RE: [e-smith-devinfo] Moving user files to a second disk on the 2.4.x Kernel

2002-04-01 Thread David Brown
I posted it to the dev-info list on Wed, 06 Feb 2002. You can find it here: http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo@lists.e-smith.org/msg07803.html I think Shad L. Lords did a better follow up to my post, where he went into more detail and pushed a little farther with ext3 support. Find that at:

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] template php.ini

2002-02-13 Thread David Brown
On Wednesday, February 13, 2002 Charlie Brady wrote: To clarify things for me, what benefit do we derive out of this? Are we templating php.ini just so it's like everything else, or is there a deeper reason? There is a deeper reason. I suspected as much, or I wouldn't have really

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] ANNOUNCE: Updated PHP upgrade HOWTO

2002-02-12 Thread David Brown
On Sunday, February 10, 2002, Dan Brown wrote: I've updated David Brown's PHP upgrade HOWTO to reflect the PHP 4.1.1 RPMs I recently uploaded to ftp.e-smith.org. It's still at http://www.familybrown.org/howtos/php-upgrade-howto-sme512.html. Any feedback would be appreciated. Thanks

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] template php.ini

2002-02-12 Thread David Brown
To clarify things for me, what benefit do we derive out of this? Are we templating php.ini just so it's like everything else, or is there a deeper reason? I can see templating files that rely on changes in the server configuration (i.e. httpd.conf or smb.conf), but php.ini does not need to be a

RE: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Masq modules

2002-02-08 Thread David Brown
-Original Message- From: w9ya [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 11:34 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Fwd: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Masq modules Finally someone at e-smith/Mitel that can state the obvious without being in middle of a cat-fight. Thank you.

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] Masq modules

2002-02-08 Thread David Brown
-Original Message- From: Adam Sleight [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 1:36 PM To: David Brown; w9ya; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Masq modules My point is that I hardly think Mitel is behind times Nor do I. The problem is that we

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Masq modules

2002-02-08 Thread David Brown
I think the confusion is based on trying to both firewall and serve? At least it is for me. I seem to remember when e-smith recommended that firewalling and serving should be done separately, on separate equipment. I tend to agree with that. OK, but the issue is being a gateway, not so

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] Masq modules

2002-02-08 Thread David Brown
But you want to know when somebody is going to do it for you though! This faceless w9ya is clearly a troll and best ignored. This is exactly what I was talking about earlier. How can discussion like this possibly be productive? Bob was simply stating his opinion on the subject like

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] Masq modules

2002-02-08 Thread David Brown
- From: Graeme Robinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 4:52 PM To: David Brown Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; w9ya; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [e-smith-devinfo] Masq modules On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, David Brown wrote: Agreed. Bob is raising valid points and your flaming him

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] 2.4.x Kernel Upgrade Mini-HowTo

2002-02-07 Thread David Brown
On Thursday, February 07, 2002, Darrell May wrote: David, many thanks for taking the time to put this mini-Howto together. I might have some time over the weekend to give it a try myself. No problem at all. I'd appreciate it if other people would try this out and verify that it works for

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] 2.4.x Kernel Upgrade Mini-HowTo

2002-02-07 Thread David Brown
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, David Brown wrote: Here's the biggest problem (as has already been stated several times): even if we get all the latest up to date RedHat 7.2 packages up and running. I guess I should read what I post before I post it. :) What I meant to say was: Here's the biggest

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] 2.4.x Kernel Upgrade Mini-HowTo

2002-02-07 Thread David Brown
-Original Message- From: Darrell May [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 3:43 PM To: David Brown; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [e-smith-devinfo] 2.4.x Kernel Upgrade Mini-HowTo David Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: we still need masq modules for pptp

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] 2.4.x Kernel Upgrade Mini-HowTo

2002-02-07 Thread David Brown
-Original Message- From: Darrell May [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 4:01 PM To: Charlie Brady; Darrell May Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [e-smith-devinfo] 2.4.x Kernel Upgrade Mini-HowTo Charlie Brady [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: This is

[e-smith-devinfo] 2.4.x Kernel Upgrade Mini-HowTo

2002-02-06 Thread David Brown
disclaimer First, let me preface this by saying that I have never messed with kernel upgrades before, and I am just writing this so people who want to mess with trying to upgrade their SME servers to a 2.4.x kernel and see what breaks (a bit of stuff). Don't ask me complicated questions about

[e-smith-devinfo] [ANNOUNCE] PHP 4.0.6-7 Upgrade for SME v5.1.2 HowTo Available For Comment

2002-02-05 Thread David Brown
Well, the title says it all. You can find it at http://www.familybrown.org/howtos/php-upgrade-howto-sme512.html Many thanks to Charlie Brady for basically making this work and helping me work the bugs out of the HowTo. David M. Brown Frick, Frick Jetté Architects [EMAIL PROTECTED] --

[e-smith-devinfo] PHP 4.0.6-10 Upgrade to SME 5.1.2

2002-01-31 Thread David Brown
After a successful upgrade to SMEv5.1.2, I was surprised to find that PHP was left at v4.0.4pl1-9. No matter, as the v4.0.6-10 files were still on the server. I proceeded to follow Dan Brown's How To at http://www.familybrown.org/howtos/php-upgrade-howto-2.html, but I'm getting the following

