[freenet-CVS] freenet/src/freenet OpenConnectionManager.java, 1.142, 1.143

2003-10-23 Thread Pascal
Update of /cvsroot/freenet/freenet/src/freenet In directory sc8-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv23443 Modified Files: OpenConnectionManager.java Log Message: Correct the "Send queue"/"Data sent" labels. Index: OpenConnectionManager.java ==

[freenet-CVS] freenet/src/freenet/node/rt NGRoutingTable.java, 1.15, 1.16

2003-10-23 Thread Edward J. Huff
Update of /cvsroot/freenet/freenet/src/freenet/node/rt In directory sc8-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv22946 Modified Files: NGRoutingTable.java Log Message: Fix NPE in NGRoutingTable.reference in same way as similar NPE was fixed in NGRoutingTable.updateReference. Index: NGRoutingTable.java

[freenet-CVS] freenet/src/freenet OpenConnectionManager.java, 1.141, 1.142

2003-10-23 Thread Pascal
Update of /cvsroot/freenet/freenet/src/freenet In directory sc8-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv22903 Modified Files: OpenConnectionManager.java Log Message: Fix indenting (no functional changes) Index: OpenConnectionManager.java === R

[freenet-CVS] freenet/src/freenet/node Main.java,1.278,1.279

2003-10-23 Thread Pascal
Update of /cvsroot/freenet/freenet/src/freenet/node In directory sc8-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv21889 Modified Files: Main.java Log Message: Fix threading Index: Main.java === RCS file: /cvsroot/freenet/freenet/src/freenet/node/Ma

[freenet-CVS] freenet/src/freenet/node Main.java,1.277,1.278

2003-10-23 Thread Pascal
Update of /cvsroot/freenet/freenet/src/freenet/node In directory sc8-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv21112 Modified Files: Main.java Log Message: Fix indenting (no functional changes) Index: Main.java === RCS file: /cvsroot/freenet/fre

[freenet-dev] xsl in fproxy

2003-10-23 Thread Zlatin Balevsky
Can anyone familiar with xsl list the differences between filtering html for anonimity-compromising content and filtering xsl transformations? If an xml file is filtered agains the current rules (no off-freenet links, no actions) and its corresponding xsl is made sure not to contain any such t

Re: [freenet-dev] Using NGR network information

2003-10-23 Thread Tom Kaitchuck
On Thursday 23 October 2003 21:36, Doug Bostrom wrote: > Greetings, > > Having responded to Matthew's request for a few people to set up a test > network of NGR servers, I'm now wondering how the one I've started can be > more useful. I've been using it to retrieve various random things, and > whe

[freenet-dev] Using NGR network information

2003-10-23 Thread Doug Bostrom
Greetings, Having responded to Matthew's request for a few people to set up a test network of NGR servers, I'm now wondering how the one I've started can be more useful. I've been using it to retrieve various random things, and when I have a few moments from time to time I'll insert something

[freenet-CVS] freenet/src/freenet/message Accepted.java, 1.3, 1.4 AnnouncementComplete.java, 1.3, 1.4 AnnouncementExecute.java, 1.3, 1.4 AnnouncementFailed.java, 1.7, 1.8 AnnouncementReply.java, 1.3, 1.4 DataInsert.java, 1.2, 1.3 DataNotFound.java, 1.4, 1.5 DataReply.java, 1.4, 1.5 DataRequest.java, 1.7, 1.8 DataSend.java, 1.8, 1.9 Identify.java, 1.5, 1.6 InsertReply.java, 1.3, 1.4 InsertRequest.java, 1.3, 1.4 NodeAnnouncement.java, 1.6, 1.7 NodeMessage.java, 1.7, 1.8 QueryAborted.java, 1.3, 1.4 QueryRejected.java, 1.9, 1.10 QueryRestarted.java, 1.3, 1.4 Request.java, 1.15, 1.16 StoreData.java, 1.10, 1.11 VoidMessage.java, 1.3, 1.4

2003-10-23 Thread Matthew Toseland
Update of /cvsroot/freenet/freenet/src/freenet/message In directory sc8-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv2447/src/freenet/message Modified Files: Accepted.java AnnouncementComplete.java AnnouncementExecute.java AnnouncementFailed.java AnnouncementReply.java DataInsert.java DataNotFou

[freenet-CVS] freenet/src/freenet/message/client ClientMessage.java, 1.8, 1.9

2003-10-23 Thread Matthew Toseland
Update of /cvsroot/freenet/freenet/src/freenet/message/client In directory sc8-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv2447/src/freenet/message/client Modified Files: ClientMessage.java Log Message: 6276: Fix major bug in 6275; make Message.toRawMessage(Presentation,PeerHandler) be the one and only toRawMe

