sendsms

2001-12-27 Thread Shridhar Raju
Hi, I sent SM using php-admin/sendsms.php, but didn't gave any mobile number (receiver). Even then /cgi-bin/sendsms gave following response (including header) Sending the SMS Text message "Testing. Shridhar Raju" to the phone ... HTTP/1.0 202 Foo Content-Length: 5 Content-

sendsms

2002-01-20 Thread Karl Friedrich
im using Kannel 1.1.5 over CIMD2...   when FROM is not set or FROM has no value, the message is not being sent, but when i add value to FROM, the message is being sent...   CIMD2 on the carrier side was enabled to accept suffix like for example if the access number is 1234, you can have 5678

Sendsms Post

2001-09-01 Thread Bruno David Rodrigues
How do sendsms POST interface works ?   I tried changing form method from GET to POST and it gives me "Authorization failed for sendsms", so fields didn't get inside.   In the code, I just see references to X-Kannel-* and text in body. This could be great for a reply to sms

Re: sendsms

2001-12-28 Thread Stipe Tolj
> I sent SM using php-admin/sendsms.php, but didn't gave any mobile number > (receiver). Even then /cgi-bin/sendsms gave following response (including > header) > > Sending the SMS Text message "Testing. Shridhar Raju" to the phone ... > > HTTP/1.0 202 Foo

Re: sendsms

2001-12-28 Thread Andreas Fink
> > I sent SM using php-admin/sendsms.php, but didn't gave any mobile number >> (receiver). Even then /cgi-bin/sendsms gave following response (including >> header) >> >> Sending the SMS Text message "Testing. Shridhar Raju" to the phone ... >

Re: sendsms

2002-01-20 Thread Stipe Tolj
Karl Friedrich wrote: > > im using Kannel 1.1.5 over CIMD2... > > when FROM is not set or FROM has no value, the message is not being > sent, but when i add value to FROM, the message is being sent... yep, that's how it is intended. See the user's guide for more. Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] -

sendsms interface

2002-11-18 Thread Kita B. Ndara
Hi, I have a web2sms system whereby I collect and reformat messages from the web, then push them into my kannel through the sendsms interface. If I push messages rapidly through the sendsms interface using lynx -dump '...', intermitently the interface goes silent (i.e. empty response

ems sendsms sample

2002-02-16 Thread Patrick Mignott
i have had the this list has gone in detail about EMS standard with Kannel but i have not been able to find any example showing how to send a ringtone, icon using sendsms, i have only found nokia stuff, could some be so kind to send me a sample to EMS or Motorola sample of how to send a

Re: sendsms interface

2002-11-19 Thread Stipe Tolj
> I have a web2sms system whereby I collect and > reformat messages from the web, then push them into my > kannel through the sendsms interface. If I push > messages rapidly through the sendsms interface using > lynx -dump '...', intermitently the interface goes >

Re: ems sendsms sample

2002-02-25 Thread Bruno David Rodrigues
age.   Any experiences ?   - Original Message - From: Patrick Mignott To: 'Kannel' Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 6:31 PM Subject: ems sendsms sample i have had the this list has gone in detail about EMS standard with Kannel but i have not been able

sendsms and smsc parameter

2002-04-26 Thread Andrea Viscovich
As someone pointed out sometime ago, if you have multiple smsc, the parameter smsc in sendsms url does not work. I know the routing  can be done by properly write the kannel conf file, but I would like to choose it from a web page time by time, so the only thing is to have the parameter

Sending push using sendsms?

2003-01-22 Thread Peter Löfman
Is it possible to send a SI message using sendsms cgi script? If so, has anyone done it? Any example? /Peter Lofman _ Planera semestern på MSN http://www.msn.se/resor/default.asp

[bug] /cgi-bin/sendsms?smsc=

2002-03-20 Thread Alex Judd
picks up the new parameters (ie. the parameters from the last query) and works. Anyone seen this happening before? -> 1st Send (to use SMSC1) GET /cgi-bin/sendsms?username=username&password=password&to=+4477&from=username&text=Test+Message&smsc=SMSC2 HTTP/1.0 -&g

