Re: multi-wc-format review

2022-02-19 Thread Stefan Kueng
On 19.02.2022 16:31, Daniel Shahaf wrote: Stefan Kueng wrote on Sat, Feb 19, 2022 at 16:11:59 +0100: I guess I'm a little late to this discussion, but I just upgraded today to the svn trunk and saw the new APIs. From what I understand is that new clients can choose which WC format to use

Re: multi-wc-format review

2022-02-19 Thread Stefan Kueng
I guess I'm a little late to this discussion, but I just upgraded today to the svn trunk and saw the new APIs. From what I understand is that new clients can choose which WC format to use during checkout/upgrade? If that's correct, I'd like to propose a small enhancement: * provide an env

svn st shows missing for root folder

2019-11-19 Thread Stefan Kueng
Using svn 1.13.0 on Windows: SUBST G:\ D:\Development\TestWC G: svn st . ! . ? Foo ? src\nonversioned As you can see, the root folder doesn't show the correct status. This showed the correct status with 1.12.x. Stefan

crash resolving conflict

2019-05-02 Thread Stefan Kueng
Hi, Crashreports for TSVN show a problem in the svn_client_conflict_tree_get_details() API. The data passed to the API is correct, already checked that. Here's the stack trace: libsvn_tsvn.dll!uri_escape(const char * path, const char * table, apr_pool_t * pool) Line 920 C

Re: extending the blame callback

2019-01-14 Thread Stefan Kueng
On 14.01.2019 14:25, Branko Čibej wrote: On 14.01.2019 13:36, Julian Foad wrote: Stefan, thanks for taking account of the feedback and updating the doc string in r1851197. I took a look and thought to rewrite the part about encoding and line splitting like this: * Character Encoding

Re: extending the blame callback

2019-01-11 Thread Stefan Kueng
On 10.01.2019 23:46, Branko Čibej wrote: On 10.01.2019 19:13, Stefan Kueng wrote: On 10.01.2019 06:58, Branko Čibej wrote: On 10.01.2019 04:58, Branko Čibej wrote: On 07.01.2019 20:57, Stefan Kueng wrote: @@ -758,6 +759,33 @@    * will be true if the reason there is no blame

Re: extending the blame callback

2019-01-10 Thread Stefan Kueng
On 10.01.2019 06:58, Branko Čibej wrote: On 10.01.2019 04:58, Branko Čibej wrote: On 07.01.2019 20:57, Stefan Kueng wrote: @@ -758,6 +759,33 @@ * will be true if the reason there is no blame information is that the line * was modified locally. In all other cases @a local_change

Re: svn commit: r1850781 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: include/svn_client.h libsvn_client/blame.c libsvn_client/deprecated.c

2019-01-08 Thread Stefan Kueng
On 08.01.2019 20:30, Michael Pilato wrote: On 08.01.2019 19:45, stevek...@apache.org wrote: Author: steveking Date: Tue Jan 8 18:45:45 2019 New Revision: 1850781 [...] Modified: subversion/trunk/subversion/include/svn_client.h URL:

Re: svn commit: r1850781 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: include/svn_client.h libsvn_client/blame.c libsvn_client/deprecated.c

2019-01-08 Thread Stefan Kueng
On 08.01.2019 19:58, Branko Čibej wrote: On 08.01.2019 19:45, stevek...@apache.org wrote: Author: steveking Date: Tue Jan 8 18:45:45 2019 New Revision: 1850781 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1850781=rev Log: Extend the blame callback with a string length parameter. *

Re: extending the blame callback

2019-01-07 Thread Stefan Kueng
On 07.01.2019 19:58, Daniel Shahaf wrote: Stefan Kueng wrote on Mon, 07 Jan 2019 19:30 +0100: On 06.01.2019 21:09, Daniel Shahaf wrote: Stefan Kueng wrote on Sun, Jan 06, 2019 at 20:40:28 +0100: @@ -758,6 +759,33 @@ * will be true if the reason there is no blame information

Re: extending the blame callback

2019-01-07 Thread Stefan Kueng
On 07.01.2019 19:56, Branko Čibej wrote: On Mon, 7 Jan 2019, 19:30 Stefan Kueng <mailto:tortoise...@gmail.com> wrote: I think for proper C, all variables need to be declared at the start of the function. Unless of course svn allows newer C versions? Not "the start of t

