Hi,
It was a long time ago. I just loooked at the code.
I think it should work with a few changes. I do not
use these layouts anymore. I first began with wmii,
then dwm. I, of course, missed the wmii ``capabilities
so I wrote dwmii.c. But, with time, I realized that
moving the windows from column
On 01/08/2012 10:30 AM, John Matthewman wrote:
I would like a window manager that has wmii's acme-like window
management, but without the 9P filesystem, wmiir, support for
configuration via python, ruby, etc.
use dwm as a base to build upon
+1
I imagine having a stacked layout + manual
On 1/8/12, Anselm R Garbe garb...@gmail.com wrote:
Someone could implement a stacked mode patch for dwm based on two
extra windows (similar to the dwm bar) per column -- wouldn't be too
hard.
I would like a window manager that has wmii's acme-like window
management, but without the 9P
On 8 January 2012 10:30, John Matthewman jmatthew...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1/8/12, Anselm R Garbe garb...@gmail.com wrote:
Someone could implement a stacked mode patch for dwm based on two
extra windows (similar to the dwm bar) per column -- wouldn't be too
hard.
I would like a window manager
On Sun 08 Jan 2012 04:30:47 PM PST, John Matthewman wrote:
I would like a window manager that has wmii's acme-like window
management, but without the 9P filesystem, wmiir, support for
configuration via python, ruby, etc.
Try i3, which was inspired by wmii: http://i3wm.org/
--
If something has
2012/1/8 John Matthewman jmatthew...@gmail.com:
I would like a window manager that has wmii's acme-like window
management, but without the 9P filesystem, wmiir, support for
configuration via python, ruby, etc. Trim the fat off of it (or
perhaps it would be better to use dwm as a base to build
On 1/9/12, Thomas Dahms thmsd...@googlemail.com wrote:
2012/1/8 John Matthewman jmatthew...@gmail.com:
I would like a window manager that has wmii's acme-like window
management, but without the 9P filesystem, wmiir, support for
configuration via python, ruby, etc. Trim the fat off of it (or
Þann fim 5.jan 2012 23:12, skrifaði Connor Lane Smith:
That's not inherent to GUIs, it just so happens that existing GUIs are
extremely poorly made. It's not interaction which needs to be logged
so much as the modification of persistent data -- files and such --
which could easily be logged by
On 7 January 2012 17:26, Bjartur Thorlacius svartma...@gmail.com wrote:
That's not enough. I want the output of all commands (messages, documents,
calculations, notes and error reports) to be stored on increasingly
mainstream terabyte disks along with enough metadata to uniquely identify
it.
On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 05:50:06PM +, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
So long as you have the input state for those commands -- the files
themselves -- why must we log the output for each and every command?
Error correction.
If we know the state of the directory, why log invocations of `ls`?
ls
On 7 January 2012 20:21, de...@gmx.de wrote:
But for me, wmii's window managing is far better than dwm's one. I tried
dwm for eight weeks. Now back to wmii. I like the stagged mode at most.
I like window titles. I like columns.
Someone could implement a stacked mode patch for dwm based on two
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 7:02 AM, Patrick Haller
201009-suckl...@haller.ws wrote:
On 2012-01-01 21:13, Suraj N. Kurapati wrote:
So I considered the trade-offs between SLOC minimalism, project and
community activity, and my productivity in DWM vs. WMII and finally
decided to switch back to WMII
Hey,
On 5 January 2012 14:19, David Tweed david.tw...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not aware of any way of either storing or, more importantly,
searching a user's interaction with the GUI apps on a computer system.
That's not inherent to GUIs, it just so happens that existing GUIs are
extremely poorly
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 11:12:44PM +, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
That's not inherent to GUIs, it just so happens that existing GUIs are
extremely poorly made. It's not interaction which needs to be logged
so much as the modification of persistent data -- files and such --
which could easily
I don't understand how this is related to your quote?
You always execute ls when you cd to a different folder?
