Nelson B Bolyard wrote:
If Microsoft has merely taken a DER-encoded object from another standard
and has incorporated it into a cert extension, that seems fine to me.
I hope they did it in such a way that existing BER/DER parsers of the
sMIMECapabilities attribute can just parse the extension
Hi all,
I've googled to and fro and have only found another poster having
roughly the same problem as I. The situation is this:
I want to authenticate against a juniper SA 2500 firewall with a user
and password AND a certificate. I have a safenet iKey 1032 token where
I imported the p12
I can't help you with the specific problem [:-(] but I can help you
with a diagnostic at least. Which is? Smart card vendors have
spent decades on fighting each other on the spec/middleware
side and naturally we all have to pay the price.
Tokens for consumers have therefore been [rightfully]
On 2009-07-02 02:58 PDT, Udo Puetz wrote:
I want to authenticate against a juniper SA 2500 firewall with a user and
password AND a certificate.
I have a safenet iKey 1032 token where I imported the p12 certificate.
In firefox (tried 2.0.x, 3.0.x and 3.5.x) I imported the safenet
K1PK112.DLL
Anders Rundgren wrote:
Linux: doesn't even provide a crypto service API, or does it?
There's a PKCS#11 driver implementation by OpenSC project (see
http://www.opensc.org/).
Ciao, Michael.
--
dev-tech-crypto mailing list
dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org
On 07/02/2009 10:17 PM, Anders Rundgren:
If you want to use Hardware tokens, PKCS #11, and Firefox you
either must be nuts, a masochist, very smart, or highly committed.
For all those which are nuts, masochists, smart and highly committed I
blogged this article which shows how easy it can
USB does actually have a PKCS#10 device reader profile. If you were
to extend that by adding a generic oh, it also has a device in a slot
that performs these functions layer that was exposed through the
device-reader profile, it would be universal -- and universally
implemented in the platform
PKCS #10? I guess you really meant PKCS #11.
I'm not aware of any such profile. There is smart card profile
but I doubt it has much to do with PKCS #11, it is rather about
7816.
Anyway, the way Firefox is linked to PKCS #11 is probably OK
in Linux-land.
However, in Windows-land where 80% of
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Anders
Rundgrenanders.rundg...@telia.com wrote:
PKCS #10? I guess you really meant PKCS #11.
I'm not aware of any such profile. There is smart card profile
but I doubt it has much to do with PKCS #11, it is rather about
7816.
You're right, PKCS#11.
Kyle Hamilton wrote:
3) There is no desire at/for the bank to allow smart-card login,
because there are alternatives that are more useful
Exactly! It doesn't work for the really useful applications that
could drive the market.
Anders
PS. There were some oddities in the
On 2009-07-02 12:17 PDT, Anders Rundgren wrote:
If you want to use Hardware tokens, PKCS #11, and Firefox you
either must be nuts, a masochist, very smart, or highly committed.
For ordinary users it makes little sense.
Hardware tokens: there are any number of different types
PKCS #11: the
Nelson B Bolyard wrote:
If you want to use Hardware tokens, PKCS #11, and Firefox you
either must be nuts, a masochist, very smart, or highly committed.
Anders, The user has made a decision and we're helping him with it.
That's fine, I have personally noted that these kinds of problems are
12 matches
Mail list logo