Re: extending the blame callback

2019-01-07 Thread Stefan Kueng
the attached patch has some corrections to the doc strings. If there are no objections, I'll commit this tomorrow. Also see inline comments: On 06.01.2019 21:09, Daniel Shahaf wrote: Stefan Kueng wrote on Sun, Jan 06, 2019 at 20:40:28 +0100: +++ subversion/include/svn_client.h (working

Re: extending the blame callback

2019-01-06 Thread Stefan Kueng
On 06.01.2019 19:54, Daniel Shahaf wrote: The encoding may also be set explicitly via a svn:mime-type="text/foo; charset=utf-16-le" property. (We even parse that in mod_dav_svn, I think?) Setting the mime-type to text/.. with the utf16 charset helps only that the --force flag doesn't need

Re: extending the blame callback

2019-01-06 Thread Stefan Kueng
On 06.01.2019 19:37, Branko Čibej wrote: Windows default is UTF-16-LE, at least on x86(_64) and other little-endian architectures. I'm not sure what they do on ARM but I'd be surprised if Windows doesn't put it in little-endian mode, given that decades of legacy software assume

Re: extending the blame callback

2019-01-06 Thread Stefan Kueng
On 06.01.2019 15:05, Branko Čibej wrote: Sorry about getting into this late, but as Julian said: * we already have a (char*, len) wrapper, called svn_string_t, so I would expect it would be neatest to use that; but the patch has: @@ -758,6 +758,28 @@

Re: extending the blame callback

2019-01-06 Thread Stefan Kueng
On 06.01.2019 15:22, Julian Foad wrote: Branko Čibej wrote: + const svn_string_t line = {sb->data, sb->len}; In plain old C, we can't write that, but we have a helper function: svn_stringbuf__morph_into_string(). but that destroys the original stringbuf, but that one is

Re: extending the blame callback

2019-01-06 Thread Stefan Kueng
On 05.01.2019 22:35, Daniel Shahaf wrote: Stefan Kueng wrote on Sat, 05 Jan 2019 21:15 +0100: here's a patch using svn_stringbuf_t for review. Change "Provided for backwards compatibility with the 1.6 API" to "Provided for backwards compatibility with the 1.11 API" in s

Re: extending the blame callback

2019-01-05 Thread Stefan Kueng
On 05.01.2019 17:53, Julian Foad wrote: Stefan Kueng wrote: When running blame on an utf16 text file, the lines can not be used since the blame callback only passes a 'char *' parameter which means it ends at the first zero char. But actually, svn knows if the line has more content. +1

Re: extending the blame callback

2019-01-05 Thread Stefan Kueng
On 05.01.2019 18:05, Mark Phippard wrote: On Jan 5, 2019, at 10:58 AM, Stefan Kueng wrote: So, with this patch I'm able to do a blame on utf16 files, so I'd like to commit this if there are no objections. I have no objections, just a question. I thought SVN treated utf16 files

Re: extending the blame callback

2019-01-05 Thread Stefan Kueng
On 05.01.2019 17:53, Julian Foad wrote: Stefan Kueng wrote: When running blame on an utf16 text file, the lines can not be used since the blame callback only passes a 'char *' parameter which means it ends at the first zero char. But actually, svn knows if the line has more content. +1

extending the blame callback

2019-01-05 Thread Stefan Kueng
Hi, When running blame on an utf16 text file, the lines can not be used since the blame callback only passes a 'char *' parameter which means it ends at the first zero char. But actually, svn knows if the line has more content. So I'd like to propose the following patch which extends the

Re: Subversion Exception!

2018-12-12 Thread Stefan Kueng
On 12.12.2018 21:12, Branko Čibej wrote: On 12.12.2018 19:07, Stefan Kueng wrote: On 12.12.2018 13:55, TortoiseSVN-dev on behalf of Julian Foad wrote: Subversion encountered a serious problem. Please take the time to report this on the Subversion mailing list […] https

Re: Subversion Exception!

