Re: F26 System Wide Change: Enable coredumpctl by default

Dne 5.12.2016 v 17:54 Jan Kurik napsal(a): > Note that coredumpctl is intended as a developer tool, not as an > automatic bug reporting tool nor as a replacement for ABRT. Who is main user of Fedora? Developer (who may prefer coredumpctl) or normal user (who may prefer bug reporting tool)? > >

HTML Netiquette [Re: I'd like to take ownership of Orpie]

On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 05:47:16PM +, Jared L Wallace wrote: > This package has > been retired for some time. I've updated it and gotten it reviewed and > approved. href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382152; rel="noopener" > target="_blank" >

Re: F26 System Wide Change: Fedora 26 C/C++ Compilation Flags Updates - warning

On 12/06/2016 04:44 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: I've run into a reasonable number of failures of (custom) configure checks due to this. Mainly calling exit() without including stdlib.h. So keep alert everyone. Unfortunately this can lead to unpredictable and perhaps hard to detect changes.

Re: F26 System Wide Change: Fedora 26 C/C++ Compilation Flags Updates

I have such a piece of hardware and could run a benchmark in ~1 week, if you're curious. That said, Fedora Workstation is borderline unusable on that hardware anyway - due to the integrated graphics, not the CPU. I doubt most users would notice a slowdown from different CFLAGS when gnome-shell

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 638 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087 dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7 400 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7 119

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 516 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031 python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6 510 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168 rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6 442

[Bug 1401295] perl-Net-GitHub-0.86 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401295 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Net-GitHub-0.86-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

Re: F26 System Wide Change: Fedora 26 C/C++ Compilation Flags Updates - warning

On 11/10/2016 03:30 AM, Jan Kurik wrote: = Proposed System Wide Change: Fedora 26 C/C++ Compilation Flags Updates = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Fedora26CFlags Change owner(s): * Florian Weimer This change updates the default C/C++ compilation flags, as determined by the

[Bug 1401295] perl-Net-GitHub-0.86 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401295 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

Re: F26 System Wide Change: Enable coredumpctl by default

On 12/05/2016 07:05 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: meanwhile systemd-coredump steals away my core dumps and requires privileged operations to retrieve them. No, it doesn't. Coredumps are accessible to the user that the program was running under. So you can see your coredumps, and

Re: F26 System Wide Change: Enable coredumpctl by default

On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 05:58:19PM -0800, Nicholas Miell wrote: > On 12/05/2016 05:46 PM, Nicholas Miell wrote: > >On 12/05/2016 12:55 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > >>systemd-coredump+coredumpctl give you pretty easy access to core > >>files, they are just dumped into

Re: Some preliminary Fedora 25 stats — and future release scheduling

On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 09:47:23PM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On 5 December 2016 at 19:59, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 09:47:43AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > >> The stats I get are about a week behind, which means I now have >

Re: hdf5 1.8.18 update in rawhide

On 12/05/2016 01:47 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: I'm building hdf5 1.8.18 for rawhide now. I'll be rebuilding all dependent packages afterwards. Scratch that - ppc64 test failures again. *sigh* -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA Division

Re: Some preliminary Fedora 25 stats — and future release scheduling

On 5 December 2016 at 19:59, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 09:47:43AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: >> The stats I get are about a week behind, which means I now have >> information about the first week of the Fedora 25 release. See the >> graph

[Bug 1398299] perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.09 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398299 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.09

[Bug 1397612] ctstream-25 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397612 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|ctstream-25-1.fc26

[Bug 1323662] Authen:: Krb5 uses internal and no longer existing krb5 functions

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323662 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Authen-Krb5-1.9-18.fc2

[Bug 1398475] perl-IO-Prompt-0.997004 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398475 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-IO-Prompt-0.997.004-1.

Re: Some preliminary Fedora 25 stats — and future release scheduling

On Mon, 2016-12-05 at 19:12 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > That's exactly why I'm suggesting the point release or batched update > — > that would include a GNOME bump. OK then, if we're willing to bump all of GNOME in a point release (that's a lot of stuff!) then I don't object.

