* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-08-15 14:58:32]:
On Thursday 14 August 2008 14:33, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: nextgens
Date: 2008-08-14 13:33:41 + (Thu, 14 Aug 2008)
New Revision: 21838
Modified:
* Ian Clarke [2008-08-14 14:01:25]:
> I've created a wiki page with my ideas, please flesh out/edit.
>
> http://wiki.freenetproject.org/WarningTextDraft
>
> Ian.
>
As I was explaining to toad on IRC it's not a matter of threat level but
threat model:
- is the presumed attacker
* Florent Daigni?re [2008-08-14 12:00:43]:
> Hi,
>
> I've just upgraded mantis to a new version... and ran into some
> encoding related problems doing it... hence the downtime.
>
> Everything should have been sorted out by now. Please
> double-check that everything
* Daniel Cheng [2008-08-14 09:47:48]:
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 4:57 AM, Michael Rogers
> wrote:
> > On Aug 12 2008, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> >> We can increase the cost significantly and thereby slow the attacker
> >> down. It's still possible, but it's no
Hi,
I've just upgraded mantis to a new version... and ran into some
encoding related problems doing it... hence the downtime.
Everything should have been sorted out by now. Please
double-check that everything works as expected and ensure that
any
Hi,
I am planning to get rid of some steps in the wizard; At the moment we
have the following:
private enum WIZARD_STEP {
WELCOME,
OPENNET,
NAME_SELECTION,
BANDWIDTH,
DATASTORE_SIZE,
MEMORY,
Hi,
I am planning to get rid of some steps in the wizard; At the moment we
have the following:
private enum WIZARD_STEP {
WELCOME,
OPENNET,
NAME_SELECTION,
BANDWIDTH,
DATASTORE_SIZE,
MEMORY,
Hi,
I've just upgraded mantis to a new version... and ran into some
encoding related problems doing it... hence the downtime.
Everything should have been sorted out by now. Please
double-check that everything works as expected and ensure that
any
* Daniel Cheng [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-08-14 09:47:48]:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 4:57 AM, Michael Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 12 2008, Matthew Toseland wrote:
We can increase the cost significantly and thereby slow the attacker
down. It's still possible, but it's no longer
* Florent Daignière [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-08-14 12:00:43]:
Hi,
I've just upgraded mantis to a new version... and ran into some
encoding related problems doing it... hence the downtime.
Everything should have been sorted out by now. Please
double-check
* Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-08-14 14:01:25]:
I've created a wiki page with my ideas, please flesh out/edit.
http://wiki.freenetproject.org/WarningTextDraft
Ian.
As I was explaining to toad on IRC it's not a matter of threat level but
threat model:
- is the presumed
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-08-08 19:54:32]:
On Friday 08 August 2008 18:06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: nextgens
Date: 2008-08-08 17:06:13 + (Fri, 08 Aug 2008)
New Revision: 21674
Modified:
trunk/freenet/src/freenet/clients/http/FProxyToadlet.java
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-08-14 23:12:24]:
On Thursday 14 August 2008 22:52, Florent Daignière wrote:
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-08-08 19:54:32]:
On Friday 08 August 2008 18:06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: nextgens
Date: 2008-08-08 17:06:13
* Dave Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-08-09 23:43:54]:
Hi,
I've just had to apply the attached patch to Freenet in order to be able
to connect to FProxy or the FCP server on a standard OS X box. I don't
suggest applying this patch: this is almost certainly not how it's meant
to work, but
* Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-08-14 18:42:57]:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 5:09 PM, Matthew Toseland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 14 August 2008 20:01, Ian Clarke wrote:
What do you think of my changes?
