https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1784195
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1784195
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1782662
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 09:26:16PM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 12/1/19 10:48 AM, Adrian Reber wrote:
> > I prepared a protobuf upgrade from 3.6 to 3.11 in rawhide. It comes with
> > a soname update and requires its dependencies to be rebuilt.
> >
> > I tested it all in copr and most of the
On Fri, 2019-12-13 at 13:15 +0100, Jun Aruga wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 12:17 PM Frank R Dana Jr.
> wrote:
> > Hmmm. If there's a plan is to get it working again relatively soon,
> > though, I should probably withdraw my PR[1] to remove mention of it
> > from the Non-Responsive Maintainer
On 12/1/19 10:48 AM, Adrian Reber wrote:
I prepared a protobuf upgrade from 3.6 to 3.11 in rawhide. It comes with
a soname update and requires its dependencies to be rebuilt.
I tested it all in copr and most of the packages are rebuilding except
for the following packages:
* dynafed -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1782941
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1782935
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1782932
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1678626
Bug 1678626 depends on bug 1764813, which changed state.
Bug 1764813 Summary: Review Request: apt - Command-line package manager for
Debian packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764813
What|Removed
On Monday, December 16, 2019 6:30:14 PM MST Adam Williamson wrote:
> All you have to do is subscribe to the test-announce@ list and, when a
> mail like this one appears:
>
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-announce@lists.fedoraproj
>
On Monday, December 16, 2019 6:30:14 PM MST Adam Williamson wrote:
> Yup. This was anticipated. What's the alternative? We never drop Python
> 2 support in order to keep software that is clearly becoming
> increasingly out of date in a distribution which has "First" as one of
> its core
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Modularity Team (weekly) on 2019-12-17 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC
At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
Meeting of the Modularity Team.
More information available at: [Modularity Team
On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 9:37 PM Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> Adam Williamson wrote:
> > BTW, there is another point here which you may not appreciate: Fedora
> > and Debian aren't really in competition. Fedora does not see its job as
> > being to Conquer The World and have everyone run Fedora. Fedora
Greetings y'all.
My name is Carson Black & it's nice to meet y'all.
I'm from Frankfort, Kentucky (and no, I'm not interested in bourbon), and
I'm currently a student at one of the high schools here. I'd be lying if I said
I had
any explicit goals with the Fedora project, as I just do what I feel
Paul -
See:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers#Claiming_Ownership_of_a_Retired_Package
because the package has been retired for longer than 8 weeks it needs to
go through a new review. I would run fedora-review on the package and
file a review request
Adam Williamson wrote:
> BTW, there is another point here which you may not appreciate: Fedora
> and Debian aren't really in competition. Fedora does not see its job as
> being to Conquer The World and have everyone run Fedora. Fedora is
> targeted at particular purposes and particular audiences.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1778465
Bug 1778465 depends on bug 1778382, which changed state.
Bug 1778382 Summary: [RFE] EPEL-8 branch for perl-HTTP-Lite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1778382
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756036
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756036
Bug 1756036 depends on bug 1778382, which changed state.
Bug 1778382 Summary: [RFE] EPEL-8 branch for perl-HTTP-Lite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1778382
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1778382
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1765495
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
On Mon, 2019-12-16 at 16:52 -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
>
> Right, my only contributions to Fedora on this account have been Mindshare
> related, and various Copr builds. I'm not currently a packager, nor am I a
> member of QA. However, that doesn't change much about my argument. It's still
On Monday, December 16, 2019 12:16:29 PM MST Kamil Paral wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 4:06 PM John M. Harris Jr
>
> wrote:
> > > An older installation medium can be used and the system upgraded. And
> >
> > older
> >
> > > installation medium can be used and pointed at latest installation
On Monday, December 16, 2019 10:41:57 AM MST Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sun, 2019-12-15 at 22:59 -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
>
> > This is not the only change I am referring to. We've been in the
> > habit of dropping things that work, with no real reasons lately.
> > For example, look at
On 12/16/19 9:37 AM, Troy Dawson wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 14, 2019 at 10:31 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 09:19:16PM -0500, Mukundan Ragavan wrote:
>>> It appears that upower is in RHEL-8 but only in x86_64 and powerpc 64
>>> architectures. Due to this, some of my builds fail.
On Monday, December 16, 2019 11:48:49 AM MST Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > This is not accurate. You're not accounting for the time it takes to
> > write the disc, and we also have to check that the media check works,
> > which takes quite a while on its own.
>
>
> Who
On Monday, December 16, 2019 12:52:49 PM MST Kamil Paral wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 6:14 PM John M. Harris Jr
>
> wrote:
> > On Monday, December 16, 2019 9:56:01 AM MST Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > This is not accurate. You're not accounting for the time it takes to
> > > write the disc,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1784195
Bug ID: 1784195
Summary: perl-Net-DBus-1.2.0 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Net-DBus
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ruby_2.7
== Summary ==
Ruby 2.7 is the latest stable version of Ruby. Many new features and
improvements are included for the increasingly diverse and expanding
demands for Ruby. With this major update from Ruby 2.6 in Fedora 31 to
Ruby 2.7 in Fedora 32,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1784170
Bug ID: 1784170
Summary: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-7.40 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker
Keywords:
Chris Murphy wrote:
> There is nothing sudden about this proposal. It is not unusual. It has
> been laboriously explained. You just don't like what you're hearing.
