On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 2:40 PM, xor wrote:
> If you want to get changelogs of the new builds, bookmark that USK:
> USK at
> BFa1voWr5PunINSZ5BGMqFwhkJTiDBBUrOZ0MYBXseg,BOrxeLzUMb6R9tEZzexymY0zyKAmBNvrU4A9Q0tAqu0,AQACAAE/fullchangelog/1283
Thank you, I didn't know about that. I do read what
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 11:55 PM, Volodya
wrote:
> Freenet is in active development.
The good old standby argument.
> Stability is good, but would you rather have a buggy insecure node?
So, Freenet is buggy and insecure? I understood that it was caveat
emptor, but being so buggy and insecure
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 11:55 PM, Volodya volo...@whengendarmesleeps.org wrote:
Freenet is in active development.
The good old standby argument.
Stability is good, but would you rather have a buggy insecure node?
So, Freenet is buggy and insecure? I understood that it was caveat
emptor, but
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 2:40 PM, xor x...@gmx.li wrote:
If you want to get changelogs of the new builds, bookmark that USK:
u...@bfa1vowr5puninsz5bgmqfwhkjtidbburoz0mybxseg,BOrxeLzUMb6R9tEZzexymY0zyKAmBNvrU4A9Q0tAqu0,AQACAAE/fullchangelog/1283
Thank you, I didn't know about that. I do read what
It seems that I'm getting an update-your-node notice once a week or
so. This is very frequent. I can choose to ignore them for a while,
but it seems like it's better to just go with it, because if I ignore
it too long I get that message about being left behind. What kind of
updates are these?
It seems that I'm getting an update-your-node notice once a week or
so. This is very frequent. I can choose to ignore them for a while,
but it seems like it's better to just go with it, because if I ignore
it too long I get that message about being left behind. What kind of
updates are these?
Mika Hirvonen wrote:
At the moment, this is a moot point, because the only JRE that will run
the latest versions of Freenet adequately is Sun's, but if (or when) the
Kaffe guys implement NIO and we want to support them, we might have a
problem.
Blackdown works.
-todd
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003, Toad wrote:
What newsgroups? I don't know about any newsgroups.
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.devel/
It was covered adequately on the devl list (which unstable users should
be reading), the CVS list, and the IRC channels on both freenode and
IIP.
I
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003, Toad wrote:
It IS called unstable you know.
Dude. That's pretty dense.
Was doing this sudden, forced fork discussed? I mean, it seems like most
people here agree that it's a good idea, so what would have been the harm
in throwing out the idea on devl and giving it a
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, Edward J. Huff wrote:
On Mon, 2003-10-20 at 16:01, Todd Walton wrote:
We used to have a list, tech@, where this kind of discussion would go, but
it fell to the reaper.
Now we use chat for that purpose, since it gets no other traffic...
Oh. Well, chat isn't
Is it correct that Sun's JDK 1.4.2 is not recommended for use with
Freenet? 1.4.1 is preferred at this time, correct?
-todd
___
Devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, [iso-8859-1] Some Guy wrote:
That's a whole other post and I'm kind of worried this post is too academic and
people will have
trouble seeing how it relates to freenet.
We used to have a list, tech@, where this kind of discussion would go, but
it fell to the reaper.
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, Toby Butzon wrote:
I'm new around here, so I hope this isn't too out of line... How come
nobody around here snips out quoted material they're not specifically
replying to?
We just got him to put blank lines between the quoted material and his
material. One step at a
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, Pete wrote:
I just want to be able to read scum/fillament/reskill/thoughtcrime and
others again :-(
Hear hear.
-todd
___
Devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
Wow. In the last couple of hours, all of a sudden, all the active links
on the gateway page suddenly showed up (four of them, I removed TFEE).
All four loaded, other pages are loading.
I didn't update the node or anything, it just suddenly started working
really well.
-todd
On Sun, 12 Oct 2003, Edward J. Huff wrote:
It would be interesting to see the node version histogram
of people who are getting good performance.
I'm getting pretty good performance.
Oct 12, 2003 1:40:10 PM
nodes: 49
scale factor: 1.0 (This is used to keep lines 64 characters)
On Sun, 12 Oct 2003, Benjamin Coates wrote:
A discussion on #freenet leads me to suggesting this change to QueryReject
behavior:
The goal here is to reduce the message traffic to overloaded nodes without
seriously changing network behavior.
