On 08/12/2014 10:06 AM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
It could also be solved with making operator T*() explicit, but neither of
these options are something that we can use in our code base today.
So at risk of adding yet another flavor of thing: why not introduce an
already_AddRefedT sort of struct
On 12/08/2014 16:57, rviti...@mozilla.com wrote:
From now on all alerts will be sent by default also to
telemetry-ale...@mozilla.com.
How does one read that list? I can't find anywhere on how to subscribe.
--
GCP
___
dev-platform mailing list
Karl Tomlinson wrote:
Aryeh Gregor writes:
The compiler is required to use the move constructor (if one exists) instead of
the copy constructor when constructing the return value of a function, and also
when initializing an object from the return value of a function, or assigning
the
Well there is https://github.com/mozilla/jwcrypto which does JWS.
It is available in privileged JS through jwcrypto.jsm (i.e.
resource://gre/modules/identity/jwcrypto.jsm).
There's some code usage for these things in the MobileIdentityManager,
Webapps and Payments jsms.
On 12.08.2014 19:22,
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 9:42 AM, Jeff Walden jwalden+...@mit.edu wrote:
So at risk of adding yet another flavor of thing: why not introduce an
already_AddRefedT sort of struct that *does* own an addref, *will* release
on destruction if not nulled out, and does *not* explicitly convert to T*?
Actually, MS is very clear on their position on MathML in Internet Explorer:
http://status.modern.ie/mathml?term=mathML
Well, status.modern.ie was published about a year after my message.
Curiously enough, according to
On 08/12/2014 06:23 PM, Aryeh Gregor wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 6:16 PM, Benoit Jacob jacob.benoi...@gmail.com wrote:
As far as I know, the only downside in replacing already_AddRefed by
nsCOMPtr would be to incur more useless calls to AddRef and Release. In the
case of threadsafe i.e.
On 8/13/2014 3:34 AM, Philipp Kewisch wrote:
Does this also affect binary extensions in any way? I'd imagine that
globally installed extensions would break signing if placed incorrectly.
You cannot place anything in the Firefox bundle. Any extensions, binary
or not, would need to be
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Ehsan Akhgari ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com wrote:
What goal would this achieve? I don't understand why it's OK to ignore the
return value of a function which returns an already AddRef'ed object from
a conceptual perspective.
You might want the effect of the
On 14-08-12 08:46 PM, Cameron McCormack wrote:
Ben Hearsum wrote:
Apple recently announced changes to how OS X applications must be
packaged and signed
Does this also apply if you run .app/Contents/MacOS/firefox binary
manually rather than opening the .app?
I'm not sure about that. I also
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Aryeh Gregor a...@aryeh.name wrote:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Ehsan Akhgari ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com
wrote:
What goal would this achieve? I don't understand why it's OK to ignore
the
return value of a function which returns an already AddRef'ed
Hi,
I have to pass an array of strings (or JS::Value array) to JS-XPCOM from my C++
code. I could not find the proper example in C++ to implements this.
Based on the jsFunction I am passing in JS-XPCOM, i will extract the correct
number of values in the JS and call the expected function.
How
The Web APIs documentation meeting is Friday at 10 AM Pacific Time (see
http://bit.ly/APIDocsMeeting for your time zone). Everyone's welcome to
attend; if you're interested in ensuring that all Web APIs are properly
documented, we'd love your input.
We have an agenda, as well as details on
If this is from a binary component, i would advise against passing
JSVals directly, because the APIs you need to manipulate are no longer
exported (they're still temporarily exported in Windows IIUC, but
that's changing soon). See
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=978995
Instead, you
Thanks Bholly.
regards,
Shan'
On Wednesday, August 13, 2014 8:48:40 PM UTC+5:30, Bobby Holley wrote:
If this is from a binary component, i would advise against passing
JSVals directly, because the APIs you need to manipulate are no longer
exported (they're still temporarily exported in
Hello Paolo,
On 13/08/2014 17:40, Paolo Amadini wrote:
I've just updated the MDN page about the testing frameworks to add more
details, like the process where the tests run in an e10s build, and
moved everything to a table to make the information more accessible.
The links to detail pages are
On 8/13/2014 4:55 PM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Too bad I didn't know about your page before, it would have saved me
quite some time.
Well, I just created the page :-) The work for better descriptions in
mach and Treeherder is quite useful as well!
