Hi,
Mod_jk 1.2.22 has been available for testing for some days.
No new bugs have been reported so far, so it is time to proceed with the
release vote.
The source distribution can be downloaded from:
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/tomcat-connectors/jk/source/jk-1.2.22/
or
Mladen Turk wrote:
The source distribution can be downloaded from:
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/tomcat-connectors/jk/source/jk-1.2.22/
or
http://www.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/jk/source/jk-1.2.22/
May I ask -why-?
It's not released (quite yet, has 0 votes) - what on
Hi,
I also see the APR JMX memory leak with following APR Connector config
Connector port=30011
URIEncoding=UTF-8
useExecutor=false
minSpareThreads=150
maxSpareThreads=150
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
The source distribution can be downloaded from:
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/tomcat-connectors/jk/source/jk-1.2.22/
or
http://www.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/jk/source/jk-1.2.22/
May I ask -why-?
It's not released (quite yet,
Mladen Turk wrote:
Don't understand your question.
It was more then a week available for a developers review.
The official stable is still 1.2.21 until 1.2.22 gets votes or not,
in which case we'll go for 1.2.23.
So what's the problem?
How many times will I repeat to this list that until
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
Don't understand your question.
It was more then a week available for a developers review.
The official stable is still 1.2.21 until 1.2.22 gets votes or not,
in which case we'll go for 1.2.23.
So what's the problem?
How many times will I repeat
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
The memory leak exists in the APR and JIO connector, when and only when
they use the shared Executor and the Executor has a
minSpareThreadsmaxThreads.
I know that, I was planning to adapt your patch.
Rémy
Mladen Turk wrote:
I suggest you revoke my commit privileges to the
www.apache.org/dist/ so it won't happen again and you
won't need to repeat this again.
I'm sure infra would be happy to if you would prefer this. I'm assuming
the (this might be news to you) was news to you, but this struck
Peter Rossbach wrote:
I also see the APR JMX memory leak with following APR Connector config
minSpareThreads=150
maxSpareThreads=150
maxThreads=150
I don't think there's a leak in that connector. For starters
minSpareThreads and
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
I suggest you revoke my commit privileges to the
www.apache.org/dist/ so it won't happen again and you
won't need to repeat this again.
I'm sure infra would be happy to if you would prefer this.
LOL. Man, you really don't like me ;)
Is it
Hi,
On 4/13/07, Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
I suggest you revoke my commit privileges to the
www.apache.org/dist/ so it won't happen again and you
won't need to repeat this again.
I'm sure infra would be happy to if you would prefer
Let's try to chill out, please ;) I'm sure putting the candidate
binaries on the official mirrors before the vote was an honest
mistake. So let's move them to /dev/dist, have a proper vote like
we're having right now, and then put the legit release on the mirrors
again in a couple of days.
+1
Apache Tomcat Connectors 1.2.22 is:
[X] Stable - no major issues, no regressions
[ ] Beta - at least one significant issue -- tell us what it is
[ ] Alpha - multiple significant issues -- tell us what they are
Thanks for RM.
-
Apache Tomcat Connectors 1.2.22 is:
[x] Stable - no major issues, no regressions
[ ] Beta - at least one significant issue -- tell us what it is
[ ] Alpha - multiple significant issues -- tell us what they are
Guenter.
-
On Apr 13, 2007, at 7:20 AM, Yoav Shapira wrote:
Let's try to chill out, please ;) I'm sure putting the candidate
binaries on the official mirrors before the vote was an honest
mistake. So let's move them to /dev/dist, have a proper vote like
we're having right now, and then put the legit
On Apr 13, 2007, at 2:33 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi,
Apache Tomcat Connectors 1.2.22 is:
[X] Stable - no major issues, no regressions
[ ] Beta - at least one significant issue -- tell us what it is
[ ] Alpha - multiple significant issues -- tell us what they are
So let it be written; so
Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Apr 13, 2007, at 7:20 AM, Yoav Shapira wrote:
Let's try to chill out, please ;) I'm sure putting the candidate
binaries on the official mirrors before the vote was an honest
mistake.
++1 (especially on the chill out part ;) ) !!