2018-12-12 Thread Stefan Kueng
On 12.12.2018 13:55, TortoiseSVN-dev on behalf of Julian Foad wrote: Subversion encountered a serious problem. Please take the time to report this on the Subversion mailing list […] https://subversion.apache.org/mailing-lists.html It is likely that this is a problem specific to

Re: Hide experimental APIs to unblock 1.11 release

2018-09-20 Thread Stefan Kueng
On 9/20/2018 5:17 PM, Julian Foad wrote: A fresh perspective on the experimental-APIs issue just came to me: this should not hold up the 1.11 release. We were falling into the old trap of thrashing about debating how to do it, assuming we needed some solution for 1.11, but we don't. One of

Re: thoughts about shelving

2018-09-15 Thread Stefan Kueng
A few more thought, mostly for the next release: * svn_client_shelf_save_new_version3 takes two callback functions, but they both have the same type. So why not just change that API to take one callback but provide a 'failed' flag instead? * when a shelve operation fails, we have to remove

thoughts about shelving

2018-09-15 Thread Stefan Kueng
Hi, I know I'm a little bit late, but now I'm implementing the new shelf APIs in TSVN so it's now that I have some thoughts and suggestions: * there are deprecated APIs already, even though they weren't there in 1.10.0, for example svn_client_shelf_save_new_version - since they're all new

Re: handling of reparse points

2018-06-08 Thread Stefan Kueng
On 08.06.2018 00:30, Branko Čibej wrote: Just FYI: in that case svn would have a requirement for NTFS. Because both hard links (for files) and junctions (for directories) only work on NTFS. So it wouldn't be possible anymore to use svn on e.g. a usb stick formatted with FAT32. Yes ... we'd

handling of reparse points

2018-05-18 Thread Stefan Kueng
Hi, It seems that svn doesn't handle reparse points properly in all situations. Which causes big problems for TSVN when a working copy is on a Onedrive folder. See here for more details: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/tortoisesvn/hlQj5OifhBg/RX_cw_sQCgAJ While in this particular situation,

Re: Shelving / Checkpointing thoughts

2017-09-02 Thread Stefan Kueng
On 27.08.2017 02:09, Branko Čibej wrote: On 27.08.2017 02:04, Daniel Shahaf wrote: Julian Foad wrote on Fri, 25 Aug 2017 21:42 +0100: Let's clarify. We can mean two possible things when we say 'a series of patches': 1. "patch versions": a series of successively better patches, all

Re: translations (buildbot to update translatable strings)

2017-03-13 Thread Stefan Kueng
On 13.03.2017 11:52, Julian Foad wrote: Stefan K, trying to help push this forward... We have consensus to do something about automatically providing updates to translatable strings. We need some help to fill in the details and actually do it. From my perspective, it looks like we should: *

Re: wish for new API or extended one

2017-02-08 Thread Stefan Kueng
On 08.02.2017 15:03, Evgeny Kotkov wrote: Stefan Sperling <s...@elego.de> writes: Ah, indeed. Thank you very much for this patch! Please commit it when you get a chance. Thanks, I committed the fix in r1782169. Stefan Kueng <tortoise...@gmail.com> writes: But as I mentio

Re: wish for new API or extended one

2017-02-07 Thread Stefan Kueng
On 07.02.2017 21:34, Stefan Sperling wrote: On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 08:17:41PM +0100, Stefan Kueng wrote: I figured out the problem: to get updated descriptions, I have to call svn_client_conflict_tree_get_resolution_options() again to get new updated options. I can't just get the description

Re: wish for new API or extended one

2017-02-07 Thread Stefan Kueng
On 07.02.2017 09:37, Stefan Sperling wrote: On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 07:54:46PM +0100, Stefan Kueng wrote: On 06.02.2017 13:19, Stefan Sperling wrote: On Sun, Feb 05, 2017 at 03:23:33PM +0100, Stefan Küng wrote: Still doesn't work for me

Re: translations

2017-02-06 Thread Stefan Kueng
On 05.02.2017 20:55, Daniel Shahaf wrote: Stefan Kueng wrote on Sun, Feb 05, 2017 at 15:28:25 +0100: On 05.02.2017 12:21, Andreas Stieger wrote: On 04/02/17 17:13, Stefan Kueng wrote: [...]I'm wondering about the translations of those strings. Several points on this: #1 Working

Re: wish for new API or extended one

2017-02-06 Thread Stefan Kueng
On 06.02.2017 13:19, Stefan Sperling wrote: On Sun, Feb 05, 2017 at 03:23:33PM +0100, Stefan Küng wrote: Still doesn't work for me. svn_client_conflict_option_set_moved_to_repos_relpath(opt, j, scratchpool); label = svn_client_conflict_option_get_label(opt, scratchpool); description =

Re: translations

2017-02-05 Thread Stefan Kueng
On 05.02.2017 12:21, Andreas Stieger wrote: On 04/02/17 17:13, Stefan Kueng wrote: [...]I'm wondering about the translations of those strings. Several points on this: #1 Working with Pootle works well, both ways. There is just a bit of a coordination effort. That coordination needs

