On 2013/7/3 4:05, Andreas Stieger wrote:
Hi There,
On 02/07/13 16:00, Dongsheng Song wrote:
Today, when I merge zh_CN.po from trunk to 1.8.x, I had encounter the
following error:
$ python ../../../../trunk/tools/dev/po-merge.py
../../../../trunk/subversion/po/zh_CN.po zh_CN.po
Traceback
On 2013/7/3 6:55, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2013/7/3 Andreas Stieger andreas.stie...@gmx.de:
Hi There,
On 02/07/13 16:00, Dongsheng Song wrote:
Today, when I merge zh_CN.po from trunk to 1.8.x, I had encounter the
following error:
$ python ../../../../trunk/tools/dev/po-merge.py
Hi, Arwin,
Von: Arwin Arni [mailto:ar...@collab.net]
On 06/20/2013 07:01 PM, Julian Foad wrote:
Arwin Arni wrote:
Properties are validated regardless of the action on the property.
This poses a problem when it comes to very old repositories that contain
invalid
properties committed by
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 9:00 PM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote:
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 5:07 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
As noted on IRC earlier, we just deprecated BDB so that we wouldn't
have to continue supporting multiple backends. But it seems you have
just created a third/new
On 07/01/2013 05:35 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
+++ subversion/branches/verify-keep-going/subversion/svnadmin/svnadmin.c Mon
Jul 1 12:01:38 2013
@@ -850,13 +850,16 @@ repos_notify_handler(void *baton,
case svn_repos_notify_failure_summary:
if (notify-revision !=
On 07/03/2013 03:11 PM, Prabhu wrote:
On 07/01/2013 05:35 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
+++
subversion/branches/verify-keep-going/subversion/svnadmin/svnadmin.c
Mon Jul 1 12:01:38 2013
@@ -850,13 +850,16 @@ repos_notify_handler(void *baton,
case svn_repos_notify_failure_summary:
On 03.07.2013 11:41, Prabhu wrote:
On 07/01/2013 05:35 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
+++
subversion/branches/verify-keep-going/subversion/svnadmin/svnadmin.c
Mon Jul 1 12:01:38 2013
@@ -850,13 +850,16 @@ repos_notify_handler(void *baton,
case svn_repos_notify_failure_summary:
if
2013/7/3 Dongsheng Song dongsheng.s...@gmail.com:
On 2013/7/3 6:55, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2013/7/3 Andreas Stieger andreas.stie...@gmx.de:
Hi There,
On 02/07/13 16:00, Dongsheng Song wrote:
Today, when I merge zh_CN.po from trunk to 1.8.x, I had encounter the
following error:
$ python
On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 11:56:16AM +0200, Branko Čibej wrote:
svnadmin: E165011: Repository '/tmp/testrepo' failed to verify
Summary of corrupt revisions:
Revision 2: E160004: Final line in revision file r2 missing space
Revision 4: E160004: Invalid change kind in rev file
Revision 6:
于 2013/7/3 18:11, Konstantin Kolinko 写道:
2013/7/3 Dongsheng Song dongsheng.s...@gmail.com:
On 2013/7/3 6:55, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2013/7/3 Andreas Stieger andreas.stie...@gmx.de:
Hi There,
On 02/07/13 16:00, Dongsheng Song wrote:
Today, when I merge zh_CN.po from trunk to 1.8.x, I had
Prabhu wrote on Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 15:11:36 +0530:
Do you want it to look like,
$ svnadmin verify /tmp/testrepo/ --keep-going
* Verifying repository metadata ...
* Verified revision 0.
* Verified revision 1.
* Error verifying revision 2.
svnadmin: E160004: Final line in revision file
prabh...@apache.org wrote on Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 10:49:02 -:
+ notify_failure-warning_str = apr_psprintf(pool,
+ _(E%06d: %s),
Would it make sense to push the E%06d: part down to the implementation
of svn_err_best_message()?
I.e., if the
Konstantin Kolinko wrote on Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 02:22:54 +0400:
2013/7/2 Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name:
How about adding 'svn cleanup --rm-I' as a short option for 'svn cleanup
--remove-ignored'?
Currently we have --cl as a short option for --changelist, and in the
past we
On 03.07.2013 13:37, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
prabh...@apache.org wrote on Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 10:49:02 -:
+ notify_failure-warning_str = apr_psprintf(pool,
+ _(E%06d: %s),
Would it make sense to push the E%06d: part down to the implementation
of
Branko Čibej wrote on Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 13:48:57 +0200:
On 03.07.2013 13:37, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
prabh...@apache.org wrote on Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 10:49:02 -:
+ notify_failure-warning_str = apr_psprintf(pool,
+ _(E%06d: %s),
Would it
On 07/03/2013 05:07 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
prabh...@apache.org wrote on Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 10:49:02 -:
+ notify_failure-warning_str = apr_psprintf(pool,
+ _(E%06d: %s),
Would it make sense to push the E%06d: part down to the implementation
BDB's relicense to AGPL sparked some discussion about potentially
blacklisting it in configure or making it opt-in. Attached a patch that
blacklists it. (We can convert it to opt-in after we test with it, or
if someone asks, etc.)