Re: sendsms and smsc parameter

2002-04-26 Thread Stipe Tolj
Yes the docs tell the truth. In general specifying a "&smsc=foobar" in the GET request should route the message to the specific smsc-id = "foobar". Can you provide us a kannel.conf setup and example GET request where this is failing? Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: sendsms and smsc parameter

2002-04-26 Thread Andrea Viscovich
TED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 6:35 PM Subject: Re: sendsms and smsc parameter > Yes the docs tell the truth. > > In general specifying a "&smsc=foobar" in the GET request should route > the message to the specific smsc-id = "f

RE: sendsms and smsc parameter

2002-04-26 Thread Angel Fradejas
Para: Stipe Tolj CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Asunto: Re: sendsms and smsc parameter Well, I'm sorry Stipe. I just thought that setting smsc was enought, instead I realized that I should set preferred-smsc-id to themselves for each smsc group, and now it works. Just one question. Now I have .. sm

Re: sendsms and smsc parameter

2002-04-27 Thread Nisan Bloch
At 11:49 AM 4/26/02 +0200, Andrea Viscovich wrote: As someone pointed out sometime ago, if you have multiple smsc, the parameter smsc in sendsms url does not work. I know the routing  can be done by properly write the kannel conf file, but I would like to choose it from a web page time by time

POST to /cgi-bin/sendsms

2002-08-28 Thread Anarchy
can we do a POST to the sendsms HTTP interface or must we use GET only? if not, is there any plan to support both POST and GET?  -> [EMAIL PROTECTED]Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes

Sendsms interface : Connection: Keep-Alive

2002-11-05 Thread Alan McNatty
Hello, I'm using current cvs (1.2.1 effectively) and have noticed a change in how the sendsms http interface is working (not sure since when). When I connect to kannel sendsms http interface with a Connection: Close header my request is processed and the connection is closed. However if I

Re: Sending push using sendsms?

2003-01-23 Thread Dziugas Baltrunas
I'm sorry, what do you meen SI meesage? regards, Dziugas Baltrunas On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, [iso-8859-1] Peter Löfman wrote: > Is it possible to send a SI message using sendsms cgi script? > If so, has anyone done it? > Any example? >

Re: Sending push using sendsms?

2003-01-23 Thread Peter Löfman
I mean a Service Indication push message. /Peter Lofman From: Dziugas Baltrunas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Peter Löfman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Sending push using sendsms? Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 10:12:24 +0200 (EET) I'm sorry, what do you meen SI

Re: Sending push using sendsms?

2003-01-23 Thread Bernd Kronmueller
That is what we do to deliver SI to handsets: http://curry:13013/cgi-bin/sendsms?username=tester&password=foobar&to=%2B447771537333&text=%01%06%04%03%AE%81%EA%02%05%6A%00%45%C6%0C%03134.231.12.23/Title.mid?210125%00%11%038@asdksas%00%08%0A%C3%07%20%02%10%17%09%02%23%10%C3%07%20%02%10

RE: Sending push using sendsms?

2003-01-23 Thread Damir Salantic
WSP (IP bearer - GPRS) and not over SMS? It seems to me that WAP PUSH specification enables that possibility. Is that (going to be) supported in Kannel? Thanks Damir Salantic > >On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, [iso-8859-1] Peter Löfman wrote: > > > > > Is it possible to send a

Re: Sending push using sendsms?

2003-01-23 Thread Aarno Syvänen
? Thanks Damir Salantic On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, [iso-8859-1] Peter Löfman wrote: Is it possible to send a SI message using sendsms cgi script? If so, has anyone done it? Any example? /Peter Lofman

Re: Sending push using sendsms?

2003-01-23 Thread Peter Löfman
Thanks alot Bernd! I will try this out! /Peter Lofman From: Bernd Kronmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Peter Löfman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Sending push using sendsms? Date: 23 Jan 2003 09:13:05 + That is what we do to deliver SI to handsets:

Re: Sending push using sendsms?

2003-01-23 Thread Aarno Syvänen
WSP part seems problematic. What you mean %03 being 'content type'. There is no token for it, only its value is tokenized. Aarno On Thursday, January 23, 2003, at 10:13 AM, Bernd Kronmueller wrote: That is what we do to deliver SI to handsets: http://curry:13013/cgi-bin/ sendsm

Re: Sending push using sendsms?