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] PHP 4.0.6-10 Upgrade to SME 5.1.2

2002-01-31 Thread David Brown
answering what I know I used ths HOWTO for PHP upgrade on SME5.0 http://sme.nightspirit.nl/php-upgrade.html I don't dare to upgrade again, since I use TTF-fonts in some cases. Thor The files listed on this site are the same as the files in Dan Brown's HowTo, so I doubt that I'll get a

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] PHP 4.0.6-10 Upgrade to SME 5.1.2

2002-01-31 Thread David Brown
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Charlie Brady wrote: Try fetching the php 4.0.6-7 RPMs from my contrib directory, and using them instead of the arvin RPMs. The src RPM is straight from RH7.2, but has been recompiled so that the binary RPMs exactly match the library dependencies of SME 5.x. Before

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] Samba 2.2.2 - Win NT security model HOWTO

2001-12-14 Thread David Brown
On Thursday, December 13, 2001 10:22 PM, Greg Zartman wrote: Following is a draft Samba -Win NT security model howto. It may be a little rough around the edges as it's a bit late as I now finish this thing. Please comment/modify as seen fit. Greg, this is great! Thanks for jumping in and

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] SME Server 5.1Beta3 Comments

2001-12-13 Thread David Brown
On Thursday, December 13, 2001 3:31 PM, Greg Zartman wrote: David Brown posted a workaround for the problem in these apps when you first raised the issue: This isn't a work around. It's more like trying to fix the wing of an airplane with duct-tape. I explored this option in my shop

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] SME Server 5.1Beta3 Comments

2001-12-13 Thread David Brown
On Thursday, December 13, 2001 6:33 PM, Greg Zartman wrote Technically, this isn't my statement. If you'd be interested, I can dig-up and forward the white papers that document this issue in detail. This is probably a good thing to include/reference in a HowTO so you can support what you

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] domain admin group

2001-12-13 Thread David Brown
On Thursday, December 13, 2001 6:43 PM, Gordon Rowell wrote: - One option is to set domain admin group = @shared to include all users on the SME Server - Question: Wouldn't that mean that any valid user could log in and change any setting on the local workstation as an Administrator

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] Workgroup panel roaming profiles option?

2001-12-01 Thread David Brown
Given this statement, is it possible for *some* users to have roaming profiles? I know I personally dislike roaming profiles under Windoze, since there tends to be a configuration fight between installation of Windoze on different machines, but equally, I recognise that they're absolutely

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] e-smith-samba-1.1.0-29 available

2001-11-29 Thread David Brown
On Thu, 29 Nov 2001, Greg Zartman wrote: Until Samba implements a wider range of user groups beyond two (domain users and domain admins) or MS developers start writing software differently, users need to have at least power user preveldge to run many apps. The above parameter places all

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] e-smith-samba-1.1.0-29 available

2001-11-29 Thread David Brown
If you set logon drive = H: (or whatever), the user will have \\servername\username automatically mapped to that drive and netlogon.bat will run under that drive. Without a clear definition, I believe samba defaults to using Z: OK, the above isn't entirely true: logon drive = H: will map H:

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] e-smith-samba-1.1.0-29 available

2001-11-29 Thread David Brown
Which means, it would appear, that H: would end up mapped to (in SME's case) \\%N\%U\._winprofile, which would really mess things up, I fear. However, according to the Samba docs for 2.2.2, logon home will be used in full for profiles access and truncated to the parent directory for

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] e-smith-samba-1.1.0-29 available

2001-11-29 Thread David Brown
See also an earlier message in this thread: http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo@lists.e-smith.org/msg06526.html I read that message, but it is slightly incorrect. To disable roaming profiles, only logon path needs no value, not logon home. As I stated in my discussion on logon drive

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] e-smith-samba-1.1.0-14 suggestions

2001-11-13 Thread David Brown
On Monday, November 12, 2001 at 5:09 PM Gordon Rowell wrote: [...] I'm having trouble getting the printing to work right under samba 2.2.2, and I didn't know if the permissions was part of the problem. [...] Is it printing or installation of printer drivers which is failing? Well,

[e-smith-devinfo] Printing with Samba 2.2.2 (was [e-smith-devinfo] e-smith-samba-1.1.0-14 suggestions)

2001-11-13 Thread David Brown
On Monday, November 12, 2001 at 5:09 PM Gordon Rowell wrote: [...] The question I have about e-smith-samba-1.1.0-14 is regarding how it sets the permissions on the directories for the printer drivers. Dan Brown's How-To says to run chmod -R 777 on the directories, and I wanted to know

[e-smith-devinfo] e-smith-samba-1.1.0-14 suggestions

2001-11-12 Thread David Brown
I've got a couple of quick suggestions and questions about the e-smith-samba-1.1.0-14 rpm. It looks like the template fragments 11logonPath and 11logonHome got switched, as they each point to the other one's variable, i.e. 11logonPath has logon home = and 11logonHome has logon path = Also, I