What advantage does this have over the way it
On Sat, 11 Oct 2003, Ian Clarke wrote:
For the stable merge of the current unstable code, which will likely be
5029, we should consider the benefits of increasing lastGoodBuild to
5029. Some say that 5028 is next to useless, however some of the best
nodes in routing tables I have seen are
Me three.
-todd
On Sat, 11 Oct 2003, Pascal wrote:
I have been having the same problem with this list. I wonder if it is
not our email providers but the list itself?
-Pascal
Jonathan Howard wrote:
I'm noticing not all messages are getting to my e-mail, I should change
On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, Ian Clarke wrote:
Ok, I only suggested 692 because they did. Obviously we should choose
the best option available to us.
So make the call. 692 or 5028? Decide.
-todd
___
Devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 6 Oct 2003, [iso-8859-1] Some Guy wrote:
1) We do/could know that specialization happens. If we assume my peers
have an idea of what my specialization is, and they have this from
measuring my ablity to handle requests, then I know all of this too. In
fact I should be able to
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003, Tracy R Reed wrote:
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 05:23:53PM -0700, Todd Walton spake thusly:
Well, something to consider is: Are we sure nodes really need to
specialize, as things are? Maybe there's a lot more disk space out there
than there is stuff to fill
On Sun, 5 Oct 2003, fish wrote:
On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 03:53:12PM +1300, David McNab wrote:
On Sun, 2003-10-05 at 15:41, fish wrote:
Did you consider using jython, then just copying the code outright?
But I'd rather avoid any kind of jvm dependency. Especially when it's so
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003, Ken Corson wrote:
is histogram of keys in the local datastore - I'm not certain these
are the keys (to specialize in) that matter, but I think they are.
I believe the one you want is the second link (first under Histograms),
called Histogram of the keys in the node's
What's wrong with mail.freenetproject.org? On trying to connect, I get
Connection Refused.
This is an issue, since people can't sign up for the support list, and
people who aren't on the support list can't send email to it.
Ian? Matthew? Anybody? Please?
-todd
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003, Toad wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 10:13:22PM +1200, David McNab wrote:
This is not an issue with modern operating systems like Linux and BSD,
where there are dependency-resolving infrastructures (and a user-base
not scared of reading README/INSTALL files).
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Tom Kaitchuck wrote:
On Tuesday 23 September 2003 12:22 am, Todd Walton wrote:
If there are other nodes on the network that you trust, you could
exchange this information with them, and have a much better idea of their
specialization. Also this could also provide
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, [iso-8859-1] Some Guy wrote:
1) Reuse NGR code to let the node keep statistics on
itself like it's neighbors do. The quality of this
estimate would be far better than that a neighbor can
make, because it knows about all the queries it
handles, and it has a long time to
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, Tom Kaitchuck wrote:
On Monday 22 September 2003 12:18 pm, Ian Clarke wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 12:13:13PM +0200, Some Guy wrote:
Two ideas:
1) Reuse NGR code to let the node keep statistics on
itself like it's neighbors do. The quality of this
estimate
Does the mail archive archive mail?
I'm trying to find a specific mail from the support list, one that I know
was sent recently, after the switch to mail-archive.com. But, looking
through the archives, I can't seem to find it. In fact, the latest
message I see is from February 13, 2003.
As
On startup of my node I'm getting java.io.IOException: Already closed!.
Somebody posted this same problem to the list on September 8, and didn't
get a response. I've just posted to the support list. If you have an
answer to this problem, I would love to hear it on support.
But my real
On Fri, 19 Sep 2003, Tom Kaitchuck wrote:
Mnet's, Enthropy's, and Freenet's goals are essentially the same. Gunnet and
Grapevine differ from Freenet's goals only in that they think it is too hard
to do, and so they are willing to make compromises to get something done now.