Re: No Boost update in F25

On Tue, 2016-12-06 at 01:41 +, Joseph Stockman wrote: > Well, it continues to mean the busted version of boost::asio for > those who want to utilize any of the C++11 features (futures, etc). > We've been forced to drop all Fedora support for our products until > that changes. Well a Boost

Re: F26 System Wide Change: Enable coredumpctl by default

On 12/05/2016 05:46 PM, Nicholas Miell wrote: On 12/05/2016 12:55 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: systemd-coredump+coredumpctl give you pretty easy access to core files, they are just dumped into /var/lib/systemd/coredump/. The advantage is that a) things are logged and can be easily

[389-devel] Please review: Move DS tests in RPM to proper python locations

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48835 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48835/0001-Ticket-48835-Tests-with-setup.py.in.patch -- Sincerely, William Brown Software Engineer Red Hat, Brisbane signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[Bug 1401750] biber 2.6 FTBS; test failures b/c of hash changes

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401750 --- Comment #1 from Colin Macdonald --- I think its this upstream commit 3d62817080598d68514ed2691b1f616fcda2abe3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

Re: F26 System Wide Change: Enable coredumpctl by default

On 12/05/2016 12:55 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: systemd-coredump+coredumpctl give you pretty easy access to core files, they are just dumped into /var/lib/systemd/coredump/. The advantage is that a) things are logged and can be easily looked up and queried, b) you get a lot of

Re: My package has stopped building on rawhide

Nevermind, I was able to figure that out.   Thanks Jerry, I have it building now :) JARED L. WALLACE Software Engineer, Sametime Extended Support Phone: 1-512-973-5281 E-mail: jared-wall...@us.ibm.com     - Original message -From: Jared L Wallace/Austin/IBM@IBMUSTo:

Re: Some preliminary Fedora 25 stats — and future release scheduling

On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Mon, 2016-12-05 at 16:10 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: >> It was by design, though — for a while, when a schedule slipped, we >> planned the next schedule as 6 or 7 months from the actual release. >> This time, we

Re: No Boost update in F25

Well, it continues to mean the busted version of boost::asio for those who want to utilize any of the C++11 features (futures, etc). We've been forced to drop all Fedora support for our products until that changes. ___ devel mailing list --

[Bug 1401750] New: biber 2.6 FTBS; test failures b/c of hash changes

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401750 Bug ID: 1401750 Summary: biber 2.6 FTBS; test failures b/c of hash changes Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: biber Assignee: c...@m.fsf.org Reporter:

Re: Some preliminary Fedora 25 stats — and future release scheduling

On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 08:10:39PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 12:59:41AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > Can you publish the data that was used to make this graph? > > (I don't mean the raw logs, just the table of #IPs vs date vs release) > > We don't

Re: Some preliminary Fedora 25 stats — and future release scheduling

On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 12:59:41AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > Can you publish the data that was used to make this graph? > (I don't mean the raw logs, just the table of #IPs vs date vs release) We don't want to expose the IP addresses. Actually, *I* don't even see them. Is there

[EPEL-devel] Re: Updating pytest in EPEL6

I am in favor of the update. On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 2:23 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > Does anyone have any opinions about updating pytest to 2.4.2 in EPEL6? > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1400254 > > -- > Orion Poplawski > Technical Manager

Re: Some preliminary Fedora 25 stats — and future release scheduling

On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 09:47:43AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > The stats I get are about a week behind, which means I now have > information about the first week of the Fedora 25 release. See the > graph here: > > https://mattdm.fedorapeople.org/stats/fedora-os-select-2016-11-22.png Can you

Re: i686 [was Re: how does Fedora 24 x86_64 boot on EFI-32?]

