No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020, 06:04 Bill Chatfield via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> I have chosen a delinquent Java package to work fix. But I need some help
> understanding what's going on. Groovy is failing to build because it
> depends on gradle-local which doesn't exist. But gradle-
Fabio explained the reasoning etc, but if you are asking where to find
some details yourself, then it is git-dist commit log:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gradle/c/4a126e8e3380eda7ceda22b18a9d9633bcd8cda8?branch=master
You can see that in the repository is just `dead.package` file now,
whic
Dne 26. 01. 20 v 23:33 Bill Chatfield via devel napsal(a):
>> You're right. The Java SIG was not organised around an account group,
>> so it does not exist. I don't know why it is that way, but that could
>> easily be fixed - other language interest groups are organised this
>> way, after all (pyt
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 6:04 AM Bill Chatfield via devel
wrote:
>
> I have chosen a delinquent Java package to work fix. But I need some help
> understanding what's going on. Groovy is failing to build because it depends
> on gradle-local which doesn't exist. But gradle-local did exist at one ti
On 1/26/20 11:52 AM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le dimanche 26 janvier 2020 à 10:10 +, Andrew Haley a écrit :
>> On 1/26/20 8:43 AM, Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote:
>>
>>> Java has been in a terminal course in Fedora for a year at
>>> least. You can see how much Red Hat Java leadership cares abo
Hi,
I've tried to get in touch with David Dick about
perl-DateTime-Format-RFC3339. The bug was left untouched, even after
setting need-info flag. I've also tried to reach to him by direct mail.
According to fedora_active_user, last FAS login was on 2019-12-10, but
he had no activity since 20
On Sun, 2020-01-26 at 22:33 +, Bill Chatfield via devel wrote:
> > That's not really fair. DNF is pretty much only the user interface,
> > and everything it's built on top of (hawkey, librepo, libsolv) is
> > implemented in C / C++. And when I think back to using yum, dnf is
> > really fast :)
On 27. 01. 20 10:34, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 6:04 AM Bill Chatfield via devel
wrote:
I have chosen a delinquent Java package to work fix. But I need some help
understanding what's going on. Groovy is failing to build because it depends on
gradle-local which doesn't ex
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 1:08 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 27. 01. 20 10:34, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 6:04 AM Bill Chatfield via devel
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> I have chosen a delinquent Java package to work fix. But I need some help
> >> understanding what's going on. Gro
On 27/01/2020 12:01, Adam Williamson wrote:
I don't know in detail how apt works, but IIRC (sorry if I'm wrong), in
a previous discussion of this it's been suggested that the difference
is apt doesn't refresh this data unless you explicitly ask it to, while
dnf does automatically refresh it on m
On Monday, January 27, 2020, 3:58:07 AM EST, Fabio Valentini
wrote: > Depending on what you want to achieve, I think
I can give you better "first package to work on" suggestions :)
Yes, please give me some suggestions. I thought I had found one with few
dependencies but looks like it's
On Sat, Jan 25, 2020 at 02:52:05PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> Question and (pre)proposal:
> Can Fedora converge on a single swap-on-ZRAM implementation, and if
> so, which one? Fedora Workstation WG wants to move to swap-on-ZRAM by
> default in Fedora 33, and the working group needs to pick somet
Le 2020-01-27 10:52, Andrew Haley a écrit :
You would not expect a GCC devroom to be concerned about the problems
of all packages written in C and C++, so why would Java be any
different?
I would expect a GCC devroom to be concerned about the problems of all
packages written in C and C++ once
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
2 of 43 required tests failed, 4 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 25/158 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedor
On Sun, Jan 26, 2020 at 12:53 PM Nicolas Mailhot via devel
wrote:
>
> Le dimanche 26 janvier 2020 à 10:10 +, Andrew Haley a écrit :
> > On 1/26/20 8:43 AM, Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote:
> >
> > > Java has been in a terminal course in Fedora for a year at
> > > least. You can see how much Re
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200126.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200127.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:6
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 41
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 5.20 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Le 2020-01-27 15:13, Mario Torre a écrit :
On Sun, Jan 26, 2020 at 12:53 PM Nicolas Mailhot via devel
wrote:
Le dimanche 26 janvier 2020 à 10:10 +, Andrew Haley a écrit :
> On 1/26/20 8:43 AM, Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote:
>
> > Java has been in a terminal course in Fedora for a year at
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 3:32 PM Nicolas Mailhot
wrote:
> When a community driven conference grows to the size and reach of FOSDEM
> yes you can infer quite a lot from its schedule (one could do the same,
> removing the community word, for things where community is not relevant;
> that’s how half
Hi,
FYI all php-zendframework-* packages are now retire from rawhide.