On 02.01.2012, Patrick Haller 201009-suckl...@haller.ws wrote:
On 2012-01-01 21:13, Suraj N. Kurapati wrote:
So I considered the trade-offs between SLOC minimalism, project and
On 2012-01-02 12:26, hiro wrote:
I don't understand how this is related to your quote?
Suraj re-evaluated his toolset. I think the re-evaluation part is a good
idea, however it seems you could spend too much time doing it.
You always execute ls when you cd to a different folder?
in
You can also use du instead of cd;ls
Overloading simple, old, standard commands is bad for my inflexible brain.
The X11 stuff is way too difficult for me to care.
On Sat 24 Dec 2011 12:13:04 PM PST, dtk wrote:
On 12/22/2011 05:54 PM, Suraj N. Kurapati wrote:
I'm another WMII expatriate and I'm still not completely used to
DWM's lack of on-the-fly tag creation: especially when some new
random task comes up and all of my tags are currently occupied.
On 01/01/2012 11:13 PM, Suraj N. Kurapati wrote:
Good point. After seeing people take SLOC minimalism further than
the suckless community's beloved DWM (c.f. MonsterWM), I realized
that it all came down to *choice* and that I actually had a choice.
So I considered the trade-offs between
On 2012-01-01 21:13, Suraj N. Kurapati wrote:
So I considered the trade-offs between SLOC minimalism, project and
community activity, and my productivity in DWM vs. WMII and finally
decided to switch back to WMII (which I used since six years prior).
How often do people re-evaluate their
Hey cls,
On 12/22/2011 04:57 PM, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
On 22 December 2011 16:36, dtk d...@gmx.de wrote:
nope, 32 is aplenty. Thing is, in wmii I create them on demand and name
them dynamically (to reflect their purpose), which conveniently groups
them as well. I just don't want the tag I
On 12/22/2011 05:32 PM, Suraj N. Kurapati wrote:
On Thu 22 Dec 2011 02:44:54 PM PST, dtk wrote:
is there a way to have widgets in the status bar display images
instead of utf8 symbols?
I gave up on this approach for DWM and used dzen2 as my status bar
instead:
On 24 December 2011 12:08, dtk d...@gmx.de wrote:
So, what's the policy here? All future development in patches, so we
don't spoil that fancy 2K SLOC statistic everybody is so fond of? :/
*sceptic*
Hah. :) We fold in popular patches, slowly, so dwm doesn't become all
bloated and unstable. My
On 12/24/11, Connor Lane Smith c...@lubutu.com wrote:
I'm not sure a screenshot is necessary. It would just be a fullscreen
window. :p If you hide the status bar it's honestly *just* the window.
And a border, telling you whether it is focused or not (assuming a
non-zero borderpx).
Dnia 22 grudnia 2011 16:53 Manolo Martínez man...@austrohungaro.com
napisał(a):
The claim is that when this people finish rewriting dwm then go write their
e-mails in
Gnome 3?
--
That's certainly possible, given compulsive behaviour of tweaking
tweaks.
They work day to day in Gnome, then
I kill dwm when I've placed all my windows correctly so I can save more RAM.
Everyone who wants more functionality than just placing his windows in
a perfect way once and for all is stupid.
On 23.12.2011, Jakub Lach jakub_l...@mailplus.pl wrote:
Dnia 22 grudnia 2011 16:53 Manolo Martínez
Dnia 23 grudnia 2011 11:34 hiro 23h...@googlemail.com napisał(a):
I kill dwm when I've placed all my windows correctly so I can save more RAM.
Everyone who wants more functionality than just placing his windows in
a perfect way once and for all is stupid.
Words of wisdom!
For ultimate RAM
On Fri, 23 Dec 2011 10:34:35 -, hiro 23h...@googlemail.com wrote:
I kill dwm when I've placed all my windows correctly so I can save more
RAM.
I actually did that the other day, so I could GIMP my Christmas cards.