We strongly recommend that you only use Freenet in darknet mode [are we
* Daniel Cheng [2008-08-13 09:08:02]:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 11:50 PM, Florent Daigni?re
> wrote:
> > * Matthew Toseland [2008-08-12 14:47:30]:
> >
> >> We need better handling of this sort of option ... at the very least, the
> >> node
> >> should accept the
* Daniel Cheng [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-08-13 09:08:02]:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 11:50 PM, Florent Daignière
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-08-12 14:47:30]:
We need better handling of this sort of option ... at the very least, the
node
should
* Matthew Toseland [2008-08-12 15:14:49]:
> On Monday 11 August 2008 15:39, nextgens at freenetproject.org wrote:
> > Author: nextgens
> > Date: 2008-08-11 14:39:46 + (Mon, 11 Aug 2008)
> > New Revision: 21748
> >
> > Modified:
> >
* Matthew Toseland [2008-08-12 14:47:30]:
> We need better handling of this sort of option ... at the very least, the
> node
> should accept the change, write it to disk, and then tell the user that they
> need to restart their node, with a button to do so. There has been a bug
> filed for
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-08-12 14:47:30]:
We need better handling of this sort of option ... at the very least, the
node
should accept the change, write it to disk, and then tell the user that they
need to restart their node, with a button to do so. There has been a bug
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-08-12 15:14:49]:
On Monday 11 August 2008 15:39, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: nextgens
Date: 2008-08-11 14:39:46 + (Mon, 11 Aug 2008)
New Revision: 21748
Modified:
* Daniel Cheng [2008-08-11 23:07:43]:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 10:39 PM, wrote:
> > Author: nextgens
> > Date: 2008-08-11 14:39:46 + (Mon, 11 Aug 2008)
> > New Revision: 21748
> >
> > Modified:
> >
* Daniel Cheng [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-08-11 23:07:43]:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 10:39 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: nextgens
Date: 2008-08-11 14:39:46 + (Mon, 11 Aug 2008)
New Revision: 21748
Modified:
trunk/freenet/src/freenet/clients/http/FirstTimeWizardToadlet.java
* Matthew Toseland [2008-08-07 16:58:09]:
> On Wednesday 06 August 2008 09:31, Florent Daigni?re wrote:
> > * Matthew Toseland [2008-08-05 14:14:02]:
> >
> > > On Sunday 03 August 2008 10:16, Julien Cornuwel wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I just did a fresh install on Ubuntu 8.04 and I
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-08-07 16:58:09]:
On Wednesday 06 August 2008 09:31, Florent Daignière wrote:
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-08-05 14:14:02]:
On Sunday 03 August 2008 10:16, Julien Cornuwel wrote:
Hi,
I just did a fresh install on Ubuntu
* Matthew Toseland [2008-08-02 20:55:28]:
> On Saturday 02 August 2008 08:10, Florent Daigni?re wrote:
> > * Matthew Toseland [2008-08-02 01:48:29]:
> >
> > > On Friday 01 August 2008 20:40, Florent Daigni?re wrote:
> > > > * Matthew Toseland [2008-08-01 19:31:35]:
> > > >
> > > > > On
* Matthew Toseland [2008-08-06 16:36:20]:
> On Wednesday 06 August 2008 14:53, nextgens at freenetproject.org wrote:
> > Author: nextgens
> > Date: 2008-08-06 13:53:08 + (Wed, 06 Aug 2008)
> > New Revision: 21631
> >
> > Modified:
> >trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/PeerNode.java
> > Log:
* Matthew Toseland [2008-08-06 16:32:07]:
> On Wednesday 06 August 2008 16:07, Florent Daigni?re wrote:
> > * Matthew Toseland [2008-08-05 19:28:25]:
> >
> > > On Tuesday 22 July 2008 15:50, nextgens at freenetproject.org wrote:
> > > > Author: nextgens
> > > > Date: 2008-07-22 14:50:26 +
* Matthew Toseland [2008-08-05 19:28:25]:
> On Tuesday 22 July 2008 15:50, nextgens at freenetproject.org wrote:
> > Author: nextgens
> > Date: 2008-07-22 14:50:26 + (Tue, 22 Jul 2008)
> > New Revision: 21304
> >
> ...
> > Added: trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/SeedServerTestPeerNode.java
>
* Matthew Toseland [2008-08-05 14:14:02]:
> On Sunday 03 August 2008 10:16, Julien Cornuwel wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just did a fresh install on Ubuntu 8.04 and I noticed the following
> > problems :
> >
> > - No shotcurts are created on the Desktop or in the Menu.
