Re: F20 release name election?

On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 17:39 -0700, Dan Mashal wrote: > I personally LOVE release names. However, I feel that we should forego > it this one release. > > What is the point of the board of the community decides everything? > > We all know that there needs to be a tough decision made by the board, >

Proposal for new package group: Development:Formal Methods Tools

On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 03:26:48PM -0600, Jerry James wrote: > On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 1:31 PM, John C. Peterson wrote: > > I would like to edit comps.xml to add a new package group for the tools > > that have already been packaged by the Formal Methods SIG. > > > > I propose that the group be loc

Re: Bundled Flash

fre 2013-08-23 klockan 16:46 -0700 skrev Adam Williamson: > But if > I'm going to do it, I'd rather get the replace-dir-with-symlink stuff > 'right' (for whatever value we decide is 'right') first time. The shortest scriptlet I saw to remove a directory in pretrans is: (see e.g. http://pkgs.fedor

Re: Bundled Flash

On 8/23/13, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote: > It's for case #2 that the exception got expanded to be allowed for > webapp packages, but it's really not intended to just permit bundling > to continue when you can just as easily unbundle. I'll look at > tightening Bah, that was supposed to say: I'll loo

Re: Bundled Flash

On 8/23/13, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2013-08-23 at 17:12 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: >> One further thought here: >> https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Packaging:JavaScript#Static_Inclusion_of_Libraries >> >> Taking a static library approach is also allowed. This can save packa

Re: Review swap request: web-assets

On Aug 23, 2013 6:00 PM, "T.C. Hollingsworth" wrote: > > Hi! > > Would someone be willing to trade me a review for: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=997678 > > It's dead simple at the moment: it just provides a couple directories and RPM > macros. Later on it will grow some httpd mag

Re: Bundled Flash

On Fri, 2013-08-23 at 17:12 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 02:28:23PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Fri, 2013-08-23 at 23:15 +0200, Michael Scherer wrote: > > > > So anyway - I think we need some best practice on this. We definitely > > need a 'if you absolutely mus

Re: F20 release name election?

Toshio Kuratomi gmail.com> writes: > We could just put the release number into those files and keep the release > name in our heads, I suppose. There wouldn't be a technical downside to > that but I don't know whether people would like that socially or not. When I said "release name" I meant ju

Re: F20 release name election?

On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 11:55:44PM +, Andre Robatino wrote: > Josh Boyer fedoraproject.org> writes: > > > The Board has an open ticket on the naming process. We're working > > through it now, but "no release names" isn't an immediate option > > because the last time we proposed that the comm

Re: Bundled Flash

On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 02:28:23PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2013-08-23 at 23:15 +0200, Michael Scherer wrote: > > So anyway - I think we need some best practice on this. We definitely > need a 'if you absolutely must change a directory into a symlink (or a > file, or the same operat

Review swap request: web-assets

Hi! Would someone be willing to trade me a review for: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=997678 It's dead simple at the moment: it just provides a couple directories and RPM macros. Later on it will grow some httpd magic but that's on hold until Fedora 21 since we're still sorting that

Re: F20 release name election?

Josh Boyer fedoraproject.org> writes: > The Board has an open ticket on the naming process. We're working > through it now, but "no release names" isn't an immediate option > because the last time we proposed that the community vote showed names > were still desired. Hopefully we'll resolve the

Re: Bundled Flash

On Fri, 2013-08-23 at 16:40 -0700, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote: > On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > And, T.C., we probably need the Web Assets policy to set some > > rules/guidelines on how best to achieve unbundling: should we always try > > to patch the upstream to find th

Re: Release packages ownership

On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 7:11 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote: >> libquvi >> -- >> A cross-platform library for parsing flash media stream >> >> libquvi-scripts >>

Re: Bundled Flash

On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > And, T.C., we probably need the Web Assets policy to set some > rules/guidelines on how best to achieve unbundling: should we always try > to patch the upstream to find the 'official' location of the shared > resource on Fedora? Should we a

Re: Bundled Flash

On Fri, 2013-08-23 at 01:53 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 22:05 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 21:47 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > > As plupload is a .sh not a .as3 I *think* we may be able to build it > > > with swfc. I'll see whether that'

Re: Bundled Flash

On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Michael Scherer wrote: > So what we found on irc : > > Since rpm first create the files for the new rpm that is installed, then > remove the files that should be removed still present from old rpm and > not in the new one, we fix the issue by waiting until the dire

Re: F20 release name election?