By the way, do you know what is talos g1? I
Hi dev-platform,
TL;DR - Cloud Services and Quality Engineering would like to propose the
creation of a directory named “external in gecko and gaia repos for externally
dependent tests.
This enables features married to Cloud Services such as Loop, FindMyDevice,
FirefoxAccounts, and Sync to
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 5:44 PM, Ehsan Akhgari ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com wrote:
Can't you do the following instead?
unused MyFunction(); // I know that I'm leaking this ref, but it's ok
somehow
No, because the use-case is where you don't want to leak the ref --
you want it to be released
On 8/13/14 9:21 AM, Edwin Wong wrote:
Hi dev-platform,
TL;DR - Cloud Services and Quality Engineering would like to propose the creation of
a directory named “external in gecko and gaia repos for externally dependent
tests.
This enables features married to Cloud Services such as Loop,
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 5:14 AM, Aryeh Gregor a...@aryeh.name wrote:
I think this can be improved upon a bit further: just change
already_AddRefed to behave more similarly to nsCOMPtr, but still not
convert to T* implicitly. So for instance:
* Change ~already_AddRefed to just release the
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 9:24 AM, Aryeh Gregor a...@aryeh.name wrote:
No, because the use-case is where you don't want to leak the ref --
you want it to be released automatically for you. So for instance,
here's a real-world bit of code from nsWSRunObject:
if ((aRun-mRightType
Did we ever reach agreement about moving gaia into m-c? It would make this
type of problem go away, and make regression range hunting much easier.
On Aug 13, 2014, at 9:21 AM, Edwin Wong edw...@mozilla.com wrote:
Hi dev-platform,
TL;DR - Cloud Services and Quality Engineering would like
On 08/13/2014 07:44 AM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
If that is the goal, then I don't agree that is a useful outcome at all. I
*do* wish that there were better *and* safer ways of doing more things
automatically but ownership transfers are inherently unsafe operations that
are expressed using
On 2014-08-13, 12:21 PM, Edwin Wong wrote:
Hi dev-platform,
TL;DR - Cloud Services and Quality Engineering would like to propose the creation of
a directory named “external in gecko and gaia repos for externally dependent
tests.
This enables features married to Cloud Services such as Loop,
On 2014-08-13, 12:24 PM, Aryeh Gregor wrote:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 5:44 PM, Ehsan Akhgari ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com wrote:
Can't you do the following instead?
unused MyFunction(); // I know that I'm leaking this ref, but it's ok
somehow
No, because the use-case is where you don't want to
Hi Greg,
A few had discussed manifest vs directory separation of tests. I think the
directory idea took root because it’s easily identifiable from it’s path,
reducing collision with existing tests. I also agree, using directory as a
form of meta data is limiting. That said, both concepts
On 08/13/2014 08:36 AM, rviti...@mozilla.com wrote:
I requested a public list available over NNTP (see Bug 1053202,
mozilla.qa.telemetry-alerts). That should make everybody happy.
I would sort of like a pulse notification for these, but it probably
wouldn't get enough usage yet for it to be
On 2014-08-13, 3:07 PM, Edwin Wong wrote:
Ehsan,
This wouldn’t be a top level dir, it would be as such:
• [area]/[framework]/external/test_example.js
• content/media/test/mochitest/external/test_loop.html
• gaia/apps/findmydevice/test/marionette/external/fmd_locate.py
On 8/13/2014 12:21 PM, Edwin Wong wrote:
Hi dev-platform,
TL;DR - Cloud Services and Quality Engineering would like to propose the
creation of a directory named “external in gecko and gaia repos for
externally dependent tests.
This enables features married to Cloud Services such as
On 08/13/2014 07:24 PM, Aryeh Gregor wrote:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 5:44 PM, Ehsan Akhgari ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com wrote:
Can't you do the following instead?