For information
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Ian Clarke wrote:
There seem to be a number of people who read about CHKs and SSKs, and
think thats all there is to freenet. I suppose it is somewhat
understandable as our routing mechanism can be difficult for people to
get their heads around, and NGR doesn't make that
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, Gordan wrote:
On Monday 15 Sep 2003 11:29, Some Guy wrote:
[routing]
One solution that was proposed to do this was to do
light insertions or inverse passive requests. The
idea is to make a new insertion message which says the
sender has a trail to key X. This
On Sun, 14 Sep 2003, Lorrin Nelson wrote:
But would anyone ever find anything on the read-only node? Say I've got
200 items on the read-only note (ie, a couple moderate-sized websites).
Chances are there will be no similarity between the CHKs of those items.
Good point. I was thinking
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, Gordan wrote:
There is a difference between being able to guess which part of the network
to route the request into and being able to follow the bread-crumb trail
back to the node designated to always make the files available. My
understanding was that the latter
Then there is the whole HTL issue thrown into the mix, too, but a DNF for
HTL=X should probably also immediately return a DNF for HTLX. For HTLX,
there should probably be some kind of a probabalistic DNF return, depending
on how big HTL is...
Probabilistic is coming to succeed NGRouting as
On Sun, 14 Sep 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where can I get all of these fancy new freenet versions that this
devel-list keeps referring to? The sourceforge CVS seems to be stuck at
6173 for its unstable branch.
Latest unstable:
On Sun, 14 Sep 2003, Edgar Friendly wrote:
pineapple [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I was wondering if there were any plans to have the
option in Freenet for users to make their node read
only. That is, content can only be inserted localy
and not by requests. Some content providers may
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003, [iso-8859-1] Some Guy wrote:
This may only open the network up to greater attack! A
hostile node(s) can close in on the node(s)
responsible for that hash-space and get thier IPs.
You can't close in on a node. In fact, that's what Freenet is all about
stopping. No
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003, Toad wrote:
1. Merge unstable to stable. Most reports say it is at least as good as
stable now, and in many regards much better.
This would mean stable has NGRouting, and if you put NGRouting in stable
it's going to have to be trumpeted. NGRouting now implemented! Sliced
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Toad wrote:
On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 01:53:06PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As FROST[-WOT]'s protocol is proprietary the author
of this document has designed the FRUIT protocol.
This is futile.
Which makes it all that much more exciting, eh?
-todd
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Gordan wrote:
jrand0m? Who is that?
Organizational hacker extraordinaire, anonymous everyman, man who is no
man, hostile environment fanatic.
A disturbed soul fighting for the forces of good.
Proprietor of the [j]random flog:
http://localhost:/[EMAIL
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Tom Kaitchuck wrote:
However the data is further away
than maxHtl/2 then it is fairly likly that the other file is too.
Why do you think that?
-todd
___
Devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Amazing.
I sent an email almost identical to the one below to the web list. It
seems the web list was a casualty of the trouble of late. Will it be
coming back up?
Also, the reason I sent it to the web list was to suggest that this story
be put on the front page news section of
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003, Ian Clarke wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 03:57:19PM +0300, Mika Hirvonen wrote:
What problems were you having with RH9?
Mainly that the mailman rpm that comes with it is broken (this has been
confirmed by the authors of mailman).
In case it matters, Gentoo's
On Tue, 19 Aug 2003, Sebastian Lohmeier wrote:
I've seen several release numbers (0.6, 2.0) mentioned on the list.
Is there any past email or a document that describes the future
development of freenet (i.e. which features and maturity level are
targeted and a rough estimate when they are
On Sat, 16 Aug 2003, Zooko wrote:
I am still not sure that what you refer to as convergence isn't
implicit in the specification already. If nodes are making radically
different estimates to each-other about routing times, then those
estimates can't be very good. If nodes are making good
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've started playing with the Frost code. I hope to have my spectacular
new user interface done by Monday night.
Keep us posted, please.
-todd
___
devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sure that the vast majority of us are computer nerds and, as such,
have read the book Criptonomicon by Neal Stephenson.
Cryptonomicon.
I have very little idea how to implement this, but Freenet might make a
viable platform for anonymous
On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, Jay Oliveri wrote:
D. This is unnecessary complexity if its to be woven into Fred. Expecting
*all* client writers to somehow implement this scheme without first
standardizing and perhaps even adding to the FCP spec is unreasonable
(fcptools may insert content, but
On Tue, 12 Aug 2003, pineapple wrote:
I know this may sound funny, but did you try IBM?