On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 08:51:35AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: >> into it, and it's in the middle of his priorities somewhere between >> "actual urgent work" and "other actual important work"), but >> preliminary

Re: My package has stopped building on rawhide

Thanks. How can I examine the config.log? (I know soomeone mentioned adding "||:" after %configure, but I don't see where the config.log ends up being accessible)     JARED L. WALLACE Software Engineer, Sametime Extended Support Phone: 1-512-973-5281 E-mail: jared-wall...@us.ibm.com     -

[Bug 1401740] New: perl-Text-Reflow-1.16 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401740 Bug ID: 1401740 Summary: perl-Text-Reflow-1.16 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Text-Reflow Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1401733] New: perl-Gearman-2.002.004 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401733 Bug ID: 1401733 Summary: perl-Gearman-2.002.004 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Gearman Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1401732] New: perl-Business-ISSN-1.002 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401732 Bug ID: 1401732 Summary: perl-Business-ISSN-1.002 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Business-ISSN Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1401732] perl-Business-ISSN-1.002 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401732 --- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Patches were not touched. All were applied properly -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1401732] perl-Business-ISSN-1.002 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401732 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Patching or scratch build for perl-Business-ISSN-1.001 failed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1401732] perl-Business-ISSN-1.002 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401732 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1228207 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1228207=edit Rebase-helper rebase-helper-debug.log log file.

[Bug 1401731] perl-Business-ISMN-1.131 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401731 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1228206 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1228206=edit Rebase-helper rebase-helper-debug.log log file.

[Bug 1401731] perl-Business-ISMN-1.131 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401731 --- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Patches were not touched. All were applied properly -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1401731] New: perl-Business-ISMN-1.131 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401731 Bug ID: 1401731 Summary: perl-Business-ISMN-1.131 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Business-ISMN Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1401731] perl-Business-ISMN-1.131 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401731 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Patching or scratch build for perl-Business-ISMN-1.13 failed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

Re: Some preliminary Fedora 25 stats — and future release scheduling

On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 06:03:32PM -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > I still think it's a good idea for Workstation. We really need to be > seen as the leading GNOME distro: that's what gets GNOME people using > Workstation and recommending that other people install it, then those > people

[Bug 1401727] New: perl-Config-Model-Tester-2.058 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401727 Bug ID: 1401727 Summary: perl-Config-Model-Tester-2.058 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Config-Model-Tester Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

i686 [was Re: how does Fedora 24 x86_64 boot on EFI-32?]

On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 08:51:35AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > into it, and it's in the middle of his priorities somewhere between > "actual urgent work" and "other actual important work"), but > preliminary stats show a big drop in i686 mirror connections over the > last year — like, about cut

Re: Some preliminary Fedora 25 stats — and future release scheduling

On Mon, 2016-12-05 at 16:10 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > It was by design, though — for a while, when a schedule slipped, we > planned the next schedule as 6 or 7 months from the actual release. > This time, we tried to keep it to October even though the previous > release had slipped, resulting

FESCo and Council elections - December 2016/January 2017

Greetings, FESCo and Council elections are now open and we're looking for new candidates: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Elections For FESCo we have opened five seats: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Development/SteeringCommittee/Nominations For Council we have opened one seat:

Re: My package has stopped building on rawhide

On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Jared L Wallace wrote: > > The configure script errors out when checking: > > AC_TRY_LINK([#include ], > [gsl_complex a; GSL_SET_COMPLEX(, 1.0, 1.0); > gsl_complex_logabs(a);], > HAS_GSL_LIB=yes, HAS_GSL_LIB=no) > > This works fine

Re: My package has stopped building on rawhide

On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 12:19 AM, Jared L Wallace wrote: > > The configure script errors out when checking: > > AC_TRY_LINK([#include ], > [gsl_complex a; GSL_SET_COMPLEX(, 1.0, 1.0); > gsl_complex_logabs(a);], > HAS_GSL_LIB=yes, HAS_GSL_LIB=no) > > This works