unused MyFunction(); // I know that I'm leaking this ref, but it's ok
somehow
No, because the use-case is where you don't want to
(reposting, got stuck in the queue)
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Ilya Grigorik igrigo...@gmail.com
wrote:
Whereas for (b) you can also do it in place by prefetching the template
and then issuing a data request for
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Ilya Grigorik igrigo...@gmail.com
wrote:
Whereas for (b) you can also do it in place by prefetching the template
and then issuing a data request for relevant data once you know the exact
In fact, I am implementing something like:
[scriptable, uuid(3c2a2d26-08d6-415b-a635-24f15983bde6)]
interface nsIMultilineTreeView: nsITreeView
{
long getCellTextPartCount(in long row, in nsITreeColumn col);
AString getCellTextPart(in long row, in nsITreeColumn col, in long partIdx);
On 2014-08-13, 3:24 PM, Ilya Grigorik wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Ilya Grigorik igrigo...@gmail.com
wrote:
Whereas for (b) you can also do it in place by prefetching the template
and then issuing a data
Hello all,
We are in the process of making JS 'let' semantics ES6-compliant in
SpiderMonkey. I hope to land bug 1001090 sometime this month or early next
month (I've been told there's a B2G uplift on Sept 1st), which is one of many
for ES6 'let'-compliance. It changes 'let' semantics in two
AFAICT gaia doesn't use let in its core code (since let is not available
in non-chrome js yet) but it does use it in its build scripts etc.
However, let is pretty heavily used in add-ons. CCing Jorge who can
probably help with what to do with that. But have we considered not
changing the
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:52:29AM -0700, Doug Turner wrote:
Did we ever reach agreement about moving gaia into m-c? It would make
this type of problem go away, and make regression range hunting much
easier.
The gaia repo is massive, importing it in m-c would more than double
m-c's size.
Anyways, now that gaia revisions are tied to m-c revisions with
b2g/config/gaia.json, regression range hunting should be a matter of
tooling around that, now.
That is excellent news.
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
About not changing the behavior for chrome JS, the prospect of having chrome JS
becoming more divergent from standard JS is unwelcome to me. Having additional,
orthogonal features is one thing, but a fundamental feature with the same
syntax that behaves differently depending on the context is
On 2014-08-13, 6:02 PM, Shu-yu Guo wrote:
About not changing the behavior for chrome JS, the prospect of having chrome JS
becoming more divergent from standard JS is unwelcome to me. Having additional,
orthogonal features is one thing, but a fundamental feature with the same
syntax that
On 2014-08-09, 10:19 PM, Bobby Holley wrote:
I've mentioned this before [1], but recent checkins in mozilla-central
suggest that this message could use repeating.
Please don't write new tests that do tricky things with SpecialPowers.wrap
and friends (like SpecialPowers.Cc and SpecialPowers.Cu,
On Wednesday, August 13, 2014 8:06:08 PM UTC+1, Steve Fink wrote:
I would sort of like a pulse notification for these, but it probably
wouldn't get enough usage yet for it to be worthwhile. (I'd feed it into
an irc bot that notifies me + maybe a channel.)
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Ehsan Akhgari ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com wrote:
Note that anything tested in mochitest-chrome is not tested on Firefox OS at
all, which is a *great* reason to avoid writing mochitest-chrome at all
costs.
Well, until bug 797164 is fixed. Mochitest-chrome is
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 12:06:08PM -0700, Steve Fink wrote:
On 08/13/2014 08:36 AM, rviti...@mozilla.com wrote:
I requested a public list available over NNTP (see Bug 1053202,
mozilla.qa.telemetry-alerts). That should make everybody happy.
I would sort of like a pulse notification for
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 06:09:31PM -0400, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
On 2014-08-13, 6:02 PM, Shu-yu Guo wrote:
About not changing the behavior for chrome JS, the prospect of having chrome
JS becoming more divergent from standard JS is unwelcome to me. Having
additional, orthogonal features is one
On 8/13/14, 5:56 PM, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 06:09:31PM -0400, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
On 2014-08-13, 6:02 PM, Shu-yu Guo wrote:
About not changing the behavior for chrome JS, the prospect of having
chrome JS becoming more divergent from standard JS is unwelcome to me.
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Ilya Grigorik igrigo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Ilya Grigorik igrigo...@gmail.com
wrote:
Whereas for (b) you can also do it in place by prefetching the template
tl;dr: try repo is being reset - read on for ways to access old push data
Today we experienced another hg.m.o event that is not recovering similar
to past events. After 2-1/2 hours with no signs of recovery, and with
the recommendation of the sheriffs, we are resetting the try repo now.
While
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 5:16 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Ilya Grigorik igrigo...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
Do you really think that Google would be able to morph a google
calendar
50 matches
Mail list logo