On 23/08/13 17:49 -0400, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote: > Or how about "None". It even fits with the lineage -- just like the > Schrodinger's cat, it's neither False nor True. It's None. > > That would be a worthy tribute to the pythonista and the release-name hater. +1 -- Jan -- devel mailing li

Re: Blocking unblocked retired packages

I don't know what happened with libgssglue. This was retired for what reason? It affects too many... -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Blocking unblocked retired packages

Hi, On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 11:25:47PM +0200, Till Maas wrote: > Depending on: maven2-common-poms > antlr-maven-plugin (maintained by: spot, tradej) > antlr-maven-plugin requires maven2-common-poms = 1.0-50.fc20 This is a BR, I reported it here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sh

Re: Bundled Flash

On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2013-08-23 at 06:36 -0700, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote: >> Any chance you could just use an Alias in the apache config? Then you can >> just >> delete the directory and not muck around with making yum happy. > > Doesn't seem to work

Re: Release packages ownership

Hi, - Original Message - > Hi, > > due to a lack of time, I released the ownership of most of my packages : The following packages are used by Totem (directly or indirectly), so it would be good to have them find new owners: > grilo-plugins >

Re: F21 schedule: what would you do with more time?

On 08/22/2013 09:03 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: As we look at Fedora.next ideas and possibly decide to start implementation in the F21 timeframe, we will likely find _new_ things that take specific work. Let's not worry about that right now. What things we do _now_ could be improved with the inves

Re: F20 release name election?

On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 5:27 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > Can we request an exception from the board to add "" (empty string) as > an option for _just_ the F20 naming poll? Or how about "None". It even fits with the lineage -- just like the Schrodinger's cat, it's neither False nor True. It's None.

Re: F20 release name election?

On 08/23/2013 04:27 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > Can we request an exception from the board to add "" (empty string) as > an option for _just_ the F20 naming poll? You'd have to reset voting, too. I've already voted, but I'd re-vote to vote for no name. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproje

Re: Bundled Flash

On Fri, 2013-08-23 at 23:15 +0200, Michael Scherer wrote: > > No, I've mostly left it as is since written, and adapted to additional > > bundled PHP libs as needed. Testing was heavy at the time but has > > been mimimal since. Conversely, it's been a long time since I've had > > a BZ on any of t

Re: F20 release name election?

On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 8:34 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 10:29 PM, Paul Wouters wrote: >> It would be good if the next vote would allow "none" as an option. I >> could not vote 'none' on the last election. And I think it is important >> to track the percentage of people who want

Blocking unblocked retired packages

Hi, I blocked the following packages that were retired in pkgdb but not blocked in koji (there might be some packages included that have been retired recently where rel-eng tickets were filed): acheck acheck-rules animorph bsd-mailx c-ares19 cdi-api11 clearlooks-phenix-theme climm detex emerillon

Re: Bundled Flash

Le vendredi 23 août 2013 à 14:19 -0500, Jon Ciesla a écrit : > > > > On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Adam Williamson > wrote: > On Fri, 2013-08-23 at 13:57 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: > > Pretty? Nope. Overkill? Maybe? Reliable? So far. > > Are you sure? Does

Release packages ownership

Hi, due to a lack of time, I released the ownership of most of my packages : cclive -- Command line video extraction utility clive

Re: F20 release name election?

On Fri, 23 Aug 2013 09:04:54 -0500, inode0 wrote: > [...] so why do we have to keep going over this? Dunno whether we _have_ to. The original purpose of this thread has been a different one. -- Fedora release 20 (Null) - Linux 3.11.0-0.rc6.git1.2.fc20.x86_64 loadavg: 0.08 0.09 0.07 -- devel ma

Re: Bundled Flash

On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2013-08-23 at 13:57 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: > > > > Sorry, just noticed the gist of this thread. Are you trying to > > replace a directory with a symlink? Take a look at gallery2: > > > > > > Example. > > > > > > In %install: > >

Re: Bundled Flash

On Fri, 2013-08-23 at 13:57 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: > Sorry, just noticed the gist of this thread. Are you trying to > replace a directory with a symlink? Take a look at gallery2: > > > Example. > > > In %install: > #remove bundled Smarty. > rm -rf lib/smarty > ln -s ../../php/Smarty2 > $

Re: USB-based Gnome 3 lockups

Digimer wrote: >When I got this laptop (Thinkpad W530), I ran F17. It was always > perfectly stable. When I installed F18, it started to (seemingly) > randomly lock up Gnome 3. I could never see much in syslog of use. > >I knew it was just gnome because I could still ctrl+alt+fX to othe

Re: Bundled Flash

On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2013-08-23 at 11:26 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > You could just say "screw anaconda installs" and just use `rm -rf`. > Though I > > > tried that once, in *EPEL* even, and it only took a week for someone to > > > complain.