Reality check: *No* company of any size is going to give money to Freenet.
They're going to say, Stay away from my ten-foot pole! Don't touch it!
Good reasons to stay away from Freenet:
1) It's lousy
On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, Tom Kaitchuck wrote:
A better idea, would be to setup a web hosting provider. Offer people
unlimited storage and X amount of bandwidth for Y dollars per month. Then any
websight can store any static content (all their downloads) on Freenet. You
could insert each
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003, Zooko wrote:
Ian Clarke wrote:
Yep. Since Mnet has (temporarily) lost economic mechanisms, since Freenet is
adding erasure coding, and since both projects are currently developing new
routing schemes, the two designs have grown closer.
Freenet adding erasure
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003, Toad wrote:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 08:35:02PM -0500, Tom Kaitchuck wrote:
On Wednesday 13 August 2003 08:13 pm, Toad wrote:
Have you looked at the javadocs? ant javadoc, and look at docs/api/
No, how do I get that?
Run ant javadoc. Then point your web browser at
On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, Tom Kaitchuck wrote:
On Friday 01 August 2003 07:30 pm, Todd Walton wrote:
A: Have the insertion utilities archive and compress by zipping. Have
Fred compress by zipping. Yields good compression. Requires no major
changes to Fred. Requires no changes to FProxy.
B
On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, Tom Kaitchuck wrote:
So there are three possible solutions.
A: Have the insertion utilities archive and compress by zipping. Have Fred
compress by zipping. Yields good compression. Requires no major changes to
Fred. Requires no changes to FProxy.
B: Have the insertion
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Niklas Bergh wrote:
I am more in favour of tar.bz2 format. It would be measurably more compact
for compressible data, with little speed penalty to speak of.
As a windows user I am not too fond of that idea though
As a Windows user, you run the same virtual machine
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Gordan wrote:
Here is what I propose. ZIP archives to be replaced with tar archives. Then,
on a lower, node level, at insert time, the file being inserted is checked.
If it's mime type or extension are indicative of compressed content, we
simply insert the file as is.
On Sat, 26 Jul 2003, Toad wrote:
NIO phase 2 is also in the pipeline, but probably post 0.6.
What does NIO phase 2 consist of?
-todd
___
devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hawk.freenetproject.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, Greg Wooledge wrote:
Todd Walton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
You're confusing word function. The original poster mislead with the use
of LRU cache. It should be LRU'd cache or some such. Cache is a noun
in LRU cache and a verb in probabilistic caching.
LRU
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003, Greg Wooledge wrote:
I wish we *would* go back to the simple LRU cache. It seemed to work
a lot better than probabilistic caching does.
You're confusing word function. The original poster mislead with the use
of LRU cache. It should be LRU'd cache or some such. Cache
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Gordan wrote:
While using SVMs is all well and cool, it is easy to get stuck with the idea
of using AIs because it _sounds_ like a really clever thing to do. Often,
however, much simpler heuristic methods can give results that are not
measurably worse and much easier
Why do you suppose that, when my node is disconnected from the network,
but is up and running, I can open up the two edition sites on my gateway
page, but not the three DBR sites that are also there?
I've fetched all three DBR sites today, so they've passed through my
datastore. So if my node
On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is the weekly Freenet Project job jar update.
Comments to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OPEN JOBS
-
* Produce a Kaffe-bundled distro of Fred.
http://firenze.linux.it/~giannibi/easyfreenet/
-todd
On Sat, 19 Jul 2003, Tom Kaitchuck wrote:
When browsing Freenet just after the date rollover can be very annoying. It is
almost unusable for a period of time. Many DBR don't get their sites out soon
enough, or don't have enough time to distribute them before people start
requesting the new
On Thu, 17 Jul 2003, Ian Clarke wrote:
Possibly. One important point to accelerate a node's ability to learn
about the network is that when a node sees a reference (perhaps in the
DataSource field of a DataReply) and it has statistical information (a
RTE + other data) about that node,
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Toad wrote:
Anyone inserted anything through fproxy recently? Did it work? We have
some reports of it consistently breaking on large files...
I'm running Build 5012, Load 75%.
I'm presently inserting two files simultaneously:
1) A 305.9 MB file.
