Re: [ANN] Apache Tomcat JK 1.2.23 Web Server Connector released

Guenter Knauf wrote: > 3) where do the older versions go? Trivial answer; http://archive.apache.org/dist/ is a complete historical record of http://www.apache.org/dist/ - all automated. So delete stale flavors at will. Rainer Jung wrote: > > I had no permissions to delete them, I'll write to the

Bug report for Tomcat 5 [2007/05/20]

+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Watchdog [2007/05/20]

+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat 4 [2007/05/20]

+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat 3 [2007/05/20]

+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36155] - tomcat chooses wrong host if using mod_jk

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r539979 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/java/org/apache/jk/common/MsgAjp.java

Author: billbarker Date: Sun May 20 16:08:56 2007 New Revision: 539979 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=539979 Log: Porting fix for Bug #36155 from TC 6 branch Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/java/org/apache/jk/common/MsgAjp.java Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/java/o

svn commit: r539974 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/jk/common/MsgAjp.java

Author: billbarker Date: Sun May 20 15:45:26 2007 New Revision: 539974 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=539974 Log: Shave a couple of ms off of the time :) Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/jk/common/MsgAjp.java Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/jk/com

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36155] - tomcat chooses wrong host if using mod_jk

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r539971 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/jk/common/MsgAjp.java

Author: billbarker Date: Sun May 20 15:28:47 2007 New Revision: 539971 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=539971 Log: Always reset the MB when doing getBytes Fix for bug #36155 1) an unconditional reset is cheap if I'm going to call MB.setBytes 2) the JK connector doesn't support any

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42412] - java.lang.ClassCastException: javax.mail.Session

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Improving mod_jk URI forwarding

Why do you think, that /myapp/%252e%252e/otherapp/danger is equivalent to /myapp/../otherapp/danger ? Because it is on the Tomcat side and it ends up as /otherapp/danger. No it is not. If you send /myapp/%252e%252e/otherapp/danger to Tomcat, it will map the URL into the /myapp context (wh

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41696] - ApplicationDispatcher can't handle alternative HttpRequest-Implementation on forward

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [ANN] Apache Tomcat JK 1.2.23 Web Server Connector released

Hi Rainer, > Yes, I tried to delete all older versions of binaries (tried = as far as > permissions allowed), but for sme platforms we don't have 1.2.23 > binares, so I kept the latest available ones. that was what I expected. > There is an open point, if we can find a way of distributing contribu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42463] New: - "crossContext" and classloader issues - pls amend docu

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Improving mod_jk URI forwarding

Bill Barker wrote: Now the reverse proxy should have the ability to modify the URI (in the sense of mod_rewrite). If we accept, that mod_rewrite in httpd 1.3-2.2 is only able to operate on the decoded URI, we have no chance of making this interoperable with forwarding the original undecoded U

Re: Improving mod_jk URI forwarding

Rainer Jung wrote: Before I answer, let me first ask a question: What's wrong withg my suggestion? Or even better: use the encoding done with mod_proxy_ajp? Because it doesn't solve the real problem. Original URI: /myapp/%252e%252e/otherapp/danger JkMount /myapp/* Apache httpd will corr

Re: Improving mod_jk URI forwarding

"Rainer Jung" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jean-Frederic wrote: >> On Sun, 2007-05-20 at 18:17 +0200, Rainer Jung wrote: >>> Before I answer, let me first ask a question: What's wrong withg my >>> suggestion? >> >> Well thinking to it I am not very happy with the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41513] - JSP examples don't work and don't display source

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42455] - localhost:8080 -- many (?all?) jsp code samples are 404...broken links?

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42449] - JNDIRealm does not catch NullPointerException

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r539907 - in /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk: java/org/apache/catalina/realm/JNDIRealm.java webapps/docs/changelog.xml

Author: funkman Date: Sun May 20 11:33:16 2007 New Revision: 539907 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=539907 Log: JNDIRealm does not catch NullPointerException for Sun's LDAP provider Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/realm/JNDIRealm.java tomcat/tc6.0.x/

Re: Possible bug with ETag in 304 responses - dev input requested

On 5/20/07, Julian Reschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Yes, I think that's correct. It's bug. OK then, I'll submit a bug report. -- Len Popp [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands,

Re: [ANN] Apache Tomcat JK 1.2.23 Web Server Connector released

2007/5/20, Guenter Knauf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hi Henri, > The iSeries (i5/OS) version need stuff added after 1.22 so it will be > available in 1.24... dont get me wrong - I didnt want to kick here, it was only a question why we had different handling for each platform I know, it was more t

Re: Improving mod_jk URI forwarding

Jean-Frederic wrote: On Sun, 2007-05-20 at 18:17 +0200, Rainer Jung wrote: Before I answer, let me first ask a question: What's wrong withg my suggestion? Well thinking to it I am not very happy with the change: +++ -#define JK_OPT_FWDURIDEFAULTJK_OPT_FWDURICOMPATUNPARSED +#define JK_O