>
> > Woops ! They appeared
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-08-05 14:14:02]:
On Sunday 03 August 2008 10:16, Julien Cornuwel wrote:
Hi,
I just did a fresh install on Ubuntu 8.04 and I noticed the following
problems :
- No shotcurts are created on the Desktop or in the Menu.
Woops ! They
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-08-05 19:28:25]:
On Tuesday 22 July 2008 15:50, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: nextgens
Date: 2008-07-22 14:50:26 + (Tue, 22 Jul 2008)
New Revision: 21304
...
Added: trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/SeedServerTestPeerNode.java
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-08-06 16:32:07]:
On Wednesday 06 August 2008 16:07, Florent Daignière wrote:
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-08-05 19:28:25]:
On Tuesday 22 July 2008 15:50, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: nextgens
Date: 2008-07-22 14:50:26
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-08-06 16:36:20]:
On Wednesday 06 August 2008 14:53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: nextgens
Date: 2008-08-06 13:53:08 + (Wed, 06 Aug 2008)
New Revision: 21631
Modified:
trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/PeerNode.java
Log:
bugfix
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-08-02 20:55:28]:
On Saturday 02 August 2008 08:10, Florent Daignière wrote:
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-08-02 01:48:29]:
On Friday 01 August 2008 20:40, Florent Daignière wrote:
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-08-01
* toad at freenetproject.org [2008-08-01 18:29:29]:
> Author: toad
> Date: 2008-08-01 18:29:28 + (Fri, 01 Aug 2008)
> New Revision: 21563
>
> Modified:
>trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/updater/UpdateOverMandatoryManager.java
> Log:
> Logging
>
> Modified:
>
* Matthew Toseland [2008-08-02 01:02:41]:
> On Wednesday 30 July 2008 00:02, nextgens at freenetproject.org wrote:
> > Author: nextgens
> > Date: 2008-07-29 23:02:45 + (Tue, 29 Jul 2008)
> > New Revision: 21497
> >
> > Modified:
> >
* Matthew Toseland [2008-08-02 02:10:35]:
> On Thursday 17 July 2008 18:04, nextgens at freenetproject.org wrote:
> > Author: nextgens
> > Date: 2008-07-17 17:04:05 + (Thu, 17 Jul 2008)
> > New Revision: 21173
> >
> > Modified:
> >trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/PeerManager.java
> >
* Matthew Toseland [2008-08-02 02:09:19]:
> On Saturday 19 July 2008 20:38, nextgens at freenetproject.org wrote:
> > Author: nextgens
> > Date: 2008-07-19 19:38:31 + (Sat, 19 Jul 2008)
> > New Revision: 21270
> >
> > Modified:
> >trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/KeyTracker.java
> > Log:
* Matthew Toseland [2008-08-02 01:49:28]:
> On Friday 01 August 2008 21:22, Florent Daigni?re wrote:
> > * Matthew Toseland [2008-07-31 23:08:40]:
> >
> > > On Thursday 31 July 2008 21:47, Florent Daigni?re wrote:
> > > > * Matthew Toseland [2008-07-31 20:46:26]:
> > > >
> > > > > Surely it
* Matthew Toseland [2008-08-02 01:48:29]:
> On Friday 01 August 2008 20:40, Florent Daigni?re wrote:
> > * Matthew Toseland [2008-08-01 19:31:35]:
> >
> > > On Tuesday 22 July 2008 17:52, nextgens at freenetproject.org wrote:
> > > > Author: nextgens
> > > > Date: 2008-07-22 16:52:25 +
* Matthew Toseland [2008-08-02 01:29:00]:
> On Friday 01 August 2008 21:45, nextgens at freenetproject.org wrote:
> > Author: nextgens
> > Date: 2008-08-01 20:45:14 + (Fri, 01 Aug 2008)
> > New Revision: 21569
> >
> > Modified:
> >trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/Node.java
> >
* Matthew Toseland [2008-08-02 02:09:14]:
> On Friday 18 July 2008 16:50, nextgens at freenetproject.org wrote:
> > Author: nextgens
> > Date: 2008-07-18 15:50:32 + (Fri, 18 Jul 2008)
> > New Revision: 21211
> >
> > Modified:
> >trunk/freenet/src/freenet/clients/http/StartupToadlet.java
* toad at freenetproject.org [2008-08-02 00:57:20]:
> Author: toad
> Date: 2008-08-02 00:57:20 + (Sat, 02 Aug 2008)
> New Revision: 21574
>
> Modified:
>trunk/apps/new_installer/res/unix/bin/setup.sh
> Log:
> More helpful error message
>