This project is dead
Read:
https://framework.zend.com/blog/2019-04-17-announcing-laminas.html
So, now, all php-laminas-* packages are built and available
including the compatibility layer which allow to use
it the same way
- Original Message -
> From: "Tom Seewald"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Sunday, January 26, 2020 12:35:32 PM
> Subject: Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
>
> > On Sat, Jan 25, 2020 at 11:07 PM Bill Chatfield via devel
> *snip*
> > True. Nobody cares about Java packages
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 2:52 PM Bill Chatfield via devel
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, January 27, 2020, 3:58:07 AM EST, Fabio Valentini
> wrote:
> > Depending on what you want to achieve, I think I can give you better "first
> > package to work on" suggestions :)
>
> Yes, please give me some sugge
Hi all,
Per the Fedora 32 schedule[1] we will be starting a mass rebuild for
Fedora 32 today. We are doing a mass rebuild for Fedora 32 for all the
changes:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GLIBC231
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/32/ChangeSet#Binutils_2.33
https://fedoraproject.org
Le 2020-01-27 15:46, Mario Torre a écrit :
You keep ignoring that a large part of the packaged ecosystem comes
from different places and is maintained by different people,
That’s why coordination conferences like the FOSDEM exist.
and not everything is in a state of chaos as you imply
Othe
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 10:25:50AM -0500, Mohan Boddu wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Per the Fedora 32 schedule[1] we will be starting a mass rebuild for
> Fedora 32 today. We are doing a mass rebuild for Fedora 32 for all the
> changes:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GLIBC231
> https://fedorap
On Mon, 27 Jan 2020 10:25:50 -0500
Mohan Boddu wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Per the Fedora 32 schedule[1] we will be starting a mass rebuild for
> Fedora 32 today. We are doing a mass rebuild for Fedora 32 for all the
> changes:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GLIBC231
> https://fedoraprojec
On Mon, 2020-01-27 at 16:34 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 10:25:50AM -0500, Mohan Boddu wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Per the Fedora 32 schedule[1] we will be starting a mass rebuild for
> > Fedora 32 today. We are doing a mass rebuild for Fedora 32 for all the
> > changes:
>
On 1/17/20 11:53 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 30. 11. 19 2:27, Ivan Chavero wrote:
Yes i'm going to update it to the newest version this weekend
thanks for following up!
Hello Ivan. Could you please have a look?
@Ivan,
Any update on the status of Nextcloud?
___
Andrew Haley writes:
> On 1/26/20 11:52 AM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>> Le dimanche 26 janvier 2020 à 10:10 +, Andrew Haley a écrit :
>>> On 1/26/20 8:43 AM, Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote:
>>>
Java has been in a terminal course in Fedora for a year at
least. You can see how much Red
Hi,
sorry if this a newbie question, I tried to search this
but did not find good documentation on this problem.
I'm in the process of upgrading the clojure package to
next version, which has new dependencies. These dependencies
require certain clojure version themselves, so it makes a
chicken-a
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 5:28 PM Robbie Harwood wrote:
> > You would not expect a GCC devroom to be concerned about the problems
> > of all packages written in C and C++, so why would Java be any
> > different?
>
> Honestly? I totally would expect that. Wouldn't that be better for
> everyone?
>
Since we have side tags now it shouldn't be disruptive but still wanted to
give a warning.
Dependent packages seem to be:
blender
luxcorerender
OpenColorIO
Thanks,
Richard
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an e
tMario Torre writes:
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 5:28 PM Robbie Harwood wrote:
>
>>> You would not expect a GCC devroom to be concerned about the
>>> problems of all packages written in C and C++, so why would Java be
>>> any different?
>>
>> Honestly? I totally would expect that. Wouldn't that
> First, I'd like to see Fedora become more of an "operating system factory".
20s is from 2020 to 2029. 10 years. So long.
So, let me write high level thoughts. And let me post a new topic.
For the topic 'more of an "operating system factory"', I want to see
Fedora project as a place to "democrat
Yes, sorry about that. I'm working on it right now. Should be done before
midnight CET.
FPC 3.2.0 was originally to come out before the end of 2019, but it still
hasn't been released. Reading the forums and the bug tracker, none of the
remaining issues affect Fedora, so I decided to go with 3.
