[freenet-dev] I was asked to send this to you

2003-01-21 Thread Tyler Riddle
I am forwarding this review to you at the request of Pitsoft. They seem to have some good points, you should definitly read it. I, however, do not take credit for this review. You may contact the original author via [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Begin forwarded Message -- To the developers of Freenet: I

[freenet-dev] I was asked to send this to you

2003-01-21 Thread Tyler Riddle
I am forwarding this review to you at the request of Pitsoft. They seem to have some good points, you should definitly read it. I, however, do not take credit for this review. You may contact the original author via drbardo at pitsoft.info -- Begin forwarded Message -- To the developers of Freene

Re: [freenet-dev] Freenet website redesign - Feedback, ideas and help wanted

2002-12-15 Thread Tyler Riddle
The only thing I can think of as a potential issue will be browser compatibility. From the mockup: This will be a collapsible menu with main headings such as: While having nifty features is fun PLEASE remember to make the site comptabile with non-mainstream browsers. In this case think about the

[freenet-dev] Freenet website redesign - Feedback, ideas and help wanted

2002-12-15 Thread Tyler Riddle
The only thing I can think of as a potential issue will be browser compatibility. From the mockup: This will be a collapsible menu with main headings such as: While having nifty features is fun PLEASE remember to make the site comptabile with non-mainstream browsers. In this case think about the

Re: [freenet-dev] bug report

2002-12-14 Thread Tyler Riddle
I probably should of mentioned that this was in the most recent CVS version. Tyler --- Tyler Riddle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I made a couple typos while working with some > freenet > URIs and I noticed that fred did not deal with that > very well. > > Using a

[freenet-dev] bug report

2002-12-14 Thread Tyler Riddle
I probably should of mentioned that this was in the most recent CVS version. Tyler --- Tyler Riddle wrote: > I made a couple typos while working with some > freenet > URIs and I noticed that fred did not deal with that > very well. > > Using a malformed URI gives the follo

[freenet-dev] bug report

2002-12-14 Thread Tyler Riddle
I made a couple typos while working with some freenet URIs and I noticed that fred did not deal with that very well. Using a malformed URI gives the following error (with stack trace ommited): Couldn't retrieve key: SSK@kkjfkeal// Hops To Live: 15 Please report the following to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[freenet-dev] bug report

2002-12-14 Thread Tyler Riddle
I made a couple typos while working with some freenet URIs and I noticed that fred did not deal with that very well. Using a malformed URI gives the following error (with stack trace ommited): Couldn't retrieve key: SSK at kkjfkeal// Hops To Live: 15 Please report the following to devl at freene

Re: [freenet-dev] sneakernet transport method

2002-12-11 Thread Tyler Riddle
Thank you so much Edgar =) [snip] > > > I don't know how the conversation got to the topic > of nodes guessing > other nodes' specialization. This started about > whether a node could > guess what other nodes believe its specialization > is. I took a temporary steer in that direction to feel the

[freenet-dev] sneakernet transport method

2002-12-11 Thread Tyler Riddle
Thank you so much Edgar =) [snip] > > > I don't know how the conversation got to the topic > of nodes guessing > other nodes' specialization. This started about > whether a node could > guess what other nodes believe its specialization > is. I took a temporary steer in that direction to feel the

Re: [freenet-dev] sneakernet transport method

2002-12-11 Thread Tyler Riddle
[snip] > > > And I assert that any presumptions the node makes > about what other > nodes believe its specialization is are inherently > flawed. > [snip] I really appreciate the fact that you are taking some time to discuss this issue. I'm glad that atleast one person with the knowledge required

[freenet-dev] sneakernet transport method

2002-12-11 Thread Tyler Riddle
[snip] > > > And I assert that any presumptions the node makes > about what other > nodes believe its specialization is are inherently > flawed. > [snip] I really appreciate the fact that you are taking some time to discuss this issue. I'm glad that atleast one person with the knowledge required

Re: [freenet-dev] SneakerNet Version 2

2002-12-10 Thread Tyler Riddle
Indeed Oskar, Obviously there is no value in a mechanism that would allow fred to participate in a network off of the internet. Also, all those damn leaching transient nodes can rot in hell - screw them, if they don't want to contribute to the network they don't deserve any of it's protection. I

[freenet-dev] SneakerNet Version 2

2002-12-10 Thread Tyler Riddle
Indeed Oskar, Obviously there is no value in a mechanism that would allow fred to participate in a network off of the internet. Also, all those damn leaching transient nodes can rot in hell - screw them, if they don't want to contribute to the network they don't deserve any of it's protection. I

Re: [freenet-dev] sneakernet transport method

2002-12-09 Thread Tyler Riddle
[snip] > > > What about putting 180 meg of the most recent keys > in the datastore onto > the cd. These are likely to include the most > popular content. Then, > when you import the data only overwite (bump out) > older keys. The > import could report something like "X meg" or "Y % > of the

[freenet-dev] sneakernet transport method

2002-12-09 Thread Tyler Riddle
[snip] > > > What about putting 180 meg of the most recent keys > in the datastore onto > the cd. These are likely to include the most > popular content. Then, > when you import the data only overwite (bump out) > older keys. The > import could report something like "X meg" or "Y % > of the

[freenet-dev] www.freenetproject.org missing?

2002-12-09 Thread Tyler Riddle
user@box ~$ nslookup www.freenetproject.org Server: XXX Address: XXX *** XXX can't find www.freenetproject.org: Non-existent host/domain user@box ~$ nslookup freenetproject.org Server: Address: X Non-authoritative answer: Name:freenetproject.org Address: 66.3

[freenet-dev] www.freenetproject.org missing?

2002-12-09 Thread Tyler Riddle
user at box ~$ nslookup www.freenetproject.org Server: XXX Address: XXX *** XXX can't find www.freenetproject.org: Non-existent host/domain user at box ~$ nslookup freenetproject.org Server: Address: X Non-authoritative answer: Name:freenetproject.org Address:

Re: [freenet-dev] patch to fproxy to change freenet key detection

2002-12-08 Thread Tyler Riddle
No, actualy, that is what you would think it should do but in fact it does not. If you check the patch, you can see the code in question here. The code checked for a key that started with SSK@ CHK@ and KSK@ but had no provisions for freenet:SSK@ etc. I just added 3 lines that would allow freenet:

[freenet-dev] patch to fproxy to change freenet key detection

2002-12-08 Thread Tyler Riddle
No, actualy, that is what you would think it should do but in fact it does not. If you check the patch, you can see the code in question here. The code checked for a key that started with SSK@ CHK@ and KSK@ but had no provisions for freenet:SSK@ etc. I just added 3 lines that would allow freenet:

[freenet-dev] patch to fproxy to change freenet key detection

2002-12-06 Thread Tyler Riddle
It never really made sense to me that fproxy would reject keys that start with freenet: so I fixed that... I'm not sure if this is the best way to pull it off but it does work. Patch in diff -u format attached. Tyler = AIM:rllybitesY! Messenger:triddle_1999 __

[freenet-dev] patch to fproxy to change freenet key detection

2002-12-06 Thread Tyler Riddle
It never really made sense to me that fproxy would reject keys that start with freenet: so I fixed that... I'm not sure if this is the best way to pull it off but it does work. Patch in diff -u format attached. Tyler = AIM:rllybitesY! Messenger:triddle_1999 __

[freenet-dev] fcp broken in recent cvs?

2002-12-03 Thread Tyler Riddle
I cvs updated last night and rebuilt, today FCP seems to be broken. Example: frees@machine frees$ date; upload-site; date Tue Dec 3 21:29:19 PST 2002 fcpStartup: begin 1 open sockets sending fcp id bytes sending handshake... fcpStartup: awaiting response ^C Tue Dec 3 21:30:24 PST 2002 frees@mach

[freenet-dev] fcp broken in recent cvs?

2002-12-03 Thread Tyler Riddle
I cvs updated last night and rebuilt, today FCP seems to be broken. Example: frees at machine frees$ date; upload-site; date Tue Dec 3 21:29:19 PST 2002 fcpStartup: begin 1 open sockets sending fcp id bytes sending handshake... fcpStartup: awaiting response ^C Tue Dec 3 21:30:24 PST 2002 frees a

Re: [freenet-dev] Replacing Freenet Forever on the gateway page

2002-12-02 Thread Tyler Riddle
like Nubile on the > gateway page, then how > about a DBR site that links to them such as the > Freenet Help Index? > > Jeff > > > Tyler Riddle wrote: > > > There was talk a bit ago about replacing Freenet > > Forever on the gateway page. The author ha

[freenet-dev] Replacing Freenet Forever on the gateway page

2002-12-02 Thread Tyler Riddle
page, then how > about a DBR site that links to them such as the > Freenet Help Index? > > Jeff > > > Tyler Riddle wrote: > > > There was talk a bit ago about replacing Freenet > > Forever on the gateway page. The author has not > added > > a

Re: [freenet-dev] Replacing Freenet Forever on the gateway page

2002-12-01 Thread Tyler Riddle
> say it should be added to the gateway page. Whether > FF should > be dropped is a different question altogether -- > there's no law > that says there must be precisely three links! This is true. Personaly, I would like to see the gateway page link to sites that try to link to other sites. Link

[freenet-dev] Replacing Freenet Forever on the gateway page

2002-12-01 Thread Tyler Riddle
> say it should be added to the gateway page. Whether > FF should > be dropped is a different question altogether -- > there's no law > that says there must be precisely three links! This is true. Personaly, I would like to see the gateway page link to sites that try to link to other sites. Link

[freenet-dev] Replacing Freenet Forever on the gateway page

2002-12-01 Thread Tyler Riddle
There was talk a bit ago about replacing Freenet Forever on the gateway page. The author has not added any meaningfull content on that page in near a month. I definitly support the idea of replacing that link (on such prime realestate) with something else. As before, I still believe that The Index

[freenet-dev] Replacing Freenet Forever on the gateway page

2002-12-01 Thread Tyler Riddle
There was talk a bit ago about replacing Freenet Forever on the gateway page. The author has not added any meaningfull content on that page in near a month. I definitly support the idea of replacing that link (on such prime realestate) with something else. As before, I still believe that The Index

Re: [freenet-dev] what do you prefer? (routing tree)

2002-11-28 Thread Tyler Riddle
Is it a matter of coding the software then? Is the old simulation software not up to par any more? Tyler --- Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 03:22:58PM -0800, Tyler > Riddle wrote: > > What kind of hardware do you need for a box to

[freenet-dev] what do you prefer? (routing tree)

2002-11-28 Thread Tyler Riddle
Is it a matter of coding the software then? Is the old simulation software not up to par any more? Tyler --- Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 03:22:58PM -0800, Tyler > Riddle wrote: > > What kind of hardware do you need for a box to be > > usefull for simulatio

Re: [freenet-dev] what do you prefer? (routing tree)

2002-11-27 Thread Tyler Riddle
What kind of hardware do you need for a box to be usefull for simulations? I'm willing to donate machine time on my box if it will be usefull. Tyler --- Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 04:30:02PM +0100, Anonymous > wrote: > > oak-tree or a cypress? > > > > I'

[freenet-dev] what do you prefer? (routing tree)

2002-11-27 Thread Tyler Riddle
What kind of hardware do you need for a box to be usefull for simulations? I'm willing to donate machine time on my box if it will be usefull. Tyler --- Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 04:30:02PM +0100, Anonymous > wrote: > > oak-tree or a cypress? > > > > I'm talking about our

Re: [freenet-dev] patch for fproxy (half flame, half technical argument)

2002-11-21 Thread Tyler Riddle
Oskar, I appreciate your candid response =) You raise good points. --- Oskar Sandberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 08:22:46AM -0800, Tyler > Riddle wrote: > > Ugh, I really hate personal attacks (as they make > my > > argument look weak) so

[freenet-dev] patch for fproxy (half flame, half technical argument)

2002-11-21 Thread Tyler Riddle
Oskar, I appreciate your candid response =) You raise good points. --- Oskar Sandberg wrote: > On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 08:22:46AM -0800, Tyler > Riddle wrote: > > Ugh, I really hate personal attacks (as they make > my > > argument look weak) so I'll temper that wi

Re: [freenet-dev] patch for fproxy (half flame, half technical argument)

2002-11-21 Thread Tyler Riddle
generating to fluff and flame war so I'm not going to bother responding to your response unless it has some objective data that I feel is wrong. Your "gut" does not hold enough credibility with me to be considered as valid input when I leverage the past posts I have seen you make. ---

[freenet-dev] patch for fproxy (half flame, half technical argument)

2002-11-21 Thread Tyler Riddle
generating to fluff and flame war so I'm not going to bother responding to your response unless it has some objective data that I feel is wrong. Your "gut" does not hold enough credibility with me to be considered as valid input when I leverage the past posts I have seen you make. --- Edgar

Re: [freenet-dev] What to replace Freenet Forever with

2002-11-21 Thread Tyler Riddle
grand scheme of TII. Tyler --- Ed Tomlinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On November 20, 2002 08:20 pm, Tyler Riddle wrote: > > If Freenet Forever is really going to get removed > I > > sugest you replace it with The Index Index: > > SSK@Pqb7VI1DhPl1kaB0p4-CJyFfUUcPAgM/T

[freenet-dev] What to replace Freenet Forever with

2002-11-21 Thread Tyler Riddle
grand scheme of TII. Tyler --- Ed Tomlinson wrote: > On November 20, 2002 08:20 pm, Tyler Riddle wrote: > > If Freenet Forever is really going to get removed > I > > sugest you replace it with The Index Index: > > SSK at Pqb7VI1DhPl1kaB0p4-CJyFfUUcPAgM/TII// > > >

Re: [freenet-dev] patch for fproxy

2002-11-20 Thread Tyler Riddle
HTL) is minimal compared to the load that frost places on the network. Tyler --- Edgar Friendly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 05:55:10PM -0800, Tyler > Riddle wrote: > > > The attached file is

[freenet-dev] patch for fproxy

2002-11-20 Thread Tyler Riddle
HTL) is minimal compared to the load that frost places on the network. Tyler --- Edgar Friendly wrote: > Matthew Toseland writes: > > > On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 05:55:10PM -0800, Tyler > Riddle wrote: > > > The attached file is a patch to fproxy that > causes it > > &g

[freenet-dev] tying freesites together with jars

2002-11-20 Thread Tyler Riddle
This was posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] but I did not see any word of here or any activity regarding it on the tech list so I'm posting it here. This is something I have been advocating for a while (not entirely in this manor, but the functionality is the same) and I also posted to tech@ some time ago

[freenet-dev] tying freesites together with jars

2002-11-20 Thread Tyler Riddle
This was posted to tech at freenetproject.org but I did not see any word of here or any activity regarding it on the tech list so I'm posting it here. This is something I have been advocating for a while (not entirely in this manor, but the functionality is the same) and I also posted to tech@ some

[freenet-dev] What to replace Freenet Forever with

2002-11-20 Thread Tyler Riddle
If Freenet Forever is really going to get removed I sugest you replace it with The Index Index: SSK@Pqb7VI1DhPl1kaB0p4-CJyFfUUcPAgM/TII// It is a much beter way, IMNSHO, to organize the freesites. Check out the freesite and read the Philosophy section to completley understand why. Tyler = AI

[freenet-dev] What to replace Freenet Forever with

2002-11-20 Thread Tyler Riddle
If Freenet Forever is really going to get removed I sugest you replace it with The Index Index: SSK at Pqb7VI1DhPl1kaB0p4-CJyFfUUcPAgM/TII// It is a much beter way, IMNSHO, to organize the freesites. Check out the freesite and read the Philosophy section to completley understand why. Tyler =

Re: [freenet-dev] patch for fproxy

2002-11-19 Thread Tyler Riddle
east getting you the HTML for a site if it errors for you on the first time you try to retrieve it. Tyler --- Tuomas Lukinmaa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tyler Riddle wrote: > > > It gives freenet one of my favorite > > features: leave it alone for long enough and it >

[freenet-dev] patch for fproxy

2002-11-19 Thread Tyler Riddle
east getting you the HTML for a site if it errors for you on the first time you try to retrieve it. Tyler --- Tuomas Lukinmaa wrote: > Tyler Riddle wrote: > > > It gives freenet one of my favorite > > features: leave it alone for long enough and it > will > > do what you wa

[freenet-dev] patch for fproxy

2002-11-18 Thread Tyler Riddle
The attached file is a patch to fproxy that causes it to include a refresh meta tag on certain network error pages - I intended it to only show up for RNF and DNF as these seem to make the most sense. The patch is a godsend when you are getting tons and tons of RNF and it actualy has brought throug

[freenet-dev] patch for fproxy

2002-11-18 Thread Tyler Riddle
The attached file is a patch to fproxy that causes it to include a refresh meta tag on certain network error pages - I intended it to only show up for RNF and DNF as these seem to make the most sense. The patch is a godsend when you are getting tons and tons of RNF and it actualy has brought throug

[freenet-dev] I got the FCP tools to compile on solaris

2002-11-01 Thread Tyler Riddle
I managed to tweak the FCP tools into compiling on solaris - there is not anything fundamentaly broken with them there at all. For some reason that I am not sure of __EXTENSIONS__ must be defined to get the defs for the structure that dies. Also nanosleep is only in the rt lib, so a good ole -lrt n

[freenet-dev] I got the FCP tools to compile on solaris

2002-11-01 Thread Tyler Riddle
I managed to tweak the FCP tools into compiling on solaris - there is not anything fundamentaly broken with them there at all. For some reason that I am not sure of __EXTENSIONS__ must be defined to get the defs for the structure that dies. Also nanosleep is only in the rt lib, so a good ole -lrt n

[freenet-dev] 526 reports nodes over 600 as highest seen build

2002-10-29 Thread Tyler Riddle
I would include a patch but I think it would take who ever is going to fix it longer to apply the patch then it would to type in the 20 characters that make up the difference in that line between 526 and 525. To make it easy as possible it is on line 586 of node/NodeReference.java Tyler = AIM

[freenet-dev] 526 reports nodes over 600 as highest seen build

2002-10-29 Thread Tyler Riddle
I would include a patch but I think it would take who ever is going to fix it longer to apply the patch then it would to type in the 20 characters that make up the difference in that line between 526 and 525. To make it easy as possible it is on line 586 of node/NodeReference.java Tyler = AIM

Re: [freenet-dev] 0.5.0.1 half-released

2002-10-29 Thread Tyler Riddle
the list? Tyler --- Jukka Holappa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Tyler Riddle wrote: > | I had a nasty problem with freenet making my > computer > | unusable too. However, on a unix box, this is > super > | easy t

[freenet-dev] 0.5.0.1 half-released

2002-10-29 Thread Tyler Riddle
the list? Tyler --- Jukka Holappa wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Tyler Riddle wrote: > | I had a nasty problem with freenet making my > computer > | unusable too. However, on a unix box, this is > super > | easy to solve and I have nev

Re: [freenet-dev] 0.5.0.1 half-released

2002-10-29 Thread Tyler Riddle
I had a nasty problem with freenet making my computer unusable too. However, on a unix box, this is super easy to solve and I have never had that problem again since the first day it happned. Just nice the java process to something other then 0. I run my node at nice 10 but if you wanted a good de

[freenet-dev] 0.5.0.1 half-released

2002-10-29 Thread Tyler Riddle
I had a nasty problem with freenet making my computer unusable too. However, on a unix box, this is super easy to solve and I have never had that problem again since the first day it happned. Just nice the java process to something other then 0. I run my node at nice 10 but if you wanted a good de