EPEL Fedora 5 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing: Age URL 488 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5 383 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-6608/Django-1.1.4-2.el5 7 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDO

EPEL Fedora 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 488 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6 7 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11175/php-symfony2-HttpFoundation-2.2.5-1.el6 7 https://admin.fedorapr

Re: Bundled Flash

On Fri, 2013-08-23 at 11:26 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > You could just say "screw anaconda installs" and just use `rm -rf`. Though > > I > > tried that once, in *EPEL* even, and it only took a week for someone to > > complain. :-( > > I suppose we could do it that way wrapped in an 'if' s

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring long-term FTBFS packages for Fedora 20

Hi, On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 11:51:15AM +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote: > On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 12:05 AM, Till Maas wrote: > > > smart athimm, scop > > Where does this information about maintainers come from? Once upon a > time I (scop) was a co-maintainer for this package, but

Re: Bundled Flash

On Fri, 2013-08-23 at 11:26 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > Any chance you could just use an Alias in the apache config? Then you can > > just > > delete the directory and not muck around with making yum happy. > > Doesn't seem to work. Seems like it's just ignored: if I set it and move > tin

Re: Bundled Flash

On Fri, 2013-08-23 at 06:36 -0700, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote: > On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 5:40 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > All the upstream projects I found seemed to consider jumping to tinymce > > 4 a rather large move. Debian packages 3 and 4 as separate packages. I > > rather think we should d

grib_api license change and shared library support

grib_api 1.11.0 will be built shortly for Rawhide. Two main changes: - License changes from LGPLv3 to ASL 2.0 - grib_api now builds shared libraries. Please move to use BR grib_api-devel. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office

Re: How to check EPEL dependencies from Fedora?

On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Till Maas wrote: > On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 10:52:47AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > > > If you're maintaining EPEL packages, might I suggest having a VM with > RHEL > > or CentOS handy? > > Kevin does this already for everybody: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wik

fcitx-unikey-0.2.2 license tag corrected from GPLv2+ to GPLv3+

The previous version 0.1.1 is already under GPLv3+. -robin -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: How to check EPEL dependencies from Fedora?

On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 10:52:47AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > If you're maintaining EPEL packages, might I suggest having a VM with RHEL > or CentOS handy? Kevin does this already for everybody: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Machine_Resources_For_Package_Maintainers Regards Till -- de

Re: A new depedency of existing BuildRequires causes build failure - who to blame?

On 08/21/2013 03:09 AM, Ville Skyttä wrote: On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Tadej Janež wrote: I'll fill a bug against plplot. By the way, plplotd.pc lists quite a few things in its Libs: line -- without having a deeper look I think chances are that at least some of them should be moved to L

Re: How to check EPEL dependencies from Fedora?

On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 09:10:44AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > > I tried using repoquery from a mock chroot of EPEL 6, but as I understand > > it, running yum/rpm tools really are not designed to work from inside > mock. > > At least if giv

Re: F21 schedule: what would you do with more time?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 23 Aug 2013 09:33:59 +0100 Peter Robinson wrote: > On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Mat Booth > wrote: > > > On 22 August 2013 16:03, Matthew Miller > > wrote: > > > >> Based on discussion at Flock, on the devel mailing list, and in > >> t

USB-based Gnome 3 lockups

Hi all, When I got this laptop (Thinkpad W530), I ran F17. It was always perfectly stable. When I installed F18, it started to (seemingly) randomly lock up Gnome 3. I could never see much in syslog of use. I knew it was just gnome because I could still ctrl+alt+fX to other terminals. If

Re: How to check EPEL dependencies from Fedora?

