On 19/10/15 07:23, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 18. Oktober 2015, 20:54:33 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
>> Multi-sourcing does not improve anonymity - it tends to reduce it.
> It allows using higher latency without impacting the user experience.
It also gives the attacker more samples.
Am Montag, 19. Oktober 2015, 01:16:24 schrieb
salutarydiacritica...@ruggedinbox.com:
> You might want to look into maintaining a subreddit and other social
> media accounts. Its a way to reach more people.
>
> Reddit fundraising was a big success last year with tens of thousands of
> dollars fo
Am Sonntag, 18. Oktober 2015, 14:33:53 schrieb
salutarydiacritica...@ruggedinbox.com:
> I can't see the new page because of unauthorized error.
The error message gives you the login. (guest / guest) — it’s just for locking
out bots.
> Some of the papers are on anonbib but many are not.
I’m not
Am Sonntag, 18. Oktober 2015, 20:54:33 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> Multi-sourcing does not improve anonymity - it tends to reduce it.
It allows using higher latency without impacting the user experience.
Best wishes,
Arne
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_
You might want to look into maintaining a subreddit and other social
media accounts. Its a way to reach more people.
Reddit fundraising was a big success last year with tens of thousands of
dollars for privacy projects.
On 2015-10-18 15:54, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On 18/10/15 10:03, Arne Bab
On 18/10/15 10:03, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 18. Oktober 2015, 01:47:05 schrieb
> salutarydiacritica...@ruggedinbox.com:
>> Adding latency is a bad idea and actually less effective than you
>> believe compared to other ways.
>>
>> http://freehaven.net/anonbib/cache/ShWa-Timing06.
I can't see the new page because of unauthorized error.
Some of the papers are on anonbib but many are not.
You can try the National Science Foundation or something like it in your
country for funding proposals.
On 2015-10-18 05:03, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
Am Sonntag, 18. Oktober 2015,
Am Sonntag, 18. Oktober 2015, 01:47:05 schrieb
salutarydiacritica...@ruggedinbox.com:
> Adding latency is a bad idea and actually less effective than you
> believe compared to other ways.
>
> http://freehaven.net/anonbib/cache/ShWa-Timing06.pdf
As far as I can see by quick skimming, this is onl
They frown on bittorrent yes but because it takes up limited exit
bandwidth. Theoretically Freenet is contained in the network and not
exiting. Recent statistics Tor put out say only 3% of total network
bandwidth goes to hidden service traffic, very underused. Total
connection is 6 hops but the
Am Samstag, 17. Oktober 2015, 23:35:31 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> > Also Freenet-over-wireless would kill traffic analysis.
> As I mentioned before, you still need the long links. If it's mostly
> wireless, and the long links don't connect directly to each other, and
> you have some credible stego
On 17/10/15 22:31, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Samstag, 17. Oktober 2015, 21:04:23 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
I do think we could provide better anonymity than Tor in the long run
though. But we can't prevent blocking - *any* peer-to-peer network
running over the regular Interne
Am Samstag, 17. Oktober 2015, 21:04:23 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> >> I do think we could provide better anonymity than Tor in the long run
> >> though. But we can't prevent blocking - *any* peer-to-peer network
> >> running over the regular Internet can be detected cheaply.
> > Even when Freenet i
On 17/10/15 20:45, hyazin...@emailn.de wrote:
> From: Matthew Toseland
> Date: 17.10.2015 18:41:23
> At: devl@freenetproject.org
> Topic: [freenet-dev] Tunnels was Re: Project Status
>> I do think we could provide better anonymity than Tor in the long run
>> though. But w
From: Matthew Toseland
Date: 17.10.2015 18:41:23
At: devl@freenetproject.org
Topic: [freenet-dev] Tunnels was Re: Project Status
> I do think we could provide better anonymity than Tor in the long run
> though. But we can't prevent blocking - *any* peer-to-peer network
> ru
On 17/10/15 01:33, salutarydiacritica...@ruggedinbox.com wrote:
> Right now Freenet discovers other clients on opennet by way of seed
> nodes. Hypothetically you can run the nodes as hidden services and
> embed the addresses in Freenet clients. Clients generate their own
> hidden address keys and b
15 matches
Mail list logo