2003-01-23 Thread Stipe Tolj
Peter Löfman wrote: > > Thanks alot Bernd! > > I will try this out! why do you want to live in "hard land"?! while Aarno has written the PPG in wapbox that does all the WAP push magic. We use it for MMS notification pushing via SMS. Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---

[PATCH] multi-cast support for sendsms

2002-01-16 Thread Stipe Tolj
27;allowed' and 'denied' lists by walking + * the 'denied' list and check if items are also present in 'allowed', + * then we will discard them from 'allowed'. + */ +for (i = 0; i < list_len(denied); i++) { +receiv = list_get(denied, i);

Additional [bug] /cgi-bin/sendsms?smsc=

2002-03-20 Thread Alex Judd
This appears to be something to do with the fact that as far as I can tell from reading smsc_http.c the smsc= parameter is now depricated so the system is alternating between the available SMSCs even though I'm telling it to use a specific one. Can we do this in another way? Thanks Alex --

RE: POST to /cgi-bin/sendsms

2002-08-29 Thread Oded Arbel
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: POST to /cgi-bin/sendsms can we do a POST to the sendsms HTTP interface or must we use GET only? if not, is there any plan to support both POST and GET?  -> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Do You Yahoo!?Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes

RE: POST to /cgi-bin/sendsms

2002-08-29 Thread Anarchy
i tested with a simple html form that accepts the msisdn and text (username and password are hidden fields) and posts it to /cgi-bin/sendsms i got the unauthorised error message upon changing the form method to get, the problem disappears... huh?  Oded Arbel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

RE: POST to /cgi-bin/sendsms

2002-08-29 Thread Oded Arbel
y [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 10:45 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: POST to /cgi-bin/sendsms i tested with a simple html form that accepts the msisdn and text (username and password are hidden fields) and posts it to /cgi-bin/sendsms i got the unauth

Re: POST to /cgi-bin/sendsms

2002-08-29 Thread Andrea Viscovich
st 29, 2002 10:45 AM Subject: RE: POST to /cgi-bin/sendsms i tested with a simple html form that accepts the msisdn and text (username and password are hidden fields) and posts it to /cgi-bin/sendsms i got the unauthorised error message upon changing the form method to get

RE: POST to /cgi-bin/sendsms

2002-08-29 Thread Oded Arbel
OD ... and then I want to be ALONE --   -Original Message-From: Andrea Viscovich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 12:08 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: POST to /cgi-bin/sendsms I had exactly the same problem, with latest cvs, I don't

Re: POST to /cgi-bin/sendsms

2002-09-04 Thread Anarchy
i tried posting only the to and text parameters to /cgi-bin/sendsms?username=xxx&password=xxx and /cgi-bin/sendsms?user=xxx&pass=xxx and got the same results... i guess POST is not supported right now :( Oded Arbel wrote: Unauthorized error is received when the username and password are i

RE: POST to /cgi-bin/sendsms

2002-09-04 Thread Oded Arbel
POST is supported. I tried to reproduce the error you describe, but w/o success. we also use the sendsms interface constantly w/o problems. Can you supply some smsbox logs from when you tried to send the message using POST or GET ?   --Oded Arbelm-Wise mobile solutions[EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: POST to /cgi-bin/sendsms

2002-09-04 Thread Anarchy
i tried with a small page:       http://*.*.*.*:13013/cgi-bin/sendsms" method="post">            Recipient                     

Re: POST to /cgi-bin/sendsms

2002-09-04 Thread Oded Arbel
Anarchy wrote: i tried with a small page: and got the error "Authorization failed for sendsms"... below are the logs from smsbox.log: 2002-09-05 01:03:22 [3] INFO: smsbox: Got HTTP request from <210.24.202.83> 2002-09-05 01:03:22 [2] DEBUG: HTTP: Creating HTTPClient fo

Re: POST to /cgi-bin/sendsms

2002-09-04 Thread Anarchy
i added the enctype to the form... http://*.*.*.*:13013/cgi-bin/sendsms" enctype="application/x-www-form-urlencoded" method="post"> and the results are the same as before... smsbox.log shows the same thing tried using user/pass instead of username/password to no ava