On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > I tried using repoquery from a mock chroot of EPEL 6, but as I understand > it, running yum/rpm tools really are not designed to work from inside mock. repoquery from yum-utils >= 1.1.31-17.fc19 has --installroot which can be used from outsid

Re: Changes to make MySQL vs. MariaDB less confusing

- james.hoga...@gmail.com wrote: > From the first date Honza announced the intended feature we heard a > lot of promises from Oracle about how they would act with stewardship > but words are cheap - so far in all this time there's been little of > any actual substance. I get the feeling the d

Re: F21 schedule: what would you do with more time?

On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 08/23/2013 10:39 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > >> * much longer build.log holding time for FTBFS. >> >> I think this comes down to the amount of storage it takes and the amount >> we have available. > > Is that really that much? And i

EPEL need help in installing dom4j on rhel 6.4

Hi, I am trying to install dom4j rpm in rhel 6.4. As it is not available in rhel,i have added epel repo and tried to install dom4j ,but no luck. Here is my epel.repo [epel] name=Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux 6 - $basearch #baseurl=http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/6/$basearch mirror

Re: Changes to make MySQL vs. MariaDB less confusing

On 22/08 09.27, Bjorn Munch wrote: > > I will get back with more details later. I have now made new packages available and updated #958131. - Bjorn -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedorapro

[Bug 1000525] New: perl-UUID-Tiny-1.04 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000525 Bug ID: 1000525 Summary: perl-UUID-Tiny-1.04 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-UUID-Tiny Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: mhron...@red

[Bug 989982] perl-SOAP-Lite-1.06 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989982 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|perl-SOAP-Lite-1.05 is |perl-SOAP-Lite-1.06 is

Re: How to check EPEL dependencies from Fedora?

On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 09:10:44AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > I tried using repoquery from a mock chroot of EPEL 6, but as I understand > it, running yum/rpm tools really are not designed to work from inside mock. > At least if gives a lot of errors about the rpm database, but it did > produce ou

Re: How to check EPEL dependencies from Fedora?

I'm thinking this produce a bit more of a complete list... # repoquery --resolve --whatrequires fltk rpmdb: /var/lib/rpm/Name: unexpected file type or format error: cannot open Name index using db3 - Invalid argument (22) rpmdb: /var/lib/rpm/Providename: unexpected file type or format error: canno

Re: F-20 Branched report: 20130823 changes

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 23 Aug 2013 16:11:14 +0200 Kalev Lember wrote: > On 08/23/2013 03:42 PM, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 8:46 AM, Christopher Meng > > wrote: > >> What about this? > >> > >> perl(Digest::SHA) > >> > >> I've seen many

Re: Changes to make MySQL vs. MariaDB less confusing

On 23 August 2013 14:06, Rich Mattes wrote: > On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 3:40 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > >> >> >> Frankly I'm still of the opinion the Oracle distribution of the MySQL >> based server should be dropped entirely... If Oracle want 'community-mysql' >> to exist for Fedora and want to ma

How to check EPEL dependencies from Fedora?

I would like to get fltk in EPEL updated to 1.3.X as fldigi is dropping backward compatibility with fltk 1.1.X. In order to do that I was trying to figure out the magnatude of the change, but I don't seem to have a good way of checking which other EPEL packages will need to be rebuilt. I tried us

Re: F-20 Branched report: 20130823 changes

On 08/23/2013 03:42 PM, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote: > On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 8:46 AM, Christopher Meng wrote: >> What about this? >> >> perl(Digest::SHA) >> >> I've seen many broken ones because of it now. > > I'd like to know, too. The perl-Digest-SHA package is still in the > fedpkg sources, a

Re: F20 release name election?

On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 8:04 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > I don't think it's been hatred (or passionate fighting, or else he would > have tried to reach a decision at the FPB level), but indeed, he has been > one of those who think the release name process is a waste of time and of > no use. > >

[perl-POE] 1.356 bump

commit 13e0611fec5e66f884a719bdbc4dc5b2474cd834 Author: Petr Šabata Date: Fri Aug 23 15:53:02 2013 +0200 1.356 bump .gitignore|1 + perl-POE.spec | 37 - sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) --- diff --gi

File POE-1.356.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by psabata

A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-POE: 287f75fb2ae59fb9de16abfdca01baae POE-1.356.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/per

Re: Bundled Flash

On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 5:44 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > Just to cover my ass, this kind of symlinking is explicitly allowed by > the draft new JavaScript policy: > > "Regardless, web applications may want to make subdirectories of > %{_jsdir} available under their own directory via aliases or sy