Re: wish for new API or extended one

2017-02-04 Thread Stefan Kueng
On 04.02.2017 19:52, Stefan Sperling wrote: On Sat, Feb 04, 2017 at 07:21:50PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote: On Sat, Feb 04, 2017 at 04:57:45PM +0100, Stefan Küng wrote: But the problem with the description not being updated still persists. OK, I believe I see the problem. The *option*

Re: translations

2017-02-04 Thread Stefan Kueng
On 04.02.2017 18:16, Daniel Shahaf wrote: Stefan Kueng wrote on Sat, Feb 04, 2017 at 17:13:06 +0100: I remember there was a discussion about two years ago about using a web based translation tool for Subversion (e.g. http://translationproject.org/), but that discussion got to no real decision

translations

2017-02-04 Thread Stefan Kueng
Hi, Since the new conflict resolver API offer a lot of strings to be used in an UI, I'm wondering about the translations of those strings. I remember there was a discussion about two years ago about using a web based translation tool for Subversion (e.g. http://translationproject.org/), but

Re: wish for new API or extended one

2017-02-04 Thread Stefan Kueng
On 04.02.2017 14:12, Stefan Sperling wrote: On Sat, Feb 04, 2017 at 01:45:10PM +0100, Stefan Kueng wrote: On 04.02.2017 11:16, Stefan Sperling wrote: On Sat, Feb 04, 2017 at 09:23:06AM +0100, Stefan Kueng wrote: Hi, while trying out the new conflict resolver APIs I came upon a slight

Re: wish for new API or extended one

2017-02-04 Thread Stefan Kueng
On 04.02.2017 14:12, Stefan Sperling wrote: On Sat, Feb 04, 2017 at 01:45:10PM +0100, Stefan Kueng wrote: On 04.02.2017 11:16, Stefan Sperling wrote: On Sat, Feb 04, 2017 at 09:23:06AM +0100, Stefan Kueng wrote: Hi, while trying out the new conflict resolver APIs I came upon a slight

Re: wish for new API or extended one

2017-02-04 Thread Stefan Kueng
On 04.02.2017 14:24, Stefan Sperling wrote: On Sat, Feb 04, 2017 at 02:12:45PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote: The idea is to just call it as many times as you want to. It just sets an internal index that indicates which moved-to-path to use for descriptions and resolution from now on. See

Re: wish for new API or extended one

2017-02-04 Thread Stefan Kueng
On 04.02.2017 11:16, Stefan Sperling wrote: On Sat, Feb 04, 2017 at 09:23:06AM +0100, Stefan Kueng wrote: Hi, while trying out the new conflict resolver APIs I came upon a slight problem. The API svn_client_conflict_option_get_description() returns a string that can be used to show

wish for new API or extended one

2017-02-04 Thread Stefan Kueng
Hi, while trying out the new conflict resolver APIs I came upon a slight problem. The API svn_client_conflict_option_get_description() returns a string that can be used to show to the user as a choice - in TSVN that would be the text on a two-line button (the 'label' is the first line, the

Re: segfault with new conflict resolver

2017-01-30 Thread Stefan Kueng
On 28.01.2017 15:38, Stefan Sperling wrote: On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 01:47:03PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote: On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 01:31:46PM +0100, Stefan Kueng wrote: Hi, trying out the new conflict resolver. Ran into a segfault on my first try: Thank you! I will fix this ASAP

segfault with new conflict resolver

2017-01-28 Thread Stefan Kueng
Hi, trying out the new conflict resolver. Ran into a segfault on my first try: libsvn_client\conflicts.c, function find_modified_rev(): if there is no author for a commit, then we get a segfault here: /* No paths were changed in this revision. Nothing to do. */ if (!

