Jack~
"You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep."
~Native Proverb~
"Each man is good in His sight. It is not necessary for eagles
;
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
--
"You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back."
~Dakota Ja
-
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
------
"You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back."
servlet/JSP container). It would be
> tiresome to keep having to deal with an incorrect perception, based on
> the fact that it would be a subproject.
>
> Craig
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-ma
---
"You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back."
~Dakota Jack~
"You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep."
~Native Proverb~
"Each man is good in His sight. It is not
g with me on this.
> > >
> > > I'd be interested in seeing what you've come up with.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > sean
> > > >
> > >
> > > Craig
> > >
> > >
, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
------
"You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back."
~Dakota Jack~
"You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep."
~Native Proverb~
"Each man is good in His sigh
e Javadocs for this application will be published soon, with a pointer on
> the Wiki, and nightly builds will commence this evening.
>
> --------
>
> Craig
>
>
here possible. This is one
of the main reasons I have difficulty with JSF. I really am contrary
to the coupling.
Jack
--
--
"You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back."
~Dakota Jack~
"You can't wake a person w
> . In EditAction they do edit logic, and than forward to ResultAction.
>
> As discussed in bug 16107:
> http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16107
>
> Regards, Jan
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dakota Jack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: dins
lf instead of hunting around
> struts-config looking for it. :-)
>
> > Regards, Jan
>
> sean
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
self instead of hunting around struts-config
> > looking for it. :-)
>
> What logic?
>
> - Dave
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
--
"
age and may be helpful to some. Indeed, from my mail, I would
say the latter is true.
Jack
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 12:10:13 -0600, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 9:35 AM -0800 1/4/05, Dakota Jack wrote:
> >Craig's says that the problem is solved by tight coupling.
]> wrote:
> At 9:35 AM -0800 1/4/05, Dakota Jack wrote:
> >Craig's says that the problem is solved by tight coupling. That also
> >seems to be true.
>
> Look, Jack: we all realize that you don't care for JSF and don't
> think it should be a fundamental com
problem at the root of needing to change
an entire archetecture?
Jack
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 07:32:56 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dakota,
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Dakota Jack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: dinsdag 4 jan
illing, and able to do the work.
>
> In a volunteer environment, Darwin always decides. The better technology
> attracts the best volunteers. Better volunteers do better work, and the
> spiral continues upward.
>
> Which is better? I don't know. Neither do you, or Joe, or
they do edit logic, and than forward to ResultAction.
>
> As discussed in bug 16107:
> http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16107
>
> Regards, Jan
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dakota Jack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: dinsdag 4 januari 2005
e compared to that conceptually.
>
> The flip-side (where my mixed feelings come in, partially) is that I've
> never really bought into the whole "call the server to handle every
> little UI event" model. I suppose that's a separate debate though :)
>
> --
&g
mapping.
This make sense to you?
Jack
--
--
"You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back."
~Dakota Jack~
"You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep."
~Native Proverb~
"Each man is good in His s
not make it float on its back."
~Dakota Jack~
"You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep."
~Native Proverb~
"Each man is good in His sight. It is not necessary for eagles to be crows."
~Hunkesni (Sitting Bull), Hunkpapa Sioux~
I would not have written this had I received Craig's note first.
Sometimes someone has to tell you that you are not nuts.
Jack
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 22:54:09 -0800, Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ted, I think I may be getting where our communication was breaking
>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
--
"You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back."
~Dakota Jack~
"You can't wake a person who is
What is the reason why ModuleConfigImpl freezes mrconfig? Would there
be some difficulty in making message resources dynamic?
Jack
--
--
"You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back."
~Dakota Jack~
"You can't
o water but you cannot make it float on its back."
~Dakota Jack~
"You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep."
~Native Proverb~
"Each man is good in His sight. It is not necessary for eagles to be crows.&qu
"You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back."
~Dakota Jack~
"You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep."
~Native Proverb~
"Each man is good in His sight. It is not necessary for
hat the session can be cleaned
> >>fairly easy when skipping from one dialog to the other and information
> >>is not unnessecarly stored.
> >
> >
> > My current thinking is that we want the ability to have more than one
> > active dialog, so you can "push&quo
ot; at the end?
>
> >
> > > Craig
> >
> > sean
> >
>
> Hubert
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
-
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
> -----
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> >>> solution that we're using now. Wizard generally implies a
> >>> guided series of steps where you can go forwards and backwards
> >>> (at least to me it does.)
> >>>
> >>> sean
> >>>
> >>> --------
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Craig
In my experience, this sort of program, app, or whatever you want to
call it, is better stored in application scope. That way there are no
limits to the algorithms you can foster.
Jack
--
--
"
ed framework.
--
--
"You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back."
~Dakota Jack~
"You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep."
~Native Proverb~
"Each man is good in His sight. It is not necessary for eagles to be crows.&
p file, if you want to send that. I cannot answer you more
helpfully about a standard place it would be good to send it: sorry!
Jack
--
"You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back."
"Heaven has changed. The Sky now goes all the way to our feet.
~Dakot
ion or suit at law
- ac·tion·ably /-blE/ adverb
Could the interface be called "Action"? I imagine this has all been
discussed before and will set off a firestorm of "Lordy Lordy"s. But,
what the heck, one can keep trying to be helpful.
Jack
--
"You can lead a horse
1 - 100 of 313 matches
Mail list logo