Re: F-20 Branched report: 20130823 changes

On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 8:46 AM, Christopher Meng wrote: > What about this? > > perl(Digest::SHA) > > I've seen many broken ones because of it now. I'd like to know, too. The perl-Digest-SHA package is still in the fedpkg sources, and doesn't say it's .dead. Is it just a bogus transient error? R

Re: Bundled Flash

On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 5:40 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > All the upstream projects I found seemed to consider jumping to tinymce > 4 a rather large move. Debian packages 3 and 4 as separate packages. I > rather think we should do the same rather than just pretend they're the > same thing and we'l

Re: solib change: libmng 2.0.2 coming to rawhide Monday!

On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 8:10 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote: > Per https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=997816 I will be updating > libmng in rawhide Monday. My repoquery indicated the following consumers: > > Rebuilt fine with libmng 2.0.2: > > avahi > DevIL > ETL > freeimage > gcin > gimp > PyQt

solib change: libmng 2.0.2 coming to rawhide Monday!

Per https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=997816 I will be updating libmng in rawhide Monday. My repoquery indicated the following consumers: Rebuilt fine with libmng 2.0.2: avahi DevIL ETL freeimage gcin gimp PyQt qt qt3 scim-bridge synfig FTBFS with either libmng 1.0.10 or libmng 2.0.2:

Re: Changes to make MySQL vs. MariaDB less confusing

On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 3:40 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > > > Frankly I'm still of the opinion the Oracle distribution of the MySQL > based server should be dropped entirely... If Oracle want 'community-mysql' > to exist for Fedora and want to maintain it themselves then they can set up > their own

Re: F20 release name election?

On Fri, 23 Aug 2013 13:39:40 +0200, Tomas Radej wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 18:23:39 -0600 > Chris Murphy wrote: > > > > > I'd back no release name for 20 with 8 points and 0 for everything else, if > > it's an option, and in particular if the marketing includes to the effect > > of

Heads up: GNOME 3.9.90 in F20 / rawhide

Hi, Just a quick heads up that GNOME 3.9.90 builds have landed in today's Branched (F20) and Rawhide. This is the first Beta release towards GNOME 3.10 and marks the beginning of the UI and API freezes. Next up is GNOME 3.9.91 on September 4th. I am personally running F20 here with the latest GN

Re: F-20 Branched report: 20130823 changes

What about this? perl(Digest::SHA) I've seen many broken ones because of it now. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Bundled Flash

On Fri, 2013-08-23 at 05:40 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > However, to do this, I run into the fucking > convert-a-directory-to-a-symlink old chestnut, and RPM/yum just isn't > having it. Following the breadcrumbs all over this list and Bugzilla I > came up with this %pretrans: > > %pretrans -p

Re: Bundled Flash

On Fri, 2013-08-23 at 04:43 -0700, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote: > Thanks for tackling this! > > On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 4:03 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > So, tinymce has a 'media' plugin which lets you embed media in HTML > > you're editing with it. If it thinks the media might need playing with >

Re: F20 release name election?

On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 10:29 PM, Paul Wouters wrote: > On Thu, 22 Aug 2013, Chris Murphy wrote: > >> >> On Aug 22, 2013, at 6:12 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: >>> >>> >>> I'm not necessarily disagreeing, but there are essentially two camps >>> right now. Those that don't care about release names one bi

Re: F20 release name election?

On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 8:39 PM, Dan Mashal wrote: >> It will be dedicated in the release announcement. Perhaps someone >> might add something to the download page on the website as well. >> > > Hi Josh, > > Thanks for replying. > > I personally LOVE release names. However, I feel that we should

Re: Bundled Flash

Thanks for tackling this! On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 4:03 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > So, tinymce has a 'media' plugin which lets you embed media in HTML > you're editing with it. If it thinks the media might need playing with > Flash, it'll generate HTML that tries to use a Flash player - > moxiep

Re: F20 release name election?

Hi, On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 18:23:39 -0600 Chris Murphy wrote: > I'd back no release name for 20 with 8 points and 0 for everything else, if > it's an option, and in particular if the marketing includes to the effect of: > "Fedora 20 is nameless in honor of Seth Vidal who hated release names wit

Re: Bundled Flash

On Fri, 2013-08-23 at 04:03 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > Just nuking moxieplayer.swf doesn't stop tinymce generating HTML that > looks for it, so that's not really the way to go. But I think I found a > way to patch the plugin not to try and use moxieplayer.swf and just to > spit out nice clean

Re: F21 schedule: what would you do with more time?

