The Fedora Packaging Committee has some open seats and is accepting
submissions from interested candidates to serve on the FPC.
The FPC would like to thank Ralf Corsepius, Dominik 'Rathann'
Mierzejewski, and Thomas Spura for their service.
This position involves not only reviewing Packaging
The Fedora Packaging Committee has some open seats and is accepting
submissions from interested candidates to serve on the FPC.
The FPC would like to thank Ralf Corsepius, Dominik 'Rathann'
Mierzejewski, and Thomas Spura for their service.
This position involves not only reviewing Packaging
The Fedora Packaging Committee has some open seats and is accepting
submissions from interested candidates to serve on the FPC.
The FPC would like to thank Ralf Corsepius, Dominik 'Rathann'
Mierzejewski, and Thomas Spura for their service.
This position involves not only reviewing Packaging
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2018-03-01 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. uitime):
= Day: Thursday ==
2018-03-01 09:00
PST US/Pacific
2018-03-01
On 28 February 2018 at 11:37, Björn Persson wrote:
> Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
>> Shouldn't we consider having -devel packages Require gcc or gcc-c++?
>> What good is a header package without a compiler anyway?
>> This would also (indirectly) pull in the compiler and fix most of
Fabio Valentini wrote:
> AFAICT, those "broken deps in rawhide" mails are only sent if there is a
> compose, and during the past weeks, there have been few of those ... so
> breakage is sometimes allowed to sit unnoticed (and grow increasingly
> worse) for very long.
Isn't that the real issue to
On 28 February 2018 at 10:03, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le 2018-02-28 15:28, Orcan Ogetbil a écrit :
>>
>> On 28 February 2018 at 09:19, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>
>
>> These are all _very_ edge use-cases.
>
>
> Those are *not* edge-cases.
We have a few thousand build failures. If you cannot find as
On 02/28/2018 07:05 PM, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
> I have an update here:
>
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/epiphany-3.26.6-1.fc27
>
> that is blocked due to some harmless translation-related warnings from
> desktop-file-validate.
It does not appear to be blocked currently.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 02/28/2018 01:38 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 01:12:03PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 05:57:53PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>>> mistake that caused files to go missing, and was never
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550305
Bug ID: 1550305
Summary: perl-Net-FTPSSL-0.40 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Net-FTPSSL
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
I have an update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/epiphany-3.26.6-1.fc27
that is blocked due to some harmless translation-related warnings from
desktop-file-validate. I'm not the translation police and do not plan
to make any changes to the desktop file.
* Who can help unblock
Hi Dusty,
I'm very excited for atomic workstation.
Sincerely,
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Friday at 15:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2018-03-02 15:00 UTC'
Links to all issues below
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 09:53:19AM -0700, stan wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Feb 2018 08:04:41 -0500
> "Jared K. Smith" wrote:
>
> > ... Even if we didn't have
> > this rule, it would be common courtesy to announce any change that
> > causes others to have to do work, even if
> "OO" == Orcan Ogetbil writes:
OO> Shouldn't we consider having -devel packages Require gcc or gcc-c++?
OO> What good is a header package without a compiler anyway?
You could argue whether they're useful without a compiler, but they are
certainly useful without gcc.
Hi team,
please, review a small fix:
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49584
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49590
Thanks,
Simon
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
1087 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087
dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7
850 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f
mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7
432
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
960 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168
rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6
850 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-e2b4b5b2fb
mcollective-2.8.4-1.el6
821
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 12:49:09PM -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 12:38 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé
> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 01:12:03PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 05:57:53PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > >
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 12:38 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé
wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 01:12:03PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 05:57:53PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > > mistake that caused files to go missing, and was never detected by the
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 01:12:03PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 05:57:53PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > mistake that caused files to go missing, and was never detected by the
> > person
> > making the change, because of the use of globs. So I agree it is good
>
On Wed, 2018-02-28 at 13:12 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 05:57:53PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > mistake that caused files to go missing, and was never detected by the
> > person
> > making the change, because of the use of globs. So I agree it is good
> >
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 05:57:53PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> mistake that caused files to go missing, and was never detected by the person
> making the change, because of the use of globs. So I agree it is good practice
> to explicitly list files without globs whereever it is practical
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550056
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-RT-Client-REST-0.51-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550055
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Test-Harness-3.41-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1549884
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-RDF-NS-20180227-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1549556
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 10:35:11 +0100,
Vít Ondruch <vondr...@redhat.com> wrote:
And was the compose successful today or not. Looking at
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/Fedora-Rawhide-20180228.n.0/logs/global/pungi.global.log
it probably was, but it is not obviou
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 09:51:49AM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On 02/27/2018 06:06 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2018-02-27 at 19:41 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> >> On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 6:47 PM, Kevin Kofler
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Richard Shaw wrote:
> Is
On 02/27/2018 06:06 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-02-27 at 19:41 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 6:47 PM, Kevin Kofler
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Richard Shaw wrote:
Is it time to update the packaging guidelines to enforce setting a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1549884
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550056
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550055
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
On Wed, 2018-02-28 at 16:51 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 18.2.2018 v 18:09 Igor Gnatenko napsal(a):
> >
> > List of packages and respective maintainers:
> > https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/gcc-removal-pkgs.txt
> >
Igor, you will fix my packages isn't it ?
