Hi
Quite often, my node hits 100%, rejects all incoming requests, and produces
pretty logs in red. This is just a few lines, it can go on a bit, several lines
per second!
21:27:54 millisToSleep=8010 seems unreasonable. Limiting this wait to 1000 null
21:27:54 millisToSleep=8010 seems unreasona
On Tuesday 12 November 2002 09:20, you wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 01:25:58AM -0500, Gianni Johansson wrote:
> > The fproxy splitfile support was written as a one off hack and is not
> > really maintainable. It needs to be rewritten from scratch to cleanly
> > separate the mechanics of ins
Costas Dokolas writes:
> I'm re-posting this to the devl list as I didn't get an answer from the
> support list...
>
> ---
>
> Hi, I'm new to the list and sort of new to freenet.
>
> I'm running a transient node at home and noticed that although some nodes
> seem unreachable (Connection Attemp
Ian Clarke writes:
> For a while now, we have been working on the distribution servlet, which
> is basically designed to allow people to give copies of Freenet, together
> with seednodes, to their friends - effectively augmenting the current
> centralized pull model of software distribution wi
On Sun, 10 Nov 2002 07:56:08 -0800 Oskar Sandberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>No, this is not going in, unless it is going to be forced over my
>
>kicking and screaming objections.
With a starting line like that, how can I resist replying?
Let's look clearly and dispassionately at the effec
Ian Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> For a while now, we have been working on the distribution servlet, which
> is basically designed to allow people to give copies of Freenet, together
> with seednodes, to their friends - effectively augmenting the current
> centralized pull model of softw
On Tuesday 12 November 2002 09:20, you wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 01:25:58AM -0500, Gianni Johansson wrote:
> > The fproxy splitfile support was written as a one off hack and is not
> > really maintainable. It needs to be rewritten from scratch to cleanly
> > separate the mechanics of ins
Costas Dokolas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm re-posting this to the devl list as I didn't get an answer from the
> support list...
>
> ---
>
> Hi, I'm new to the list and sort of new to freenet.
>
> I'm running a transient node at home and noticed that although some nodes
> seem unreachable
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Nothing wrong with source only distributions, as long as you make the
> build process clear in the docs.
the thing is, i forgot to document a step this time. but that's not
really the big problem... the problem is, okay, that'll build on debian,
bu
e.org |- The Red Hot Chili Peppers
http://wooledge.org/~greg/ |
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021112/ab7ae4ad/attachment.pgp>
Anonymous ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> nope, I'm thinking about a gateway/router node that is static both for
> internal and external nodes.
> but it should uses different references because for internal it's
> 192.168.x.x and for external it has a public IP.
>
> in this way, this node is a junct
No.
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 02:36:33PM +0100, Anonymous wrote:
> I'm asking that:
>
> is possible to make an intra-freenet with static, mutual referenced, nodes
> for the intra and transient (or nothing, non-existent, isolated) for the
> global freenet?
>
> and build a 'gateway' static node wi
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 02:14:03PM +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 01:52:20PM +0100, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
< >
> > Actually, FCP encryption is already supported. All you need to do is
> > send the first protocol designator byte as whatever FNP uses instead of
> > whatever
I'm re-posting this to the devl list as I didn't get an answer from the
support list...
---
Hi, I'm new to the list and sort of new to freenet.
I'm running a transient node at home and noticed that although some nodes
seem unreachable (Connection Attempts: X, Successful Connections: 0 (0%))
thei
>> and build a 'gateway' static node with an internal (for intranet) address
and a public (for world) address?
> This is not currently implemented. What you want is a node that only
transmits its reference to internal nodes, but to external nodes appears
transient.
nope, I'm thinking about a gate
Hi
Quite often, my node hits 100%, rejects all incoming requests, and produces pretty
logs in red. This is just a few lines, it can go on a bit, several lines per second!
21:27:54 millisToSleep=8010 seems unreasonable. Limiting this wait to 1000 null
21:27:54 millisToSleep=8010 seems unreasonab
On Sun, 10 Nov 2002 07:56:08 -0800 Oskar Sandberg
wrote:
>No, this is not going in, unless it is going to be forced over my
>
>kicking and screaming objections.
With a starting line like that, how can I resist replying?
Let's look clearly and dispassionately at the effects of the proxy
co
2.
http://freenetproject.org/
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021112/9ffbd44f/attachment.pgp>
Hello to All,
I work in software company and I like freenet idea and
the good Java program code.