On Fri 23 Dec 2011 10:24:54 AM PST, Jakub Lach wrote:
They work day to day in Gnome, then try to emulate it's insanity
in currently acceptable flavour of the month wm, then brag
on their home forum with screenshots (arch forum anyone?),
seeking peer approval.
Touché! s/Gnome/wmii/ and
Hey guys,
is there a way to have widgets in the status bar display images instead
of utf8 symbols?
I know it's a question of philosophy whether you'll want that (and will
therefore inevitably spawn holy flame wars ;)), but I just saw it
yesterday in awesome[0] and think it was a pretty neat
What are widgets?
On Thu, 22 Dec 2011 13:44:54 -, dtk d...@gmx.de wrote:
is there a way to have widgets in the status bar display images instead
of utf8 symbols?
s/(image|symbol)/glyph/g
Modify your font. There are patches either on the website or on the
Archlinux Forums that modify dwm to use more
On 11/15/2011 06:59 AM, Suraj N. Kurapati wrote:
On Thu 10 Nov 2011 09:29:53 PM PST, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
wmii is cursed. Its code base has grown by factor 3 or 4 in terms
of SLOC, whereas its functionality has stalled.
Thanks Anselm. I think I've held on to the past for too long, and
On 12/22/2011 02:49 PM, hiro wrote:
What are widgets?
Encapsulated, reusable functionality that displays information in the
status bar. Whole onmouseover thing and such...
dtk
Hey,
On 22 December 2011 15:35, dtk d...@gmx.de wrote:
I tag clients according to the topic they deal with (yess, I have
*several* Firefox windows open on different tags at any given point in
time -.-), which is why static tagging with a predefined number of tags
works really really bad for
Hey,
On 22 December 2011 14:44, dtk d...@gmx.de wrote:
I just saw it
yesterday in awesome[0] and think it was a pretty neat feature to
display information in a compact yet intuitive way.
The general consensus is that sprinkling icons everywhere actually
makes the interface far more
Hello,
The general consensus is that sprinkling icons everywhere actually
makes the interface far more complicated and distracting, and
generally quite *bad*. While there *are* some exceptions where icons
are more compact, they are rare.
Consider the meter widgets people are obsessed with
Hey,
thx for your quick response!
On 12/22/2011 03:49 PM, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
On 22 December 2011 15:35, dtk d...@gmx.de wrote:
I tag clients according to the topic they deal with (yess, I have
*several* Firefox windows open on different tags at any given point in
time -.-), which is
Sidestepping the holy-war topic here, I'd like to point out that there
are plenty of status bars out there like tint2 and dzen2 that you
could use. I've even heard of people using DWM in conjunction with
xfce-panel. A patch to add the same functionality that one of these
examples already does
I just looked at the screenshot linked by the OP, and thats indeed
wrong
usage of icons, IMHO. I argued againts the wifi signal example, not for
replacing descriptive names of applications with crappy logos without
any
expressivenes. How the fuck can a wolf represent an audio application?
At
lol, people on suckless don't actually use their window managers, they
brag about it and rewrite it and rewrite it and rewrite it. It's more
of a hobby than a necessity for them.
On 12/22/2011 04:27 PM, Florian Limberger wrote:
The general consensus is that sprinkling icons everywhere actually
makes the interface far more complicated and distracting, and
generally quite *bad*. While there *are* some exceptions where icons
are more compact, they are rare.
Yupp. Don't
On 12/22/11 at 04:47pm, hiro wrote:
lol, people on suckless don't actually use their window managers, they
brag about it and rewrite it and rewrite it and rewrite it. It's more
of a hobby than a necessity for them.
The claim is that when this people finish rewriting dwm then go write their
On 12/22/2011 04:38 PM, Justin Pogue wrote:
Sidestepping the holy-war topic here, I'd like to point out that there
are plenty of status bars out there like tint2 and dzen2 that you
could use.
k. Was just reluctant to integrate it. Redirecting all the information
there. wmii's status bar
Somebody claiming to be dtk wrote:
This is why dwm has tags: just don't view the tags you aren't using.