RE: POST to /cgi-bin/sendsms

2002-09-05 Thread Oded Arbel
ct: Re: POST to /cgi-bin/sendsms i added the enctype to the form... http://*.*.*.*:13013/cgi-bin/sendsms" enctype="application/x-www-form-urlencoded" method="post"> and the results are the same as before... smsbox.log shows the same thing tried using u

RE: POST to /cgi-bin/sendsms

2002-09-05 Thread Kalle Marjola
On Wed, 4 Sep 2002, Anarchy wrote: > i tried with a small page: > http://*.*.*.*:13013/cgi-bin/sendsms"; method="post"> > > > The problem here is that this creates an HTTP call of something like... (headers) (body

RE: Sendsms interface : Connection: Keep-Alive

2002-11-05 Thread Oded Arbel
> -Original Message- > From: Alan McNatty [mailto:alan@;catalyst.net.nz] > I think (from memory) the connection would always close in the past. Yes, that was a bug, and it was fixed. it should be in the Changelog (the old pre 1.2.1 changelog), I remember seeing it there. -- Oded Arbel

[PATCH] admin, sendsms bind to interface

2002-11-18 Thread Nisan Bloch
Hi All Patches to the bb_http.c and smsbox.c to allow the admin and sendsms http interface to bind to a specified interface. files patched: gw/smsbox.c, gw/bb_http.c, gwlib/cfg.def Nisan --- ../cvs/gateway/gw/smsbox.c Thu Nov 14 12:11:38 2002 +++ ../gateway-cvsup/gw/smsbox.c Sun Nov 17 22:51

label in logs to differenciate sendsms requests

2001-12-19 Thread Gildas PERROT
Hi, I would like to differenciate sendsms requests for a unique sendsms user defined (there will be several users of a unique sendmsms account). I can't use &from variable or &text or &smsc which are used for another aim. Is there any other variable to do that ? Is someone inte

Re: [PATCH] multi-cast support for sendsms

2002-01-16 Thread Stipe Tolj
BTW, I took care that the additional things don't break the current messages and handling of single message receivers in 'to'. So I guess this should be not breaking any current running setups?! Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Sy

Re: [PATCH] multi-cast support for sendsms

2002-01-17 Thread Valter Santos
thanks Stipe ;) Valter - Original Message - From: "Stipe Tolj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:55 PM Subject: [PATCH] multi-cast support for sendsms > Hi all, > > today I have implemented the

Re: [PATCH] multi-cast support for sendsms

2002-01-17 Thread Stipe Tolj
yet anyone tested the code on an own installation?! Voting for commiting this to CVS please! Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Münsterstr. 248 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: [EMA

Re: [PATCH] multi-cast support for sendsms

2002-01-17 Thread Valter Santos
I have tested the patch!... it works fine to me (for now!!!) cheers, Valter - Original Message - From: "Stipe Tolj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 3:04 PM Subject: Re: [PATCH] multi-cast support for sendsms > yet

Re: [PATCH] multi-cast support for sendsms

2002-01-17 Thread Stipe Tolj
Valter Santos wrote: > > I have tested the patch!... it works fine to me (for now!!!) have you tried white/black-lists too? Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Münsterstr. 248 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax:

Re: [PATCH] multi-cast support for sendsms

2002-01-17 Thread Valter Santos
yes! i try multicasting with blacklist right now seams to work okay! valter - Original Message - From: "Stipe Tolj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 7:31 PM Subject: Re: [PATCH] multi-cast support for sendsms

Re: [PATCH] admin, sendsms bind to interface

2002-11-19 Thread Stipe Tolj
> Patches to the bb_http.c and smsbox.c to allow the admin and sendsms http > interface to bind to a specified interface. > > files patched: gw/smsbox.c, gw/bb_http.c, gwlib/cfg.def +1, sounds reasonable and doesn't change default behaviour, commited to cvs. Thanks for the pa

RE: [PATCH] admin, sendsms bind to interface

2002-12-23 Thread Mauricio Ramos
o:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 9:33 PM To: Nisan Bloch Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PATCH] admin, sendsms bind to interface > Patches to the bb_http.c and smsbox.c to allow the admin and sendsms http > interface to bind to a specified interface. > > fil