My package has stopped building on rawhide

  The configure script errors out when checking:   AC_TRY_LINK([#include ],    [gsl_complex a; GSL_SET_COMPLEX(, 1.0, 1.0);  

Re: Some preliminary Fedora 25 stats — and future release scheduling

On 5 December 2016 at 17:18, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 05:01:24PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: >> There is another problem with .0...N releases. As soon as you version >> your main release like that, everyone assumes .0 is unstable or broken >> and

VTK 7.1 w/MPI coming to rawhide

I'm building VTK 7.1 for rawhide now. Other big change is MPI support. I'll build the dependent packages tomorrow after it completes (about 20 hours). -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380

Re: Fedora Rawhide-20161205.n.0 compose check report

On Mon, 2016-12-05 at 13:31 +, Fedora compose checker wrote: > Missing expected images: > > Workstation live i386 > Kde live x86_64 > Xfce raw-xz armhfp > Minimal raw-xz armhfp > Workstation live x86_64 > Kde live i386 > > Failed openQA tests: 18/79 (x86_64), 6/15 (i386) > > New failures

Re: F26 System Wide Change: Enable coredumpctl by default

If you remove ABRT and set kernel.core_pattern to 'core', then if you don't configure systemd to use RLIMIT_CORE=0, every crashing process will create  a new core dump file in its CWD: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/

Re: Some preliminary Fedora 25 stats — and future release scheduling

On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 3:18 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 05:01:24PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: >> There is another problem with .0...N releases. As soon as you version >> your main release like that, everyone assumes .0 is unstable or broken >> and

Re: Some preliminary Fedora 25 stats — and future release scheduling

On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 3:01 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > There is another problem with .0...N releases. As soon as you version > your main release like that, everyone assumes .0 is unstable or broken > and they wait for .1. Some wait for .2 (which doesn't exist in your >

Re: Some preliminary Fedora 25 stats — and future release scheduling

On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 05:01:24PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > There is another problem with .0...N releases. As soon as you version > your main release like that, everyone assumes .0 is unstable or broken > and they wait for .1. Some wait for .2 (which doesn't exist in your > proposal but

Re: F26 System Wide Change: Enable coredumpctl by default

Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek writes: > You still can restore such behaviour pretty easily. Just set the > kernel.core_pattern sysctl. Yup, that's what I do. Just adding my two cents on Fedora trying to help me "be a developer" without doing what I need as a developer. But I

Re: F26 System Wide Change: Enable coredumpctl by default

-- Původní zpráva -- Od: DJ Delorie Komu: Development discussions related to Fedora Datum: 5. 12. 2016 20:37:43 Předmět: Re: F26 System Wide Change: Enable coredumpctl by default " Jan Kurik writes: > Note

Re: F26 System Wide Change: Enable coredumpctl by default

" -- Původní zpráva -- Od: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek Komu: Development discussions related to Fedora Datum: 5. 12. 2016 21:57:12 Předmět: Re: F26 System Wide Change: Enable coredumpctl by default "On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at

Re: Some preliminary Fedora 25 stats — and future release scheduling

On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 4:26 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 01:43:58PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: >> I'm not sure it's much harder to do without modularity. Right now >> Fedora could do a Fedora 26 release without any conventional release >> media for

Re: Some preliminary Fedora 25 stats — and future release scheduling

On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 2:26 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 01:43:58PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: >> I'm not sure it's much harder to do without modularity. Right now >> Fedora could do a Fedora 26 release without any conventional release >> media for

[Bug 1398475] perl-IO-Prompt-0.997004 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398475 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1323662] Authen:: Krb5 uses internal and no longer existing krb5 functions

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323662 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1398299] perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.09 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398299 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1398604] perl-Devel-NYTProf-6.04 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398604 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1397617] perl-XML-Twig-3.50 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397617 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1398049] perl-XML-Twig-3.52 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398049 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1397818] perl-BibTeX-Parser-0.70 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397818 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-BibTeX-Parser-0.70-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1397612] ctstream-25 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397612 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1397824] perl-LaTeX-ToUnicode-0.05 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397824 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