Like you say, tag clients according to their role, and then by
definition those which are not being used needn't be seen. However,
you may be interested in flextile [1].
wouldn't be used to
On 22 December 2011 16:36, dtk d...@gmx.de wrote:
nope, 32 is aplenty. Thing is, in wmii I create them on demand and name
them dynamically (to reflect their purpose), which conveniently groups
them as well. I just don't want the tag I do development of project A on
to be on tag 5. Today. And
On Thu 22 Dec 2011 02:44:54 PM PST, dtk wrote:
is there a way to have widgets in the status bar display images
instead of utf8 symbols?
I gave up on this approach for DWM and used dzen2 as my status bar
instead: https://github.com/sunaku/.dwm/blob/master/dwm-statusbar
(Pictured at bottom of
On Thu 22 Dec 2011 04:36:55 PM PST, dtk wrote:
I just cannot see how to do the stuff I feel I need with static
layouts. And since I don't believe that manual layouts are what
bloat wmii, I fail to understand why I cannot haz them :/ Worse, I
fail to see why I'm the only one who wants them
On Thu 22 Dec 2011 04:57:24 PM PST, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
In dwm you can view multiple tags at the same time, which pulls all
clients with that tag into view. (Which is really amazing once you get
used to it. Other window managers just make me feel really
constrained.)
Now that you mention
On 22 December 2011 18:02, Suraj N. Kurapati sun...@gmail.com wrote:
In contrast, WMII has fine-grained multi-tagging (a client can appear
on multiple views) so I would either (1) choose a client from dmenu to
pull into my current view or (2) go to the tag I want and multi-tag the
clients that
On Thu 22 Dec 2011 06:07:05 PM PST, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
On 22 December 2011 18:02, Suraj N. Kurapati wrote:
Multi-tagging is cool and useful, but too coarse grained in DWM.
I don't understand what you mean. In dwm a single client can have
multiple tags, and one can also view multiple
On Dec 22, 2011 12:03 PM, Suraj N. Kurapati sun...@gmail.com wrote:
Now that you mention it, I rarely use this feature because it's too
coarse grained. For instance, I have tags pre-allocated for particular
tasks so viewing more than one of them simultaneously pulls in too many
unrelated
On Thu 22 Dec 2011 02:05:36 PM PST, Jacob Todd wrote:
On Dec 22, 2011 12:03 PM, Suraj N. Kurapati sun...@gmail.com
wrote:
Now that you mention it, I rarely use this feature because it's too
coarse grained. For instance, I have tags pre-allocated for
particular tasks so viewing more than
Is there a reason you're not just using awesome?
-sth
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Suraj N. Kurapati sun...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu 22 Dec 2011 02:44:54 PM PST, dtk wrote:
is there a way to have widgets in the status bar display images
instead of utf8 symbols?
I gave up on this
whoops, I missed the [wmii] tag. Please ignore my last post.
--sth
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Seth Hover seth.ho...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a reason you're not just using awesome?
-sth
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Suraj N. Kurapati sun...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu 22 Dec 2011
On Thu 22 Dec 2011 11:54:21 AM PST, Seth Hover wrote:
Is there a reason you're not just using awesome?
Subjectively, I like C and Ruby better than Lua. Architecturally, I
like that DWM is minimal, having a very limited statusbar, because
I can use a better tool for the job (dzen2) or even go
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 04:27:35PM +0100, Florian Limberger wrote:
then how do you distinguish the percentage of battery load and the
percentage of wifi signal strength? Sometimes, I don't care if wifi
signal quality is exactly 87% or 78%, It would suffice if I knew if it
is over 25%, 50%
On Thu, 22 Dec 2011 20:34:12 -0500, Kurt H Maier wrote:
A one-letter prefix doesn't help you? b50% s70%? I don't even do
that
much. I used to just have it read, e.g., 50% 70% and I used my
amazing
pattern-recognition skills to discern that the battery life was
mysteriously always first in
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 02:52:28AM +0100, Florian Limberger wrote:
I know what you are displaying, I use a slightly modified version of
the status.sh script you posted once. Thanks though.
