On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 02:24:52AM +, Toad wrote:
Why? Accesses from localhost are unlimited anyway. This setting only
affects runners of public nodes.
Not all of us run fred on their desktop machines..
--
Frank v Waveren Fingerprint: 21A7 C7F3
[EMAIL
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Frank v Waveren
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 02:24:52AM +, Toad wrote:
Why? Accesses from localhost are unlimited anyway. This setting only
affects runners of public nodes.
Not all of us run fred on their desktop machines..
'Specially not
Make Y-threads the
default.
___
Devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
from the freenet.ini file:
# set yes to not bandwidth throttle connections to
LocalInterfaces i.e. FCP and mainportdontLimitClients=false
Set this as true by
default.
___
Devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 08:46:20PM -0500, Juiceman wrote:
from the freenet.ini file:
# set yes to not bandwidth throttle connections to LocalInterfaces i.e. FCP and
mainport
dontLimitClients=false
Set this as true by default.
Why? Accesses from localhost are unlimited anyway. This
Remember the SSK Anarchy freesite?
-- jj
Please, don't make us remember.. Public private keys brings out the
worst parts of people.
/N
___
Devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 10:51:22PM -0600, Tom Kaitchuck wrote:
On Monday 03 November 2003 08:46 pm, Toad wrote:
They don't have to be world writable. The node that has it writes to it.
If it is under an SSK and is signed by that key, it can't do anything and
get away with it. Then it
On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 11:12:33PM +, Ian Clarke spake thusly:
If you expect only a .08% psuccess
How do you know that 92% of requests aren't for data that isn't in the
network.
You are implying that frost is the cause of this? If that's the case I
think the frost project has to die
Tracy R Reed wrote:
It would be nice if there were a
psuccess measurement which did not include KSK's.
IIRC Frost also inserts under SSKs.
With an 8% psuccess rate
I would have to insert a splitfile with around 1000% redundancy to be able
to get it on the first try.
Erm, no - you are assuming
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 09:41:23AM +, Ian Clarke spake thusly:
When and who scoffed? Quotes please. I was carefully picking through
the NGR code and encouraging others to do-so. The scientific method is
to conduct an experiment, and see whether things improve. To the extent
a
Tracy R Reed wrote:
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 09:41:23AM +, Ian Clarke spake thusly:
toad, last week I think. I don't have the IRC logs hanging around.
Well, toad is big enough and ugly enough to defend his own statements.
By that argument almost none of non-symbolic AI would work since
On Monday 03 November 2003 02:10 am, Tracy R Reed wrote:
You are implying that frost is the cause of this? If that's the case I
think the frost project has to die because it is killing the rest of the
network. But I'm not sure that it is. It would be nice if there were a
psuccess measurement
On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 03:16:32PM -0800, Tracy R Reed wrote:
On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 08:41:45PM +, Ian Clarke spake thusly:
With NGR finally starting to meet expectations, we need to think about
what lies between now and our 0.6 release.
If you expect only a .08% psuccess and barely
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 12:10:13AM -0800, Tracy R Reed wrote:
On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 11:12:33PM +, Ian Clarke spake thusly:
If you expect only a .08% psuccess
How do you know that 92% of requests aren't for data that isn't in the
network.
You are implying that frost is the
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 12:42:02AM +, Toad spake thusly:
that's fine but I rather expected a bit more. :) My psuccess is slowly
creaping up (it was .02% for so long) so hopefully it's just a matter of
Are you sure that's % ? 0.02% = 0.0002...
Oops, you are right. Should be .02 or 2%.
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 12:45:25AM +, Toad spake thusly:
That is not a solution. Frost works, somebody would reimplement it, we
have no enforcement capability against them, and if frost died now
somebody would reintroduce it post 1.0 and mess up a network adapted to
no Frost. We need to
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 02:58:03AM -0800, Tracy R Reed wrote:
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 09:41:23AM +, Ian Clarke spake thusly:
When and who scoffed? Quotes please. I was carefully picking through
the NGR code and encouraging others to do-so. The scientific method is
to conduct an
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 11:24:42AM +, Ian Clarke wrote:
Tracy R Reed wrote:
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 09:41:23AM +, Ian Clarke spake thusly:
toad, last week I think. I don't have the IRC logs hanging around.
Well, toad is big enough and ugly enough to defend his own statements.
By
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 04:03:34PM -0600, Tom Kaitchuck wrote:
On Monday 03 November 2003 02:10 am, Tracy R Reed wrote:
You are implying that frost is the cause of this? If that's the case I
think the frost project has to die because it is killing the rest of the
network. But I'm not sure
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 06:03:29PM -0800, Tracy R Reed wrote:
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 12:45:25AM +, Toad spake thusly:
That is not a solution. Frost works, somebody would reimplement it, we
have no enforcement capability against them, and if frost died now
somebody would reintroduce it
On Monday 03 November 2003 07:18 pm, Toad wrote:
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 04:03:34PM -0600, Tom Kaitchuck wrote:
On Monday 03 November 2003 02:10 am, Tracy R Reed wrote:
You are implying that frost is the cause of this? If that's the case I
think the frost project has to die because it is
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 08:22:08PM -0600, Tom Kaitchuck wrote:
On Monday 03 November 2003 07:18 pm, Toad wrote:
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 04:03:34PM -0600, Tom Kaitchuck wrote:
On Monday 03 November 2003 02:10 am, Tracy R Reed wrote:
You are implying that frost is the cause of this? If
On Monday 03 November 2003 08:46 pm, Toad wrote:
How can the next to last node in the chain know how long the message took
to get to it? Doesn't it just estimate how long it would take to get it
successfully.
Uhm, what? The calculation assumes that if the request fails, the origin
node
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 09:07:25PM -0600, Tom Kaitchuck wrote:
On Monday 03 November 2003 08:46 pm, Toad wrote:
How can the next to last node in the chain know how long the message took
to get to it? Doesn't it just estimate how long it would take to get it
successfully.
Uhm, what?
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 06:03:29PM -0800, Tracy R Reed wrote:
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 12:45:25AM +, Toad spake thusly:
That is not a solution. Frost works, somebody would reimplement it, we
have no enforcement capability against them, and if frost died now
somebody would reintroduce it
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 01:04:25AM +, Toad wrote:
AFAICS, NGRouting should have *more* obvious specialization than classic
routing, because of the relatively small amount of information in the
estimators. Classic routing allowed many tiny specializations -
NGRouting doesn't understand such
On Monday 03 November 2003 08:46 pm, Toad wrote:
They don't have to be world writable. The node that has it writes to it.
If it is under an SSK and is signed by that key, it can't do anything and
get away with it. Then it enforces only allowing the other keys listed to
append their own
With NGR finally starting to meet expectations, we need to think about
what lies between now and our 0.6 release.
The baseline is simply to consolodate currently implemented features
with a moritorium on significant new features and a focus on ensuring
that current functionality is solid.
On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 08:41:45PM +, Ian Clarke spake thusly:
With NGR finally starting to meet expectations, we need to think about
what lies between now and our 0.6 release.
If you expect only a .08% psuccess and barely a hint of specialization
that's fine but I rather expected a bit
Tracy R Reed wrote:
On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 08:41:45PM +, Ian Clarke spake thusly:
With NGR finally starting to meet expectations, we need to think about
what lies between now and our 0.6 release.
If you expect only a .08% psuccess
How do you know that 92% of requests aren't for data that
30 matches
Mail list logo