Re: Some preliminary Fedora 25 stats — and future release scheduling

On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 1:10 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > > > still not sure what that means? Software is constantly being updated, > > evolving. How does running older versions of software increase > > "impact"? > > I'm not saying running older versions increases it --

Re: Some preliminary Fedora 25 stats — and future release scheduling

On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 01:43:58PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > I'm not sure it's much harder to do without modularity. Right now > Fedora could do a Fedora 26 release without any conventional release > media for server and workstation, by just using dnf system-upgrade and > gnome-software. And in

Re: Some preliminary Fedora 25 stats — and future release scheduling

On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 12:41:18PM -0800, Gerald B. Cox wrote: > If you're saying that you believe 5 months wasn't long enough - I > suppose that is fair... but the reason there was only 5 months wasn't > by design - it was due to schedule slippage. As far as impact - I It was by design, though —

Re: F26 System Wide Change: Enable coredumpctl by default

On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 02:36:13PM -0500, DJ Delorie wrote: > > Jan Kurik writes: > > Note that coredumpctl is intended as a developer tool, > > As a developer, I remove abrt and anything else that redirects cores > away from my development area. It's really hard to debug a

hdf5 1.8.18 update in rawhide

I'm building hdf5 1.8.18 for rawhide now. I'll be rebuilding all dependent packages afterwards. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO

Re: Some preliminary Fedora 25 stats — and future release scheduling

On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 09:04:11AM -0800, Gerald B. Cox wrote: > >> > So, first, putting together a release is a lot of work. If we're >> > stepping on the toes of the previous releases, are we wasting some of >> >

Re: Some preliminary Fedora 25 stats — and future release scheduling

On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 11:53 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > > > So, first, putting together a release is a lot of work. If we're > > > stepping on the toes of the previous releases, are we wasting some of > > > that work? > > I don't see the relevance of that observation.

Re: Fedora captive portal page changed output :(

On Mon, 2016-12-05 at 14:55 -0500, Christian Schaller wrote: > Actually, I was told that Debarshi committed a fix for the TLS error > in captive portal just last  > week and has pushed a fix for it. It's two different issues unfortunately. ___ devel

Re: Fedora captive portal page changed output :(

Actually, I was told that Debarshi committed a fix for the TLS error in captive portal just last week and has pushed a fix for it. Christian - Original Message - > From: "Michael Catanzaro" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" >

Re: Some preliminary Fedora 25 stats — and future release scheduling

On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 09:04:11AM -0800, Gerald B. Cox wrote: > > So, first, putting together a release is a lot of work. If we're > > stepping on the toes of the previous releases, are we wasting some of > > that work? > I don't see the relevance of that observation. A new version, > whenever

Re: Release validation NG: planning thoughts

On Mon, 2016-12-05 at 10:33 +0100, Josef Skladanka wrote: > I kind of believe, that the "environment requirements" should be a part of > the > testplan - we should say that "testplan X needs testcase Y ran on Foo and > Bar" > in the testplan. Instead of listing all the different options in the >

Re: F26 System Wide Change: Enable coredumpctl by default

Jan Kurik writes: > Note that coredumpctl is intended as a developer tool, As a developer, I remove abrt and anything else that redirects cores away from my development area. It's really hard to debug a core dump if you can't find the core file. Just sayin'

[Bug 1400099] perl-Business-ISSN-1.001-3.fc26 FTBFS: Failed test ' Found some modules that didn't show up in PREREQ_PM or *_REQUIRES'

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1400099 Colin Macdonald changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ---

Re: F26 System Wide Change: Enable coredumpctl by default

On Mon, 05.12.16 19:27, Török Edwin (edwin...@etorok.eu) wrote: > On 2016-12-05 18:54, Jan Kurik wrote: > > = System Wide Change: Enable coredumpctl by default = > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/coredumpctl > > > > Change owner(s): > > * Michael Catanzaro > > > > Enable coredumpctl

