[freenet-dev] CPUID patch from FMS

On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 9:00 PM, Ian Clarke wrote: > On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 5:34 AM, Daniel Cheng > wrote: >> On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 11:35 PM, Ian Clarke wrote: >>> On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 6:29 AM, Matthew Toseland >>> wrote: As nextgens is worried about

[freenet-dev] Moving to java 1.5

On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 4:58 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > GCC 4.3 shipped in March, including the new ECJ frontend. It has full support > for all the new 1.5 language features. IMHO this means that there is no > longer any reason to stick to java 1.4. > > Comments? > ECJ is quite stable. Now,

[freenet-dev] New database for Freenet: db4o

On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 12:27 PM, Florent Daigni?re wrote: > * Matthew Toseland [2008-05-17 19:00:13]: > >> On Saturday 17 May 2008 00:29, Matthew Toseland wrote: >> > Ian and I have eventually come to the conclusion that we should include >> db4o, >> > and use it for our various persistence

[freenet-dev] CPUID patch from FMS

On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 11:35 PM, Ian Clarke wrote: > On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 6:29 AM, Matthew Toseland > wrote: >> As nextgens is worried about anonymous contributions, I thought he might want >> to review this before I apply it. > > You know, I wish you guys would at least try using that

[freenet-dev] New database for Freenet: db4o

I know I repeat myself, but if you consider db4o you should also consider perst as an option. Toad, can you do your 'disk full test' with perst to compare it against db4o? Perst and db4o seem to provide the same things. But according to http://www.garret.ru/~knizhnik/perstbench.html perst is much

[freenet-dev] New database for Freenet: db4o

I've got to say, I really hope Perst employ better software engineers than their web designers, because their website is awful. It somewhat shakes my confidence in them. I know this seems like a very superficial judgement, but if they put little care into the public face of their software, it is

[freenet-dev] CPUID patch from FMS

On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 5:34 AM, Daniel Cheng wrote: > On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 11:35 PM, Ian Clarke wrote: >> On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 6:29 AM, Matthew Toseland >> wrote: >>> As nextgens is worried about anonymous contributions, I thought he might >>> want >>> to

[freenet-dev] Moving to java 1.5

Hi, while ./freenet/ compiles with 1.4, you already need 1.5 for ./contrib/bdb (yes I know, nobody else want to recompile freenet-ext). // Sven-Ola Am Samstag 17 Mai 2008 22:58:02 schrieb Matthew Toseland: > GCC 4.3 shipped in March, including the new ECJ frontend. It has full > support for

[freenet-dev] New database for Freenet: db4o

convinced that we need a database... as our requirements are completely different from their typical use-cases... but well, your immediate concern is to store persistent requests to disk, right? What about using Hibernate or javax.persistence (from EE) to do that ? -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080518/d907c910/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] Combating bloat (was: Re: Post 0.7 idea: off-grid darknet!

ing all the 3rd party code we bundle is unrealistic. -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080518/9bf7ccf7/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] CPUID patch from FMS

(recent) processors. -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080518/98e6b78a/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] CPUID patch from FMS

scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080518/589871c3/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] Moving to java 1.5

On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 10:08 PM, Juiceman wrote: > On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Matthew Toseland > wrote: >> GCC 4.3 shipped in March, including the new ECJ frontend. It has full support >> for all the new 1.5 language features. IMHO this means that there is no >> longer any reason to stick

Re: [freenet-dev] CPUID patch from FMS

On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 11:35 PM, Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 6:29 AM, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As nextgens is worried about anonymous contributions, I thought he might want to review this before I apply it. You know, I wish you guys would at

Re: [freenet-dev] New database for Freenet: db4o

On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 12:27 PM, Florent Daignière [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-17 19:00:13]: On Saturday 17 May 2008 00:29, Matthew Toseland wrote: Ian and I have eventually come to the conclusion that we should include db4o, and use it for our

Re: [freenet-dev] Moving to java 1.5

On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 4:58 AM, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: GCC 4.3 shipped in March, including the new ECJ frontend. It has full support for all the new 1.5 language features. IMHO this means that there is no longer any reason to stick to java 1.4. Comments? ECJ is quite

Re: [freenet-dev] CPUID patch from FMS

On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 5:34 AM, Daniel Cheng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 11:35 PM, Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 6:29 AM, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As nextgens is worried about anonymous contributions, I thought he might

Re: [freenet-dev] CPUID patch from FMS

On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 9:00 PM, Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 5:34 AM, Daniel Cheng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 11:35 PM, Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 6:29 AM, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As

Re: [freenet-dev] New database for Freenet: db4o

I know I repeat myself, but if you consider db4o you should also consider perst as an option. Toad, can you do your 'disk full test' with perst to compare it against db4o? Perst and db4o seem to provide the same things. But according to http://www.garret.ru/~knizhnik/perstbench.html perst is much

Re: [freenet-dev] New database for Freenet: db4o

I've got to say, I really hope Perst employ better software engineers than their web designers, because their website is awful. It somewhat shakes my confidence in them. I know this seems like a very superficial judgement, but if they put little care into the public face of their software, it is