Thanks,
--
Sérgio M.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547165
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/429
In the Atomic working group in Fedora we have occasionally used virtual
Fedora Activity Days (VFADs) to get the community together to discuss
in a high bandwidth setting (video conference) some techical issues
On Wed, 28 Feb 2018 08:04:41 -0500
"Jared K. Smith" wrote:
> ... Even if we didn't have
> this rule, it would be common courtesy to announce any change that
> causes others to have to do work, even if it's only for a few users.
What about an email list called
Due to conflicts and lack of planning on my part.. I am cancelling
today's meeting. Please send agenda items for next weeks meeting to
the list
--
Stephen J Smoogen.
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send
On 27 February 2018 at 14:02, Josef Ridky wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I would like to inform you, that net-snmp package will use Python3 package
> instead of Python2.
> With this change, python2-net-snmp package will be renamed to
> python3-net-snmp package.
> This change will be
On Wed, 2018-02-28 at 12:14 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 02/27/2018 07:27 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 12:16 PM, Adam Williamson
> > > wrote:
> >
> >
> > Once again, folks, *please* announce your
Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> Shouldn't we consider having -devel packages Require gcc or gcc-c++?
> What good is a header package without a compiler anyway?
> This would also (indirectly) pull in the compiler and fix most of
> these failed builds.
Do you mean that maintainers
El mié, 28-02-2018 a las 12:32 +0100, Ralf Corsepius escribió:
> On 02/28/2018 12:21 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >
> >
> > Dne 28.2.2018 v 12:14 Ralf Corsepius napsal(a):
> > > On 02/27/2018 07:27 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 12:16 PM, Adam Williamson
> > > >
l/pungi.global.log
>
> it probably was, but it is not obvious from the log.
>
the status of the compose can always be found in the STATUS file of the
root of the compose https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/
Fedora-Rawhide-20180228.n.0/STATUS is todays for instance
Dennis
Dne 18.2.2018 v 18:09 Igor Gnatenko napsal(a):
>
> List of packages and respective maintainers:
> https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/gcc-removal-pkgs.txt
>
xchat-ruby was retired.
ruby and rubygem-bcrypt are fixed (at least in git).
Vít
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
Hi,
I've updated packmol to version 18.013. This carries a license change
from GPLv2+ to MIT. No other packages are affected, since packmol is
executable only.
--
Susi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
___
devel
Hi thanks a lot for your review.
| On Tue, 2018-02-27 at 09:02 -0500, Josef Ridky wrote:
| > Hi folks,
| >
| > I would like to inform you, that net-snmp package will use Python3 package
| > instead of Python2.
| > With this change, python2-net-snmp package will be renamed to
| > python3-net-snmp
Le 2018-02-28 16:03, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit :
Most system libraries are written in C/C++ so pretty much all the
language toolchains we ship (except for toy languages not intended to
produce complex apps) will read C/C++ header files from their
compilers to use those system libraries, and will
Le 2018-02-28 15:28, Orcan Ogetbil a écrit :
On 28 February 2018 at 09:19, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
These are all _very_ edge use-cases.
Those are *not* edge-cases.
Most system libraries are written in C/C++ so pretty much all the
language toolchains we ship (except for toy languages not
On 02/18/2018 07:09 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Over this weekend I've performed scratch-mass-rebuild without having gcc and
gcc-c++ in buildroot of all Fedora packages, many of which failed due to random
reasons and I grepped all logs for some
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550056
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-RT-Client-REST-0.51-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-43ecd9b72e
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550056
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-RT-Client-REST-0.51-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-2ff63a0451
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550056
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-RT-Client-REST-0.51-1.
On 02/28/2018 04:28 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On 28 February 2018 at 09:19, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
My point was *non-C-compilers* can read *C/C++* header files because they
need to read the ABI definitions to use it from their non C/C++ code.
That makes a C/C++ header file consumable by pretty
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550056
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In
On 02/28/2018 11:28 AM, Rafal Luzynski wrote:
28.02.2018 09:33 Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le mercredi 28 février 2018 à 00:11 -0500, Orcan Ogetbil a écrit :
Shouldn't we consider having -devel packages Require gcc or gcc-c++?
What good is a header package without a
On 28 February 2018 at 09:19, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> My point was *non-C-compilers* can read *C/C++* header files because they
> need to read the ABI definitions to use it from their non C/C++ code.
>
> That makes a C/C++ header file consumable by pretty much any kind of
> compiler, so it's
My point was *non-C-compilers* can read *C/C++* header files because
they need to read the ABI definitions to use it from their non C/C++
code.
