[e-smith-devinfo] devinfo-freeswan

2003-11-18 Thread Bruce Richardson
I've been trying out ipsec and the devinfo-freeswan package for 5.6. Got it working between two e-smith boxes on the local lan but in a short while I'm going to have to set up vpn links between e-smith boxes in remote offices and a central Sonicwall router, which will mean rolling my own custom

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] devinfo-freeswan

2003-11-18 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 12:50:53AM +, Bruce Richardson wrote: I'm intrigued by the ipsec.conf file that the devinfo package creates, where 4 connections are formed. What's the intention behind this design? Does it help avoid routing problems? Ech, forget it. I should rtfm more

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Devinfo Posting (was: bug reporting suggestion)

2003-01-04 Thread Greg Zartman
Following the above I hope should keep everyone happy as: - a ticket is opened in Mitel's bug tracking system and prioritized. - devinfo is not burdened with the issue at all. I agree with Tom: Splitting the communinty between two forums is inherently a bad idea. Devinfo should remain the

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Devinfo Posting (was: bug reporting suggestion)

2003-01-04 Thread Greg Zartman
Following the above I hope should keep everyone happy as: - a ticket is opened in Mitel's bug tracking system and prioritized. - devinfo is not burdened with the issue at all. I agree with Tom: Splitting the community between two forums is inherently a bad idea. Devinfo should remain the

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Devinfo co-operation (was Re: devfino - where is it going?)

2002-11-03 Thread Nick Ramsay
On 2 Nov 2002 at 11:36, Rasjid Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For example, there is no reason that we (the Devinfo community) could not set up our own bug-tracking system, which would then be available to both us and Mitel. In my view, a publicly accessible bug tracking system (for

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Devinfo co-operation (was Re: devfino - where is it going?)

2002-11-02 Thread Nick Ramsay
On 1 Nov 2002 at 17:55, Charlie Brady [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 1 Nov 2002, Nick Ramsay wrote: Maybe I'm missing something, maybe there's a Mitel agenda that's invisible to me, but it seems to me that Darrell has a valid point WRT obtuse-smtpd vs. mailfront. You, Darrell

[e-smith-devinfo] Devinfo co-operation (was Re: devfino - where is it going?)

2002-11-01 Thread Charlie Brady
On Fri, 1 Nov 2002, Nick Ramsay wrote: Maybe I'm missing something, maybe there's a Mitel agenda that's invisible to me, but it seems to me that Darrell has a valid point WRT obtuse-smtpd vs. mailfront. You, Darrell and anyone else is entitled to his or her opinion. You are also welcome

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Devinfo co-operation (was Re: devfino - where is it going?)

2002-11-01 Thread Rasjid Wilcox
On Sat, 2 Nov 2002 9:55 am, Charlie Brady wrote: All I ask is that you respect Mitel's right to do what it chooses to do in the interest of its customers and shareholders. I think one of the things that we need to be clear about is that while SME is an open-sourced product, it is not currently

[e-smith-devinfo] devinfo mail archive

2002-10-23 Thread Darrell May
FYI, the devinfo mail archive appears stuck on the 16th. Time to give something a kick and resync the archive :-) Regards, -- Darrell May DMC Netsourced.com http://myEZserver.com -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] devinfo mail archive

2002-10-23 Thread Dan York
Darrell, FYI, the devinfo mail archive appears stuck on the 16th. Time to give something a kick and resync the archive :-) If you are referring to the mail-archive.com archive over at: http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org/ then it is completely out of our control. All

[e-smith-devinfo] devinfo on GMane

2002-06-18 Thread admin
Hello I recently discovered the mail to news gateway GMane. I allowed myself to ask for the creation of a group for the mailing list e-smith-devinfo. The advantage compared to The Mail Archive is the possibility of posting on the newsgroup with reference on the ml. This group is called

[e-smith-devinfo] devinfo-*.rpm naming [was Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Announcement: SquirrelMail RPMS available]