Re: Improving mod_jk URI forwarding

Well thinking to it I am not very happy with the change: +++ -#define JK_OPT_FWDURIDEFAULTJK_OPT_FWDURICOMPATUNPARSED +#define JK_OPT_FWDURIDEFAULTJK_OPT_FWDURIESCAPEDMINIMAL +++ Because that is what the SPEC's says. I doubt, that the SPEC is very relevant for the reverse proxy s

Re: Improving mod_jk URI forwarding

On Sun, 2007-05-20 at 18:17 +0200, Rainer Jung wrote: > Before I answer, let me first ask a question: What's wrong withg my > suggestion? Well thinking to it I am not very happy with the change: +++ -#define JK_OPT_FWDURIDEFAULTJK_OPT_FWDURICOMPATUNPARSED +#define JK_OPT_FWDURIDEFAULT

Re: Improving mod_jk URI forwarding

Jean-Frederic wrote: On Sun, 2007-05-20 at 18:17 +0200, Rainer Jung wrote: Before I answer, let me first ask a question: What's wrong withg my suggestion? Or even better: use the encoding done with mod_proxy_ajp? For me there is nothing wrong except it adds 2 JKoptions or 3 :-) If we think t

Re: Improving mod_jk URI forwarding

On Sun, 2007-05-20 at 18:17 +0200, Rainer Jung wrote: > Before I answer, let me first ask a question: What's wrong withg my > suggestion? Or even better: use the encoding done with mod_proxy_ajp? For me there is nothing wrong except it adds 2 JKoptions or 3 :-) We know that Tomcat is going to no

Re: [ANN] Apache Tomcat JK 1.2.23 Web Server Connector released

Then I found on the main docu page: http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/ that there are direct links to the previous source versions, but all end up in a 'NOT FOUND'; should we change these to point to the archive now? I would point all of these to the download pages. We should never include

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42459] - Tomcat Web Application Manager table error

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.13

I fixed this (BZ 42459) now in r539895. Remy Maucherat wrote: Tim Funk wrote: The only 2 things I noticed (which aren't a big deal) The index pages had a bad links to the docs. (Now fixed) The status screen has a rendering bug when a webapp is stopped. I didn't have a chance to dig into it -

svn commit: r539895 - in /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk: java/org/apache/catalina/manager/HTMLManagerServlet.java webapps/docs/changelog.xml

Author: rjung Date: Sun May 20 10:12:08 2007 New Revision: 539895 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=539895 Log: Fix BZ 42459: Manager webap table format error for stopped and undeployed webapps. Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/manager/HTMLManagerServlet.j

Re: [ANN] Apache Tomcat JK 1.2.23 Web Server Connector released

I'm trying to follow this thread, I hope i'm not duplicating things. Mark Thomas wrote: Guenter Knauf wrote: this makes me ask a couple of questions: Remember we only *have* to make the source available. Anything we do on the binary front is just being helpful and the release manager is unlike

Re: Improving mod_jk URI forwarding

Before I answer, let me first ask a question: What's wrong withg my suggestion? Or even better: use the encoding done with mod_proxy_ajp? Original URI: /myapp/%252e%252e/otherapp/danger JkMount /myapp/* Apache httpd will correctly decode the URI to /myapp/%2e%2e/otherapp/danger mod_jk does

Re: Possible bug with ETag in 304 responses - dev input requested

Len Popp wrote: The issue was originally raised by Joe Mun on the Tomcat Users list: http://marc.info/?l=tomcat-user&m=117934336727314&w=2 I looked at the behaviour in Tomcat 5.5.23 and it looks like Tomcat is not handling ETag headers as required by the HTTP spec, when it returns a 304 ("not mo

Re: [ANN] Apache Tomcat JK 1.2.23 Web Server Connector released

Guenter Knauf wrote: >>> 3) where do the older versions go? >> They are automatically copied to archive.apache.org which is linked >> off the Tomcat homepage. > I found though that the README.html files which are commonly used to provide > further informations about the releases are not copied. Fo

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42412] - java.lang.ClassCastException: javax.mail.Session

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [ANN] Apache Tomcat JK 1.2.23 Web Server Connector released

Hi Henri, > The iSeries (i5/OS) version need stuff added after 1.22 so it will be > available in 1.24... dont get me wrong - I didnt want to kick here, it was only a question why we had different handling for each platform Guen. -

Re: [ANN] Apache Tomcat JK 1.2.23 Web Server Connector released

Hi Mark, >> 1) why do some folders list older versions while others do not? > Probably because they are the latest stable version for that platform. >> 2) why do we have a history of the last 3 versions with Win32 but no >> history for any other platform? > Because the old version weren't cleaned

Re: [ANN] Apache Tomcat JK 1.2.23 Web Server Connector released

The iSeries (i5/OS) version need stuff added after 1.22 so it will be available in 1.24... 2007/5/20, Guenter Knauf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hi all, > The Apache Tomcat team is pleased to announce the immediate availability > of version 1.2.23 of the Apache Tomcat Connectors. somehow I've a problem

Re: Improving mod_jk URI forwarding

Rainer Jung wrote: Mladen Turk wrote: Can you write a simple example of the uris that make the problem and why we would need to encode the %. How it is passed now, and how it would be passed with your proposal. Original URI: /myapp/%252e%252e/otherapp/danger JkMount /myapp/* Apache httpd