That script in its current incarnation is about 1/10th the size it was
when I posted it.
I know you
On 11/14/2011 11:34 PM, Justin Pogue wrote:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Jonas H.jo...@lophus.org wrote:
Hi folks!
Is it possible to use tiling w/ dualhead? i.e. have a separate tiling area
on each monitor - so that if you move a window from monitor 0 to monitor 1
in floating mode and
2011/11/14 Jonas H. jo...@lophus.org:
Is it possible to use tiling w/ dualhead? i.e. have a separate tiling area
on each monitor - so that if you move a window from monitor 0 to monitor 1
in floating mode and then move it to the tiling layer, it stays on monitor
1. (The way it works for my
On 11/15/2011 09:32 AM, Thomas Dahms wrote:
wmii spans the tiling area over all monitors, but managed columns end
at screen boundaries.
What's that Xinerama support that came with 3.9 then?
2011/11/15 Jonas H. jo...@lophus.org:
What's that Xinerama support that came with 3.9 then?
It is Xinerama. One view just includes both monitors. That is
different from dwm and other window managers, but not necessarily
worse.
--
Thomas Dahms
Hi folks!
Is it possible to use tiling w/ dualhead? i.e. have a separate tiling
area on each monitor - so that if you move a window from monitor 0 to
monitor 1 in floating mode and then move it to the tiling layer, it
stays on monitor 1. (The way it works for my setup right now is that
it's
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Jonas H. jo...@lophus.org wrote:
Hi folks!
Is it possible to use tiling w/ dualhead? i.e. have a separate tiling area
on each monitor - so that if you move a window from monitor 0 to monitor 1
in floating mode and then move it to the tiling layer, it stays on
On Thu 10 Nov 2011 09:29:53 PM PST, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
wmii is cursed. Its code base has grown by factor 3 or 4 in terms
of SLOC, whereas its functionality has stalled.
Thanks Anselm. I think I've held on to the past for too long, and
avoided DWM mainly out of disinterest in C. However,
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Connor Lane Smith c...@lubutu.com wrote:
On 08/11/2011, Suraj N. Kurapati sun...@gmail.com wrote:
I thought Suckless folks were enthusiastic about Plan9 technologies;
has this changed? If so, why?
Appreciative, not necessarily enthusiastic. Plan 9 technologies
On 11 Nov 2011 04:30, Anselm R Garbe garb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 November 2011 07:28, Suraj N. Kurapati sun...@gmail.com wrote:
And how is modern wmii different from its, let's say, pre-modern
phase? From my view, it still uses the Plan9 protocol and the Plan9
approach of exposing a
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 4:36 AM, David Tweed david.tw...@gmail.com wrote:
My view is that the plan 9 technologies are attractive if and only if
they're used everywhere: if a pseudo-filesystem interface was
pervasive it would avoid the learn another new language/technology
tricks/etc for this
On 8 November 2011 07:28, Suraj N. Kurapati sun...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu 03 Nov 2011 09:57:19 AM PDT, Kurt H Maier wrote:
There is nothing suckless about any aspect of modern wmii
I thought Suckless folks were enthusiastic about Plan9 technologies;
has this changed? If so, why?
The
Hey,
On 08/11/2011, Suraj N. Kurapati sun...@gmail.com wrote:
I thought Suckless folks were enthusiastic about Plan9 technologies;
has this changed? If so, why?
Appreciative, not necessarily enthusiastic. Plan 9 technologies have
their place, but it's very tempting to use them everywhere. I
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 9:57 PM, Kurt H Maier karmaf...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Jeffrey 'jf' Lim jfs.wo...@gmail.com
wrote:
hm. I see. So your argument was to disown wmii, because this *specific*
configuration - and NOT wmii itself - requires ruby. Alright.