I writing in Java from 3 years.
I want to help to write a way to communicate between
freenet nodes through HTTP proxy.
Do this was discuss before and someone did try to do
this ?
I have Java code fo
world) address?
could it be implemented in future FNet builds?
regards,
anonymous.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021112/fd280452/attachment.html>
ame: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021112/2be407e5/attachment.pgp>
--
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021112/c5bebb96/attachment.pgp>
--
Matthew Toseland
toad at amphibian.dyndns.org
amphibian at users.sourceforge.net
Freenet/Coldstore open source hacker.
Employed full time by Freenet Project Inc. from 11/9/02 to 11/11/02.
http://freenetproject.org/
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubb
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 08:30:00PM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> Anonymous (mtoseland at cableinet.co.uk) wrote:
>
> > does the clientport (default 8481) use any encryption?
> >
> > or is it in clear text?
>
> It's clear text.
>
> > If it's not encrypted, is possible to ask you for future imple
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 12:45:19AM +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 05:43:08AM -0500, harik at chaos.ao.net wrote:
> >
> > -4a0ab4f54f0c2d0fa49618d314952a1c52cc2271
> >
> > ... is there an UnsignedBigInt() we could use to display these?
> > Preferably with leading zeros so
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 12:32:51AM +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 02:57:53PM +0100, Marco A. Calamari wrote:
< >
> > I and a lot of my LUG friends think that the compatibility of
> > Freenet with free software is a must; please don't remove it.
> We didn't. Kaffe died on
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 12:46:44AM +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 06:10:04PM +, Alistair Phipps wrote:
> > public Socket(InetAddress address,
> > int port,
> > InetAddress localAddr,
> > int localPort)
> >
> > Could localAddr
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002, Anonymous wrote:
> hello,
>
> does the clientport (default 8481) use any encryption?
>
> or is it in clear text?
>
> I ask this because I'd like to make a public gateway with public FCP to use
> FMB or FROST remotely.
>
> If it's not encrypted, is possible to ask you for
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> browser at servalan:~/fish-is-still-an-idiot$ ./streamServer.py 6
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "./streamServer.py", line 3, in ?
> from retrieveStream import *
> File "./retrieveStream.py", line 4, in ?
> from fecUtils import *
> File
No.
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 02:36:33PM +0100, Anonymous wrote:
> I'm asking that:
>
> is possible to make an intra-freenet with static, mutual referenced, nodes for the
>intra and transient (or nothing, non-existent, isolated) for the global freenet?
>
> and build a 'gateway' static node with a
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 02:14:03PM +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 01:52:20PM +0100, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
< >
> > Actually, FCP encryption is already supported. All you need to do is
> > send the first protocol designator byte as whatever FNP uses instead of
> > whatever
>> and build a 'gateway' static node with an internal (for intranet) address
and a public (for world) address?
> This is not currently implemented. What you want is a node that only
transmits its reference to internal nodes, but to external nodes appears
transient.
nope, I'm thinking about a gate
I'm re-posting this to the devl list as I didn't get an answer from the
support list...
---
Hi, I'm new to the list and sort of new to freenet.
I'm running a transient node at home and noticed that although some nodes
seem unreachable (Connection Attempts: X, Successful Connections: 0 (0%))
thei
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 02:36:33PM +0100, Anonymous wrote:
> I'm asking that:
>
> is possible to make an intra-freenet with static, mutual referenced, nodes for the
>intra and transient (or nothing, non-existent, isolated) for the global freenet?
If I understand you correctly... it is possible to
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 02:56:13PM +0200, Ivan Dachev wrote:
> Hello to All,
>
> I work in software company and I like freenet idea and
> the good Java program code.
>
> I writing in Java from 3 years.
> I want to help to write a way to communicate between
> freenet nodes through HTTP proxy.
Steg
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 01:52:20PM +0100, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 08:30:00PM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > Anonymous ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >
> > > does the clientport (default 8481) use any encryption?
> > >
> > > or is it in clear text?
> >
> > It's clear text.
I'm asking that:
is possible to make an intra-freenet with static,
mutual referenced, nodes for the intra and transient (or nothing,
non-existent, isolated) for the global freenet?
and build a 'gateway' static node with an internal
(for intranet) address and a public (for world) address?