Dne 23.8.2013 10:24, Peter Robinson napsal(a): On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Matthew Miller mailto:mat...@fedoraproject.org>> wrote: On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 11:08:18PM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: > > What things we do _now_ could be > > improved with the investment of some eff

Re: Bundled Flash

On Thu, 2013-08-15 at 13:45 -0700, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote: > It's come to my attention that a number of packages contain Flash (.swf) > files, > but absolutely none of them have BuildRequires on a free software Flash > toolchain, nor do any of them seem to be shipping the source for these files.

Re: F21 schedule: what would you do with more time?

On 08/23/2013 10:39 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: * a unified koji/bodhi/bugzilla Web-GUI You think BZ is slow now? What do you mean by "now" ... now as in comparison to yesterday, or in general. In general, my issues with bugzilla basically are two: - It's UI is clumsy to use for Fedora -

Re: Bundled Flash

On Thu, 2013-08-15 at 13:45 -0700, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote: > It's come to my attention that a number of packages contain Flash (.swf) > files, > but absolutely none of them have BuildRequires on a free software Flash > toolchain, nor do any of them seem to be shipping the source for these files.

Re: Bundled Flash

On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 22:05 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 21:47 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > As plupload is a .sh not a .as3 I *think* we may be able to build it > > with swfc. I'll see whether that's possible. > > plupload looks like, well, a giant pain in the ass.

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring long-term FTBFS packages for Fedora 20

On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 12:05 AM, Till Maas wrote: > smart athimm, scop Where does this information about maintainers come from? Once upon a time I (scop) was a co-maintainer for this package, but I believe I've resigned a long time ago, and packagedb doesn't show me associat

Re: F21 schedule: what would you do with more time?

> > E.g. going after these: > http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/**f20-failed.html > > Right now we have ~350+ broken packages, a lengthy series of broken deps, > an unknown amount of defacto unmaintained packages and an unknown amout of > maintainers havi

Re: Problem with sed in spec file

On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 6:58 PM, Juan Orti Alcaine wrote: > El Miércoles, 21 de agosto de 2013 16:03:23 Richard W.M. Jones escribió: >> Just open a bug against selinux-policy and ask the maintainer >> to drop a file somewhere which contains the version number, eg: >> >> %install >> echo '%{ver

Re: F21 schedule: what would you do with more time?

On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Mat Booth wrote: > On 22 August 2013 16:03, Matthew Miller wrote: > >> Based on discussion at Flock, on the devel mailing list, and in the FESCo >> meeting, we are looking for feedback on the idea of a longer release cycle >> for Fedora 21 -- not (right now at le

Re: F21 schedule: what would you do with more time?

On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 11:08:18PM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: > > > What things we do _now_ could be > > > improved with the investment of some effort? > > Perl rebuild always take a lot of time, and as a result it will affect > > the ma

Re: Changes to make MySQL vs. MariaDB less confusing

On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 9:40 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > On 22 August 2013 08:27, Bjorn Munch wrote: > >> >> Yes we are! Sorry for the long silence. The window for F19 closed so >> it became less urgent, then I had vacation, was sick, then others here >> were on vacation but we're all here now and

Self introduction

Hi all, I'd like to introduce myself as a new packager. I've created a review request here for nitrogen: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000275 Nitrogen is a lightweight desktop background setter that was orphaned before the F19 release, I decided to package it after I got annoyed t

Re: Changes to make MySQL vs. MariaDB less confusing

On 22 August 2013 08:27, Bjorn Munch wrote: > > Yes we are! Sorry for the long silence. The window for F19 closed so > it became less urgent, then I had vacation, was sick, then others here > were on vacation but we're all here now and I shall be uploading new > packages with MySQL 5.6.13 very so

Re: Scala package owner unresponsive

On 08/22/2013 01:03 PM, Jochen Schmitt wrote: Yes, the reason fot this is very simple. On F18 we had a jdk-1.6.0 environment in addition to the jdk-1.7.0. Scala was built explicitly agains jdk-1.6.0 because jdk-1.7.0 is not supported on this release. Really? How did *that* happen? -- Flori