You should update trunk/apps/scripts/1run.sh
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-08-02 00:57:20]:
Author: toad
Date: 2008-08-02 00:57:20 + (Sat, 02 Aug 2008)
New Revision: 21574
Modified:
trunk/apps/new_installer/res/unix/bin/setup.sh
Log:
More helpful error message
You should update trunk/apps/scripts/1run.sh too
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-08-02 02:09:14]:
On Friday 18 July 2008 16:50, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: nextgens
Date: 2008-07-18 15:50:32 + (Fri, 18 Jul 2008)
New Revision: 21211
Modified:
trunk/freenet/src/freenet/clients/http/StartupToadlet.java
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-08-02 01:29:00]:
On Friday 01 August 2008 21:45, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: nextgens
Date: 2008-08-01 20:45:14 + (Fri, 01 Aug 2008)
New Revision: 21569
Modified:
trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/Node.java
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-08-02 01:49:28]:
On Friday 01 August 2008 21:22, Florent Daignière wrote:
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-07-31 23:08:40]:
On Thursday 31 July 2008 21:47, Florent Daignière wrote:
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-07-31
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-08-02 02:09:19]:
On Saturday 19 July 2008 20:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: nextgens
Date: 2008-07-19 19:38:31 + (Sat, 19 Jul 2008)
New Revision: 21270
Modified:
trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/KeyTracker.java
Log:
1.5ism:
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-08-02 02:10:35]:
On Thursday 17 July 2008 18:04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: nextgens
Date: 2008-07-17 17:04:05 + (Thu, 17 Jul 2008)
New Revision: 21173
Modified:
trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/PeerManager.java
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-08-02 01:02:41]:
On Wednesday 30 July 2008 00:02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: nextgens
Date: 2008-07-29 23:02:45 + (Tue, 29 Jul 2008)
New Revision: 21497
Modified:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-08-01 18:29:29]:
Author: toad
Date: 2008-08-01 18:29:28 + (Fri, 01 Aug 2008)
New Revision: 21563
Modified:
trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/updater/UpdateOverMandatoryManager.java
Log:
Logging
Modified:
* Matthew Toseland [2008-07-30 20:13:28]:
> This should really be passed in. We can pass in the fastWeakRandom too. We
> don't want one Yarrow per node in a simulator, and the DiffieHellman init
> should be global i.e. once only.
>
:@ top-posting
Have a look to current HEAD... We already
* Matthew Toseland [2008-07-31 23:08:40]:
> On Thursday 31 July 2008 21:47, Florent Daigni?re wrote:
> > * Matthew Toseland [2008-07-31 20:46:26]:
> >
> > > Surely it is less likely that openssl is available than md5sum??
> > >
> >
> > openssl is available by default on macos whereas openssl
* Matthew Toseland [2008-08-01 19:31:35]:
> On Tuesday 22 July 2008 17:52, nextgens at freenetproject.org wrote:
> > Author: nextgens
> > Date: 2008-07-22 16:52:25 + (Tue, 22 Jul 2008)
> > New Revision: 21320
> >
> > Modified:
> >trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/NodeDispatcher.java
> >
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-08-01 19:31:35]:
On Tuesday 22 July 2008 17:52, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: nextgens
Date: 2008-07-22 16:52:25 + (Tue, 22 Jul 2008)
New Revision: 21320
Modified:
trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/NodeDispatcher.java
Log:
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-07-31 23:08:40]:
On Thursday 31 July 2008 21:47, Florent Daignière wrote:
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-07-31 20:46:26]:
Surely it is less likely that openssl is available than md5sum??
openssl is available by default
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-07-30 20:13:28]:
This should really be passed in. We can pass in the fastWeakRandom too. We
don't want one Yarrow per node in a simulator, and the DiffieHellman init
should be global i.e. once only.