RE: [PATCH] admin, sendsms bind to interface

2002-12-24 Thread Nisan Bloch
ember 19, 2002 9:33 PM To: Nisan Bloch Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PATCH] admin, sendsms bind to interface > Patches to the bb_http.c and smsbox.c to allow the admin and sendsms http > interface to bind to a specified interface. > > files patched: gw/smsbox.c, gw/bb_http.c, gwl

Re: label in logs to differenciate sendsms requests

2001-12-19 Thread Andreas Fink
>Hi, > >I would like to differenciate sendsms requests for a unique sendsms user >defined (there will be several users of a unique sendmsms account). I can't >use &from variable or &text or &smsc which are used for another aim. Is >there any other variable to

RE: label in logs to differenciate sendsms requests

2001-12-19 Thread Ian Daly
e the > username would appear as "ispname:customername". So if at any time > there's a query on a message, this mechanism can be easily used to > pull out the logs. Also the wholesaler can make accounting specific > to the isp's different customers or services. If I unde

Re: label in logs to differenciate sendsms requests

2001-12-19 Thread Stipe Tolj
> I would like to differenciate sendsms requests for a unique sendsms user > defined (there will be several users of a unique sendmsms account). I can't > use &from variable or &text or &smsc which are used for another aim. Is > there any other variable to do that ?

Re: label in logs to differenciate sendsms requests

2001-12-19 Thread Stipe Tolj
ferent customers or services. > > If I understand correctly, the message will go > > sendsms request -> Kannel -> HTTP SMSC 1 (another Kannel) -> -> HTTP > SMSC n (another Kannel) -> SMSC I still did not get it -- would someone be so kind to enlight me here :) S

Re: label in logs to differenciate sendsms requests

2001-12-19 Thread Andreas Fink
fic >> > to the isp's different customers or services. >> >> If I understand correctly, the message will go >> >> sendsms request -> Kannel -> HTTP SMSC 1 (another Kannel) -> -> HTTP >> SMSC n (another Kannel) -> SMSC > >I sti

RE: label in logs to differenciate sendsms requests

2001-12-19 Thread Gildas PERROT
-Message d'origine- De : Stipe Tolj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Envoyé : mercredi 19 décembre 2001 15:30 À : Gildas PERROT Cc : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : Re: label in logs to differenciate sendsms requests > I would like to differenciate sendsms requests for a unique send

RE: label in logs to differenciate sendsms requests

2001-12-19 Thread Andreas Fink
> > Hmmm, from the architecture side I would claim you to set up as much >> "same" sendsms users as you will have logical user ids. Why isn't that >> practible in your case? >> >> Stipe > >Yes but in my application, I would have a lot of sub

Kannel crashes sendsms in emi2 and dlrmask=7

2002-11-26 Thread João Miranda
ing <> 2002-11-26 11:45:16 [3] WARNING: octstr_url_decode: corrupted end-of-string <> 2002-11-26 11:45:16 [3] INFO: smsbox: Got HTTP request from <127.0.0.1> 2002-11-26 11:45:16 [3] INFO: sendsms used by 2002-11-26 11:45:16 [3] INFO: sendsms sender: (127.0.0.1) to:<919115275&g

RE: label in logs to differenciate sendsms requests [patch]

2001-12-19 Thread Andreas Fink
here's a patch to do that. It implements &account=... please tell me if it works for you. -- Andreas Fink Fink-Consulting -- Tel: +41-61-6932730 Fax: +41-61-6932729 Mobile: +41-79-2457333 Address: A. Fink, Schwarzwaldallee 16, 40

RE: label in logs to differenciate sendsms requests [patch]

2001-12-20 Thread Andreas Fink
>Hi Andreas, > >I tried today CVS version which integrated your patch and it works perfectly >! Thanks a lot Andreas for your work ! > >Just one last thing, the account variable is not explained at >http://www.kannel.3glab.org/download/kannel-userguide-snapshot/userguide.htm >l#AEN2501. > The use