Re: F26 System Wide Change: Enable coredumpctl by default

On Mon, 2016-12-05 at 19:27 +0200, Török Edwin wrote: > The description here is a bit confusing, and scary: what if I run out > of space and I need to rm the coredumps to make room? Sorry, that description is wrong; core dumps used to be stored in the journal and still can be, but that's not the

Re: Fedora captive portal page changed output :(

On Mon, 2016-12-05 at 09:59 -0500, Paul Wouters wrote: > Right now, the situation leads me to having to close the gnome window > which only displays "TLS certificate invalid" or some text like that, > and still use my firefox and a new tab/window to get through the > captive portal. Good point. I

[Bug 1401482] biber-2.7 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401482 Colin Macdonald changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ---

Re: Fedora captive portal page changed output :(

On Mon, 2016-12-05 at 15:37 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > If I remember correctly, the browser accessing a captive portal does > not  > use the regular user Firefox profile, so we either have to preload > its  > profiles with intermediate CAs, or copy them over from the user's  > Firefox profile.

Re: F26 System Wide Change: Enable coredumpctl by default

On 12/05/2016 12:27 PM, Török Edwin wrote: The description here is a bit confusing, and scary: what if I run out of space and I need to rm the coredumps to make room? If the coredumps are stored in the same file as the systemd journal I'd loose my system logs too, so it makes no sense to have

Re: Quality control, does it exist? A recent update removed a keyboard layout from system.

On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 07:03:49PM +0200, Iiro Laiho wrote: > But isn't it quite exceptable that things can break when one version- > updates upstream components like this? After all, they are just > building blocks of operating systems, not finalized products in > themselves. Isn't it the job of

I'd like to take ownership of Orpie

This package has been retired for some time. I've updated it and gotten it reviewed and approved. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382152   Kind regards, JARED L. WALLACE Software Engineer, Sametime Extended Support Phone: 1-512-973-5281 E-mail: jared-wall...@us.ibm.com

dist.depcheck FAILED for FEDORA-2016-4d2af652fd

dist.depcheck FAILED for FEDORA-2016-4d2af652fd https://taskotron.fedoraproject.org/artifacts/all/91713da6-bb11-11e6-8baa-525400120b80/task_output/FEDORA-2016-4d2af652fd.x86_64.log ___ perl-devel mailing list --

Re: F26 System Wide Change: Enable coredumpctl by default

On 2016-12-05 18:54, Jan Kurik wrote: > = System Wide Change: Enable coredumpctl by default = > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/coredumpctl > > Change owner(s): > * Michael Catanzaro > > Enable coredumpctl by default. Core dumps will be stored in the system > journal rather than created

Re: failure of f24 to f25 upgrade

On 12/02/2016 10:34 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: Przemek Klosowski wrote: Right, that's what I thought. Still, completely blocking the upgrade seems rude. Yum had an option --skip-broken that would just leave such packages alone, I don't think keeping an old version of the filesystem package

Re: Some preliminary Fedora 25 stats — and future release scheduling

On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 6:47 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > So, first, putting together a release is a lot of work. If we're > stepping on the toes of the previous releases, are we wasting some of > that work? > I don't see the relevance of that observation. A new

Re: Quality control, does it exist? A recent update removed a keyboard layout from system.

> After waste sometime on understand what happened to Finnish keyboards > layout, I don't think you can blame Fedora project, looking at > upstream sources and releases [1] from xkeyboard-config-2.18 > to  xkeyboard-config-2.19, we got one commit with "rules: Move > Finnish DAS layout to extras",

F26 System Wide Change: Enable coredumpctl by default

= System Wide Change: Enable coredumpctl by default = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/coredumpctl Change owner(s): * Michael Catanzaro Enable coredumpctl by default. Core dumps will be stored in the system journal rather than created in the crashing process's current working directory by

  1   2   >