:@ top-posting
Have a look to current HEAD...
* Matthew Toseland [2008-07-31 19:51:44]:
> On Wednesday 02 July 2008 17:03, nextgens at freenetproject.org wrote:
> > Author: nextgens
> > Date: 2008-07-02 16:03:42 + (Wed, 02 Jul 2008)
> > New Revision: 20932
> >
> > Modified:
> >
* Matthew Toseland [2008-07-31 20:46:26]:
> Surely it is less likely that openssl is available than md5sum??
>
openssl is available by default on macos whereas openssl isn't... so far
we didn't get any complain.
> On Tuesday 01 July 2008 04:15, nextgens at freenetproject.org wrote:
> >
* Matthew Toseland [2008-07-31 20:00:34]:
> On Thursday 03 July 2008 04:56, nextgens at freenetproject.org wrote:
> > Author: nextgens
> > Date: 2008-07-03 03:56:01 + (Thu, 03 Jul 2008)
> > New Revision: 20947
> >
> > Added:
> >trunk/freenet/test/freenet/clients/
> >
* Matthew Toseland [2008-07-31 19:04:29]:
> On Sunday 29 June 2008 18:03, bombe at freenetproject.org wrote:
> > Author: bombe
> > Date: 2008-06-29 17:03:08 + (Sun, 29 Jun 2008)
> > New Revision: 20868
> >
> > Modified:
> >trunk/freenet/src/freenet/client/async/SingleFileInserter.java
>
* Matthew Toseland [2008-07-31 17:37:41]:
> On Tuesday 22 July 2008 23:33, Florent Daigni?re wrote:
> > * Robert Mead [2008-07-22 18:21:14]:
> >
> > > So it sounds like it will be about as secure as it currently is, but a
> > > lot more efficient. 5 to 3 is a big difference.
> >
> > ... On a
* Luke771 [2008-07-31 17:04:38]:
>
> Updated to r21509
>
commited in r21543
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
* Luke771 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-07-31 17:04:38]:
Updated to r21509
commited in r21543
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-07-31 17:37:41]:
On Tuesday 22 July 2008 23:33, Florent Daignière wrote:
* Robert Mead [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-07-22 18:21:14]:
So it sounds like it will be about as secure as it currently is, but a
lot more efficient. 5 to 3 is a big
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-07-31 19:04:29]:
On Sunday 29 June 2008 18:03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: bombe
Date: 2008-06-29 17:03:08 + (Sun, 29 Jun 2008)
New Revision: 20868
Modified:
trunk/freenet/src/freenet/client/async/SingleFileInserter.java
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-07-31 20:46:26]:
Surely it is less likely that openssl is available than md5sum??
openssl is available by default on macos whereas openssl isn't... so far
we didn't get any complain.
On Tuesday 01 July 2008 04:15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author:
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-07-31 19:51:44]:
On Wednesday 02 July 2008 17:03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: nextgens
Date: 2008-07-02 16:03:42 + (Wed, 02 Jul 2008)
New Revision: 20932
Modified:
* bo-le at web.de [2008-07-29 15:38:06]:
> Am Dienstag, 29. Juli 2008 14:34 schrieb Florent Daigni?re:
> > * saces at freenetproject.org [2008-07-27
> > 11:02:41]:
> > > Author: saces
> > > Date: 2008-07-27 11:02:41 + (Sun, 27 Jul 2008)
> > > New Revision: 21435
> > >
> > > Modified:
> > >
* saces at freenetproject.org [2008-07-27
11:02:41]:
> Author: saces
> Date: 2008-07-27 11:02:41 + (Sun, 27 Jul 2008)
> New Revision: 21435
>
> Modified:
>trunk/freenet/src/freenet/clients/http/FProxyToadlet.java
>trunk/freenet/src/freenet/clients/http/QueueToadlet.java
>
* Matthew Toseland [2008-07-28 23:51:10]:
> Could we possibly have a more helpful error message?
>
Well change it if you don't like it! It's a catchall test: we try to use
the Sha1Test class to download a file from the mirrors... and if that
fails we display this template.
As far as I know
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-07-27 11:02:41]:
Author: saces
Date: 2008-07-27 11:02:41 + (Sun, 27 Jul 2008)
New Revision: 21435
Modified:
trunk/freenet/src/freenet/clients/http/FProxyToadlet.java
trunk/freenet/src/freenet/clients/http/QueueToadlet.java
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-07-29 15:38:06]:
Am Dienstag, 29. Juli 2008 14:34 schrieb Florent Daignière:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-07-27 11:02:41]:
Author: saces
Date: 2008-07-27 11:02:41 + (Sun, 27 Jul 2008)
New Revision: 21435
Modified
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-07-28 23:51:10]:
Could we possibly have a more helpful error message?
Well change it if you don't like it! It's a catchall test: we try to use
the Sha1Test class to download a file from the mirrors... and if that
fails we display this template.
As
* Daniel Cheng [2008-07-27 21:38:48]:
> On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 3:55 PM, wrote:
> > Author: nextgens
> > Date: 2008-07-27 07:55:59 + (Sun, 27 Jul 2008)
> > New Revision: 21433
> >
> > Modified:
> > trunk/freenet/src/freenet/l10n/L10n.java
> > Log:
> > l10n:
* Daniel Cheng [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-07-27 21:38:48]:
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 3:55 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: nextgens
Date: 2008-07-27 07:55:59 + (Sun, 27 Jul 2008)
New Revision: 21433
Modified:
trunk/freenet/src/freenet/l10n/L10n.java
Log:
l10n: prevent a
* Luke771 [2008-07-26 00:21:11]:
>
> Re-translated the missing strings after revert caused by encoding problems
> Updated to r21399(reverted ITA l10n to r21145)
>
> The attached file has been sent without doing anything to it, not even opened
> it: as I'm not sure yet about how my new system
* Daniel Cheng [2008-07-25 13:54:49]:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 4:09 AM, wrote:
> > Author: nextgens
> > Date: 2008-07-23 20:09:00 + (Wed, 23 Jul 2008)
> > New Revision: 21351
> >
> [...]
> > Modified: trunk/apps/new_installer/res/unix/bin/install_stun.sh
> >
* Daniel Cheng [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-07-25 13:54:49]:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 4:09 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: nextgens
Date: 2008-07-23 20:09:00 + (Wed, 23 Jul 2008)
New Revision: 21351
[...]
Modified: trunk/apps/new_installer/res/unix/bin/install_stun.sh
* Luke771 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-07-26 00:21:11]:
Re-translated the missing strings after revert caused by encoding problems
Updated to r21399(reverted ITA l10n to r21145)
The attached file has been sent without doing anything to it, not even opened
it: as I'm not sure yet about how my
* Matthew Toseland [2008-07-22 23:38:12]:
> On Tuesday 22 July 2008 23:30, Florent Daigni?re wrote:
> > * Matthew Toseland [2008-07-22 23:23:17]:
> >
> > > On Tuesday 22 July 2008 22:48, Florent Daigni?re wrote:
> > > > * Ian Clarke [2008-07-22 16:11:22]:
> > > >
> > > > > I remain concerned
* Robert Mead [2008-07-22 18:21:14]:
> So it sounds like it will be about as secure as it currently is, but a
> lot more efficient. 5 to 3 is a big difference.
>
... On a small, ideal network.
NextGen$
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name:
* Matthew Toseland [2008-07-22 23:23:17]:
> On Tuesday 22 July 2008 22:48, Florent Daigni?re wrote:
> > * Ian Clarke [2008-07-22 16:11:22]:
> >
> > > I remain concerned about our installation process for 0.8. It is
> > > obviously critical that someone can get from visiting our website, to
>
* Michael Rogers [2008-07-22 22:38:12]:
> Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > Should we enable FOAF routing anyway, and if so, which mitigation measures
> > do
> > we need to implement first? Note that encrypted tunnels would not solve
> > this
> > problem, as they are impacted by it also (if we do
* Ian Clarke [2008-07-22 16:11:22]:
> I remain concerned about our installation process for 0.8. It is
> obviously critical that someone can get from visiting our website, to
> running and using Freenet, as easily as possible.