> And you are resorting to a variety of slander in mischaracterizing
> people's decisions, through your word selection.
You are the
On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 7:50 PM Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
> > This is not accurate. You're not accounting for the time it takes to
> > write the disc, and we also have to check that the media check works,
> > which takes quite a while on its own.
>
> Who cares whether the
On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 6:14 PM John M. Harris Jr
wrote:
> On Monday, December 16, 2019 9:56:01 AM MST Adam Williamson wrote:
> > This is not accurate. You're not accounting for the time it takes to
> > write the disc, and we also have to check that the media check works,
> > which takes quite a
On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 6:04 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-12-16 at 13:13 +0100, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > It's also important to understand the current state of optical media
> > release criteria. We've dropped the blocker requirement for most
> > installation media two years ago. Only
On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 4:06 PM John M. Harris Jr
wrote:
> > An older installation medium can be used and the system upgraded. And
> older
> > installation medium can be used and pointed at latest installation
> > repositories (this is not guaranteed to work, but works in majority of
> cases).
>
Adam Williamson wrote:
> This is not accurate. You're not accounting for the time it takes to
> write the disc, and we also have to check that the media check works,
> which takes quite a while on its own.
Who cares whether the media check works? If it fails, but the distro still
installs, that
On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 1:28 AM John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> This is based on random choice and personal whim, not objective reasoning.
> That there is a process does not mean that the outcome is based on anything
> more than various individuals' personal opinions.
whim
/(h)wim/
a sudden desire
On 12/16/19 1:07 PM, Andreas Tunek wrote:
Den mån 16 dec. 2019 kl 18:42 skrev Adam Williamson
mailto:adamw...@fedoraproject.org>>:
Sometimes someone will propose that we've crossed the line when we
haven't, and usually we realize this and the proposal fails (excellent
example: the recentish
Den mån 16 dec. 2019 kl 18:42 skrev Adam Williamson <
adamw...@fedoraproject.org>:
>
>
> Sometimes someone will propose that we've crossed the line when we
> haven't, and usually we realize this and the proposal fails (excellent
> example: the recentish "x86-64 micro-architecture update"
On Mon, 16 Dec 2019, Troy Dawson wrote:
On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 7:45 AM Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
On Mon, 2019-12-16 at 06:37 -0800, Troy Dawson wrote:
On Sat, Dec 14, 2019 at 10:31 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 09:19:16PM -0500, Mukundan Ragavan wrote:
It appears that
On Sun, 2019-12-15 at 22:59 -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> This is not the only change I am referring to. We've been in the
> habit of dropping things that work, with no real reasons lately.
> For example, look at dropped x86 support, and soon we will be
> dropping Python 2. We have already had
On Monday, December 16, 2019 9:56:01 AM MST Adam Williamson wrote:
> This is not accurate. You're not accounting for the time it takes to
> write the disc, and we also have to check that the media check works,
> which takes quite a while on its own.
I was accounting for that time. Writing to a
On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 6:45 AM Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> Chris Murphy wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 15, 2019 at 7:37 PM John M. Harris Jr
> > wrote:
> >> It's certainly true that Apple will not service your hardware if you've
> >> got an OS other than their proprietary nonsense installed.
> >
> > In no
On Mon, 2019-12-16 at 13:13 +0100, Kamil Paral wrote:
> It's also important to understand the current state of optical media
> release criteria. We've dropped the blocker requirement for most
> installation media two years ago. Only Everything netinst and Workstation
> Live remained. This proposal
On Mon, 2019-12-16 at 10:49 +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>
> Wishlist item: Can we just have cdn.fedoraproject.org download urls
> please?
If you mean 'a URL that redirects you to a mirror that carries the
file', that's what download.fedoraproject.org is.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community
On Sun, 2019-12-15 at 20:48 -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> Instead of trying to make arguments against those who use CDs, why not keep
>
> what already works maintained? The level of effort required here is
>
> surprisingly small, testing installation from a physical CD takes, with a
>
This is one of our most common questions, and why we are adding
podman generate systemd ...
People are interested in running containers as standard services on
linux systems. Valentin dug deep into how to do this. He explains it
all here.
On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 7:45 AM Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2019-12-16 at 06:37 -0800, Troy Dawson wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 14, 2019 at 10:31 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 09:19:16PM -0500, Mukundan Ragavan wrote:
> > > > It appears that upower is in RHEL-8 but only
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20191215.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20191216.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 45
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 6.94 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Heads up!
Master branch is now: 389-ds-base-1.4.3
No more enhancements should be going into the 1.4.2 branch.
389-ds-base-1.4.0 is essentially dead, so moving forward all bugs fixes
need to be back ported to 1.4.1, and 1.4.2.