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 7:11 PM Robbie Harwood wrote:
> Java packaging being extremely difficult is not a Fedora-specific
> problem. The modularity effects are, but the packaging has been
> known-hard for a very long time in many distros (and even outside a
> distro context, it's not fun to work
> In my experience, in 1999 I was living in the same region with an NGO
> working for a backbone network.
> And the NGO helped me to put my Linux server in their network for free.
> In the age of non-democratized computer and internet, some
> organizations helped for the new technologies.
My mista
* Bill Chatfield via devel [26/01/2020 22:33] :
>
> I don't know if the problem is dnf or a library, but it is a serious problem.
There are several issues here:
- Different servers will transmit repository metadata at different speeds
and you need to factor these out when trying to find bottlen
On Mon, 27 Jan 2020 18:42:28 -
"Artur Iwicki" wrote:
> Yes, sorry about that. I'm working on it right now. Should be done
> before midnight CET.
>
> FPC 3.2.0 was originally to come out before the end of 2019, but it
> still hasn't been released. Reading the forums and the bug tracker,
> no
Hi
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 8:56 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> It is "upstream" in the sense that it is under the same umbrella.
> There are no plans to move the code to the main repo, because it's in
> rust and currently combining meson which is used for systemd proper
> with rust and c
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 6:01 PM Mario Torre wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 5:28 PM Robbie Harwood wrote:
>
> > > You would not expect a GCC devroom to be concerned about the problems
> > > of all packages written in C and C++, so why would Java be any
> > > different?
> >
> > Honestly? I tot
Here's a koji scratch build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41102368
The ppc64le bootstrap went fine, the aarch64 one fails at:
/builddir/build/BUILD/fpcbuild-r1430/fpcsrc/compiler/ppca64 fpmake.pp -n
-Fu/builddir/build/BUILD/fpcbuild-r1430/fpcsrc/packages/fpmkunit/units_bs/
On Mon, 27 Jan 2020 20:11:07 -
"Artur Iwicki" wrote:
> Here's a koji scratch build:
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41102368
>
> The ppc64le bootstrap went fine, the aarch64 one fails at:
/builddir/build/BUILD/fpcbuild-r1430/fpcsrc/compiler/ppca64 fpmake.pp -n
-Fu/bui
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 4:46 PM Jeff Law wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2020-01-27 at 16:34 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 10:25:50AM -0500, Mohan Boddu wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Per the Fedora 32 schedule[1] we will be starting a mass rebuild for
> > > Fedora 32 today. We are
On Mon, 27 Jan 2020 21:19:34 +0100
Dan Horák wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Jan 2020 20:11:07 -
> "Artur Iwicki" wrote:
>
> > Here's a koji scratch build:
> > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41102368
> >
> > The ppc64le bootstrap went fine, the aarch64 one fails at:
what is the s
If you're asking "what's the source code", then it's built using the same
source as the RPM. After going through %setup (i.e. extracting everything and
applying patches), do:
$ cd fpcsrc/
$ make all CPU_TARGET=aarch64 OS_TARGET=linux BINUTILSPREFIX=aarch64-linux-gnu-
If you're asking "where the
On 1/26/20 5:33 PM, Bill Chatfield via devel wrote:
When I type "sudo dnf install something" it takes about 10 minutes to pull
updates from every repository, every time I run dnf. The actual install or update
proceeds at a reasonable pace. I wouldn't call it fast. I could send you a video of th
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 06:43:36PM +0200, Markku Korkeala wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sorry if this a newbie question, I tried to search this
> but did not find good documentation on this problem.
>
> I'm in the process of upgrading the clojure package to
> next version, which has new dependencies. These de
On Mon, 27 Jan 2020 20:28:15 -
"Artur Iwicki" wrote:
> If you're asking "what's the source code", then it's built using the
> same source as the RPM. After going through %setup (i.e. extracting
> everything and applying patches), do: $ cd fpcsrc/ $ make all
> CPU_TARGET=aarch64 OS_TARGET=linu
Dan and Artur,
The mass rebuild hasn't started yet, I can wait until 08:00 UTC
28-Jan-2020 before starting the mass rebuild.
If the work is not done by then, we have to run a selective rebuild later.
CC'ing Ben.
Thanks.
