Thanks a lot!
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
Hi all,
I was wondering if it would be possible, perhaps by a provenpackager, to update
the abovementioned package. There already is a bug report for quite some time
here [1].
The upstream discussion about this bug is here [2] and I even provided a pull
request to make the update even easier.
I've now also filed a bug report
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030824 for amluto. Please see the
output of the fedora-active-user script in the following comment of the
original bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685216#c10
Would this be sufficient or do I need to
Hi all,
the package python-musicbrainzngs [1] has a long-standing bug [2] and is not
upgraded to the latest version, which creates all sorts of issues for dependent
packages. Therefore, I would like to ask if a proven-package could initiate an
update. There's already a pull-request at
Sorry, to bother again, but I missed that you only created the update for f35,
but for at least f34 this should be an update to push into stable.
Thanks again.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
> On Sun, May 2, 2021 at 8:28 AM Johannes Lips wrote:
>
> maintainer.
> My fas is imcinerney.
Thanks, just added you.
>
> -Ian
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists
Thanks for that!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
> On Sun, May 2, 2021 at 9:28 AM Johannes Lips wrote:
>
> Hello Johannes,
>
> Feel free to assign elementary-icon-theme to me. I'm already the
> maintainer of all other elementary / Pantheon packages in Fedora.
> Thank you for your work with maintaining those packages!
Don
ay, 2021, 12:59 pm Johannes Lips, wrote:
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List
Hi all,
I would like to ask if someone, probably a proven packager, could look into
fixing a bug a lot of Xfce and dnfdragora users are facing at the moment.
The problem is that the update notification does not disappear by itself, but
needs to be clicked away. See upstream bug report and also
Dear all,
after quite some years, I would like to hand over the following packages to new
maintainers. I will not orphan them if no one picks them up, but it would be
great if someone with an interest in these packages could take them over.
backintime - backintime backup tool
In defense of the maintainers, these build dates are right around f33 branching
on August 11th, so perhaps that is the reason, why they've missed f33.
johannes
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
> Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> Well, as I understand it, the main reason he is sending those private
> replies is that he was banned from the mailing list, or put on moderation or
> something.
>
> If this mailing list were actually a place where people are allowed to voice
> their technical
Hi Joseph,
I am also affected by that bug and I think this is the relevant bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1800935
Cheers
Johannes
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
> "Johannes Lips"
>
> We already have a tool for reporting issues and problems, and it's not
> bodhi. If there's a problem with an already pushed update, it needs to
> be in bugzilla - where it's actually discoverable - not in bodhi, where
> it will go nowhere.
I a
Hi all,
I was recently bit by a bug, which was caused by a mismatch between
texlive-biblatex and biber. The technical side is not so important, only so
much that they need each other in a pretty specific version, which is not
reflected on the rpm level.
What I found weird is that you can't
Hi all,
since backintime released a new, major update we need to transition away from
Qt4 to Qt5. I would like to ask for an informal review on the newly created
spec file.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1703680
Additionally, I would like to ask if we should get rid of the -common
Hi all,
due to lack of interest and upstream development I've orphaned the package:
devilspie: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/devilspie
keybinder: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/keybinder
I had a hard time finding out if there was any upstream activity at all
and I think there are
> On 29.8.2018 20:05, Johannes Lips wrote:
>
> Try contacting the maintainers fo the dependent packages directly?
Well, I just did it this morning, let's see if there's some feedback. Otherwise
I'll just proceed with the retirement process of the package.
Cheers
Hi all,
since keybinder won't build on any fedora version >=29 and all functionality
should be provided by the newer python3 keybinder3 package.
I would like to ask if it's ok to retire it, but since there are some packages
depending on it, I would rather orphan it and let someone else take
Well, of course, but the issue is not the change itself or anything. It's just
the implementation and the lack of information for the maintainer.
The maintainer just sees a git commit without additional information other than
the scriplets are obsolete, which is not a lot to be honest. I would
Would have been nice to get some more background information than just the git
commit message. Then one needs to do research to find this thread and the
related ticket. I don't have time to follow all the discussions/tickets on
devel or anywhere else, but this is even more time consuming.
I would like to add, that apparently the capitalization of subpackages also
changed. This broke dependencies for me. I don't know if this was intended.
