Hi Bill,
Am 30.01.20 um 07:25 schrieb Bill Chatfield via devel:
> According the procedure for retired packages, I'm announcing my intention to
> take ownership of checkstyle, checkstyle-maven-plugin, and
> google-http-java-client. They are all retired as far as I can tell.
Welcome to Fedora -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1796332
Bug ID: 1796332
Summary: perl-Sereal-Decoder-4.008 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Sereal-Decoder
Keywords: FutureFeature,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1796330
Bug ID: 1796330
Summary: perl-Sereal-4.008 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Sereal
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1796331
Bug ID: 1796331
Summary: perl-Sereal-Encoder-4.008 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Sereal-Encoder
Keywords: FutureFeature,
Notification time stamped 2020-01-30 06:33:29 UTC
From c339dfb6ee7f4708f5f2a778bbd0bfa9796a9099 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jan 30 2020 06:33:24 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
According the procedure for retired packages, I'm announcing my intention to
take ownership of checkstyle, checkstyle-maven-plugin, and
google-http-java-client. They are all retired as far as I can tell.
___
devel mailing list --
Notification time stamped 2020-01-30 06:03:50 UTC
From 7c81a521df6504b08c998c45608b8afe6f5ebd97 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jan 30 2020 06:03:45 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2020-01-30 06:01:45 UTC
From 6e3307ef1e19ddc45f84cc4f7dbb1a94c9b88b31 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jan 30 2020 06:01:40 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2020-01-30 05:51:13 UTC
From 643288c6ec2e6134b76d6c5c197f46bb79de510a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jan 30 2020 05:51:08 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2020-01-30 05:51:46 UTC
From dfa66c6076785e735a3207388eaf81ce159eac8d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jan 30 2020 05:51:41 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2020-01-30 05:23:31 UTC
From 81dac57a0df62f13d4d06500d34d576d769135a5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jan 30 2020 05:23:26 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2020-01-30 04:32:55 UTC
From 069703f14dd8a6f13d2f0c159460755f14a33910 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jan 30 2020 04:32:49 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2020-01-30 04:32:20 UTC
From c6d6cb97b21efd0fdc3c8da77217bc5bcedb0440 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jan 30 2020 04:32:15 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2020-01-30 04:23:04 UTC
From 7d0b06577d78e2b7c2a7b11a6e79f8e575ee5197 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jan 30 2020 04:22:58 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2020/01/30/report-389-ds-base-1.4.3.2-20200130git8a3cea6.fc31.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Hi,
I took js-jquery-file-upload package to save js-query , I updated [1]
but we still need update nodejs-multimatch [2], nodejs-p-limit [3] and
nodejs-lodash [4] at least !
To update nodejs-p-limit, we need nodejs-p-try which isn't in Fedora,
here is the package review request [5]
[1]
Notification time stamped 2020-01-30 04:09:25 UTC
From e90ecf86c2aa71ec788c9108b25d03fe5cd9765c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jan 30 2020 04:09:20 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2020-01-30 04:05:41 UTC
From 1622c9ac4d51201bfc8dd0c96c598a978045ff40 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jan 30 2020 04:05:35 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2020-01-30 04:03:01 UTC
From f4c12652f3d4f590a83fad2de7c8f1d6dbb473f0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jan 30 2020 04:02:56 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2020-01-30 04:02:50 UTC
From b42d518332cc859aed5db07de9cf96cc570629db Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jan 30 2020 04:02:44 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2020-01-30 03:31:51 UTC
From e2ee83511e41a39c4b9623d26a1ab98d40549077 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jan 30 2020 03:31:46 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2020-01-30 02:59:11 UTC
From 1ca252c7bf72f7a7f2a4ad793e1bad7b37e53fe7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jan 30 2020 02:59:05 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2020-01-30 02:59:00 UTC
From 3857fa1a354aff9b3cf62c4614c753d4e9f6133f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jan 30 2020 02:58:54 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2020-01-30 02:58:48 UTC
From f3c0652166ea7f47adf0429c15519681464abe2c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jan 30 2020 02:58:43 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
On 1/30/20 3:19 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 10:26:56PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>> Here is an initial (albeit randomly generated) proposal of X and Y:
>>
>> severity CRITICAL/HIGH MEDIUM LOW
>> X 2 4 6
>> Y
On 1/30/20 8:32 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Miro Hrončok wrote:
>> My idea was that within half a year, it should be wither fixed or CLOSED
>> as WONTFIX or UPSTREAM. If we don't agree, I'm completely fine making it
>> 12 months or even ignore such bugs in the policy entirely.
