starting my own tool , before the login screen to intercept the xmessages

Hi,   i am currently working on X security. Our Approach requires us to intercept Xmesseges and this means i have to intercept the Xmessages for the login screen as well.   Our tool basically works as follows:  Tool establishes a connection with xserver on unix:0.0 , and changes the D

Re: r128 and CRT not enabled

On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 01:07:00PM -0500, David Dawes wrote: > Does anyone have a reason to not apply the patch attached to > ? I don't think this patch is correct. What it does is enable the CRTC while writing the new mode -- generally that is bad. I

Re: grep on Solaris

This works. Thanks, Lindsay Haigh David Dawes

Best Western - Reservations Confirmation (KMM1406869V44083L0KM)

This e-mail is automated and will not be responded to. Reservations can not be cancelled through this e mail. For any questions or concerns, please call your nearest Best Western Reservation Office. TOLL-FREE NUMBERS - AUSTRALIA: 131779 AUSTRIA: 0800295194 BELGIUM:080

RE: Another Render question

On Tue, 27 Jan 2004, Sottek, Matthew J wrote: > > I didn't remove anything. There was never any support for > >componentAlpha. I just made XAA aware that it didn't support > >it. > > You removed the ability for a driver to support accelerated component > alpha on a XFree 4.4.0 binary. If this

Re: Cygwin/XFree86 Status?

On Mon, 26 Jan 2004, Andrew C Aitchison wrote: > > > Even though I have XFree86 CVS commit access, I do most of my new > > > work in a separate tree, which I keep in sync with the XFree86 > > > tree. I don't find this to be a significant burden. > > Sure, I don't do actual development in that tr

RE: Another Render question

> I didn't remove anything. There was never any support for >componentAlpha. I just made XAA aware that it didn't support >it. You removed the ability for a driver to support accelerated component alpha on a XFree 4.4.0 binary. If this is now the most common case then why wouldn't a driver wan

Re: Cygwin/XFree86 Status?

On Mon, 26 Jan 2004, Kendall Bennett wrote: > David Dawes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Even though I have XFree86 CVS commit access, I do most of my new > > work in a separate tree, which I keep in sync with the XFree86 > > tree. I don't find this to be a significant burden. > > Sure, I don't

Re: -rpath not used under Linux

On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 08:13:51PM +0100, Mario Klebsch wrote: >Hi! > >Am 27.01.2004 um 18:13 schrieb David Dawes: >>> No, LD_LIBRARY_PATH always overrides except SUID case. >> >> That's not what I've found (or what Jakub Jelinek reported for >> Linux or what the rtld codes shows for FreeBSD). I'v

Re: [Dri-devel] radeon bugs

On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 07:52:32PM +, Alan Hourihane wrote: >On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 02:21:42PM -0500, David Dawes wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 06:45:10PM +, Alan Hourihane wrote: >> >On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 12:37:51PM -0500, David Dawes wrote: >> >> There are quite a few Radeon-relate

Re: [Dri-devel] radeon bugs

David Dawes wrote: On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 06:45:10PM +, Alan Hourihane wrote: On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 12:37:51PM -0500, David Dawes wrote: There are quite a few Radeon-related bugs still outstanding in bugs.xfree86.org, including several related to DRI lockups. Has anyone followed them up? D

Re: [Dri-devel] radeon bugs

On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 02:21:42PM -0500, David Dawes wrote: > On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 06:45:10PM +, Alan Hourihane wrote: > >On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 12:37:51PM -0500, David Dawes wrote: > >> There are quite a few Radeon-related bugs still outstanding in > >> bugs.xfree86.org, including several

Re: [Dri-devel] radeon bugs

On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 12:37:51PM -0500, David Dawes wrote: > There are quite a few Radeon-related bugs still outstanding in > bugs.xfree86.org, including several related to DRI lockups. > > Has anyone followed them up? David, I suspect not with XFree86's DRI drivers still being based on Mesa 4

Re: [Dri-devel] radeon bugs

On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 06:45:10PM +, Alan Hourihane wrote: >On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 12:37:51PM -0500, David Dawes wrote: >> There are quite a few Radeon-related bugs still outstanding in >> bugs.xfree86.org, including several related to DRI lockups. >> >> Has anyone followed them up? > >David

Re: -rpath not used under Linux

Hi! Am 27.01.2004 um 18:13 schrieb David Dawes: No, LD_LIBRARY_PATH always overrides except SUID case. That's not what I've found (or what Jakub Jelinek reported for Linux or what the rtld codes shows for FreeBSD). I've done some simple tests on FreeBSD, Linux, and Solaris, and the LD_LIBRARY_PAT

r128 and CRT not enabled

Does anyone have a reason to not apply the patch attached to ? David -- David Dawes developer/release engineer The XFree86 Project www.XFree86.org/~dawes ___ Devel mailing list [EMAIL PRO

radeon bugs

There are quite a few Radeon-related bugs still outstanding in bugs.xfree86.org, including several related to DRI lockups. Has anyone followed them up? David -- David Dawes developer/release engineer The XFree86 Project www.XFree86.org/~dawes