No, I
On Thu 03 Nov 2011 09:57:19 AM PDT, Kurt H Maier wrote:
There is nothing suckless about any aspect of modern wmii
I thought Suckless folks were enthusiastic about Plan9 technologies;
has this changed? If so, why?
And how is modern wmii different from its, let's say, pre-modern
phase? From my
On Mon, 7 Nov 2011 22:28:59 -0800
Suraj N. Kurapati sun...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu 03 Nov 2011 09:57:19 AM PDT, Kurt H Maier wrote:
There is nothing suckless about any aspect of modern wmii
I thought Suckless folks were enthusiastic about Plan9 technologies;
has this changed? If so, why?
And
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 1:36 AM, Jeffrey 'jf' Lim jfs.wo...@gmail.com wrote:
what does that even mean? wmii *requires* ruby? Never heard of that.
This configuration requires ruby. Try to keep up.
--
# Kurt H Maier
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 9:37 PM, Kurt H Maier karmaf...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 1:36 AM, Jeffrey 'jf' Lim jfs.wo...@gmail.com
wrote:
what does that even mean? wmii *requires* ruby? Never heard of that.
This configuration requires ruby. Try to keep up.
hm. I see. So your
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Jeffrey 'jf' Lim jfs.wo...@gmail.com wrote:
hm. I see. So your argument was to disown wmii, because this *specific*
configuration - and NOT wmii itself - requires ruby. Alright.
No, I want to disown wmii because it's a bloated 30ksloc monstrosity
that engenders
Yeah, and C engendered Java.
Just use your own configuration if you don't like it. And an older
version of wmii if you don't like change.
I think you misunderstand. While he may wish that no user again uses wmii,
that is not what he has stated here. His stated wish is wmii's removal from
suckless.org because it does not meet suckless standards.
--Andrew Hills
On 3 November 2011 02:23, Kurt H Maier karmaf...@gmail.com wrote:
Any word on a timetable for disowning wmii? This is a four-hundred
line configuration that requires a 1600-line library, not to mention
an entire extra programming language.
To manage x11 windows.
I'm in the process arranging
Hello,
For those who were weary of my Ruby wmiirc[1]'s power consumption,
I am happy to announce that the latest Ruby 1.9.3-p0 stable release
has solved Ruby's problem of causing excessive CPU wakeups-from-idle
which would drain your laptop battery much sooner than you'd expect.
On my ASUS
Anselm,
Any word on a timetable for disowning wmii? This is a four-hundred
line configuration that requires a 1600-line library, not to mention
an entire extra programming language.
To manage x11 windows.
--
# Kurt H Maier
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 7:49 PM, Suraj N. Kurapati sun...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
For those who were weary of my Ruby wmiirc[1]'s power consumption,
I am happy to announce that the latest Ruby 1.9.3-p0 stable release
has solved Ruby's problem of causing excessive CPU wakeups-from-idle
Indeed
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Kurt H Maier karmaf...@gmail.com wrote:
Anselm,
Any word on a timetable for disowning wmii? This is a four-hundred
line configuration that requires a 1600-line library, not to mention
an entire extra programming language.
To manage x11 windows.
what does
Þann mið 31.ágú 2011 23:36, skrifaði Benjamin Cathey:
I recently added a few new key combinations and I am having issues and I
am not quite sure why.
I am attempting to use the number keys in the numeric keypad and it
simply is not working. The combinations work with the regular number
keys
Okay so then they are apparently different, regardless of the keycode
give by `xev`
That's fine - however what would I use in my wmiirc to define the
difference?
Would it be:
Key $MODKEY-Control-KP0 ?
---
Actually it looks like it would be $MODKEY-Control-KP_0
Thanks for your help!