[ANN] sendsms-url and smsota-url config directives added

2001-12-31 Thread Stipe Tolj
Hi list, I just commited a minor change to cvs which allows to have user specified sendsms and sendota request URLs for smsbox. This allows to set the URLs respectively in smsbox group as follows: smskannel.conf: ... group = smsbox ... sendsms-url = "/cgi-bin/sendsms" sendota-url =

Re: Kannel crashes sendsms in emi2 and dlrmask=7

2002-12-02 Thread Stipe Tolj
João Miranda schrieb: > > Hi list, > > I'm trying to send messages with drlmask=7 and libsdb configured. > The kannel crashes after sending the first message. Can anyone help me?? > > bearerbox log: > 2002-11-26 11:44:54 [0] INFO: Kannel bearerbox II version 1.2.1 starting > 2002-11-26 11:44:54

RE: Kannel crashes sendsms in emi2 and dlrmask=7

2002-12-02 Thread João Miranda
t_len(row)); return 0; } octstr_destroy(dlr_row); return 0; } -Original Message- From: Stipe Tolj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 10:31 To: João Miranda Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Kannel crashes sendsms in emi2 and dlrmask=7 João Miranda s

Re: Kannel crashes sendsms in emi2 and dlrmask=7

2002-12-02 Thread Stipe Tolj
> I made a patch for sdb_callback_add, and the 'Row has wrong length 1' error gone. >But I still get 'PANIC: gwlib/list.c:425: lock: Assertion `list != NULL' failed.'. > Can you validate the patch and help me with the Assertion error? can you check/backtrace which list_xxx() operation (seems list

RE: Kannel crashes sendsms in emi2 and dlrmask=7

2002-12-02 Thread João Miranda
My RDBMS is Oracle, and it seems to me that the operation is list_lock(). -Original Message- From: Stipe Tolj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 17:18 To: João Miranda Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Kannel crashes sendsms in emi2 and dlrmask=7 > I mad

Re: Kannel crashes sendsms in emi2 and dlrmask=7

2002-12-02 Thread Stipe Tolj
João Miranda schrieb: > > My RDBMS is Oracle, and it seems to me that the operation is list_lock(). have you located at which position in Kannel's code this happens?! Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Vogelsanger Weg 80

Re: Kannel crashes sendsms in emi2 and dlrmask=7

2002-12-02 Thread Andreas Fink
On Montag, Dezember 2, 2002, at 07:05 Uhr, Stipe Tolj wrote: Andreas Fink schrieb: On Montag, Dezember 2, 2002, at 06:25 Uhr, Stipe Tolj wrote: João Miranda schrieb: My RDBMS is Oracle, and it seems to me that the operation is list_lock(). have you located at which position in Kannel's code t

RE: Kannel crashes sendsms in emi2 and dlrmask=7

2002-12-04 Thread João Miranda
cause you are trying to access an empty List. -Original Message- From: Stipe Tolj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 17:25 To: João Miranda Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Kannel crashes sendsms in emi2 and dlrmask=7 João Miranda schrieb: > > My RDBMS is

Re: HTTP compliance in sendsms (Was: anyone using mutli-cast GET requests)

2002-01-03 Thread Stipe Tolj
Oded Arbel wrote: > > Speaking of sendsms' HTTP interface - I've noticed that sendsms doesn't > honor the 'Connection: close' header and always use keep-alive. can that be > fixed, please ? I had a look in gwlib/http.c:899 where the following is insi

Re: HTTP compliance in sendsms (Was: anyone using mutli-cast GET requests)

2002-01-15 Thread Tuomas Luttinen
Stipe Tolj wrote: > Oded Arbel wrote: >>Speaking of sendsms' HTTP interface - I've noticed that sendsms doesn't >>honor the 'Connection: close' header and always use keep-alive. can that be >>fixed, please ? > I had a look in gwlib/http.c:899 w

[Fwd: [PATCH] SMPP pid and dcs (Was: Re: overwrite a previous sendSMS)]

2002-05-01 Thread Bruno David Simões Rodrigues
I'm going to commit this unless someone complains I've had one successfull user: From: Damjan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Ok, this patch works - I successfully compiled it and sent several overwriting messages with "pid=65". Thanks David. (Off to testing Kannel/SMPP further). -Forw