Re: [e-smith-devinfo] FAQ maintenance

2003-11-26 Thread Hsing-Foo Wang
Like we said earlier, it's all about 'making an inventory' of the community wishes on the 'best way to proceed', and you are part of it so duely noted ;-) Regards, Hsing-Foo Charlie Brady wrote: On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, Hsing-Foo Wang wrote: contribs.org has opened a discussion thread on the recen

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] FAQ maintenance

2003-11-26 Thread Hsing-Foo Wang
Well, that's the whole idea here. We are just wondering what the community thinks, and what the 'best way to proceed' is. A list instead or in addition to, all options are open. Thanks for the feedback Charlie. Charlie Brady wrote: On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, Hsing-Foo Wang wrote: Since there are ma

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] FAQ maintenance

2003-11-26 Thread dean
I too are all for keeping this discussion on this list. This list was setup for GPL Dev Info Discussions, lets keep them here. I think that as and when a need for a seperate discussion forum is required then contribs.org would be ok, but until that time I would like to see all discussions kept

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] FAQ maintenance

2003-11-26 Thread Robert van den Aker
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 12:57:07PM -0800, Greg Zartman wrote: > > To echo Charlie's question: what's wrong with this list? > > Well, if Mitel is throwing in the towel (so to speak), then this list > will eventually go away. Further, this discussion has nothing to do > with Mitel. It is a commu

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] FAQ maintenance

2003-11-26 Thread Greg Zartman
To echo Charlie's question: what's wrong with this list? Well, if Mitel is throwing in the towel (so to speak), then this list will eventually go away. Further, this discussion has nothing to do with Mitel. It is a community discussion. Contribs.org was setup to discuss things like this, ther

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] FAQ maintenance

2003-11-26 Thread John Cusick
On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 15:30, Jeff Coleman wrote: > Charlie, > > Your comment about a mailing list is appropriate. It is definitely easier > to follow a thread on a list. > > We will setup a list shortly on contribs.org to discuss the future and > potential of the e-smith release. > I couldn't

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] FAQ maintenance

2003-11-26 Thread Robert van den Aker
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 01:30:53PM -0700, Jeff Coleman wrote: > We will setup a list shortly on contribs.org to discuss the future and > potential of the e-smith release. To echo Charlie's question: what's wrong with this list? Cheers, Robert -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mai

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] FAQ maintenance

2003-11-26 Thread Jeff Coleman
oo Wang > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] FAQ maintenance > > > On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, Hsing-Foo Wang wrote: > > > contribs.org has opened a discussion thread on the recent events. > > > > see: http://contribs.org/phpBB2/viewforum.php?f=

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] FAQ maintenance

2003-11-26 Thread Charlie Brady
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, Hsing-Foo Wang wrote: > contribs.org has opened a discussion thread on the recent events. > > see: http://contribs.org/phpBB2/viewforum.php?f=16 > > Please continue the discussion there. IMO, bulletin boards don't adequately support discussions. Can you not set up a maili

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] FAQ maintenance

2003-11-26 Thread John Cusick
On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 13:58, Charlie Brady wrote: > On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, Hsing-Foo Wang wrote: > > > Since there are many questions which all of us are stuggeling with, > > contribs.org has begun contacting the major contributors from the > > community to form a sort of 'brainstorm' team. The pu

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] FAQ maintenance

2003-11-26 Thread Hsing-Foo Wang
@all, contribs.org has opened a discussion thread on the recent events. see: http://contribs.org/phpBB2/viewforum.php?f=16 Please continue the discussion there. It's not about dicisions but share thoughts and decide later ;-) Thanks, on behalf of the contribs.org team. John Cusick wrote: On We

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] FAQ maintenance

2003-11-26 Thread Charlie Brady
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, Hsing-Foo Wang wrote: > Since there are many questions which all of us are stuggeling with, > contribs.org has begun contacting the major contributors from the > community to form a sort of 'brainstorm' team. The purpose of this > 'brainstorm' thing is to provide a platfor

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] FAQ maintenance

2003-11-26 Thread John Cusick
On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 13:47, Darrell May wrote: > IMO we should continue to use and support a single community site. > Contribs.org seems to be the logical choice. > > Darrell > Whatever is decided is fine with me. Its available for use if anyone wants it. Its simple, and now that I've upgraded

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] FAQ maintenance

2003-11-26 Thread Hsing-Foo Wang
To all, Since there are many questions which all of us are stuggeling with, contribs.org has begun contacting the major contributors from the community to form a sort of 'brainstorm' team. The purpose of this 'brainstorm' thing is to provide a platform for discussion and idea's. See contribs.o

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] FAQ maintenance

2003-11-26 Thread Darrell May
IMO we should continue to use and support a single community site. Contribs.org seems to be the logical choice. Darrell -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To