[freenet-CVS] freenet/src/freenet ConnectionHandler.java, 1.196, 1.197 Message.java, 1.10, 1.11 PeerPacketMessage.java, 1.17, 1.18 Version.java, 1.468, 1.469

2003-10-23 Thread Matthew Toseland
Update of /cvsroot/freenet/freenet/src/freenet In directory sc8-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv2447/src/freenet Modified Files: ConnectionHandler.java Message.java PeerPacketMessage.java Version.java Log Message: 6276: Fix major bug in 6275; make Message.toRawMessage(Presentation,PeerHandl

[freenet-CVS] freenet/src/freenet/client FCPClient.java,1.18,1.19

2003-10-23 Thread Matthew Toseland
Update of /cvsroot/freenet/freenet/src/freenet/client In directory sc8-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv2447/src/freenet/client Modified Files: FCPClient.java Log Message: 6276: Fix major bug in 6275; make Message.toRawMessage(Presentation,PeerHandler) be the one and only toRawMessage method, to pre

Re: [freenet-dev] Re: Index for unstable network

2003-10-23 Thread Conrad J. Sabatier
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 06:46:24PM -0700, Martin Stone Davis wrote: > Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: > > >Damn, of all the times for my node to go belly-up, just as I was inserting > >the site again. :-) Ah well, gave me a chance to upgrade before > >restarting. > > Err... if you've upgraded to 62

[freenet-dev] Re: Index for unstable network

2003-10-23 Thread Martin Stone Davis
Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: Damn, of all the times for my node to go belly-up, just as I was inserting the site again. :-) Ah well, gave me a chance to upgrade before restarting. Err... if you've upgraded to 6275, then you better downgrade again to 6274 or wait for Toad to fix the problem with

Re: [freenet-dev] Re: Index for unstable network

2003-10-23 Thread Conrad J. Sabatier
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 08:12:38PM -0500, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: > On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 05:29:04PM -0700, Martin Stone Davis wrote: > > Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: > > > > >On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 06:15:15PM -0500, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: > > > > > >>I've been running a spider, collecting si

Re: [freenet-dev] Re: Index for unstable network

2003-10-23 Thread Conrad J. Sabatier
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 05:29:04PM -0700, Martin Stone Davis wrote: > Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: > > >On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 06:15:15PM -0500, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: > > > >>I've been running a spider, collecting site info and am now in the > >>process of inserting a new index freesite. Nearl

[freenet-dev] Re: Index for unstable network

2003-10-23 Thread Martin Stone Davis
Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 06:15:15PM -0500, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: I've been running a spider, collecting site info and am now in the process of inserting a new index freesite. Nearly done. Figured we could use an index site of what's actually available under the uns

Re: [freenet-dev] Index for unstable network

2003-10-23 Thread Conrad J. Sabatier
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 06:15:15PM -0500, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: > I've been running a spider, collecting site info and am now in the process > of inserting a new index freesite. Nearly done. > > Figured we could use an index site of what's actually available under the > unstable network. >

[freenet-dev] Re: Unstable weirdness in node file

2003-10-23 Thread pineapple
Running winxp home, sun jvm 1.4.2. Anyone else have this problem where their fnp port does NOT match what is in their freenet.ini file? The only error in my logfile was this: 23-Oct-2003 5:06:07 PM (freenet.support.io.NIOInputStream, QThread-17, NORMAL): waited more than 5 minutes in NIOIS.read(

[freenet-dev] Index for unstable network

2003-10-23 Thread Conrad J. Sabatier
I've been running a spider, collecting site info and am now in the process of inserting a new index freesite. Nearly done. Figured we could use an index site of what's actually available under the unstable network. As soon as the insertion is complete, I'll post the URI. Stay tuned. -- Conra

[freenet-dev] Re: 6275 stack traces

2003-10-23 Thread Martin Stone Davis
Martin Stone Davis wrote: > This is accompanied by 0/0 transmitting/receiving connections on ocm > most of the time. > > -Martin > > Martin Stone Davis wrote: > >> Immediately after starting 6275, I got this: >> Going back to 6274 solved the problem. No need to reseed either. And guess what, I'

[freenet-dev] Re: 6275 stack traces

2003-10-23 Thread Martin Stone Davis
This is accompanied by 0/0 transmitting/receiving connections on ocm most of the time. -Martin Martin Stone Davis wrote: Immediately after starting 6275, I got this: Oct 23, 2003 1:33:59 PM (freenet.node.rt.NGRoutingTable, main, NORMAL): Loading estimators Oct 23, 2003 1:34:00 PM (freenet.nod

Re: [freenet-dev] Re: Project Manager Needed?