Please see:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1485703
If it was intended, I am happy to fix this, otherwise please check your script
> Hi Johannes,
>
> as I'm experienced with Qt related stuff (member of KDE SIG too) and
> also use TeXStudio as my default TeX editor all day, I requested commit
> access now :)
You're hired! ;-)
>
> Greetings,
> Christian
>
>
> On 12/08/2
Dear list,
I would like to invite packagers with Qt experience to become co-maintainer on
the texstudio package. I am pretty occupied with my day job and won't have time
to delve into all details of Qt linking, which are currently not working
properly, when building the package for fedora >24.
> Am Mon, 28 Nov 2016 21:02:01 -0700
> schrieb Orion Poplawski
> Seems to be more comlicated,than just the build-error.
> Nevertheless, "autoreconf ..." or "autoconf" does not work.
> Just for the build-fix:
> the newest upstream should have fixed the library-path
> Am 28.11.2016 09:51, schrieb Johannes Lips:
>
> The pregenerated configure-script looks for libmpi.so in "/usr/lib
> /usr/lib/openmpi /usr/lib64/openmpi/lib", but on i686 it's in
> "/usr/lib/openmpi/lib".
> Regenerating the configure-script might work
Hi all,
I've been trying to build gretl with mpi support and I followed the guidelines
in the wiki [1]. It apparently works, since I was able to build it on 64bit,
which worked every time, but the 32bit build always fails to find the openmpi
libraries, as can be seen from the build.log from
> On Fri, 21 Oct 2016 09:17:08 +1000
> Peter Hutterer
>
> Yeah, I have never seen that here.
>
> Can you perhaps provide the information Oliver is asking for in the bug?
I've just tried libinput again and it seems to be working without any problems.
Don't
> On Thu, 20 Oct 2016 10:08:29 +0200
> Johannes Lips <johannes.lips(a)gmail.com wrote:
>
>
> Can you expand on how/what didn't work here?
>
> I've been using it here with Xfce just fine since support was added...
> no particular problems here.
Hi Kevin,
I think
On 20.10.2016 08:39, Jan Kurik wrote:
= Proposed System Wide Change: Retire Synaptics Driver =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RetireSynapticsDriver
Change owner(s):
* Peter Hutterer
Retire the xorg-x11-drv-synaptics driver and remove it from user's install.
== Detailed Description
Why not retire it directly and properly? Just an idea ;-)
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> rpms/backintime -- Simple backup tool inspired from the Flyback
I've taken backintime, as always co-maintainers are highly welcome, since it
needs quite a bit of work to get it up to date.
Thanks,
Johannes
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Dear all,
I would like to formally send a mail requesting some feedback from cicku
regarding the maintenance of the backintime package.
There is one open bug, which requests an update [1] and additionally a trac
ticket [2] was also opened, not by me.
I can see, that with an upgrade to later
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 5:04 AM, Johannes Lips <johannes.lips(a)gmail.com
> wrote:
>
> Did you actually email cicku directly? I don't see him on CC.
>
Well, apparently I didn't add him to this e-mail, but he should have received
enough notifications from bugzilla already.
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Johannes Lips <johannes.lips(a)gmail.com
> wrote:
>
> You make a lot of assumptions in that statement. People filter email
> quite a bit and relying on bugzilla mail alone is not sufficient.
>
> I find it ironic that your original
Please leave this thread alone. Since numerous days, nothing about the
original subject has been added.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Sorry to say, but this is like the hundredth time this topic came up.