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 3:11 PM Artur Iwicki wrote:
>
> Here's a koji scr
On Mon, 27 Jan 2020 15:59:37 -0500
Mohan Boddu wrote:
> Dan and Artur,
>
> The mass rebuild hasn't started yet, I can wait until 08:00 UTC
> 28-Jan-2020 before starting the mass rebuild.
>
> If the work is not done by then, we have to run a selective rebuild
> later.
I don't think we can fix i
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 10:06 PM Dan Horák wrote:
>
> On Mon, 27 Jan 2020 15:59:37 -0500
> Mohan Boddu wrote:
>
> > Dan and Artur,
> >
> > The mass rebuild hasn't started yet, I can wait until 08:00 UTC
> > 28-Jan-2020 before starting the mass rebuild.
> >
> > If the work is not done by then, we
On Mon, 27 Jan 2020 22:12:41 +0100
Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 10:06 PM Dan Horák wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 27 Jan 2020 15:59:37 -0500
> > Mohan Boddu wrote:
> >
> > > Dan and Artur,
> > >
> > > The mass rebuild hasn't started yet, I can wait until 08:00 UTC
> > > 28-Jan-2020
I've finished the build for ppc64le (bootstrapped from a cross-compiled
compiler): https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41106187
It should be noted, though, that to enable ppc64le for dependent packages, the
fpc-srpm-macros package must be edited (since packages depending on fpc u
On Mon, 2020-01-27 at 21:23 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 4:46 PM Jeff Law wrote:
> > On Mon, 2020-01-27 at 16:34 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 10:25:50AM -0500, Mohan Boddu wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > Per the Fedora 32 schedule[1]
* Artur Iwicki:
> If you're asking "what's the source code", then it's built using the same
> source as the RPM. After going through %setup (i.e. extracting everything and
> applying patches), do:
> $ cd fpcsrc/
> $ make all CPU_TARGET=aarch64 OS_TARGET=linux
> BINUTILSPREFIX=aarch64-linux-gnu-
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 1:44 PM Mario Torre wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 7:11 PM Robbie Harwood wrote:
>
> > Java packaging being extremely difficult is not a Fedora-specific
> > problem. The modularity effects are, but the packaging has been
> > known-hard for a very long time in many dis
That is a very helpful explanation. I do have a lot of repos configured but
most are necessary. Some are now added by gnome-software.
_copr_phracek-PyCharm.repo fedora-updates.repo
rpmfusion-nonfree-nvidia-driver.repo
dropbox.repo fedora-updates-testing-modular
rust-x11-2.18.2-1.fc32 hash changed its license from CC0-1.0 to MIT.
See also: https://github.com/erlepereira/x11-rs/issues/82
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedo
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
Dear maintainers.
Based on the latest fail to build from source policy, the following packages
will be retired from Fedora 32 approximately one week before branching
(2020-02-03).
Policy:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/
The packages in
No, this was done on a Fedora install. But thanks for the input! I've looked
into the sources and with patched paths and rebuilt bootstrap compiler, the
koji scratch build went ok. Gonna make a commit to dist-git soon.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@li
I guess an outdated package might be easier but I'm more concerned about the
ones that are broken. I suppose the ones that are broken are still broken
because they're hard to fix.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe se
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Modularity Team (weekly) on 2020-01-28 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC
At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
Meeting of the Modularity Team.
More information available at: [Modularity Team
Docs](https://docs.pagure.o
Are any of you on the java-devel list so that I could move my newb questions
there? I can guarantee that it's a low-traffic list so there's no risk in
joining it. :-)
google-http-java-client looks easy to fix. It won't build because it needs one
dependency, maven-checkstyle-plugin, which won't
On Tue, 28 Jan 2020, Bill Chatfield via devel wrote:
Are any of you on the java-devel list so that I could move my newb questions
there? I can guarantee that it's a low-traffic list so there's no risk in
joining it. :-)
google-http-java-client looks easy to fix. It won't build because it need
Greetings,
The antlr4 package needs a reboot so that it can ship the various
language runtime libraries, and so that it can be updated to the
latest version. I have been in contact with the maintainers of the
current antlr4 package and have received approval to proceed with
this.
I would like to
On Tue, 28 Jan 2020 02:23:10 -
"Artur Iwicki" wrote:
> No, this was done on a Fedora install. But thanks for the input! I've
> looked into the sources and with patched paths and rebuilt bootstrap
> compiler, the koji scratch build went ok. Gonna make a commit to
> dist-git soon.
awesome, tha
68 matches
Mail list logo