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 01:25:58AM -0500, Gianni Johansson wrote:
> The fproxy splitfile support was written as a one off hack and is not
> really maintainable. It needs to be rewritten from scratch to cleanly
> separate the mechanics of inserting/retrieving/encoding/decoding files from
> the p
Hello to All,
I work in software company and I like freenet idea and
the good Java program code.
I writing in Java from 3 years.
I want to help to write a way to communicate between
freenet nodes through HTTP proxy.
Do this was discuss before and someone did try to do
this ?
I have Java code fo
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 08:30:00PM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> Anonymous ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> > does the clientport (default 8481) use any encryption?
> >
> > or is it in clear text?
>
> It's clear text.
>
> > If it's not encrypted, is possible to ask you for future implementation?
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 12:45:19AM +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 05:43:08AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > -4a0ab4f54f0c2d0fa49618d314952a1c52cc2271
> >
> > ... is there an UnsignedBigInt() we could use to display these?
> > Preferably with leading zeros so the
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 12:32:51AM +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 02:57:53PM +0100, Marco A. Calamari wrote:
< >
> > I and a lot of my LUG friends think that the compatibility of
> > Freenet with free software is a must; please don't remove it.
> We didn't. Kaffe died on
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 12:46:44AM +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 06:10:04PM +, Alistair Phipps wrote:
> > public Socket(InetAddress address,
> > int port,
> > InetAddress localAddr,
> > int localPort)
> >
> > Could localAddr
hello,
does the clientport (default 8481) use any encryption?
or is it in clear text?
I ask this because I'd like to make a public gateway with public FCP to use
FMB or FROST remotely.
If it's not encrypted, is possible to ask you for future implementation?
regards.
_
signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021112/184984c2/attachment.pgp>
at users.sourceforge.net
Freenet/Coldstore open source hacker.
Employed full time by Freenet Project Inc. from 11/9/02 to 11/11/02.
http://freenetproject.org/
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021112/91aa7e9f/attachment.pgp>
The fproxy splitfile support was written as a one off hack and is not
really maintainable. It needs to be rewritten from scratch to cleanly
separate the mechanics of inserting/retrieving/encoding/decoding files from
the presentation.
Here's the path that I am currently on:
1. Add support for
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Nothing wrong with source only distributions, as long as you make the
> build process clear in the docs.
the thing is, i forgot to document a step this time. but that's not
really the big problem... the problem is, okay, that'll build on debian,
bu
users.sourceforge.net
Freenet/Coldstore open source hacker.
Employed full time by Freenet Project Inc. from 11/9/02 to 11/11/02.
http://freenetproject.org/
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021112/a17683da/attachment.pgp>
lication/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021112/3dc0953f/attachment.pgp>
ject.org/
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021112/9f821b3d/attachment.pgp>
mphibian at users.sourceforge.net
Freenet/Coldstore open source hacker.
Employed full time by Freenet Project Inc. from 11/9/02 to 11/11/02.
http://freenetproject.org/
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021112/9fb7eee2/attachment.pgp>
er.
Employed full time by Freenet Project Inc. from 11/9/02 to 11/11/02.
http://freenetproject.org/
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021112/bacd3f30/attachment.pgp>
On Monday 11 November 2002 20:56, Mike wrote:
> A bit more info,
> This was with 0.5.0.6 and it may have occured on a GMT date switch.
> Considering that it was a CHK FEC splitfile pointed to by a edition
> based freesite I don't think that it should have affected it but it
> might be an avenue to
/11/02.
http://freenetproject.org/
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021112/ec0a937f/attachment.pgp>
eenetproject.org/
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021112/e8962726/attachment.pgp>
ailing list
> devl at freenetproject.org
> http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
>
--
Matthew Toseland
toad at amphibian.dyndns.org
amphibian at users.sourceforge.net
Freenet/Coldstore open source hacker.
Employed full time by Freenet Project Inc. from 11/9/02 to 11/11/02.
http://freenetproject.org/
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021112/caad4ca2/attachment.pgp>
rg
> oskar at freenetproject.org
>
--
Matthew Toseland
toad at amphibian.dyndns.org
amphibian at users.sourceforge.net
Freenet/Coldstore open source hacker.
Employed full time by Freenet Project Inc.
http://freenetproject.org/
-- next part --
A non-text attachmen
/
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021112/7a98c65b/attachment.pgp>
59 matches
Mail list logo
