Re: [freenet-dev] Planning process Step #3

2016-05-26 Thread Ian Clarke
On Thu, May 26, 2016 8:26 PM, Steve Dougherty st...@asksteved.com wrote: On 05/26/2016 08:16 PM, Ian Clarke wrote: Many people have now contributed to the list of tasks, thank you all for your contributions. If you have not yet contributed, please do-so in the next day or two, after

Re: [freenet-dev] next step? was: Planning process step #1: Broad resource areas

2016-05-26 Thread Ian
I'll keep this as short as possible to focus on which seems to be the crux of the issue: On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 8:14 PM, Steve Dougherty wrote: > > This sounds good, and would work well if it was what happened. The mail > I responded to had a reasonable first paragraph discussing the idea at > h

Re: [freenet-dev] Planning process Step #3

2016-05-26 Thread Steve Dougherty
On 05/26/2016 08:16 PM, Ian Clarke wrote: > Many people have now contributed to the list of tasks, thank you all for > your > contributions. > If you have not yet contributed, please do-so in the next day or two, after > which I will curate the tasks and transfer them into a suitable form for > the

Re: [freenet-dev] next step? was: Planning process step #1: Broad resource areas

2016-05-26 Thread Steve Dougherty
On 05/26/2016 10:02 AM, Ian Clarke wrote: > On Thu, May 26, 2016 6:55 AM, Steve Dougherty st...@asksteved.com wrote: > I can understand if you're upset that Arne does not agree with you, but > I don't understand what you're doing here. Do you expect that if you > > berate Arne he will come around?

[freenet-dev] Planning process Step #3

2016-05-26 Thread Ian Clarke
Many people have now contributed to the list of tasks, thank you all for your contributions. If you have not yet contributed, please do-so in the next day or two, after which I will curate the tasks and transfer them into a suitable form for the next step, which will be effort estimation. Ian. Ian

Re: [freenet-dev] next step? was: Planning process step #1: Broad resource areas

2016-05-26 Thread Ian Clarke
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 9:12 AM, Florent Daigniere < nextg...@freenetproject.org> wrote: > > Btw, > > I also disagree with using google-docs; the reason being: it requires > registration to a 3rd party service whereas the alternatives (wiki or > piratepad) don't. > In that case you will be pleased

Re: [freenet-dev] next step? was: Planning process step #1: Broad resource areas

2016-05-26 Thread Florent Daigniere
On Thu, 2016-05-26 at 14:02 +, Ian Clarke wrote: > On Thu, May 26, 2016 6:55 AM, Steve Dougherty st...@asksteved.com > wrote: > I can understand if you're upset that Arne does not agree with you, > but > I don't understand what you're doing here. Do you expect that if you > > berate Arne he wi

Re: [freenet-dev] next step? was: Planning process step #1: Broad resource areas

2016-05-26 Thread Ian Clarke
On Thu, May 26, 2016 6:55 AM, Steve Dougherty st...@asksteved.com wrote: I can understand if you're upset that Arne does not agree with you, but I don't understand what you're doing here. Do you expect that if you berate Arne he will come around? I expect that we can have a discussion based on

Re: [freenet-dev] next step? was: Planning process step #1: Broad resource areas

2016-05-26 Thread Florent Daigniere
On Thu, 2016-05-26 at 07:55 -0400, Steve Dougherty wrote: > On 05/25/2016 08:49 PM, Ian Clarke wrote: > > > > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 6:44 PM, Arne Babenhauserheide > b.de> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Core technical reasons: > > > > > > - It excludes those of our users who assume (not unreaso

Re: [freenet-dev] next step? was: Planning process step #1: Broad resource areas

2016-05-26 Thread Steve Dougherty
On 05/25/2016 08:49 PM, Ian Clarke wrote: > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 6:44 PM, Arne Babenhauserheide > wrote: >> >> Core technical reasons: >> >> - It excludes those of our users who assume (not unreasonably) that >> Google might de-anonymize them. >> > > Is there any technical evidence that Goog