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-July/200860.html
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 6:56 PM, Christopher ctubbsii-fed...@apache.org
wrote:
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Rejy M Cyriac rcyr...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/15/2014 07:43 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 15.11.2014 um 15:06 schrieb Kevin Kofler:
Lars Seipel wrote:
What does the community
Hi all,
could someone from the Rel-Eng team please unblock the tilda package? I
already opened a ticket with the request and I am not sure how long I'll
have to wait until it gets unblocked. [1]
-johannes
[1] https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6018
--
devel mailing list
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
One of the long standing features that were enabled by default in yum is
support for delta rpms. dnf developers have disabled this and I think this
change deserves a broader discussion
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 10:44 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses for two package
maintainers are no longer valid. I'm starting the unresponsive
maintainer policy to find out if they are still interested in
maintaining their packages (and
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon pin...@pingoured.fr
wrote:
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 11:35:43AM +0200, Johannes Lips wrote:
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 10:44 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses for two package
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 4:22 AM, Mukundan Ragavan
nonamed...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi All,
I am trying to update Texmaker from version 4.2 to 4.3 and I have run
into a problem I am unable to solve. Here it is -
The source tarball has a
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Jan Rusnacko jrusn...@fedoraproject.org
wrote:
Hello,
following the policy for nonresponsive maintainers, does anyone have a
contact of Jeroen van Meeuwen (kanarip) ? All three mail addresses listed
here http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kanarip bounce back,
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 7:54 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon pin...@pingoured.fr
wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 10:08:13AM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 07/16/2014 03:10 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 11:00:16AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Well, I contacted kanarip
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon pin...@pingoured.fr
wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 11:02:57AM +0200, Johannes Lips wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 7:54 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon
pin...@pingoured.fr
wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 10:08:13AM -0600, Orion
Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net said:
without that protection any what is that, i don't need it
and try to remove it brings the danger to ruin the setup
And the protection is already there - the list of dependent packages
that will be removed,
Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Johannes Lips johannes.l...@gmail.com said:
Well, yeah and everybody is reading the complete output of yum/dnf if
it's trying to remove hundreds of packages?
Well, yeah. First, if you think you are removing a leaf or minor
package and the package
Les Howell hlhow...@pacbell.net wrote on Mon 23 Jun 2014 20:04:56 CEST:
On Mon, 2014-06-23 at 19:57 +0200, Johannes Lips wrote:
Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Johannes Lips johannes.l...@gmail.com said:
Well, yeah and everybody is reading the complete output of yum/dnf if
it's trying
Till Maas wrote:
The following packages did not build for two releases (no new build
since 2013-07-25) and will be retired when Fedora (F21) is branched,
unless someone successfully builds them till then. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 7:46 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky
sochotni...@redhat.com wrote:
I am doing spring cleanup and getting rid of most of my packages. The
full list is a bit too long (mizdebsk agreed to take over all
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 14:15:56 +0100
Tomasz Torcz to...@pipebreaker.pl wrote:
Personally I always felt that this symbiotic relationship was a big
part of
what made Fedora interesting.
Yes, but please don't
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 12:36 AM, Richard Vickery
richard.vicker...@gmail.com wrote:
Being on the test kernel - or, more likely, using a more stable one from
the list that is compiled - is probably the answer to the issue: how am I
to watch a VOB file?
This has nothing to do with the kernel
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Johannes Lips johannes.l...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi all,
I finally came to the conclusion, that I no longer want to invest time and
effort in keeping all my Java packages in good shape. I don't have the time
anymore to unbundle all the bundled libraries and keep
Hi all,
I finally came to the conclusion, that I no longer want to invest time
and effort in keeping all my Java packages in good shape. I don't have
the time anymore to unbundle all the bundled libraries and keep a dozen
downstream patches to make it work.
freemind is close to a 1.0.0
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 9:40 AM, James Hogarth james.hoga...@gmail.comwrote:
On 22 August 2013 08:27, Bjorn Munch bjorn.mu...@oracle.com wrote:
Yes we are! Sorry for the long silence. The window for F19 closed so
it became less urgent, then I had vacation, was sick, then others here
were on
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sun, 2013-08-04 at 21:35 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
There is a large number of failures[1] that need to be
addressed.
I don't know if this is just a coincidence, but the links to log files
in the filled
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:59 PM, Lennart Poettering
mzerq...@0pointer.dewrote:
BOn Tue, 30.07.13 16:14, Dan Williams (d...@redhat.com) wrote:
On Tue, 2013-07-30 at 23:03 +0200, Lars Seipel wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 04:28:55PM +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
thunar and pcmanfm are
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 9:32 AM, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Pierre-Yves Luyten p...@luyten.fr wrote:
Not sure if it makes any sense but maybe could we have something like
freeze tag
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org wrote:
Le mercredi 03 juillet 2013 à 09:44 +0200, Johannes Lips a écrit :
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 9:32 AM, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Dan Mashal
dan.mas...@gmail.com
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Since this topic comes up every few months, and no one's pointed
out the obvious answer yet, I'll say it:
* Instead of making up more rules, make the tooling better so
we don't have to repeat update descriptions in multiple places. *
Wouldn't it make sense to perhaps
Christopher Meng wrote:
I can take it because I love elementary's things.