B
Þann fim 1.sep 2011 17:42, skrifaði Benjamin Cathey:
Okay so then they are apparently different, regardless of the keycode
give by `xev`
I ran xev on my system, and it reported different keycodes and keysyms,
but equivalent XLookupString results.
I don't speak wmiirc, but I'm happy if I was
Sorry if this is a repost - I had mail client fail so I am not sure if
the send completed.
I recently added a few new key combinations and I am having issues and I
am not quite sure why.
I am attempting to use the number keys in the numeric keypad and it
simply is not working. The
I recently added a few new key combinations and I am having issues and I
am not quite sure why.
I am attempting to use the number keys in the numeric keypad and it
simply is not working. The combinations work with the regular number
keys however not with those on the keypad. Using xev it
Looks like this did send twice. Also I accidentally included
$MODKEY-Control-l which does work. It's the numbers that do not work
(only the numeric pad) as I mentioned
Thanks again
Benjamin
On 08/31/2011 07:36 PM, Benjamin Cathey wrote:
I recently added a few new key combinations and I am
Hello,
I'm running wmii's hg tip (rev 2788).
I just experienced a strange behaviour with the specific shortcut
$MODKEY-2 after switching from the be (azerty) to the us dvorak-intl xkb
layout. When using that shortcut, the current window seems to lose focus
(the title bar stays highlighted).
twosuperior isn't a key on US keyboards, and pressing Alt-2 injects
it in many applications. It is possible that it is confusing Alt-2
with your literal twosuperior. Just a thought--I'm not an expert.
--Andrew Hills
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Mr. Bougs mrbo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
On 08/24/2011 01:20 AM, orlando wrote:
All you have to do is rename Delete to Close and close should appear
at the top of the menu.
Thank you, that did it.
All you have to do is rename Delete to Close and close should appear at
the top of the menu.
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 9:15 AM, Gidon Ernst
er...@informatik.uni-augsburg.de wrote:
Hi,
recently the order of items
[Delete, Kill, Fullscreen]
in the menu that appears when right-clicking on
On 05.08.2011 16:24, Ethan Grammatikidis wrote:
On Fri, 5 Aug 2011 14:39:23 +0200
Eckehard Berns ecki-suckl...@ecki.to wrote:
I also have encountered freezes with fullscreen flash video playback (I
haven't tested something other than youtube). I noticed that I didn't
encounter those freezes
On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 18:15:51 +0200
Gidon Ernst er...@informatik.uni-augsburg.de wrote:
Hi,
recently the order of items
[Delete, Kill, Fullscreen]
in the menu that appears when right-clicking on a window's titlebar
changed to
[Kill, Delete, Fullscreen]
Oh this old thing. dwm
On 10 August 2011 23:10, Ethan Grammatikidis eeke...@fastmail.fm wrote:
Oh this old thing. dwm could use an fwvm-style Close which sends a delete
if the window supports it, otherwise sends a kill, thus hiding a particularly
ugly part of X.
It does.
s/dwm/wmii/ ?
cls
On Wed 10 Aug 2011 11:24:54 PM PDT, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
On 10 August 2011 23:10, Ethan Grammatikidis wrote:
dwm could use an fwvm-style Close which sends a delete if the
window supports it, otherwise sends a kill, thus hiding a
particularly ugly part of X.
It does.
s/dwm/wmii/ ?
On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 23:24:54 +0100
Connor Lane Smith c...@lubutu.com wrote:
On 10 August 2011 23:10, Ethan Grammatikidis eeke...@fastmail.fm wrote:
Oh this old thing. dwm could use an fwvm-style Close which sends a delete
if the window supports it, otherwise sends a kill, thus hiding a
Oh this old thing. dwm could use an fwvm-style
Close which sends a delete if the window supports
it, otherwise sends a kill, thus hiding a particularly
ugly part of X.
Maybe so, but I fail to see how this relates to the
question asked. Which one of us is particularly
dense this time 'round?
1 - 100 of 643 matches
Mail list logo