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] apcupsd

2001-10-25 Thread David Brown
I have this up and running as well, except for the web monitoring, which I just found out existed. That'll teach me to *really* RTFM. :) I also botched the link in /etc/rc.d/rc7.d/S20apcupsd This might be a question out of ignorance, but is this a symbolic link (ln -s) or a hard link, and what

[e-smith-devinfo] RE: Symbolic vs hard link (Was Re: [e-smith-devinfo] apcupsd)

2001-10-25 Thread David Brown
Well, I guess I can consider myself less ignorant now. Too bad man pages can't be so helpful :) So, as it looks to me, there are very few instances where you would use hard links while doing system admin and the like. Thanks for the informative lessons. David M. Brown Frick, Frick Jetté

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] proposed new samba template fragments

2001-10-05 Thread David Brown
Just a few comments about this fragment: # [20domainadmingroup] # This parameter is intended as a temporary solution to enable # users to be a member of the Domain Admins group when a Samba # host is acting as a PDC. domain admin group = @admin The domain admin group parameter accepts a

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] [DRAFT] Samba update HowTo + rpm

2001-10-03 Thread David Brown
One suggestion I have for the dmc-mitel-samba-2.2.1a-2.noarch.rpm is that I think the custom template 10globals should actually be 11passwordChat with just the information necessary to sync the passwords, since this is the only addition that has been made to the 10globals fragment. Other than

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] [DRAFT] Samba update HowTo + rpm

2001-10-03 Thread David Brown
I had the same problem initially, but if you set strict locking = no in smb.conf, it ends this problem. I don't know if it breaks anything else, but I haven't noticed any adverse effects. David M. Brown Frick, Frick Jetté Architects [EMAIL PROTECTED] One glitch however - I want to use

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] My Samba howtos

2001-09-28 Thread David Brown
On Friday, September 28, 2001 7:47 AM, Greg Zartman wrote: When the machine leaves the samba domain and then tries to rejoin again, it regenerates a new random machine password that doesn't match the machine password in smbpasswd database. snip Good point... However,some type of transfer

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] My Samba howtos

2001-09-28 Thread David Brown
Greg, I don't quite understand this concept of Samba removing a machine account from the domain when that machine leaves the domain. From what I have observer with a small WinNT domain with a WinNT 4.0 Server acting as the PDC, client machines can leave the domain i.e. change to a workgroup, but

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] 3ware naked boot: BUG

2001-08-15 Thread David Brown
In response to the original post, 3ware's FAQ talks about a specific DELL problem. http://www.3ware.com/support/faqs.shtml#g17 David M. Brown Frick, Frick Jetté Architects [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Tom Lyon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 2:47 PM To: [EMAIL

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] 3ware naked boot: BUG

2001-08-14 Thread David Brown
This seems odd to me - I just setup an e-smith server with a 3ware Escalade 6410 with no problems at all. I had no ide drives other than those connected to the raid controller, and they were blank. Booted off the CDROM and did a standard install from scratch. Not a single problem. My

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] Server monitoring module ready for download

2001-08-08 Thread David Brown
, Frick Jette Architects [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Sage Telecommunications [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 5:22 PM To: David Brown; J.I Kim; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Server monitoring module ready for download New summary

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] Server monitoring module ready for download

2001-08-07 Thread David Brown
This change got me a listing for eth1, but the link at the top of the page for eth0 and eth1 both point to generating graphs for eth0. I can't give many suggestions on this one, except that I thought the original problem might have to deal with the foreach $key (@dispRed) line (which we have now

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] Server monitoring module ready for download

2001-08-06 Thread David Brown
I have the server monitoring module up and running, and it runs nicely. I was wondering if it is possible to add eth1 to what is being monitored. eth0 is my internal NIC, and I think it would be useful to monitor the external NIC as well. Is this an easy thing to add to the module? David M.

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] Draft PHP Upgrade HOWTO

2001-07-09 Thread David Brown
This all worked great on my server, but you might want to revise your links for the i686 rpms to all say i686.rpm, as this is what really needs to be downloaded. Other than that, everything worked great, including webmail, phpMyAdmin, phpSysInfo, and phpSystem. Thanks for the HowTo. David M.

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] PHP Upgrade Howto now on e-smith.org

2001-07-09 Thread David Brown
This HowTo says to run /etc/rc.d/init.d/httpd restart but two previous posts to devinfo have listed httpd-e-smith as the appropriate service to restart, as well as running it through /etc/rc7.d/S85httpd-e-smith. Does this make a difference? Also, the HowTo lists Darrell May's email attachment

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] General Discussion forum Serving pdf files in HTML

2001-07-03 Thread David Brown
I can duplicate the problem with the following system: Win2000 SP2 - IE 5.0 SP2 - Acrobat 5.0 I have no problem viewing http://www.e-smith.org/docs/manual/print/userguide-4.1.pdf but when I copy the same file to my e-smith 4.1.2 server and browse to it, it causes IE to hang. I get the same