Thoughts?
[[[
* build/ac-macros/berkeley-db.m4
On 03.07.2013 14:55, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
BDB's relicense to AGPL sparked some discussion about potentially
blacklisting it in configure or making it opt-in. Attached a patch that
blacklists it. (We can convert it to opt-in after we test with it, or
if someone asks, etc.)
Thoughts?
Looks
I have noted KeepAlive coming up in a few of the Serf threads.
I have been looking at setting up a load-balanced Subversion cluster,
somewhat like what Blair describes in this wiki:
http://www.orcaware.com/svn/wiki/Server_performance_tuning_for_Linux_and_Unix
Anyway, in looking at load
Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com writes:
Could you try svn trunk? Set busted-proxy=yes in your config to enable
the new behavior.
Without the knob turned out, you should get a 411 error. As Stefan
pointed out, we may want to consider detecting 411 and providing a
better error message.
With the
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 5:55 AM, Daniel Shahaf danie...@elego.de wrote:
BDB's relicense to AGPL sparked some discussion about potentially
blacklisting it in configure or making it opt-in. Attached a patch that
blacklists it. (We can convert it to opt-in after we test with it, or
if someone
On 03.07.2013 16:07, Branko Čibej wrote:
I do have a comment; it specifically assumes the clients are browsers,
... and that the servers host web sites; important distinction there, too.
--
Branko Čibej | Director of Subversion
WANdisco // Non-Stop Data
e. br...@wandisco.com
Ben Reser wrote on Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 07:10:46 -0700:
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 5:55 AM, Daniel Shahaf danie...@elego.de wrote:
BDB's relicense to AGPL sparked some discussion about potentially
blacklisting it in configure or making it opt-in. Attached a patch that
blacklists it. (We can
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 7:20 AM, Daniel Shahaf danie...@elego.de wrote:
Ben Reser wrote on Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 07:10:46 -0700:
Not sure how to really handle the Windows build. I guess we can just
add 60 if we test with it because we have no auto-detection, so
you're making a deliberate choice
My workflow for reviewing backports is to run backport.pl with no
arguments. It shows me each entry and allows me to merge it (real
merge, not a dry-run) and view the resulting diff. When I'm done
I revert the last merge, edit STATUS to add my votes, and commit.
Are there features others would
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:danie...@elego.de]
Sent: woensdag 3 juli 2013 13:38
To: dev@subversion.apache.org
Cc: comm...@subversion.apache.org; prabh...@apache.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r1499315 - in /subversion/branches/verify-keep-
going/subversion:
Ben Reser wrote on Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 07:28:56 -0700:
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 7:20 AM, Daniel Shahaf danie...@elego.de wrote:
Ben Reser wrote on Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 07:10:46 -0700:
Not sure how to really handle the Windows build. I guess we can just
add 60 if we test with it because we
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 7:38 AM, Daniel Shahaf danie...@elego.de wrote:
We could do the same in configure.ac: permit BDB 6 to go through if it
was explicitly specified in the argument of --with-berkeley-db.
I'm less confident that this is a good solution for configure because
certain platforms
Ben Reser wrote on Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 08:05:43 -0700:
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 7:38 AM, Daniel Shahaf danie...@elego.de wrote:
We could do the same in configure.ac: permit BDB 6 to go through if it
was explicitly specified in the argument of --with-berkeley-db.
I'm less confident that this
On Wed, 3 Jul 2013 15:26:16 +0200, Lieven Govaerts l...@apache.org said:
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:17 PM, Lieven Govaerts
lieven.govae...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 9:37 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
Ashish,
This is normally a question for users@, but I
Daniel Shahaf wrote on Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 17:32:46 +0300:
Are there features others would like to see in backport.pl that would
make it useful for their workflows? For example, if I added a 'show log
messages of these revisions' feature, or a 'Add my +1 to this
nomination' feature,
I went
On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 08:02:02PM -, s...@apache.org wrote:
+ SVN_ERR(svn_config_get_user_config_path(config_path,
+ opt_state-config_dir, NULL,
+ pool));
+ footer = _(Available
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 10:40 AM, phi...@apache.org wrote:
Author: philip
Date: Wed Jul 3 14:40:21 2013
New Revision: 1499423
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1499423
Log:
Fix busted-proxy detection: any 411 will be received without a
Subversion error. Tested by tweaking the testsuite code to
33 matches
Mail list logo