That makes a C/C++ header file consumable by pretty much any kind of
compiler, so it's *completely useless* to try to make C/C++ devel
packages pull
Dne 28.2.2018 v 13:46 Kevin Kofler napsal(a):
> Richard Shaw wrote:
>> Unannounced soname bumps are a pain :)
> The requirement to announce soname bumps to begin with is unreasonable
> bureaucracy in the first place. If your package shows up in the broken
> dependency report, you rebuild it
On 28 February 2018 at 05:28, Rafal Luzynski wrote:
> 28.02.2018 09:33 Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>>
>> Le mercredi 28 février 2018 à 00:11 -0500, Orcan Ogetbil a écrit :
>> >
>> > Shouldn't we consider having -devel packages Require gcc or gcc-c++?
>> > What good is a header package without a
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 12:32:19PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 02/28/2018 12:21 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >
> >
> > Dne 28.2.2018 v 12:14 Ralf Corsepius napsal(a):
> > > On 02/27/2018 07:27 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 12:16 PM, Adam Williamson
> > > >
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 7:46 AM, Kevin Kofler
wrote:
> The requirement to announce soname bumps to begin with is unreasonable
> bureaucracy in the first place. If your package shows up in the broken
> dependency report, you rebuild it and move on, where is the problem?
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550055
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Test-Harness-3.41-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-675bf97721
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550055
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Test-Harness-3.41-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-7cb24f9fcf
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550055
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Test-Harness-3.41-1.fc
Richard Shaw wrote:
> Unannounced soname bumps are a pain :)
The requirement to announce soname bumps to begin with is unreasonable
bureaucracy in the first place. If your package shows up in the broken
dependency report, you rebuild it and move on, where is the problem?
I can see the point of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550055
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544589
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550056
Bug ID: 1550056
Summary: perl-RT-Client-REST-0.51 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-RT-Client-REST
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550055
Bug ID: 1550055
Summary: perl-Test-Harness-3.41 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Test-Harness
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1549884
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-RDF-NS-20180227-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-9d85899558
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1549884
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-RDF-NS-20180227-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-11d26d0837
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550049
Bug ID: 1550049
Summary: perl-DBD-SQLite-1.56 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-DBD-SQLite
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
On Feb 28, 2018 12:35, "Ralf Corsepius" wrote:
On 02/28/2018 12:21 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>
> Dne 28.2.2018 v 12:14 Ralf Corsepius napsal(a):
>
>> On 02/27/2018 07:27 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 12:16 PM, Adam Williamson
>>>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1549884
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In
On 02/28/2018 12:21 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 28.2.2018 v 12:14 Ralf Corsepius napsal(a):
On 02/27/2018 07:27 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 12:16 PM, Adam Williamson
> wrote:
Once again, folks, *please*
Dne 28.2.2018 v 12:14 Ralf Corsepius napsal(a):
> On 02/27/2018 07:27 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 12:16 PM, Adam Williamson
>> > wrote:
>>
>>
>> Once again, folks, *please* announce your soname bumps, and
On 02/28/2018 02:41 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 6:47 PM, Kevin Kofler > wrote:
Richard Shaw wrote:
> Is it time to update the packaging guidelines to enforce setting a
> "%global sover " and using it in
On 02/27/2018 07:27 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 12:16 PM, Adam Williamson
> wrote:
Once again, folks, *please* announce your soname bumps, and co-ordinate
rebuilds. (In fact it looks like Zdenek is the
Hi,
I'm deeply sorry, I thought cups-filters will be rebuilt with new qpdf
during next mass rebuild - I forgot about 'rawhide is alpha' policy so
dependent packages need to be rebuild immediately with rebased package.
Again, I'm deeply sorry and thank you Adam and Rex for fixing it!
On
Dne 28.2.2018 v 10:52 Lubomír Sedlář napsal(a):
> Vít Ondruch píše v St 28. 02. 2018 v 10:35 +0100:
>> Can the logs actually contain timestamps with timezone?
> There's a timezone offset at the beginning of the log:
>
> 2018-02-28 00:33:30 [INFO] Current timezone offset: +00:00
A bit hard
28.02.2018 09:33 Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>
> Le mercredi 28 février 2018 à 00:11 -0500, Orcan Ogetbil a écrit :
> >
> > Shouldn't we consider having -devel packages Require gcc or gcc-c++?
> > What good is a header package without a compiler anyway?
> > This would also
Vít Ondruch píše v St 28. 02. 2018 v 10:35 +0100:
> Can the logs actually contain timestamps with timezone?
There's a timezone offset at the beginning of the log:
2018-02-28 00:33:30 [INFO] Current timezone offset: +00:00
> And was the compose successful today or not. Looking at
>
>
Can the logs actually contain timestamps with timezone?
And was the compose successful today or not. Looking at
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/Fedora-Rawhide-20180228.n.0/logs/global/pungi.global.log
it probably was, but it is not obvious from the log.
Vít
Dne
Le mercredi 28 février 2018 à 00:11 -0500, Orcan Ogetbil a écrit :
>
> Shouldn't we consider having -devel packages Require gcc or gcc-c++?
> What good is a header package without a compiler anyway?
> This would also (indirectly) pull in the compiler and fix most of
> these failed builds.
>
gcc
84 matches
Mail list logo