Re: FAQ about using NFS

2015-10-09 Thread Stefan Kueng
On 09.10.2015 18:16, Branko Čibej wrote: On 09.10.2015 17:16, Julian Foad wrote: This FAQ seems rather out of date / lacking in correctness: http://subversion.apache.org/faq#nfs Since 1.7, the SQLite DB in the WC needs 'file locking' to work properly, which (as I understand it)

Re: Assertion Failure dialogs appear when attempting to open repository with bad URL

2015-06-10 Thread Stefan Kueng
On 10.06.2015 21:04, Bert Huijben wrote: I don’t think we can really fix that url in the api by canonicalizing it to something completely different/unrelated, but the assertion makes it obvious that the caller can just see/check that the url is not going to work… just like values such as the

Re: Assertion Failure dialogs appear when attempting to open repository with bad URL

2015-06-10 Thread Stefan Kueng
On 10.06.2015 19:06, Bert Huijben wrote: Hi Dean, There is not much we can do about this. The Subversion apis require that you pass canonical urls, while the client (TortoiseSVN) that you use doesn’t canonicalize the url before passing it to this api. And that's what the

Re: error committing to 1.7 servers

2015-04-09 Thread Stefan Kueng
On 09.04.2015 16:57, Bert Huijben wrote: -Original Message- From: Stefan Kueng [mailto:tortoise...@gmail.com] Sent: woensdag 8 april 2015 19:46 To: Subversion Development Subject: error committing to 1.7 servers Hi, While trying to commit a change to an xml file with the svn:mime

Re: Subversion checkout issue with certain short names on Windows

2015-03-30 Thread Stefan Kueng
On 29.03.2015 17:50, Bert Huijben wrote: -Original Message- From: Stephen White [mailto:swh...@corefiling.com] Sent: vrijdag 27 maart 2015 14:03 To: dev@subversion.apache.org Subject: Subversion checkout issue with certain short names on Windows If you pass a Windows short-name as

Re: pin externals when creating a copy from specific revision

2015-02-16 Thread Stefan Kueng
On 16.02.2015 20:22, Bert Huijben wrote: -Original Message- From: Stefan Kueng [mailto:tortoise...@gmail.com] Sent: maandag 16 februari 2015 20:01 To: Subversion Development Subject: pin externals when creating a copy from specific revision Hi, I'm still doing some testing

Re: pin externals when creating a copy from specific revision

2015-02-16 Thread Stefan Kueng
On 16.02.2015 20:39, Stefan Sperling wrote: On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 08:01:19PM +0100, Stefan Kueng wrote: Hi, I'm still doing some testing with the new --pin-externals feature, and I found a situation which I'm not sure should be handled that way: imagine the repo is at r100. Now if one

Re: pin-externals fails to handle spaces properly

2015-02-14 Thread Stefan Kueng
On 14.02.2015 10:35, Stefan Sperling wrote: Can you please file issues for these problems, with a 1.9.0 milestone? Thanks! Done: http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4558 http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4559

pin-externals fails to handle spaces properly

2015-02-13 Thread Stefan Kueng
Hi, While trying out the new 'pin externals' feature, I found a problem: if the external definition has spaces in them for the local path, something like this: ^/branches/test1 'ext with spaces' then that will get changed to ^/branches/test1@1234 ext with spaces which basically breaks the

Re: [vote] pin-externals branch to trunk

2015-02-04 Thread Stefan Kueng
On 04.02.2015 16:07, Stefan Sperling wrote: On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 06:14:02PM +0100, Stefan Kueng wrote: But can you maybe implement my other request about using an array of externals to tag so the user can chose which externals to tag and which ones to just leave as-is? Does this API do

Re: [vote] pin-externals branch to trunk

2015-02-04 Thread Stefan Kueng
On 04.02.2015 19:08, Stefan Sperling wrote: On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 06:42:08PM +0100, Stefan Kueng wrote: Maybe one more improvement: Add a new API to fetch the list of externals which would be pegged if NULL is passed to the svn_client_copy7 API. Suggested name

Re: [vote] pin-externals branch to trunk

2015-01-30 Thread Stefan Kueng
On 30.01.2015 01:10, Stefan Sperling wrote: On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 12:43:47AM +0100, Johan Corveleyn wrote: From the peanut gallery: I'm with Stefan Küng on this. I think intra-repository externals are used *a lot*, especially in companies. I'm not a big fan of this way of working myself,

Re: [vote] pin-externals branch to trunk

2015-01-29 Thread Stefan Kueng
On 29.01.2015 12:33, Stefan Sperling wrote: On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 12:14:27PM +0100, Tom Ghyselinck wrote: Hi everybody, I am following this feature with a lot of interest! One question pops up: 1. Suppose I have a branch B with external references to E 2. E has an external reference to F