Ok, it's orphaned now. Thanks and take good care of it :-)
-Johannes
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi all,
I am going to orphan the elementary-icon-theme, because it's of no use
to me. They dropped all the symlinks to make it compatible with other
desktops than Gnome3. So anyone interested is invited to take over.
Currently there is one open bug, where a user requests an update.
Hi all,
I am going to orphan link-grammar in a short while, because I actually
have absolutely no use for it and I don't recall, why I picked it up in
the first place.
So please anyone interested in abiword might want to pick it up.
Thanks a lot!
Johannes
--
devel mailing list
Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Johannes Lips johannes.l...@gmail.com
mailto:johannes.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I am going to orphan link-grammar in a short while, because I
actually have absolutely no use for it and I don't recall, why I
picked it up
Johannes Lips wrote:
Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Johannes Lips johannes.l...@gmail.com
mailto:johannes.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I am going to orphan link-grammar in a short while, because I
actually have absolutely no use for it and I don't recall
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Rich Mattes richmat...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.comwrote:
So, what about creating groups for the various desktop environments
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
Hi everyone,
I have been using smock.pl regularly and since it was not developed
recently. I wonder what everyone else is using, e.g. does something
better exist? If not, I am planning to give it a proper new home,
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 4:15 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On 06/03/13 04:39 AM, Dan Mashal wrote:
Took libindicator too. Is this deprecated upstream?
No, there are commits right up to late Feb in launchpad. But then I don't
immediately see that you'd want it for MATE
Eduardo Javier Echeverria Alvarado wrote:
Hi, everyone
I've a problem that has kept me worried about three weeks ago and i do
not know how to solve, when I try to test any package on koji (in any
instance, ppc, arm, s390, x86 ) that has a higher weight to a mega, it
refuses to even begin the
Hi all,
I am going to retire tilda in fedora rawhide in the near future. Upstream
is mostly dead and I had to maintain a lot of patches. Since the new
Xfce4-terminal also gained a dropdown mode, I don't have any further value
in tilda and so I would like to retire it and would advise all the
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 6:39 AM, Kalpa Welivitigoda callka...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 9:31 PM, Johannes Lips johannes.l...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Kalpa Welivitigoda callka...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Caterpillar
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Kalpa Welivitigoda callka...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Caterpillar caterpilla...@gmail.com
wrote:
Il 23/11/2012 15:33, Johannes Lips ha scritto:
Hi all,
I am looking for a new freemind maintainer. I've stated the reason
Hi all,
I am looking for a new freemind maintainer. I've stated the reason for this
in this mail to java-devel:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/java-devel/2012-November/004561.html
Perhaps someone would like to take over...
Johannes
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.comwrote:
Ok,I'll try
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/fping/
Seems to me that there is some action on the package. I don't know if I
miss something here.
Especially the Changelog is not so dead as you describe it.
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com
wrote:
Tom Lane (t...@redhat.com) said:
Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com writes:
Before we branch for Fedora 18, as is custom, we will block
Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Just a note that the following additional packages were orphaned yesterday
as part of cleaning up packages owned by people without bugzilla accounts:
devilspie
I've taken devilspie, but just that it's not removed from fedora since I
think it's often useful to Xfce
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Nathanael D. Noblet nathan...@gnat.cawrote:
On 07/04/2012 03:04 AM, Michael J Gruber wrote:
Hi there,
gvim as provided in the Fedora packages does not support session restore
(i.e. reopening with the same buffers) because it does not integrate
with the GNOME
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Malcolm Turmel malcolm.tur...@gmail.comwrote:
Its still taking up valuable space.
All the non-english packages should be optional.
When I try to remove one of the Package, it tells me its going to also
Uninstall lots of other stuff.
How would I go about
Marek Kasik wrote:
Hi,
I plan to rebase poppler in rawhide to poppler-0.20.1 at the end of next
week.
There are several API changes (new functions + 1 move of a private
function to public section) and 1 soname bump (libpoppler.so.25 to
libpoppler.so.26).