-Segment 1 of 3, Upload
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Toad wrote:
My point exactly. We are vulnerable to Sun interfering or collapsing. If
you care about this, see my other recent thread (Kaffe and Freenet -
funding?).
I would contribute funds.
-todd
___
devl mailing list
[EMAIL
On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Toad wrote:
We cannot make a non-sun-dependant Freenet. You cannot make a package
of Sun Java, maybe not even an installer package. We apparently care
more about the windows leechers who probably won't donate to the project
than the people who actually care about Freenet
On Mon, 14 Jul 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Produce a Kaffe-bundled distro of Fred.
http://firenze.linux.it/~giannibi/easyfreenet/
Nice. I like it. Well, I like the setup anyway. I couldn't get it to
run.
Upon 'sh start-freenet.sh' I get:
kaffe.util.NotImplemented:
On Fri, 11 Jul 2003, Toad wrote:
Is 256kbps uplink a lot more common than 128kbps?
I have DSL, I'm in the US, and I've got 256k.
-todd
___
devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hawk.freenetproject.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
The log level setting confuses me. I can't seem to intuitively figure out
where each level stands. Of the four:
Error, Normal, Minor, Debug
are they cumulative? I mean, does normal log everything error does plus
some? Does Minor log everything error and normal do, plus some? And does
I'm using build 5007.
Upon startup of the node I get the following output to the terminal where
I started it:
dump of interesting objects after gc in checkpoint:
tcpConnections 11
tcpConnections open 10
size of socketMap 10
FnpLinks 8
PlainLinks 0
NIOOS 10
NIOIS 10
CH 7
CHIS 0
CHOS 0
RIS 0
SOS
Thank you for this. Your explanation makes things clear.
-todd
On Fri, 4 Jul 2003, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
NG is really quite simple. What it does is attempt to find the route that will
respond fastest for a given key. It does this by tracking how long various
events take.
The current
Dude. I really wish you'd quote what you're replying to.
-todd
On Sat, 5 Jul 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That certainly doesn't look good.
___
devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hawk.freenetproject.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Ian Clarke wrote:
Perhaps, although that might be overkill - reimplementing wget wasn't
quite what I had in mind ;-)
So don't reimplement wget. Make start-freenet.sh fire off actual wgets.
Oh, wait...
There probably wouldn't be an easy way to do this in Windows.
-todd
On Wed, 2 Jul 2003, Toad wrote:
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 02:24:16PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote:
This is all very well, but lets just get the simple functionality
working first, then we can worry about more ambitious ways to address
the problem.
Prefetch of the bookmark links on
a)
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mmm yeah, tabbed browsing is good. I'd like it if it worked that way too.
Works for me. I run Linux/Mozilla. I open up a series of tabs containing
the pages I want ready, and let them sit and grind. When I want them, they're
there.
It would be
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, Ken T Takusagawa wrote:
...and change the following settings:
network.http.max-connections200
network.http.max-connections-per-server 100
network.http.max-persistent-connections-per-server 10
On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Nick Tarleton wrote:
Whatever you do, please make it clear that % IS A COMMENT MARKER! The newbies
really need this.
Why is it that we use '%' anyway? Is their some restriction preventing
its renaming? What are the purposes at work?
-todd
On Sun, 22 Jun 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Competition in standards is good. It gave us DOM and SAX, both of which have
their strong points and their weak points. It gave us GIF and PNG. It gave us
Perl versus the world. (just kidding 'bout the last one)
It gave us HTML for Netscape 4.01,
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Ian Clarke wrote:
You can't argue with simple market economics
Actually, you can. See: U.S. Government.
Well... See: Government.
-todd
___
devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 23 May 2003, Toad wrote:
> > > > Bug discovered. Fix in progress.
> > >
> > > Fix in unstable 6043.
> > I sometimes wonder if my PayPal goes to a person or a machine.
>
> Hehe, is that a compliment?
Yes.
-todd
___
devl mailing list
devl at
On Fri, 23 May 2003, Toad wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 11:55:41PM +0100, Toad wrote:
> > On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 07:15:46PM +0200, Niklas Bergh wrote:
> > > It would seem that the bookmark manager logs its data with wrong style
> > > line
> > > separators (only 0x0A (NOT 0x0D) instead of
On Thu, 22 May 2003, panamerica334 at gmx.net wrote:
> why aren't these cc'd to the annouce list?
In the past, it's only been version number increases that have been posted
to the announce list. I can't speak for the actual reason for this, but
it makes sense to me.
I've often received
On Wed, 21 May 2003, fish wrote:
> So, on my local tree I added an FCP command "StoreFreeDisk", with which one
> can feed the current free disk space to freed, and with that a storePercent
> config option to make the datastore grow to a maximum of n% of free disk
> space, as
> was discussed on
On Sun, 18 May 2003, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > It sounds like you mean 'crazy' to be negative. It would be preferable,
> > surely, to be able to put Freenet on as many machines as possible.
>
> Indeed, and our ability to do that is jeprodised if we start introducing
> platform specific code. We
On Sat, 17 May 2003, Ian Clarke wrote:
> I don't think an ugly platform specific kludge is justified just because
> a few crazy people try running freenet on really slow machines.
It sounds like you mean 'crazy' to be negative. It would be preferable,
surely, to be able to put Freenet on as
On Sun, 18 May 2003, Michael Schierl wrote:
> IMO volatile without synchronized is only a good idea for booleans
> (volatile booleans will be reread as often as possible, non-volatile
> booleans may be cached by each thread till the next enter/exit of a
> synchronized block) or for longs/doubles
On Sat, 17 May 2003, Todd Walton wrote:
> However, handling CPU load is definitely an issue, and it may be that, at
> this time, installing platform specific code to attack the symptom is more
> important to the functioning of the network than finding the cause. At
> this time.
On Sat, 17 May 2003, Toad wrote:
> I would like to point out here that
> transparent portability to arbitrary future or obscure platforms IS NOT
> AND NEVER HAS BEEN A CORE PROJECT GOAL.
Great! Then we can begin reimplementation of fred in C? This would have
the added benefit of reducing CPU
On Wed, 14 May 2003, Toad wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 11:07:46AM -0700, Todd Walton wrote:
> > I haven't measured exactly how much load the DNF page creates, but I have
> > noticed that when I have multiple tabs open, all loading Freenet pages,
> > and one of th
On Wed, 14 May 2003, the bishop wrote:
> But, i mostly work with ancient (slow) machinery, and i would like an
> _option_
> to turn off the clutter instead. Even in the 21st century, several people
> don't need or can't stand all that eye-candy, or want to use freenet with
> text-only
On Tue, 13 May 2003, Toad wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 02:30:24PM -0500, Glenn Crocker wrote:
> >
> > > > Yep, "JVM bugs" would fall in the realm of "Something Has Gone
> > > Wrong". It's
> > > > hard to fix all the bugs and it's easy to make the node cope better (by
> > > > having it
On Tue, 13 May 2003, Toad wrote:
> On Sun, May 11, 2003 at 12:22:09PM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > Nick Tarleton (nickptar at mindspring.com) wrote:
> >
> > > Point raised by greycat on #freenet on OPN (btw, which server is mirrored
> > > by
> > > #freenet-opn on IIP?): The error pages (the
Me too.
Build 593, Java blackdown-1.4.1-01
The file not found, "client-temp/tbf_798d0e38" really doesn't exist. It's
not surprising that it couldn't be found. I also get the same stuff in
the log. (Same except for the "Couldn't retrieve key" and "Hops To Live"
line, of course.)
In
On Fri, 9 May 2003 Erendil at aol.com wrote:
> toad.
todd
-todd
___
devl mailing list
devl at freenetproject.org
http://hawk.freenetproject.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
On Fri, 9 May 2003 Erendil at aol.com wrote:
> Mmm, yeah. Question. Someone explain to me how to set it up for SSL, because
> I run a public gateway... (gentoo linux)
Try these links.
An article on ONLamp.com, concerning Apache and SSL:
http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/onlamp/2002/04/18/ssl.html
On Fri, 2 May 2003, Roger Hayter wrote:
> I just said it is a potential embarrassment to have on the front page of
> an index, which can be seen by passers-by, e.g. in an Internet cafe in
> Riyadh, or by a very intolerant coworker in an office: I tend to agree
> with you wrt Freenet users.
1 - 100 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