2002-05-15 Thread Darrell May
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Hi Brandon, Installed this RPM using Darrell May's update panel, Thanks Steve. I appreciate you mean the best here, however I must point out the update system was built in cooperation with a team of talented individuals whom all deserve equal credit: Juan J. Prieto

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] devinfo-*.rpm naming [was Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Announcement: SquirrelMail RPMS available]

2002-05-15 Thread Brandon Friedman
Update panel. will need to have a look, is it any rpms-management tool? Will check it out! Darrell May wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Hi Brandon, Installed this RPM using Darrell May's update panel, Thanks Steve. I appreciate you mean the best here, however I must point out

[e-smith-devinfo] devinfo and www.e-smith.org are back

2002-03-25 Thread Gordon Rowell
Our ISP unilaterally decided to stop publishing e-smith.org which meant the devinfo list, www.e-smith.org and the bulletin boards disappeared completely from the net for some of Thursday night and Friday morning. We brought up www.e-smith.org at its new location early on Friday but nobody could

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] devinfo-mitel-update-system

2002-03-05 Thread Darrell May
stephen noble [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: http://www.dungog.net/web/sme/howto/shared-drives.html http://www.dungog.net/web/sme/download.html download has the updatesystem rpm the usermanager pkg and the shareddrives pkg Please note Stephen's version of the update system is a revision to the

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] devinfo-mitel-update-system

2002-03-05 Thread stephen noble
have changed in any way, please clearly state this is the case. noted :-) ftr, my change fixed a cosmetic display error and listed installed packages stephen noble dungog.net/sme __ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page

[e-smith-devinfo] devinfo support [was RE: [e-smith-devinfo] Blades - a brief 'Blades' introduction]

2001-10-23 Thread Darrell May
Greg Zartman [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I think Mitel needs to kick down some type of a consulting fee to you. From the standpoint of viewing SME development from this list, it looks like you do more development than they do. Thanks Greg. Of course Mitel does do a lot of development that we

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] devinfo support [was RE: [e-smith-devinfo] Blades - a brief 'Blades' introduction]

2001-10-23 Thread Dan York
Greg, Of course Mitel does do a lot of development that we don't see. It would be nice however if they stepped in and filled the devinfo support gap, since in the end, we_will_all_benefit. I couldn't agree more. This is the heart of GNU software development and one of the primary

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] Devinfo posts now subscribers only (was Re: [e-smith-devinfo] !Virus Alert! [was [e-smith-devinfo]

2001-09-24 Thread Steven Lewis
To: Gordon Rowell; Darrell May Cc: e-smith-devinfo Subject: RE: [e-smith-devinfo] Devinfo posts now subscribers only (was Re: [e-smith-devinfo] !Virus Alert! [was [e-smith-devinfo] Interestingly enough I didnt receive any attachment, but only saw a web page (in chinese). My up to date Nortons did

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Devinfo posts now subscribers only (was Re: [e-smith-devinfo] !Virus Alert! [was [e-smith-devinfo]

2001-09-24 Thread timothee
: Monday, September 24, 2001 3:50 PM Subject: RE: [e-smith-devinfo] Devinfo posts now subscribers only (was Re: [e-smith-devinfo] !Virus Alert! [was [e-smith-devinfo] My Norton caught it and placed it in the quarantine. I do have auto-protect, script blocking and the mail agents all running. Also

[e-smith-devinfo] Devinfo posts now subscribers only (was Re: [e-smith-devinfo] !Virus Alert! [was [e-smith-devinfo]????????????????????3????)])

2001-09-23 Thread Gordon Rowell
On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 02:01:14PM -, Darrell May [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It appears that the devinfo mailing list may have allowed an attachment, [...] Thanks Darrell. Due to this and other spam on the list, the devinfo list has now been changed to allow postings from subscribers

[e-smith-devinfo] Devinfo

2001-07-10 Thread Luuk Jansen
I've a question. The last 7 day's I didn't receive one Devinfo e-mail. Is this a problem with my server or with Devinfo? Thanks, Luuk -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues Support for registered customers and partners to