2003-10-23 Thread Tom Kaitchuck
On Thursday 23 October 2003 08:02, digital ch wrote: > You can't have it both ways. The developers want a large group of people > to test with. That means those of us who want to support the project may > opt for reduced functionality. That doesn't mean we should be completely > surprised by cha

Re: [freenet-dev] Website

2003-10-23 Thread Ian Clarke
Are you still seeing that? Jon Forsberg wrote: Hi! I get Warning: open(/tmp/sess_32eee295938ec27da2d1f7bf0f163672, O_RDWR) failed: No space left on device (28) in /home/groups/f/fr/freenet/htdocs/index.php on line 2 all over the website. Maybe that's something somebody should do something abo

Re: [freenet-dev] Unstable weirdness in node file

2003-10-23 Thread Niklas Bergh
Have you seen anything strange in the log file? /N - Original Message - From: "pineapple" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 3:42 PM Subject: [freenet-dev] Unstable weirdness in node file > Just tried the latest unstable build. For some reason

[freenet-CVS] freenet/src/freenet/message Identify.java, 1.3, 1.4 Request.java, 1.13, 1.14

2003-10-23 Thread Matthew Toseland
Update of /cvsroot/freenet/freenet/src/freenet/message In directory sc8-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv14434/src/freenet/message Modified Files: Identify.java Request.java Log Message: 6274: Logging, toString(), try to catch a bizarre crash reported by hirvox, and wierd stuff with messages being d

[freenet-CVS] freenet/src/freenet ConnectionHandler.java, 1.194, 1.195 PeerHandler.java, 1.36, 1.37 PeerPacketMessage.java, 1.15, 1.16 Version.java, 1.466, 1.467

2003-10-23 Thread Matthew Toseland
Update of /cvsroot/freenet/freenet/src/freenet In directory sc8-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv14434/src/freenet Modified Files: ConnectionHandler.java PeerHandler.java PeerPacketMessage.java Version.java Log Message: 6274: Logging, toString(), try to catch a bizarre crash reported by hirv

[freenet-dev] Website

2003-10-23 Thread Jon Forsberg
Hi! I get Warning: open(/tmp/sess_32eee295938ec27da2d1f7bf0f163672, O_RDWR) failed: No space left on device (28) in /home/groups/f/fr/freenet/htdocs/index.php on line 2 all over the website. Maybe that's something somebody should do something about. It doesn't look to nice. ___

Re: [freenet-dev] Project Manager Needed?

2003-10-23 Thread Todd Walton
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003, Toad wrote: > What newsgroups? I don't know about any newsgroups. http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.devel/ > It was covered adequately on the devl list (which unstable users should > be reading), the CVS list, and the IRC channels on both freenode and > IIP. I s

Re: [freenet-dev] Project Manager Needed?

2003-10-23 Thread Thomas Themel
Hi, Toad ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote on 2003-10-23: > What newsgroups? I don't know about any newsgroups. It was covered > adequately on the devl list (which unstable users should be reading), > the CVS list, and the IRC channels on both freenode and IIP. I don't > want to put it on the website becau

Re: [freenet-dev] Some Thoughts

2003-10-23 Thread Toad
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 02:12:55PM +0200, Some Guy wrote: > Was NGR tested as extensively as freenet's original routing? If not then why? > > You could have reused some of the same code from the first freenet paper. Even now > this might > still be a good idea. Sorry if you guys have done thi

Re: [freenet-dev] Re: Project Manager Needed?

2003-10-23 Thread Toad
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 01:03:30PM +0200, Sebastian Sauer wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > hi, > > I agree with "digital ch". I run a permanent freenet-node since over a year > now cause we really need something to stop the growing of total supervision. > > The swit

Re: [freenet-dev] Project Manager Needed?

2003-10-23 Thread Toad
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 06:24:43AM +, digital ch wrote: > Just an observation but it really seems like freenet needs a project > manager.(I know... I know... along with more full time developers, servers, > testers, etc) It has one. Ian. > > For instance the issues that just popped up with

[freenet-dev] Re: Re: Project Manager Needed?

2003-10-23 Thread zbalevsk
>Show me >where there is one really good developer grade piece of documentation on >freenet? You can't cause it doesn't exist. The reason more developers >don't work on this project is because it is obscenely complicated actually the old transport layer code (which is the only part of fred

[freenet-dev] Unstable weirdness in node file

2003-10-23 Thread pineapple
Just tried the latest unstable build. For some reason physical.tcp in the node file has a port that does not match my freenet.ini file. The port number seems to be generated randomly every time the node is started and I can't prevent it from changing even by write protecting the file. __

Re: [freenet-dev] Re: Project Manager Needed?