Regards
Marek
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Roman Kennke rken...@redhat.com wrote:
Today something happened, that happens over and over again with Fedora,
and it makes me angry. I am running Fedora 17, and so far it worked well
with the initial kernel 3.3.x (except that it would panic on shutdown...
Tadej Janež wrote:
Pavel,
On Tue, 2012-05-29 at 20:21 +0400, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
It is main reason why I request provenpackager rights. In fedora 17 it
was so painful because I several times asks build dependencies and
then ask help to push updates too.
I think in that turn now I can do
Pete Walter wrote:
Pavel Alexeev forum at hubbitus.com.ru writes:
May be in next time? What disadvantages you are seen proceed with that
update? Do you try test it?
No, I did not test this. And here's a few reasons why I think this
shouldn't be pushed:
- You are forcing others to do
On 05/26/2012 10:23 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
I'm trying to follow up on struts,
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=239819
is the last mention I can see of it.
yum with *testing shows nothing.
How can I find if it's orphaned?
Hi,
you could checkout the pkgdb:
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 09:16 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Adam Jackson wrote:
Even if all of your objections are true, and who knows, they might be:
we already do provide alternatives. The Live media is not the only
Perhaps he was just not aware of these objections. Although I could not
speak for him but it's at least a possible explanation for the proposal.
Johannes
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 9:18 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 12:50 +0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
Well I would like to see tilda maintained in fedora. In this bugreport I
created the patch and asked a provenpackager to apply it, which never
actually happened.
I could of course apply for co-maintainership but I doubt that the
maintainer would answer in a timely manner, like on most of his
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-April/166087.html
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 15:10:45 +0200, AT (Antonio) wrote:
The poll about Fedora release names keeping is terminated
[1]
Is it this bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812501
If yes, there is already an update in updates-testing which you could try.
hth
Johannes
On 04/21/2012 08:10 AM, Terry Barnaby wrote:
Some update appears to have broken the operation of ypbind recently.
I have a F14 sever that
Hi,
I found http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/Schedule and there seems
to be a relatively easy way to determine the Fedora 18 Release date.
Tuesday before October 31st. So most probably Tuesday, 30th October
2012, if I am not mistaken.
HTH
Johannes
On 04/16/2012 10:11 PM, David Malcolm
As the maintainer of freemind, I also looked into packaging freeplane
but I gave up since it adds a whole bunch of new deps. I didn't have the
time and motivation to add all those, just for a program which basically
does the same as freemind. I know that it does have some additional
features
Hi all,
I really like this website[1] and think it's really useful. I just
wanted to know what the current state of it is. Especially could I use
the current URL to promote some packages or is it likely that the URL
could change in the near future.
Is there some place where I could find
On 03/30/2012 03:58 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 08:06:11 +0100
Johannes Lipsjohannes.l...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I really like this website[1] and think it's really useful. I just
wanted to know what the current state of it is. Especially could I
use the current URL to
On 03/16/2012 10:06 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
David Tardon wrote:
How do we prevent inexperienced testers from giving undeserved karma and
thus causing an update to be automatically pushed to stable?
One has to fulfil certain requirements before one becomes a packager.
But anyone with FAS
There is a filed bug regarding this behavior. But so far no explanation or
cause for this behavior.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771043
Johannes
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Gerd Hoffmann kra...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
2) yum is currently downloading repository information
Isn't it easiest to just ask for the FAS name of the person who wants to
become a packager? I don't really see how this should be less efficient
than searching the mail address in the FAS database.
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Jamie Nguyen ja...@tomoyolinux.co.ukwrote:
Thomas Spura
Alright to answer my own question: It was already orphaned in the last
round before f16. So it's probably worth reviving!
But I think the associated workload with reviving a package could be
lowered, just to make it easier for contributors!
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Johannes Lips
What's the reason pyorbit is orphaned and deprecated? It was not part of
the recent mass orphaning and is a dep for many packages.
I just would like to know if it's worth reviving it since one of my
packages is indirectly depending on it and now refuses to build in rawhide.
Thanks
johannes
--
Hey,
I just seem to run into an error that a package builds just fine in f16
(unpackaged file is another thing) but it won't build on f17 and f18. Is
there an incompatibility of the source code with newer Qt versions or is it
just a temporary koji hickup?
f16 build:
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo