* Matthew Toseland [2008-03-17 16:45:43]:
> How hard would it be to run Freenet as the user that installed it?
>
Not hard... but as explained on IRC it's not an option because the user
is unlikely to have the SeServiceLogonRight ... and we don't want to
give him for obvious security reasons.
* Robert Hailey [2008-03-17 15:11:38]:
>
> On Mar 17, 2008, at 11:45 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
>
> > How hard would it be to run Freenet as the user that installed it?
>
> Or maybe there is a flag to make a user not login-able?
> --
> Robert Hailey
Why would you want the freenet user to
* Victor Denisov [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-18 14:59:50]:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
| I think that installer should at least ask if a dedicated user should be
| created, and an option to use an existing account. I have... what... 4
| freenet users now on my system
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-18 18:12:39]:
On Sunday 16 March 2008 12:14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: nextgens
Date: 2008-03-16 12:14:56 + (Sun, 16 Mar 2008)
New Revision: 18552
Added:
trunk/apps/new_installer/res/firefox_profile/chrome/
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-18 18:15:42]:
The below has a hardcoded http://127.0.0.1:/ - does that mean it won't
work if fproxy is on another port?
Top-posting sucks.
No, we mangle the file in install_wrapper.cmd latter on when we have
chosen which port we will use.
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-18 18:10:54]:
On Sunday 16 March 2008 10:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: nextgens
Date: 2008-03-16 10:29:28 + (Sun, 16 Mar 2008)
New Revision: 18550
Added:
trunk/apps/new_installer/res/firefox_profile/extensions.rdf
Log:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-19 00:15:58]:
Hi,
I'm a french student of computer science at ENSIMAG[1]. I am looking for
your feeling
on my proposal for working in your organization as part of the Google
Summer of Code.
I have been using the Freenet software for
* Robert Hailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-17 15:11:38]:
On Mar 17, 2008, at 11:45 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
How hard would it be to run Freenet as the user that installed it?
Or maybe there is a flag to make a user not login-able?
--
Robert Hailey
Why would you want the freenet
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-17 16:45:43]:
How hard would it be to run Freenet as the user that installed it?
Not hard... but as explained on IRC it's not an option because the user
is unlikely to have the SeServiceLogonRight ... and we don't want to
give him for obvious
* Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-17 14:31:19]:
If it is standard practice for services to run as SYSTEM then we
should probably do that too. We don't need to be spending our time
and energy reinventing how to install software on Windows.
Ian.
That was my original view too but toad
* Victor Denisov [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-17 22:59:50]:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
| If it is standard practice for services to run as SYSTEM then we
| should probably do that too. We don't need to be spending our time
| and energy reinventing how to install software
* Matthew Toseland [2008-03-15 23:04:25]:
> Is there any way we can verify that the theme doesn't do anything evil?
Sure, I did it.
> How do you unpack the .xpi's?
file -s
new_installer/res/firefox_profile/extensions/\{8e12f188-352c-4476-8198-e9b8f4a4353a\}/chrome/tmp.xpi
* Matthew Toseland [2008-03-14 18:35:37]:
> We should bundle a custom theme of some kind. Martin Nyhus posted one on
> devl... it is important that it be obvious to a user that this is NOT their
> normal browser.
Yay, I can smell from here that now we are going to argue about the
choice of
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-15 23:04:25]:
Is there any way we can verify that the theme doesn't do anything evil?
Sure, I did it.
How do you unpack the .xpi's?
file -s
new_installer/res/firefox_profile/extensions/\{8e12f188-352c-4476-8198-e9b8f4a4353a\}/chrome/tmp.xpi
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-14 18:35:37]:
We should bundle a custom theme of some kind. Martin Nyhus posted one on
devl... it is important that it be obvious to a user that this is NOT their
normal browser.
Yay, I can smell from here that now we are going to argue about
* Matthew Toseland [2008-03-13 13:56:08]:
> Do we automatically configure the ports for thingamablog in the installer?
>
No, we don't do that atm. Send a patch :p
> On Wednesday 12 March 2008 05:37, dieppe at freenetproject.org wrote:
> > Author: dieppe
> > Date: 2008-03-12 05:37:32 +
* Sven-Ola Tuecke [2008-03-12 14:52:33]:
> NextGen$,
>
> ok - I'll explain hunk by hunk.
>
> Hunk1: You can apply this one or correct the bdb version in your repo.
> Examples and unittest subdirs are simply missined from freenet CVS copy
> of bdb.
Missing parts are easy to filter out of a
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-13 13:56:08]:
Do we automatically configure the ports for thingamablog in the installer?
No, we don't do that atm. Send a patch :p
On Wednesday 12 March 2008 05:37, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: dieppe
Date: 2008-03-12 05:37:32 +
* Matthew Toseland [2008-03-12 13:00:34]:
> On Wednesday 12 March 2008 07:30, Sven-Ola T?cke wrote:
> > Yep - I mixed up SVN and CVS. The ext-jar file name still have a cvs
> component
> > and both systems are too similar. Currently, my favorite is mercurial,
> > since
> > it fits better to
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-12 13:00:34]:
On Wednesday 12 March 2008 07:30, Sven-Ola Tücke wrote:
Yep - I mixed up SVN and CVS. The ext-jar file name still have a cvs
component
and both systems are too similar. Currently, my favorite is mercurial,
since
it fits
* Sven-Ola Tuecke [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-12 14:52:33]:
NextGen$,
ok - I'll explain hunk by hunk.
Hunk1: You can apply this one or correct the bdb version in your repo.
Examples and unittest subdirs are simply missined from freenet CVS copy
of bdb.
Missing parts are easy to filter
* Matthew Toseland [2008-03-10 17:09:33]:
> On Monday 10 March 2008 14:20, NextGen$ wrote:
> > * Matthew Toseland [2008-03-10 13:57:28]:
> >
> > > On Saturday 08 March 2008 14:30, Michael Rogers wrote:
> > > > Evan Daniel wrote:
> > > > > At least for the near term future, and probably longer,
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-10 17:09:33]:
On Monday 10 March 2008 14:20, NextGen$ wrote:
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-10 13:57:28]:
On Saturday 08 March 2008 14:30, Michael Rogers wrote:
Evan Daniel wrote:
At least for the near term future, and
* toad at freenetproject.org [2008-03-07 22:42:50]:
> Author: toad
> Date: 2008-03-07 22:42:50 + (Fri, 07 Mar 2008)
> New Revision: 18422
>
> Modified:
>trunk/freenet/src/freenet/clients/http/staticfiles/defaultbookmarks.dat
> Log:
> Add the dynamic version of the Activelink Index at
* Matthew Toseland [2008-03-06 23:02:33]:
> On Thursday 06 March 2008 16:19, nextgens at freenetproject.org wrote:
> > Author: nextgens
> > Date: 2008-03-06 16:19:22 + (Thu, 06 Mar 2008)
> > New Revision: 18398
> >
> > Modified:
> >
* Colin Davis [2008-03-06 20:52:34]:
> If you want to avoid a distinct fingerprint, you could advocate
> installing http://fasterfox.mozdev.org/
> Granted, it's not the kindest software on external servers, but it's in
> common use, and would set the connections much higher.
>
>>
>> As far
* Matthew Toseland [2008-03-06 22:39:35]:
> On Thursday 06 March 2008 21:17, Colin Davis wrote:
> >
> > > Not a bad idea, although it's an additional 6MB download, and one more
> thing
> > > to update (does it auto-update?). And it's windows specific: what would
> > > we
> do
> > > on
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-07 11:31:23]:
On Friday 07 March 2008 02:37, Florent Daignière wrote:
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-06 23:02:33]:
On Thursday 06 March 2008 16:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: nextgens
Date: 2008-03-06 16:19:22
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-07 22:42:50]:
Author: toad
Date: 2008-03-07 22:42:50 + (Fri, 07 Mar 2008)
New Revision: 18422
Modified:
trunk/freenet/src/freenet/clients/http/staticfiles/defaultbookmarks.dat
Log:
Add the dynamic version of the Activelink Index at
* Ian Clarke [2008-03-06 07:52:42]:
> Simple fix for the safari problem: don't include active links in the
> front page...
>
> This can be done by checking the user agent string.
>
> Ian.
In fact I have reintroduced active-links on the front-page because users
weren't clicking on bookmarks...
* Colin Davis [2008-03-05 17:13:22]:
> As a ignorant user, I think that's as a general principal, Freenet
> should try to be as browser agnostic as possible..
>
> 1) Firefox may not be the dominant browser down the line- Freenet
> shouldn't constantly chase the tale of different browsers.
>
* Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-06 07:52:42]:
Simple fix for the safari problem: don't include active links in the
front page...
This can be done by checking the user agent string.
Ian.
In fact I have reintroduced active-links on the front-page because users
weren't clicking on
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-06 22:39:35]:
On Thursday 06 March 2008 21:17, Colin Davis wrote:
Not a bad idea, although it's an additional 6MB download, and one more
thing
to update (does it auto-update?). And it's windows specific: what would
we
do
on
* Colin Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-06 20:52:34]:
If you want to avoid a distinct fingerprint, you could advocate
installing http://fasterfox.mozdev.org/
Granted, it's not the kindest software on external servers, but it's in
common use, and would set the connections much higher.
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-06 23:02:33]:
On Thursday 06 March 2008 16:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: nextgens
Date: 2008-03-06 16:19:22 + (Thu, 06 Mar 2008)
New Revision: 18398
Modified:
trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/updater/NodeUpdateManager.java
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-06 23:07:04]:
I thought the benchmarks showed that loading the library was unhelpful?
I went to bed before fixing it, that's all :)
See r18408
On Thursday 06 March 2008 15:31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: nextgens
Date: 2008-03-06
* Matthew Toseland [2008-03-05 11:05:30]:
> You won't have a native FEC library, so decoding downloads will be *really*
> slow.
Why won't he have one ? He can probably manage to compile NativeFec on
his own.
>
> On Wednesday 05 March 2008 09:04, Sven-Ola T?cke wrote:
> > Jep. Got it up and
freenet07-mips.patchpatches for installer
freenet07-mips.tgz prepared installer for mips
readme-freenet.txt some notes
// Sven-Ola
Am Dienstag 04 März 2008 13:06:23 schrieb Florent Daignière:
[tofu removed]
It requires 1.5 to compile but 1.4 is enough
* Colin Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-05 17:13:22]:
As a ignorant user, I think that's as a general principal, Freenet
should try to be as browser agnostic as possible..
1) Firefox may not be the dominant browser down the line- Freenet
shouldn't constantly chase the tale of different
* Matthew Toseland [2008-03-04 09:57:50]:
> On Tuesday 04 March 2008 08:20, Florent Daigni?re wrote:
> > * Sven-Ola T?cke [2008-03-04 08:10:27]:
> >
> > > Florent,
> > >
> > > thanks for the pointer - next time I'll try to search harder first .
> If
> > > you're interested: I've placed my
* Sven-Ola Tuecke [2008-03-04 11:02:20]:
> Ooops - you shouldn't commit too early, since I'm not done yet. You don't
> want half-baken things in your repo. I will feed back if I'm up and
> running...
>
> // Sven-Ola
>
Your changes were sensible anyway, hence I've commited them :)
NextGen$
* Sven-Ola T?cke [2008-03-04 08:10:27]:
> Florent,
>
> thanks for the pointer - next time I'll try to search harder first . If
> you're interested: I've placed my W.I.P (readme, current binaries) on our
> download server. Second link points you to "screenshots" (2 pics on the
> bottom of
* Sven-Ola T?cke [2008-03-03 23:34:01]:
> Hey devs,
>
> I still want to build a freenet client for embedded devices (my target:
> mips).
> Can you please give me a pointer where to grab missing sources.
svn co http://freenet.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/freenet/src/freenet/support/io/
java
>
* Sven-Ola Tücke [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-04 08:10:27]:
Florent,
thanks for the pointer - next time I'll try to search harder first ggg. If
you're interested: I've placed my W.I.P (readme, current binaries) on our
download server. Second link points you to screenshots (2 pics on the
* Sven-Ola Tuecke [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-04 11:02:20]:
Ooops - you shouldn't commit too early, since I'm not done yet. You don't
want half-baken things in your repo. I will feed back if I'm up and
running...
// Sven-Ola
Your changes were sensible anyway, hence I've commited them :)
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-04 09:57:50]:
On Tuesday 04 March 2008 08:20, Florent Daignière wrote:
* Sven-Ola Tücke [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-04 08:10:27]:
Florent,
thanks for the pointer - next time I'll try to search harder first ggg.
If
you're
* Sven-Ola Tücke [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-03-03 23:34:01]:
Hey devs,
I still want to build a freenet client for embedded devices (my target:
mips).
Can you please give me a pointer where to grab missing sources.
svn co
* Matthew Toseland [2008-02-29 11:43:03]:
> Ian has stated that Frost is a separate project, and we should not wait for a
> usable FMS. (Background: Frost has been severely DoS'ed recently due to being
> based on KSK queues, and FMS is the answer). Right now we are not actually
> being
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-02-29 11:43:03]:
Ian has stated that Frost is a separate project, and we should not wait for a
usable FMS. (Background: Frost has been severely DoS'ed recently due to being
based on KSK queues, and FMS is the answer). Right now we are not actually
* Matthew Toseland [2008-02-28 12:24:12]:
> Nextgens wants to be a student this year. I've been approached by somebody
> wanting to work on searching (jai_menon).
>
It depends on what I will be doing this summer in fact :) I'm currently
looking for an internship and taking part into gSoC
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-02-28 10:55:14]:
On Thursday 28 February 2008 01:05, Florent Daignière wrote:
Of course, really we should have a browser plugin. The number of parallel
connections we recommend users allow will be easily detectable by a
hostile-to-freenet
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-02-28 12:24:12]:
Nextgens wants to be a student this year. I've been approached by somebody
wanting to work on searching (jai_menon).
It depends on what I will be doing this summer in fact :) I'm currently
looking for an internship and taking part
* Ian Clarke [2008-02-26 22:21:47]:
> I think this is Safari's fault. What I don't understand is why Safari
> would do this. I don't think it is due to threading issues in
> Freenet.
>
> Ian.
It's probably not related indeed... But I'm still interrested by the
result given by the new jars :)
* Matthew Toseland [2008-02-26 15:30:40]:
> On Monday 25 February 2008 21:21, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > Here we go, this is on a MacBook Pro running OSX 10.5.
>
> Hmmm, both this and robert's runs show a very slight reduction in the amount
> of CPU that a lower priority thread gets, but nowhere
* Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-02-26 22:21:47]:
I think this is Safari's fault. What I don't understand is why Safari
would do this. I don't think it is due to threading issues in
Freenet.
Ian.
It's probably not related indeed... But I'm still interrested by the
result given by the
* Florent Daigni?re [2008-02-25 01:55:44]:
> * Ian Clarke [2008-02-24 10:29:08]:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 10:19 PM, Florent Daigni?re <
> > nextgens at freenetproject.org> wrote:
> >
> > > * Ian Clarke [2008-02-22 18:07:35]:
> > >
> > > > Just upgraded to the current testing snapshot
* Ian Clarke [2008-02-24 10:29:08]:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 10:19 PM, Florent Daigni?re <
> nextgens at freenetproject.org> wrote:
>
> > * Ian Clarke [2008-02-22 18:07:35]:
> >
> > > Just upgraded to the current testing snapshot (sh update.sh testing),
> > and I
> > > am still finding that
* Florent Daigni?re [2008-02-24 03:36:41]:
> Hi,
>
> Just a small email to let you know that emu is going to be unreachable
> for the next few hours... Everything should be back online in four
> hours from now.
>
> Apologizes for the late notice.
>
> NextGen$
Maintainance is done, everything
Hi,
Just a small email to let you know that emu is going to be unreachable
for the next few hours... Everything should be back online in four
hours from now.
Apologizes for the late notice.
NextGen$
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name:
* Florent Daignière [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-02-24 03:36:41]:
Hi,
Just a small email to let you know that emu is going to be unreachable
for the next few hours... Everything should be back online in four
hours from now.
Apologizes for the late notice.
NextGen$
Maintainance is done
* Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-02-24 10:29:08]:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 10:19 PM, Florent Daignière
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-02-22 18:07:35]:
Just upgraded to the current testing snapshot (sh update.sh testing),
and I
am still finding
* Ian Clarke [2008-02-22 18:07:35]:
> Just upgraded to the current testing snapshot (sh update.sh testing), and I
> am still finding that it takes a rediculous amount of time for FProxy to
> show up the first time (my browser has now been hanging for well over a
> minute).
Here the
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-02-22 13:16:04]:
Please key this on HAS_ENOUGH_NICE_LEVELS not HAS_PLENTY_NICE_LEVELS. IMHO we
don't need 10; I've only used 5. Also I suggest you mention explicitly how to
solve the problem: set PRIORITY to 15 or less.
Done in r18123.
Hi,
Just a small email to let you know that emu is going to be unreachable
for the next few hours... Everything should be back online in four
hours from now.
Apologizes for the late notice.
NextGen$
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
* Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-02-22 18:07:35]:
Just upgraded to the current testing snapshot (sh update.sh testing), and I
am still finding that it takes a rediculous amount of time for FProxy to
show up the first time (my browser has now been hanging for well over a
minute).
Here the
* Matthew Toseland [2008-02-08 23:34:52]:
> On Linux, during CPU intensive node activities - resuming requests, decoding
> or encoding a large splitfile etc - the threads that do the core of Freenet's
> work (the packet sender and packet receiver threads, request senders etc),
> get starved
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-02-08 23:34:52]:
On Linux, during CPU intensive node activities - resuming requests, decoding
or encoding a large splitfile etc - the threads that do the core of Freenet's
work (the packet sender and packet receiver threads, request senders etc),
* Matthew Toseland [2008-02-16 23:45:00]:
> That will break the build for non-devs. Does it matter?
No it doesn't. It's not like if freenet-ext was cleanly buildable
anywhere but on emu ;)
>
> On Friday 15 February 2008 04:39, nextgens at freenetproject.org wrote:
> > Author: nextgens
> >
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-02-16 23:45:00]:
That will break the build for non-devs. Does it matter?
No it doesn't. It's not like if freenet-ext was cleanly buildable
anywhere but on emu ;)
On Friday 15 February 2008 04:39, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: nextgens
Date:
* Matthew Toseland [2008-02-08 13:58:34]:
> Do you want >>> instead of >> ? Google for java bitwise operators...
>
In fact java.util.zip.CRC32 does the same job... I've deleted the class
and apologize for having attempted to re-invent the wheel.
> On Friday 08 February 2008 11:09, nextgens at
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-02-08 13:58:34]:
Do you want instead of ? Google for java bitwise operators...
In fact java.util.zip.CRC32 does the same job... I've deleted the class
and apologize for having attempted to re-invent the wheel.
On Friday 08 February 2008 11:09,
* Matthew Toseland [2008-02-05 11:03:29]:
> NewPacketFormat assumes that we can generate as many keys as we want from JFK
> securely. Is this true? JFK uses an HMAC with 0, 1, or 2, to generate the
> session key or the 2 internal keys it uses, but does not explicitly document
> the option to
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-02-05 11:03:29]:
NewPacketFormat assumes that we can generate as many keys as we want from JFK
securely. Is this true? JFK uses an HMAC with 0, 1, or 2, to generate the
session key or the 2 internal keys it uses, but does not explicitly document
* Matthew Toseland [2008-02-04 12:42:16]:
> Something I noticed this month's Linux Magazine. We've been looking for a
> good
> DVCS for a while: What about Bazaar?
> - Publishes to static content, so should be easy to adapt for Freenet.
> (Hopefully - USK versioning wouldn't be a problem for
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-02-04 12:42:16]:
Something I noticed this month's Linux Magazine. We've been looking for a
good
DVCS for a while: What about Bazaar?
- Publishes to static content, so should be easy to adapt for Freenet.
(Hopefully - USK versioning wouldn't be a
* Matthew Toseland [2008-01-28 14:18:15]:
> On Sunday 27 January 2008 13:59, nextgens at freenetproject.org wrote:
> > Author: nextgens
> > Date: 2008-01-27 13:59:36 + (Sun, 27 Jan 2008)
> > New Revision: 17321
> >
> > Modified:
> >trunk/freenet/src/freenet/crypt/DSA.java
> > Log:
> >
* Matthew Toseland [2008-01-28 14:13:40]:
> On Sunday 27 January 2008 13:40, nextgens at freenetproject.org wrote:
> > Author: nextgens
> > Date: 2008-01-27 13:40:56 + (Sun, 27 Jan 2008)
> > New Revision: 17318
> >
> > Modified:
> >trunk/freenet/src/freenet/crypt/DSAPrivateKey.java
> >
* Matthew Toseland [2008-01-28 14:22:27]:
> AFAICS this is unnecessary - msg will only be null if the queue is empty.
Yes, I've done the proper fix in 17326 and reverted it in r17402
>
> On Sunday 27 January 2008 19:49, nextgens at freenetproject.org wrote:
> > Author: nextgens
> > Date:
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-01-28 14:18:15]:
On Sunday 27 January 2008 13:59, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: nextgens
Date: 2008-01-27 13:59:36 + (Sun, 27 Jan 2008)
New Revision: 17321
Modified:
trunk/freenet/src/freenet/crypt/DSA.java
Log:
doh2
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-01-28 14:22:27]:
AFAICS this is unnecessary - msg will only be null if the queue is empty.
Yes, I've done the proper fix in 17326 and reverted it in r17402
On Sunday 27 January 2008 19:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: nextgens
Date:
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-01-28 14:13:40]:
On Sunday 27 January 2008 13:40, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: nextgens
Date: 2008-01-27 13:40:56 + (Sun, 27 Jan 2008)
New Revision: 17318
Modified:
trunk/freenet/src/freenet/crypt/DSAPrivateKey.java
Log:
doh!
* zothar at freenetproject.org [2008-01-28
00:11:08]:
> Author: zothar
> Date: 2008-01-28 00:11:08 + (Mon, 28 Jan 2008)
> New Revision: 17335
>
> Modified:
>trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/NodeIPDetector.java
> Log:
> When the previously configured ipAddressOverride value has an invalid
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-01-28 00:11:08]:
Author: zothar
Date: 2008-01-28 00:11:08 + (Mon, 28 Jan 2008)
New Revision: 17335
Modified:
trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/NodeIPDetector.java
Log:
When the previously configured ipAddressOverride value has an invalid
* Matthew Toseland [2008-01-25 19:46:52]:
> Any comments? It's a fair chunk of code but it would avoid the need to
> include
> sun.* private classes which currently prevent the node from being built on
> GCJ, while still having the ability to create SSL certificates for encrypted
>
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-01-25 19:46:52]:
Any comments? It's a fair chunk of code but it would avoid the need to
include
sun.* private classes which currently prevent the node from being built on
GCJ, while still having the ability to create SSL certificates for encrypted
* Matthew Toseland [2008-01-23 17:05:15]:
> It amazes me that we have any users at all on non-Windows, given that we
> don't
> ship a "start freenet" icon.
The solution to that problem is known... if it bothers you so much go
ahead and implement it.
NextGen$
Content-Description: "Luigi
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-01-23 17:05:15]:
It amazes me that we have any users at all on non-Windows, given that we
don't
ship a start freenet icon.
The solution to that problem is known... if it bothers you so much go
ahead and implement it.
NextGen$
* Julien Cornuwel [2008-01-20 15:35:51]:
Commited in r17176, thanks
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
* Julien Cornuwel [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-01-20 15:35:51]:
Commited in r17176, thanks
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Devl mailing list
Devl@freenetproject.org
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
* Matthew Toseland [2008-01-15 19:57:47]:
Ok, let's chime in as noone else does...
I won't comment on time-requirement evaluated by toad: only on the
priority ranking.
> [0] Enough seednodes to survive a MAJOR slashdotting. That probably means
> some
> form of auto-harvesting. (1-3 weeks)
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-01-15 19:57:47]:
Ok, let's chime in as noone else does...
I won't comment on time-requirement evaluated by toad: only on the
priority ranking.
[0] Enough seednodes to survive a MAJOR slashdotting. That probably means
some
form of auto-harvesting.
* Matthew Toseland [2008-01-11 19:37:19]:
> On Sunday 06 January 2008 13:08, you wrote:
> > Author: nextgens
> > Date: 2008-01-06 13:08:43 + (Sun, 06 Jan 2008)
> > New Revision: 16940
> >
> > Modified:
> >trunk/freenet/src/freenet/l10n/freenet.l10n.de.properties
> >
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-01-11 19:37:19]:
On Sunday 06 January 2008 13:08, you wrote:
Author: nextgens
Date: 2008-01-06 13:08:43 + (Sun, 06 Jan 2008)
New Revision: 16940
Modified:
trunk/freenet/src/freenet/l10n/freenet.l10n.de.properties
* zothar at freenetproject.org [2008-01-06
18:10:45]:
> Author: zothar
> Date: 2008-01-06 18:10:45 + (Sun, 06 Jan 2008)
> New Revision: 16942
>
> Modified:
>trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/Node.java
> Log:
> Refactor N2NTM dependence on the peer being a darknet peer
>
> Modified:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-01-06 18:10:45]:
Author: zothar
Date: 2008-01-06 18:10:45 + (Sun, 06 Jan 2008)
New Revision: 16942
Modified:
trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/Node.java
Log:
Refactor N2NTM dependence on the peer being a darknet peer
Modified:
* Matthew Toseland [2008-01-03 16:49:45]:
> On Thursday 03 January 2008 16:15, nextgens at freenetproject.org wrote:
> > Author: nextgens
> > Date: 2008-01-03 16:15:23 + (Thu, 03 Jan 2008)
> > New Revision: 16856
> >
> > Modified:
> >
* Matthew Toseland [2008-01-03 15:25:55]:
> On Saturday 29 December 2007 13:34, nextgens at freenetproject.org wrote:
> > Author: nextgens
> > Date: 2007-12-29 13:34:33 + (Sat, 29 Dec 2007)
> > New Revision: 16839
> >
> > Modified:
> >trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/FNPPacketMangler.java
* David Sowder [2008-01-03 07:52:44]:
> Florent Daigni?re wrote:
>> * David Sowder [2008-01-03 07:36:39]:
>>
>>
>>> Florent Daigni?re wrote:
>>>
* Robert Hailey [2008-01-02 18:23:28]:
>
> On Jan 2, 2008, at 12:30 PM, David Sowder wrote:
>
* David Sowder [2008-01-03 07:36:39]:
> Florent Daigni?re wrote:
>> * Robert Hailey [2008-01-02 18:23:28]:
>>
>>
>>> On Jan 2, 2008, at 3:44 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
>>>
>>>
On Wednesday 02 January 2008 17:22, Robert Hailey wrote:
> On Dec 29, 2007, at 5:39 AM,
* Robert Hailey [2008-01-02 18:23:28]:
>
> On Jan 2, 2008, at 3:44 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday 02 January 2008 17:22, Robert Hailey wrote:
> >>
> >> On Dec 29, 2007, at 5:39 AM, Florent Daigni?re wrote:
> >>
> > synchronized void updateShouldDisconnectNow() {
>
701 - 800 of 1326 matches
Mail list logo