>
Do you have anything specific in mind?
Atm we have the
* Florent Daigni?re [2008-07-20 12:13:56]:
> * Matthew Toseland [2008-07-20 00:02:17]:
>
> > On Sunday 08 June 2008 13:00, nextgens at freenetproject.org wrote:
> > > Author: nextgens
> > > Date: 2008-06-08 12:00:22 + (Sun, 08 Jun 2008)
> > > New Revision: 20264
> > >
> > > Modified:
> >
* Caco Patane [2008-07-22 16:47:52]:
> Hi,
>
> Here are some updates for the spanish translation.
>
Commited in r21322, thanks :)
NextGen$
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc:
* Caco Patane [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-07-22 16:47:52]:
Hi,
Here are some updates for the spanish translation.
Commited in r21322, thanks :)
NextGen$
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
* Florent Daignière [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-07-20 12:13:56]:
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-07-20 00:02:17]:
On Sunday 08 June 2008 13:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: nextgens
Date: 2008-06-08 12:00:22 + (Sun, 08 Jun 2008)
New Revision: 20264
Modified
* Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-07-22 16:11:22]:
I remain concerned about our installation process for 0.8. It is
obviously critical that someone can get from visiting our website, to
running and using Freenet, as easily as possible.
Do you have anything specific in mind?
Atm we have
* Michael Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-07-22 22:38:12]:
Matthew Toseland wrote:
Should we enable FOAF routing anyway, and if so, which mitigation measures
do
we need to implement first? Note that encrypted tunnels would not solve
this
problem, as they are impacted by it also (if
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-07-22 23:23:17]:
On Tuesday 22 July 2008 22:48, Florent Daignière wrote:
* Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-07-22 16:11:22]:
I remain concerned about our installation process for 0.8. It is
obviously critical that someone can get from
* Robert Mead [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-07-22 18:21:14]:
So it sounds like it will be about as secure as it currently is, but a
lot more efficient. 5 to 3 is a big difference.
... On a small, ideal network.
NextGen$
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-07-22 23:38:12]:
On Tuesday 22 July 2008 23:30, Florent Daignière wrote:
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-07-22 23:23:17]:
On Tuesday 22 July 2008 22:48, Florent Daignière wrote:
* Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-07-22 16:11:22
Freenet 0.7 build 1154 is now available, please upgrade.
As you will see it's mostly a bugfix release; The detailed changelog is
available at http://cia.vc/stats/project/Freenet/.message/aca746
Please continue to report bugs on the bug tracker, or by other means.
Thank you.
-- next
* Matthew Toseland [2008-07-20 00:02:17]:
> On Sunday 08 June 2008 13:00, nextgens at freenetproject.org wrote:
> > Author: nextgens
> > Date: 2008-06-08 12:00:22 + (Sun, 08 Jun 2008)
> > New Revision: 20264
> >
> > Modified:
> >
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-07-20 00:02:17]:
On Sunday 08 June 2008 13:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: nextgens
Date: 2008-06-08 12:00:22 + (Sun, 08 Jun 2008)
New Revision: 20264
Modified:
Freenet 0.7 build 1154 is now available, please upgrade.
As you will see it's mostly a bugfix release; The detailed changelog is
available at http://cia.vc/stats/project/Freenet/.message/aca746
Please continue to report bugs on the bug tracker, or by other means.
Thank you.
signature.asc
* Michael Rogers [2008-07-19 11:45:17]:
> Matthew Toseland wrote:
> >> Atm the only limit is the size of the field in the DMT message. We allow
> >> a ShortBuffer which is 32kB... A double is 8 bytes meaning that the bad
> >> guy can advertise 4000 locations.
> >
> > This leaves two possible
301 - 400 of 1326 matches
Mail list logo