Re: [vote] pin-externals branch to trunk

2015-01-29 Thread Stefan Kueng
On 29.01.2015 22:45, Stefan Sperling wrote: On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 07:26:01PM +0100, Stefan Kueng wrote: TortoiseSVN has such a feature. Of course, it doesn't work in an ideal way. Here's what I do in TSVN: The branch/tag dialog (the one that's shown for an 'svn copy') scans the working

Re: svn commit: r1620955 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/include/svn_config.h

2014-08-28 Thread Stefan Kueng
On 28.08.2014 20:33, Branko Čibej wrote: On 27.08.2014 20:48, stevek...@apache.org wrote: Author: steveking Date: Wed Aug 27 18:48:05 2014 New Revision: 1620955 URL:http://svn.apache.org/r1620955 Log: Make 'svn status' ignore the thumbs.db files by default, which are created by the Windows

Re: crash reports

2014-05-28 Thread Stefan Kueng
On 28.05.2014 12:28, Bert Huijben wrote: -Original Message- From: Stefan Kueng [mailto:tortoise...@gmail.com] Sent: dinsdag 27 mei 2014 20:24 To: 'Subversion Development' Subject: crash reports Hi, There are several crash reports sent for TortoiseSVN that I can't figure out. I've

crash reports

2014-05-27 Thread Stefan Kueng
Hi, There are several crash reports sent for TortoiseSVN that I can't figure out. I've analyzed multiple dumps from those reports but I'm not successful in finding the root cause. I *think* it's because the crashes happen due to wrong pool handling, i.e. pools are destroyed but then used

Re: crash reports

2014-05-27 Thread Stefan Kueng
On 27.05.2014 20:56, Branko Čibej wrote: On 27.05.2014 20:23, Stefan Kueng wrote: Hi, There are several crash reports sent for TortoiseSVN that I can't figure out. I've analyzed multiple dumps from those reports but I'm not successful in finding the root cause. I *think* it's because

compile problems with apr

2014-04-25 Thread Stefan Kueng
Hi, When compiling svn with the latest Windows SDK I get compiler errors in apr. This only happens if _WIN32_WINNT is = 0x0502, and only with the SDK for Win8.1 (maybe for Win8 too, haven't tested that). I have to patch apr to make the build work. I've attached the patch I'm using. Has

Re: Subversion checked-out files not indexed in Windows search

2014-03-13 Thread Stefan Kueng
On 13.03.2014 14:14, Bert Huijben wrote: -Original Message- From: Ivan Zhakov [mailto:i...@visualsvn.com] Sent: donderdag 13 maart 2014 13:56 To: Branko Čibej Cc: Subversion Development Subject: Re: Subversion checked-out files not indexed in Windows search On 13 March 2014 16:46,

svn list broken

2014-03-06 Thread Stefan Kueng
Hi, Using a build from the svn trunk (built 30 minutes ago, r1574973): svn list -v https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/trunk shows a lot of garbage in the author column. Also linked with: apr 1.5.0 apr-util 1.5.3 serf 1.3.3 OpenSSL 1.0.1f 6 Jan 2014 zlib 1.2.8 in case that's

Re: svn list broken

2014-03-06 Thread Stefan Kueng
On 06.03.2014 19:53, Branko Čibej wrote: On 06.03.2014 19:32, Stefan Kueng wrote: Hi, Using a build from the svn trunk (built 30 minutes ago, r1574973): svn list -v https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/trunk shows a lot of garbage in the author column. Confirmed; in my case it's

Re: svn list broken

2014-03-06 Thread Stefan Kueng
On 06.03.2014 19:52, Ben Reser wrote: On 3/6/14, 10:32 AM, Stefan Kueng wrote: Using a build from the svn trunk (built 30 minutes ago, r1574973): svn list -v https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/trunk shows a lot of garbage in the author column. Also linked with: apr 1.5.0 apr-util

Re: svn list broken

2014-03-06 Thread Stefan Kueng
On 06.03.2014 20:29, Bert Huijben wrote: -Original Message- From: Stefan Kueng [mailto:tortoise...@gmail.com] Sent: donderdag 6 maart 2014 19:32 To: dev@subversion.apache.org Subject: svn list broken Hi, Using a build from the svn trunk (built 30 minutes ago, r1574973): svn list -v

svn diff, depth not working

2013-11-18 Thread Stefan Kueng
Hi, Running $ svn diff folder --depth=empty still produces the diff for all added children as well, even though the depth was set to empty. $ mkdir folder $ echo test folder/file $ svn add folder $ svn diff folder --depth=empty patch.diff now the file patch.diff also contains the diff for