I think the issue is that,
Author: fhanik
Date: Fri Apr 13 08:32:19 2007
New Revision: 528524
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=528524
Log:
This write has to be synchronized since comet can write to the buffer and cause
a buffer overflow if more than one thread is writing
Modified:
Author: fhanik
Date: Fri Apr 13 08:33:44 2007
New Revision: 528526
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=528526
Log:
if the flush is not guaranteed, then try again
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/coyote/http11/InternalNioOutputBuffer.java
Modified:
Author: fhanik
Date: Fri Apr 13 08:39:44 2007
New Revision: 528528
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=528528
Log:
Prevent NPE on a key that was cancelled by the poller
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/NioEndpoint.java
Modified:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: fhanik
Date: Fri Apr 13 08:32:19 2007
New Revision: 528524
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=528524
Log:
This write has to be synchronized since comet can write to the buffer and cause
a buffer overflow if more than one thread is writing
That's
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42115.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41949.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Apr 13, 2007, at 10:00 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Apr 13, 2007, at 7:20 AM, Yoav Shapira wrote:
Let's try to chill out, please ;) I'm sure putting the candidate
binaries on the official mirrors before the vote was an honest
mistake.
++1 (especially on the chill out
+1
Am 13.04.2007 um 08:33 schrieb Mladen Turk:
So here's the vote, which will be open until Tuesday April 17,
12:00 GMT.
Apache Tomcat Connectors 1.2.22 is:
[x] Stable - no major issues, no regressions
[ ] Beta - at least one significant issue -- tell us what it is
[ ] Alpha - multiple
Remy Maucherat wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: fhanik
Date: Fri Apr 13 08:32:19 2007
New Revision: 528524
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=528524
Log:
This write has to be synchronized since comet can write to the buffer
and cause a buffer overflow if more than one thread
Author: fhanik
Date: Fri Apr 13 09:51:54 2007
New Revision: 528551
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=528551
Log:
prevent a timeout when a servlet write is issued, but not flushed
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/coyote/http11/InternalNioOutputBuffer.java
Modified:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42103.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42103.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: fhanik
Date: Fri Apr 13 11:08:43 2007
New Revision: 528570
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=528570
Log:
Use the remaining for the byte buffer as the capacity is the total capacity and
not the limit
Modified:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Apr 13, 2007, at 10:00 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Apr 13, 2007, at 7:20 AM, Yoav Shapira wrote:
Let's try to chill out, please ;) I'm sure putting the candidate
binaries on the official mirrors before the vote was an honest
mistake.
++1
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42119.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: fhanik
Date: Fri Apr 13 12:05:01 2007
New Revision: 528594
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=528594
Log:
consolidate usage between executor runnables and worker threads
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/NioEndpoint.java
Modified:
Author: fhanik
Date: Fri Apr 13 12:16:08 2007
New Revision: 528605
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=528605
Log:
remove redundant calls, easier to track usage
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/NioEndpoint.java
Modified:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Lets say you have two threads writing to the response (async write from
comet)
both of them could end up on the line:
socket.getBufHandler().getWriteBuffer().put(buf, offset, length);
assuming nothing is synced in the path down to here, hence causing a
buffer
Author: fhanik
Date: Fri Apr 13 16:26:07 2007
New Revision: 528702
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=528702
Log:
Added a TCP ping for membership, to be used with static memberships and with
the TCP failure detector
Added:
Author: fhanik
Date: Fri Apr 13 18:41:35 2007
New Revision: 528735
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=528735
Log:
Smarter executor, only create threads if no threads are available
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/core/StandardThreadExecutor.java
Author: fhanik
Date: Fri Apr 13 19:48:45 2007
New Revision: 528744
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=528744
Log:
Minor optimizations
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/NioEndpoint.java
Author: fhanik
Date: Fri Apr 13 20:45:41 2007
New Revision: 528751
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=528751
Log:
minor optimization, go directly to the poller, chances of another request being
present at that very time is very slim
Modified:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
So, can we agree I made an mistake?
Hey, I make 'em all the time...
No - I don't dislike you Mladen :) Nor Redhat - work with Marc and Joe
all the time on httpd-stuff.
Cool, let's move forward. I'll make sure I don't upload files
on random places any more :)
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Lets say you have two threads writing to the response (async write
from comet)
both of them could end up on the line:
socket.getBufHandler().getWriteBuffer().put(buf, offset, length);
assuming nothing is synced in the path down to here,
41 matches
Mail list logo