Re: -rpath not used under Linux

On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 05:44:57PM +0100, Martin MOKREJS wrote: >On Tue, 27 Jan 2004, David Dawes wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 03:22:35PM +0100, Martin MOKREJS wrote: >> >On Sat, 24 Jan 2004, David Dawes wrote: >> >> >I will stick to -rpath on Linux, so what should I do to compile X with >>

Re: -rpath not used under Linux

On Tue, 27 Jan 2004, Martin MOKREJŠ wrote: > On Tue, 27 Jan 2004, David Dawes wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 03:22:35PM +0100, Martin MOKREJS wrote: > > >On Sat, 24 Jan 2004, David Dawes wrote: > > > > >I will stick to -rpath on Linux, so what should I do to compile X with > > >it on Linux a

Re: -rpath not used under Linux

On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 05:44:57PM +0100, Martin MOKREJ? wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 03:22:35PM +0100, Martin MOKREJS wrote: > > >On Sat, 24 Jan 2004, David Dawes wrote: > > > > >I will stick to -rpath on Linux, so what should I do to compile X with > > >it on Linux and where is it documente

Re: -rpath not used under Linux

On Tue, 27 Jan 2004, David Dawes wrote: > On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 03:22:35PM +0100, Martin MOKREJS wrote: > >On Sat, 24 Jan 2004, David Dawes wrote: > > >I will stick to -rpath on Linux, so what should I do to compile X with > >it on Linux and where is it documented, Dave?;) > > Add the following

Re: -rpath not used under Linux

On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 03:22:35PM +0100, Martin MOKREJS wrote: >On Sat, 24 Jan 2004, David Dawes wrote: >I will stick to -rpath on Linux, so what should I do to compile X with >it on Linux and where is it documented, Dave?;) Add the following line to your host.def file: #define UseRpath YES Th

Re: grep on Solaris

On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 10:46:55AM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Building 4.4.0 RC2 on Solaris gives the following on Solaris for >xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86 > >rm -f build.new >echo "#define BUILD_DATE `date +%Y%m%d`" > build.new >echo "#define CLOG_DATE `if tail CHANGELOG | grep -F -q '$X

Re: libXinerama

On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 07:13:30AM +, Andrew C Aitchison wrote: >On Mon, 26 Jan 2004, Mike A. Harris wrote: > >> On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Mark Vojkovich wrote: >> >Subject: Re: libXinerama >> > >> > It ships with XFree86 and RH should have installed it in >> >/usr/X11R6/lib/ >> >> My guess, is t

Re: Hi

Hiya, Lately, I've started receiving more than 1.500 unsolicited e-mails per day on this address, so I've closed it down. If you really meant for a mail to get through to me, please write [EMAIL PROTECTED] = På det seneste er jeg begyndt at modtage mere end 1.500 e-mails per dag på den

Re: -rpath not used under Linux

On Sat, 24 Jan 2004, David Dawes wrote: Hi, I see the patch already comitted to xc tree so wanted to compile xfree86 with -rpath ... > On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 06:09:46PM +0100, Matthieu Herrb wrote: > >David Dawes wrote (in a message from Saturday 24) > > > > If there is no general consensus, I

Re: Please confirm (conf#527cf097699735d628121921e7a8b681)

dear fucknut, we don't want to see the bogus bounces your software delivers to innocent bystanders when you get mail with a forged address. fix your software or quit using the internet! thanks, an asshole On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 10:45:01AM +0100, Lars B. Dybdahl wrote: > << VIGTIG INFORMATION! >>

grep on Solaris

Building 4.4.0 RC2 on Solaris gives the following on Solaris for xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86 rm -f build.new echo "#define BUILD_DATE `date +%Y%m%d`" > build.new echo "#define CLOG_DATE `if tail CHANGELOG | grep -F -q '$XFree86:'; then tail CHANGELOG | grep -F '$XFree86:' | sed s,'.* \([0-9]

Please confirm (conf#527cf097699735d628121921e7a8b681)

<< VIGTIG INFORMATION! >> Dette er en automatisk besked. Den e-mail, som du har sendt (vedhÃftet forneden), krÃver en bekrÃftelse fÃr den kan leveres til modtageren. For at bekrÃfte at du har sendt e-mailen, skal du trykke pà besvar knappen i dit e-mail program nu og returnere denne e-mail (Du be

Re: libXinerama

On Mon, 26 Jan 2004, Mike A. Harris wrote: > On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Mark Vojkovich wrote: > >Subject: Re: libXinerama > > > > It ships with XFree86 and RH should have installed it in > >/usr/X11R6/lib/ > > My guess, is that he has a binary application he's downloaded, > which was compiled on Gen