>
> I don't see how
Miro Hrončok wrote:
> My idea was that within half a year, it should be wither fixed or CLOSED
> as WONTFIX or UPSTREAM. If we don't agree, I'm completely fine making it
> 12 months or even ignore such bugs in the policy entirely.
I don't see how it is an improvement to close security fixes that
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50870
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/50859
—
Sincerely,
William Brown
Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server
SUSE Labs
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
Notification time stamped 2020-01-30 02:12:00 UTC
From 8afd19aa1bc74fb721681740b5411d42965630bc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jan 30 2020 02:11:55 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2020-01-30 02:08:32 UTC
From bc0b327c706514a4a8dc0f76a9c3613a14c72396 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jan 30 2020 02:08:27 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2020-01-30 01:56:47 UTC
From 0e1788e97740672effdf63864d812827e46954c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jan 30 2020 01:56:42 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2020-01-30 01:53:52 UTC
From 32a204ed11e35f244da3edf867a14e86d058c082 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jan 30 2020 01:53:47 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2020-01-30 01:55:20 UTC
From 8862027509eeab0cba63a2e6cbc22bed4de08cbe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jan 30 2020 01:55:15 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2020-01-30 01:50:20 UTC
From db0b3de53eae1987dbe1e5afc72db7f25b220937 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jan 30 2020 01:50:15 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2020-01-30 01:40:44 UTC
From 271f9bb58e5a2a4ddf4e8e7b41b308fb4f75aeaf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jan 30 2020 01:40:38 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2020-01-30 01:09:50 UTC
From 1a1dfda6223d67beb93abdf3a75c0cc3e9d1afc6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jan 30 2020 01:09:44 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2020-01-30 00:57:56 UTC
From 83d4e589dc97d5049ad4684b562f057bf2093b60 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jan 30 2020 00:57:51 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2020-01-30 00:59:03 UTC
From 00effc81e0d855c7e30959b6bba26073b45f2c69 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jan 30 2020 00:58:58 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2020-01-29 23:56:28 UTC
From afb44d7d3207a52f60ef6df79aa20886c29f33ca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jan 29 2020 23:56:23 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2020-01-29 23:24:03 UTC
From 1ca7f924af0ccd5e9af8381441b3690e3ab4422c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jan 29 2020 23:23:59 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2020-01-29 22:49:36 UTC
From 3f40d1a255f7fb8cdee398c4f8440bb7b5a772ee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jan 29 2020 22:49:29 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2020-01-29 22:45:22 UTC
From 447766d02dd318a98bee7d878e0981e154ef9095 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jan 29 2020 22:45:17 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2020-01-29 22:32:55 UTC
From db8dd765c3110e815feca27e7f6dc75deda337b5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jan 29 2020 22:32:50 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Notification time stamped 2020-01-29 22:30:05 UTC
From cafab39cf5008bd840d54ffa99a8b32a102a93e1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jan 29 2020 22:30:00 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
Pierre-Yves Chibon writes:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 11:51:29PM +0100, Dan Čermák wrote:
>> "Richard W.M. Jones" writes:
>>
>> > I always think that Fedora works fine if you maintain 1-5 packages.
>> > It's possible to maintain 20 with a lot of work. And if you want to
>> > maintain 100+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1796214
Mark McKinstry changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
---
Hello Rex,
>So, we (kde-sign, Qt maintainers) generally update strategically where it
>makes sense to warrant the time investment in doing so.
I understand.
Also that some people contribute it in their free time/or paid time
(but not mandatory to contribute),
which of course means a lot.
I
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 12:52:53PM -0500, Robbie Harwood wrote:
> Julen Landa Alustiza writes:
>
> > (snip)
> >
> > 20/1/29 14:49(e)an, Clement Verna igorleak idatzi zuen:
> >> To me that's the all point of this
> >> process, let's put down what we *really* *really* need and then look at
> >>
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020, 17:19 Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 at 16:23, Leigh Griffin wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 10:35 AM Iñaki Ucar
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 at 00:08, Leigh Griffin
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020, 22:06 Iñaki Ucar
> wrote:
> >> >>
On 29. 01. 20 22:49, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 10:26:56PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Here is an initial (albeit randomly generated) proposal of X and Y:
severity CRITICAL/HIGH MEDIUM LOW
X 2 4 6
Y 2
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 10:26:56PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Here is an initial (albeit randomly generated) proposal of X and Y:
>
> severity CRITICAL/HIGH MEDIUM LOW
> X 2 4 6
> Y 2 4 6
In RHEL, low impact
Hello, Fedora has an approved security policy since September 2018 [0]:
If a CRITICAL or IMPORTANT security issue is currently open
against a package, or a security issue of lower severity has been
open for at least 6 months, four weeks before the branch point a
procedure similar to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1796214
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1656402
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1656402=edit
[patch] Update to 1.02 (#1796214)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1796214
Bug ID: 1796214
Summary: perl-CDB_File-1.02 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-CDB_File
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 01:18:48 +0100, Jiri Hladky wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Jirka,
> I have a simple package for review. It's called practrand - a Software package
> for the Randon number generation & testing
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795461
I see that it hasn't been taken up for
Rex Dieter kirjoitti 28.1.2020 16:57:
Markku Korkeala wrote:
Hi,
sorry if this a newbie question, I tried to search this
but did not find good documentation on this problem.
I'm in the process of upgrading the clojure package to
next version, which has new dependencies. These dependencies
Richard W.M. Jones kirjoitti 27.1.2020 22:35:
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 06:43:36PM +0200, Markku Korkeala wrote:
I think it's Perl where IIRC the package can be configured
as a bootstrap package (by setting an RPM variable), built
that way, the dependencies are then built, then the perl
package is
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 7:18 AM Remi Collet wrote:
> There are different:
>
> * Changelog is for end user
> * Git log is for package maintainer
I completely agree with this distinction. We're creating more "noise"
for end users if we end up adding all the "whoops" commits into the
%changelog.
On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 at 18:26, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 at 11:38, Clement Verna
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 at 16:18, Pierre-Yves Chibon
> wrote:
> >>
>
> >> these heroics related to pagure?
> >>
> >> If not, I'm not sure what is the point you were
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1792699
--- Comment #10 from Mark McKinstry ---
Jitka,
Thanks for building it at
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-4bf83642a1 .
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Julen Landa Alustiza writes:
> (snip)
>
> 20/1/29 14:49(e)an, Clement Verna igorleak idatzi zuen:
>> To me that's the all point of this
>> process, let's put down what we *really* *really* need and then look at
>> the different options.
>>
>
> Do we *really* *really* need to compete with
On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 at 16:56, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-01-29 at 15:56 +0100, Clement Verna wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 29, 2020, 15:23 Julen Landa Alustiza <
> jla...@fedoraproject.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > (snip)
> > >
> > > 20/1/29 14:49(e)an, Clement Verna igorleak idatzi zuen:
> > >
On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 at 11:38, Clement Verna wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 at 16:18, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>>
>> these heroics related to pagure?
>>
>> If not, I'm not sure what is the point you were trying to make for this
>> thread.
>
>
> My point is that we have to dedicate a team
On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 at 16:18, Julen Landa Alustiza
wrote:
>
>
> 2020(e)ko urtarrilaren 29(a) 15:56:08 (CET)-(e)an, Clement Verna <
> cve...@fedoraproject.org>-(e)k hau idatzi zuen:
> >On Wed, Jan 29, 2020, 15:23 Julen Landa Alustiza
> >
> >wrote:
> >
> >> (snip)
> >>
> >> 20/1/29 14:49(e)an,
On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 at 16:23, Leigh Griffin wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 10:35 AM Iñaki Ucar wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 at 00:08, Leigh Griffin wrote:
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020, 22:06 Iñaki Ucar wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, 28 Jan 2020 at 20:58, Leigh Griffin wrote:
>> >> >
>>
On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 at 16:18, Pierre-Yves Chibon
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 03:56:08PM +0100, Clement Verna wrote:
> >On Wed, Jan 29, 2020, 15:23 Julen Landa Alustiza
> > wrote:
> >
> > (snip)
> >
> > 20/1/29 14:49(e)an, Clement Verna igorleak idatzi zuen:
> > > To
Damian Ivanov wrote:
> But it's not the only CVE fixed with Qt 5.14.1
> The point is that there is other software using Qt which doesn't start
> with K even though K works just fine with 5.14 by the experience of other
> distributions.
Bumping Qt versions is... a fairly difficult process in
On Wed, 2020-01-29 at 16:17 +0100, Julen Landa Alustiza wrote:
>
> 2020(e)ko urtarrilaren 29(a) 15:56:08 (CET)-(e)an, Clement Verna
> -(e)k hau idatzi zuen:
> > On Wed, Jan 29, 2020, 15:23 Julen Landa Alustiza
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > (snip)
> > >
> > > 20/1/29 14:49(e)an, Clement Verna
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1793917
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1796106
Referenced Bugs:
On Wed, 2020-01-29 at 15:56 +0100, Clement Verna wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2020, 15:23 Julen Landa Alustiza
> wrote:
>
> > (snip)
> >
> > 20/1/29 14:49(e)an, Clement Verna igorleak idatzi zuen:
> > > To me that's the all point of this
> > > process, let's put down what we *really* *really* need
* Neal Gompa:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 10:07 AM Julen Landa Alustiza
> wrote:
>>
>> Per git ref acls is not a common thing on git forges. If this is a final
>> requirement, we should start analyzing the viability of implementing and
>> maintain it on the different forges (and it should be
On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 at 09:46, Damian Ivanov wrote:
>
> >That is looking for a boogeyman under the bed to blame something that
> >has a long long history of not happening. Ever since OBS has been out,
> >there has been a yearly 'why isn't Fedora moving to OBS' thread
>
> It has always been a bad
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 3:30 PM Pierre-Yves Chibon
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 04:06:22PM +0100, Julen Landa Alustiza wrote:
> >Per git ref acls is not a common thing on git forges. If this is a
> final
> >requirement, we should start analyzing the viability of implementing
> and
>
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 10:07 AM Julen Landa Alustiza
wrote:
>
> Per git ref acls is not a common thing on git forges. If this is a final
> requirement, we should start analyzing the viability of implementing and
> maintain it on the different forges (and it should be feasible with all of
>
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 04:06:22PM +0100, Julen Landa Alustiza wrote:
>Per git ref acls is not a common thing on git forges. If this is a final
>requirement, we should start analyzing the viability of implementing and
>maintain it on the different forges (and it should be feasible with
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 03:56:08PM +0100, Clement Verna wrote:
>On Wed, Jan 29, 2020, 15:23 Julen Landa Alustiza
> wrote:
>
> (snip)
>
> 20/1/29 14:49(e)an, Clement Verna igorleak idatzi zuen:
> > To me that's the all point of this
> > process, let's put down what we
2020(e)ko urtarrilaren 29(a) 15:56:08 (CET)-(e)an, Clement Verna
-(e)k hau idatzi zuen:
>On Wed, Jan 29, 2020, 15:23 Julen Landa Alustiza
>
>wrote:
>
>> (snip)
>>
>> 20/1/29 14:49(e)an, Clement Verna igorleak idatzi zuen:
>> > To me that's the all point of this
>> > process, let's put down what
- Original Message -
> From: "Stephen John Smoogen"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 8:47:46 AM
> Subject: Re: Java Dev Group and Fedora Quality
>
> On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 at 05:14, Andrew Haley wrote:
> >
> > On 1/27/20 3:13 PM,
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 10:35 AM Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 at 00:08, Leigh Griffin wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020, 22:06 Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, 28 Jan 2020 at 20:58, Leigh Griffin
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > This thread is serving as a source of requirements
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 10:07:55AM -0500, Randy Barlow wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-01-29 at 09:43 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > Also AIUI fedpkg chain-build doesn't work except in
> > Rawhide, although I'm not sure why that is?
>
> It doesn't work in stable because you need to create buildroot
>
On Wed, 2020-01-29 at 09:43 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Also AIUI fedpkg chain-build doesn't work except in
> Rawhide, although I'm not sure why that is?
It doesn't work in stable because you need to create buildroot
overrides for each dependency before you can proceed with building the
Per git ref acls is not a common thing on git forges. If this is a final
requirement, we should start analyzing the viability of implementing and
maintain it on the different forges (and it should be feasible with all of the
rest of our strange ACLs on dist-git)
On pagure side, now that our
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020, 15:23 Julen Landa Alustiza
wrote:
> (snip)
>
> 20/1/29 14:49(e)an, Clement Verna igorleak idatzi zuen:
> > To me that's the all point of this
> > process, let's put down what we *really* *really* need and then look at
> > the different options.
> >
>
> Do we *really*
On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 at 05:14, Andrew Haley wrote:
>
> On 1/27/20 3:13 PM, Alex Scheel wrote:
> > N.B.: I'd like to thank the Red Hat JVM team for being solid in
> > their Fedora execution. But they maintain only the JVM, and not
> > the rest of the Java ecosystem. :-)
>
> Thank you.
>
> One
>That is looking for a boogeyman under the bed to blame something that
>has a long long history of not happening. Ever since OBS has been out,
>there has been a yearly 'why isn't Fedora moving to OBS' thread
It has always been a bad management decision to not change.
Ever since OBS has been out
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 09:37:36AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 9:29 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 03:22:25PM +0100, Julen Landa Alustiza wrote:
> > > (snip)
> > >
> > > 20/1/29 14:49(e)an, Clement Verna igorleak idatzi zuen:
> > > >To me
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 9:29 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 03:22:25PM +0100, Julen Landa Alustiza wrote:
> > (snip)
> >
> > 20/1/29 14:49(e)an, Clement Verna igorleak idatzi zuen:
> > >To me that's the all point of this process, let's put down what we
> > >*really*
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 4:05 PM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> And ... you lost me right there...
> Pierre
That's too bad. Even If it's sounds harsh it's the reality.
It has been discussed before and there was no technical reason not to.
Just someone going for a short term solution.
Maybe it is
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 03:22:25PM +0100, Julen Landa Alustiza wrote:
> (snip)
>
> 20/1/29 14:49(e)an, Clement Verna igorleak idatzi zuen:
> >To me that's the all point of this process, let's put down what we
> >*really* *really* need and then look at the different options.
> >
>
> Do we
On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 at 06:10, Damian Ivanov wrote:
>
> Maybe now that RH is part of IBM they have changed their short sighted view
> of not collaborating on a better build system like OBS.
That is looking for a boogeyman under the bed to blame something that
has a long long history of not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1796036
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
(snip)
20/1/29 14:49(e)an, Clement Verna igorleak idatzi zuen:
To me that's the all point of this
process, let's put down what we *really* *really* need and then look at
the different options.
Do we *really* *really* need to compete with other full featured git
forges on features? The
Le 28/01/2020 à 10:03, Richard W.M. Jones a écrit :
> I always think that Fedora works fine if you maintain 1-5 packages.
> It's possible to maintain 20 with a lot of work. And if you want to
> maintain 100+ (things like the ocaml-* set that I help to maintain)
> then you have to write your own
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1793917
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Link ID||Github
|
That's one of the big reasons I like Red Hat. You guys rock! :-)
On Wednesday, January 29, 2020, 5:14:18 AM EST, Andrew Haley
wrote:
On 1/27/20 3:13 PM, Alex Scheel wrote:
> N.B.: I'd like to thank the Red Hat JVM team for being solid in
> their Fedora execution. But they maintain
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 01:09:04PM +0200, Damian Ivanov wrote:
>Maybe now that RH is part of IBM they have changed their short sighted
>view of not collaborating on a better build system like OBS. As I recall
And ... you lost me right there...
Pierre
On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 at 11:36, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 at 00:08, Leigh Griffin wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020, 22:06 Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, 28 Jan 2020 at 20:58, Leigh Griffin
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > This thread is serving as a source of requirements (although
olysonek closed without merging a pull-request against the project:
`perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random` that you
are following.
Closed pull-request:
``
Drop Group tag
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random/pull-request/1
___
olysonek commented on the pull-request: `Drop Group tag` that you are following:
``
Igor has already handled this. Closing.
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel
olysonek closed without merging a pull-request against the project:
`perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA` that you
are following.
Closed pull-request:
``
Drop Group tag
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel
1 - 100 of 133 matches
Mail list logo