Thanks,
Mark
--
389 Directory Server Development Team
On Mon, 2019-12-16 at 06:37 -0800, Troy Dawson wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 14, 2019 at 10:31 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 09:19:16PM -0500, Mukundan Ragavan wrote:
> > > It appears that upower is in RHEL-8 but only in x86_64 and powerpc 64
> > > architectures. Due to this, some of
=
#fedora-meeting-1: FESCO (2019-12-16)
=
Meeting started by contyk at 15:00:06 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2019-12-16/fesco.2019-12-16-15.00.log.html
Meeting
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
4 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 18/165 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test not failed in
On Monday, December 16, 2019 5:13:11 AM MST Kamil Paral wrote:
> It's very important to understand that dropping a release criterion for
> optical boot doesn't mean Fedora can't be installed from a DVD in the
> future. The bugs that affect just bare-metal optical booting (and not
> virtual
On Sat, Dec 14, 2019 at 10:31 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 09:19:16PM -0500, Mukundan Ragavan wrote:
> > It appears that upower is in RHEL-8 but only in x86_64 and powerpc 64
> > architectures. Due to this, some of my builds fail. This one for example
> > -
Dear maintainers.
Based on the latest fail to build from source policy, the following packages
will be retired from Fedora 32 approximately one week before branching (February
2020).
Policy:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/
The
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1783629
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 09:19:55AM +0100, Lukas Brabec wrote:
> The oldest laptops I have experience with are HP 4520s and Lenovo
> X201i, both from 2010, both support USB boot.
I still have two AMD server motherboards deployed that don't support
booting off of USB sticks. But to give an idea
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1783984
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
The following Sources of the specfile are not valid URLs so we cannot
automatically build the new version for you. Please use URLs in your Source
declarations if possible.
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1783984
Bug ID: 1783984
Summary: fusioninventory-agent-2.5.2 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: fusioninventory-agent
Keywords: FutureFeature,
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Monday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2019-12-16 15:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 9:40 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Drop_Optical_Media_Criterion
>
> = Drop Optical Media Release Criterion =
>
> == Summary ==
> Proposal to make all Fedora optical media non-blocking. This means
> we'd stop blocking on bugs found during
Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 15, 2019 at 7:37 PM John M. Harris Jr
> wrote:
>> It's certainly true that Apple will not service your hardware if you've
>> got an OS other than their proprietary nonsense installed.
>
> In no way is it true, let alone certainly true.
>
> They've explicitly
Ryan Walklin wrote:
> Those are pretty vague references to old workstations and servers rather
> than specific make/model. Can you not use a generic rescue DVD/CD running
> something like rEFInd http://www.rodsbooks.com/refind to then actually
> boot from USB? Then you wouldn't have to faff
Hello,
To better co-ordinate the maintenance of Science and Technology related
packages, we've created the scitech_sig group on FAS for package
maintainers[1]. If you are a package maintainer and maintain or are
interested in maintaining general packages related to Science and
Technology, please:
Hi,
> Soon after release, weeks, this first update payload is easily the
> size of the Workstation Live ISO. Is it typical to setup a local
> mirror to mitigate this problem? If it were easier to setup a local
> mirror, or locally mirror a subset of the RPMs in a release, would
> that help
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1772789
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Upgrade perl-Type-Tiny to |Upgrade perl-Type-Tiny to
Hi,
I would like to ask if anyone knows how to contact Steve Jenkins (fas:
stevej). I tried his mail but without success. All the bugs assigned to him
[0] are untouched and in NEW state, so I created Non-responsive maintainer
check bug [1].
Thanks for any information you can provide.
[0] -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1783933
Bug ID: 1783933
Summary: Upgrade perl-Dancer2 to 0.208002
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Dancer2
Assignee: dd...@cpan.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1782941
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1782935
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
On Monday, December 16, 2019 1:19:55 AM MST Lukas Brabec wrote:
[snip]
> I'm the one who usually does it [1][3][4][5], sometimes it is cmurf [2].
I saw. It's odd that Fedora supports that walled garden environment, though
that's neither here nor there. The fact that it is actually tested is why
On Monday, December 16, 2019 12:20:32 AM MST Chris Murphy wrote:
> First, I haven't claimed it's not getting tested.
Sorry, must have been a misunderstanding on my part.
> Second, you have used a fallacy of circular reasoning. The test is
> being done because it's required to be done. That the
I'm +1.
The oldest laptops I have experience with are HP 4520s and Lenovo X201i, both
from 2010, both support USB boot.
Two biggest online stores in Czechia:
- CZC.cz lists 1422 laptops without optical drive, 128 with.
- Alza.cz lists 2223 without optical drive filter, 138 with.
Every autumn,
On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 06:41:35AM -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>Hi
>On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 11:43 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon
><[1]pin...@pingoured.fr> wrote:
>
> `Monitoring` means: you get a bugzilla ticket
> `Monitoring and scrach builds` means: you get the bugzilla ticket and
76 matches
Mail list logo