2003-10-23 Thread digital ch
From: Martin Stone Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Discussion of development issues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [freenet-dev] Re: Project Manager Needed? Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 00:00:22 -0700 digital ch wrote: Just an observation but it really seems like freenet needs

[freenet-dev] Some Thoughts

2003-10-23 Thread Some Guy
Was NGR tested as extensively as freenet's original routing? If not then why? You could have reused some of the same code from the first freenet paper. Even now this might still be a good idea. Sorry if you guys have done this and I haven't heard, but I never was all that convinced by NGR.

RE: [freenet-dev] Re: Don't upgrade to 6269

2003-10-23 Thread Pete
I ran Prodnet, and my nodes rt maxed at 40 nodes with only 15 reachable. One day after toad's some what say hasty fork (I agree with the decision, I just think it'd been better to use a new branch than supposedly ruin the experience :-/?? For others) my rt has hit 32 nodes with 25 reachable, and ho

[freenet-dev] [OT] Freenet development no. 200xxx

2003-10-23 Thread Jens Skripczynski
hi, having had this discussion a lot the last month, I want to raise it again from the dead. I'm quite as unhappy as Matthias "don't upgrade...". The releases of the stable branch where not as stable as I would expect from a stable build (e.g. mutt took 3-4 years to become final release stable 1

[freenet-dev] Fred Status automailer script + start-freenet.sh + update-unstable.sh

2003-10-23 Thread Edward J. Huff
These are the scripts I use to start freenet, update unstable, and to mail fred status to Toad. Use ./start-freenet --unstable These attempt to avoid downloading the same snapshots repeatedly, but because the snapshots directory doesn't avoid changing the creation time of files which haven't chan

[freenet-dev] Re: Project Manager Needed?

2003-10-23 Thread Sebastian Sauer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 hi, I agree with "digital ch". I run a permanent freenet-node since over a year now cause we really need something to stop the growing of total supervision. The switch to a devel-network without really giving informations out isn't the first big m

[freenet-dev] Overload

2003-10-23 Thread Jonathan Howard
Are most of the nodes on dev-network overloaded or is this a client side bug giving me mostly high search died probability? I have 11 nodes with open connections, two with ~0.5 SDP, other close to 1. I have got a reasonable number of Successful Transfers compared with stable. __

Re: [freenet-dev] Network Fork on Unstable

2003-10-23 Thread Sebastian Lohmeier - monochromata Networked-Services Engineering
Hi Toad, I have set up a node for the testing-network. It is reachable at monochromata.kicks-ass.net:28166. Regards Sebastian ___ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Re: [freenet-dev] Re: Don't upgrade to 6269

2003-10-23 Thread Alejandro. R. Mosteo Chagoyen
Dicho por Martin Stone Davis: > True, it would have been nice if it had been made clear to all using > the unstable that they should be not only reading "devl" but also > CVS and IRC://freenode/freenet, but it was only *30 MINUTES* between > Toad starting to make changes and him posting detailed i

[freenet-dev] Re: Don't upgrade to 6269

2003-10-23 Thread Martin Stone Davis
Costas Dokolas wrote: -Original Message- From: Ian Clarke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 9:13 AM To: Discussion of development issues Subject: Re: [freenet-dev] Re: Don't upgrade to 6269 Todd Walton wrote: You (Toad) and whoever few also agreed to this beforeha

[freenet-dev] Re: 6263 Status

2003-10-23 Thread Mike Stump
> > For a total of 0.3% chance of a query getting an answer? If only > > 0.3% of all queries even get a DF, certainly the chance of > > actually getting all the data is even lower? > Where do you get the 0.3% chance from? psuccess is the probability > of the whole requests successfully moving dat

Re: [freenet-dev] Re: Network Fork

2003-10-23 Thread Ken Corson
So, can anyone (everyone) who is unstable reach this : freenet:[EMAIL PROTECTED],VJx7RVBspylkZ0CLO8d1cw ? It was my first insertion (and yes, for all you jokesters, it was WONDERFUL 8^O ) ___ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetpro

RE: [freenet-dev] Re: Don't upgrade to 6269

2003-10-23 Thread Costas Dokolas
> -Original Message- > From: Ian Clarke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 9:13 AM > To: Discussion of development issues > Subject: Re: [freenet-dev] Re: Don't upgrade to 6269 > > > Todd Walton wrote: > > You (Toad) and whoever few also agreed to this beforehand

[freenet-dev] Re: Project Manager Needed?

2003-10-23 Thread Martin Stone Davis
Martin Stone Davis wrote: digital ch wrote: Just an observation but it really seems like freenet needs a project manager.(I know... I know... along with more full time developers, servers, testers, etc) For instance the issues that just popped up with the new unstable. I was one of those peo